User talk:Llwy-ar-lawr/archive4

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read.

My userpage

What is your opinion on my strange and wonderful userpage?--Ketchup Boss (talk) 19:53, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

It's... er, strange and wonderful. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:02, 21 Jun 2014

I'm a House M.D. Fan. Are you?--Ketchup Boss (talk) 20:29, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

No. Have you ever heard of Plethyn? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:29, 21 Jun 2014

Not trying to be rude,but do you think that Uncyclopedia has way to many redirect pages?--Ketchup Boss (talk) 20:53, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

No. Redirects are cheap - they don't hurt anything and it's not clear what it would mean to have too many of them. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:58, 21 Jun 2014

How the hell is the article Template:Boner so funny?--Ketchup Boss (talk) 21:14, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

I don't find it funny, but I think the idea is that penises are automatically funny, one I don't happen to share. You might ask Frosty, since he created it. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:24, 22 Jun 2014

Ask Jeeves

I love this article! Do you?--Ketchup Boss (talk) 03:31, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Sure. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 18:18, 22 Jun 2014

Sgwrs

What does Sgwrs even mean?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 18:25, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Talk. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 18:42, 22 Jun 2014

What is your favorite injoke? WOW IT'S FUCKING KETCHUP BOSS OR SOMETHING is mine.--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 18:58, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

I haven't got one. How can it be yours if it's based on someone else's ? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:12, 22 Jun 2014

Favorite Article

Where do I vote to get an article featured?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 19:22, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

VFH. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:23, 22 Jun 2014

Penn and Teller

Are you into the great humor of Penn and Teller? Thank goodness they were talking about autism and vaccines in one of the Bullshit! episodes.--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 19:58, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Never heard of them. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:59, 22 Jun 2014

Search up Rock Lobster on YouTube today by The B-52's. Sorry for bothering you today.--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 20:22, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Desu

Left a note for you on the VFD page. Me so confused. Aleister 19:44 27-6-14

Ohio

Please don't delete this! Not now, at least. Can you read it and give me feedback please? Ohio. Thanks! -- MagicBus Talk to me! 19:50, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

I'm not sure why you were afraid I'd delete it, but sure. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:51, 27 Jun 2014

Me either, I guess I'm afraid that it would be deleted at some point. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 19:53, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Seems like an ok article. Some funny things there. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:55, 27 Jun 2014

Alright, thanks. I really thought we could use another state article. These are important. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 19:56, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Agreed. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:57, 27 Jun 2014

Fisher Price

Why do people even find this injoke funny? I know I ask a lot of questions. Once again,sorry for bothering you so much lately.--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 01:39, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Because they're weird. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 01:41, 28 Jun 2014

Some one wrote "go eat shit fuckers" on uncyclopedia once (I dont remember if it was a talk page or forum) and this was a joke on it. --ShabiDOO 11:24, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

VFD

Hi! Just wanted to ask you not to archive VFD entries too quickly. Normally, you are supposed to wait for an hour after the nomination is closed, and I think it makes sense, because others can be aware of the result and don't have to search for the nomination in the archives or history. Concerning DESU article in particular, it happened so quickly, that I had no opportunity of voting for or against the article or leaving a comment, even though I visited Uncyclopedia the day before yesterday and this morning. Anton (talk) 11:00, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Look, I'm sorry you didn't get to vote, but as far as I can tell there is no such rule. If you do know of where this rule is, please show me a link because I would be very interested to know, particularly since the other admins don't follow it. If you think such a rule should be implemented or the time limit should be extended (extending the time limit seems more like what you're getting at... ?), that's possibly a valid point for discussion, but I'm afraid it's not policy (yet) - admins basically just do what they want, or something.

OTOH, in User:TKF/VFH Removal Guidelines, it says something about a 'big' VFD vote, but I don't know if anyone follows that page... in any case, the article was pretty clearly going to get kept in some form or other unless a miracle happened, considering the number of keep votes, so I used what I thought was common sense. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 16:30, 28 Jun 2014

It turns out we had a very similar discussion on a very similar topic on this talk page just a few months ago. Entirely forgot about that! Having re-read it, I don't find any your objections to my objections, just that it has been done that way. Puppy pointed out that we had Uncyclopedia:VFD Protocol, which is out of date, though. But even then, it says that "VFD entries require a reasonable minimum amount of time to be voted on or noticed by the author before deletion." We can only guess what Flammable meant by "a reasonable amount of time".

