Uncyclopedia:VFH/A Man Getting Hit in the Crotch 800 Times (2nd Nom)

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

A Man Getting Hit in the Crotch 800 Times (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: A Man Getting Hit in the Crotch 800 Times	Score: 10 Horrified-but-snickering winces
Nominated by:	EpicAwesomeness (talk) 09:24, September 4, 2011 (UTC)
For: 13	For. Nommed for VFH a few years ago and failed, but we're violently short on articles so it's going up again. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 09:24, September 4, 2011 (UTC) Fuck yes! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:55, 4 September 2011  FOR Why not? It made me laugh until the tears came. Isn't that a good thing? Screw high-brow. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 11:09, September 4, 2011 (UTC) For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:26, September 4, 2011 (UTC) For. Jmplayer 17:28, September 4, 2011 (UTC) Yes. Simple and ridiculously funny. Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 21:02, September 4, 2011 (UTC) For. Nice! ShabiDOO 00:14, September 5, 2011 (UTC)  Yes because because because it is good. —  (talk) (contributions) 01:16, September 5, 2011 (UTC)  For - Well, the other articles on VFH have heart, but A Man Getting Hit in the Crotch 800 Times has a man getting hit in the crotch 800 times. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 03:12, Sep. 5, 2011 For. Kip put it better than I ever could have. -RAHB 04:38, September 5, 2011 (UTC) For Feature worthy as-is but would be even better if someone could chop up a movie poster for it.--    12:50, September 5, 2011 (UTC) Done and DONE, sir! ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 11:30, September 11, 2011 (UTC)  For. User:DJ Mixerr/sig DJ Mixerr 23:19, September 5, 2011 (UTC) The. --UU - natter 06:36, Sep 11
Against: 3	Written two years after Idiocracy came out, this strikes me as unacceptably derivative. pillow talk 08:00, September 6, 2011 (UTC) I have no idea what that other guy is talking about, but I feel like Iǘe seen this before, and done better. Just... all the bits. Various places. And they don't really come together that well. 1234 ~ 19:36, 7 September 2011 Against. Funnybony    07:58, Sep 11 07:58, September 11, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. I think the article could refer back to something really out there (e.g. Jackass or Balls of Steel, Wipeout etc) to make it seem more faux-real. Just seems to be in its own universe here in my view. Also lacks wood jokes. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:09, September 5, 2011 (UTC) Comment. Writing is good but the article needs more illustrations. Total missed opportunity on the soccer (Oh excuse me, football) picture. Should read "A screenshot from the British version of the film, called "Some bloke getting a cracking smack to the goolies 600 times" or something else loaded with British slang. It's kind of like someone who's WAY too American attempting to make British humor (Irony alert) --    11:58, September 5, 2011 (UTC)

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.