But anyway, using common sense, the deleted article was mostly certainly going to be deleted, but the DESU one was not necessarily going to be kept. Yes, there were a lot of keep votes, but they were about the original version of the article, which you rewrote. After that, I would call the result everything except for obvious. MagicBus proposes to delete the article, despite the rewrite, Aleister wants two versions and Frosty - the original one only (here, here and here)... In that case, I think that leaving a nomination open for at least another day for more people to participate in the discussion would be a good idea. Anton (talk) 17:05, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Your initially stated objection was that I had not allowed enough time between closing the nomination and archiving it, but the problem you have is that the nomination was not left open long enough, and the rule you point to advises to keep nominations open for a reasonable amount of time. (I can't tell if 'voted on' is attached to 'author' - it may just be saying nominations should be left open long enough to be noticed by the author, though I may be totally confused here.) I think I can safely conclude that any question of when to archive a nomination isn't relevant to what you're trying to tell me. Now that that's straightened out - it seems we have different ideas of what constitutes common sense. You are correct that the keep votes were for the original article, but I think that should be at the very least interpreted as a sign that the article should not be deleted. The original article is still there in the history. Perhaps that does not necessarily mean the discussion should have been closed just then, considering that I did rewrite the article and there was some controversy on whether that was appropriate. Perhaps the real issue at hand was that I rewrote the article in the middle of the vfd discussion in spite of the lack of consensus for what should be done.

I didn't entirely rewrite it, mind you. I just removed the image/rainbow spam (which I think I will put back, actually, sans the flashing images and rainbow text), changed the wording to be more random as opposed to just attacking the meme and its users (random is not a good thing; I plan to fix it) and removed the bold, colour and all caps. If you compare the two versions, you will (should) find that mine is closely based on the old one. I admit I really did want to get rid of the old article and I am fairly confident that if I had rewritten it without it being on vfd there would not have been such yelling about it. I won't defend any of my actions as regards this article, particularly since I've managed to generate quite a lot of objections to this, that and the other thing, except to say this: the rules and treatment of them are so squishable that I can get away with quite a lot if I try hard enough. Probably.

In any case, I think what this boils down to is where my rewrite should be discussed. I don't have any more to say about anything because I've run off the rails of intelligent replies to stuff and I've landed square in a patch of dandelions. And I have a feeling there's a hornets' nest nearby... – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 18:19, 28 Jun 2014

...oh yeah, remember I said something about the keep arguments not having any substance? I still stand by that. Mr-ex argued that Uncyclowikia kept it so we should too, which is a stupid argument. Cat said that it wasn't as bad as most of his articles, which I guess it isn't, but his articles are often pretty awful and we should be judging stuff on vfd by average articles, not awful ones. JFC and Frosty said that it was a parody, which it partly was and partly wasn't - the images (which I plan to at least partially restore) may be a parody, but the text is/was more of a rant; it parodies nothing except perhaps itself. Aleister said that it was a freeform work of art - Uncyclopedia is not, and I repeat, not about 'freeform works of art', it's about stuff that is funny. The more sensible arguments, IMHO, were to be found in the delete section. However, there are two problems with resorting to this kind of reasoning: a) it's a Wikipedia rule that only valid arguments may be considered, b) if we are going to pretend this is Wikipedia, we might as well pretend we have WP:INVOLVED which rules out any possibility of my closing the discussion at all, since I !voted in it. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 18:34, 28 Jun 2014

TL;DR Yow! Lotta words! How bout we just get the VFD entry back and stop arguing about it? Snarglefoop (talk) 18:38, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Ok it's back. Everybody seems to hate that I closed the discussion so yeah. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 18:39, 28 Jun 2014

Spoon on floor

Ya right.--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 23:08, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Fnurdle. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:13, 28 Jun 2014

How do I upload sound files?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 23:27, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Use Special:Upload just like for images. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:05, 29 Jun 2014

The Big Participatory Article

I pressed the random article button and brought me to this. How does this article make any sense at all? I understand Norman Cook and his Fatboy Slim thing, but seriously what the fuckity fuck?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 19:22, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

*shrugs* It's an article on Norman Cook trying to get people to write an article with him and failing miserably. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:42, 29 Jun 2014

Gordon Ramsay

Isn't this article funny?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 21:57, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Sure. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:00, 29 Jun 2014

Watch this--Ketchup Boss

Please close your youtube tags. *sigh* – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:57, 29 Jun 2014

How do I close my tags? By the way why does this YouTube video not show?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 23:04, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

You close your tags by putting </youtube> somewhere after you put <youtube>. The video doesn't show because you typed <v=0gMLHrY5zjc> and it should just be 0gMLHrY5zjc. You don't need the <v= bit - just the eleven-character string associated with the video. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:57, 30 Jun 2014

Hey Ketchup Boss. If you have any questions about anything you're also free to ask me or any experienced user who's recently been online (you can see through recent changes). --ShabiDOO 01:55, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

All fixed! Thanks for the help! Now, give me your opinion on this classic commercial.--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 02:06, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

It's, er, a commercial about Mountain Dew. I don't have any particularly useful opinions. Shabidoo might, though. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:09, 30 Jun 2014

When I was living in Canada you couldn't buy Mountain Dew because some of the chemicals that are inside it are banned by the government and the company refused to make a special version without them just for the Canadians. I tried it once in the US. It was so sweet I couldn't finish it. I also wondered if the chemicals in it which are banned in Canada were eating away at the neurons in my Brain or not. Or perhaps it ignited a chain reaction in my liver which will eventually one day blow into full out cancer. I don't know. I just don't know. --ShabiDOO 02:30, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Isn't that weird though? What does being barefoot have to do with soda?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 04:23, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

I expect it's something to do with walking barefoot up a mountain. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 04:29, 30 Jun 2014

UnNews main page

Do you know if there's a way to make the UnNews mainpage headlines look less gay? They are currently spaced right out, like 1.5 or something. Is there something we can do here: Template:Lead_articles_2/a ? Leverage (talk) 08:10, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Everything looks fine to me in Monobook, which I use because it's a much better skin, but when I take a peek in Vector, lo and behold - our good friend the typography refresh has worked its magic and made it look stupid. There is a forum here where you can vote to get rid of it, but if that doesn't fly... I'll try to figure out something. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 17:00, 30 Jun 2014

I've set the line-height for the headlines to 100%. I think it's better now - see what you think. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 17:04, 30 Jun 2014

Much more like it! Good stuff! Leverage (talk) 17:32, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

What template...

gives you a random uncyclopedia page and one that gives you a random uncyclopedia picture? I'm doing a test page. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 18:42, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

I don't know of any such template, though there is <randomimage /> for random images. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 18:45, 30 Jun 2014

This is what I'm working on: User:MagicBus/test. As you can see, i'm trying random a band, song and album from uncyclopedia article titles. The album cover is whatever image from uncyclopedia come up. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 18:51, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

The Letter

Listen to this: --Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 00:57, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Ok... (you needed a slash in the last youtube tag and to get rid of v=) – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:59, 1 Jul 2014

Ok--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 01:01, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Now watch "Free Love" by Voice Farm from 1991.--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 01:52, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

[23:44] llwy-ar-lawr This channel is boring and annoying

It probably needs more shock images Madclaw @ ^talk 21:47, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Actually, what it needs is fewer people who post shock images and go on at length about sex and sockpuppets and try to drive me nuts. Not that you wanted to hear what I had to say, of course. You just wanted to make a joke that only you would find funny, just to show me your wonderful sense of humour. To that I say: Hrmph! I've had quite enough of your little game, thank you very much. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:51, 1 Jul 2014

you're welcome Madclaw @ ^talk 21:56, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

What do you think about the "Free Love" video?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 01:18, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Pie

Pie Award

This user has been a good Uncyclopedian, and therefore gets pie.

KEEP YOUR GRUBBY HANDS OFF IT!

J F C 22:00. Jul 2

llwy, my dear...

As a casual, user-to-user suggestion, might I suggest cooling it with the reverts? If you wanna remove comments from your own talk page, then fair enough. I don't really agree that it should be done, but I don't write the policies. Removing messages on other user's talk pages, on the other hand, is pretty extreme and shouldn't be done unless there's a valid reason. Removing Madclaw's remarks simply because he raised legitimate concerns about your behavior that you happen to disagree with not only constitutes as extreme, but also reminiscent of a certain dog mascot who shall not be named. So yeah, make of this suggestion what you will. I'd just rather not see you lose your user rights over something so trivial. — S G 1|Hereish ^{[citation needed]} 18:07, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Fine, whatever, but those are not 'legitimate concerns' he was raising; he was just being annoying and telling lies that he knows are lies. Please don't bother me about this again until you realise that I am the victim here. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 18:10, 5 Jul 2014

Hi

I don't know what the hell you think you are doing but removing Madclaws user rights was a very bad move on your part. Additionally I don't give you permission to rollback Madclaw on my usertalk pages, so he is completely allowed to rollback you there, and the other case was his own user talk, which if you consider this and this makes you look like a massive hypocrite. Don't remove Madclaw's user rights unless he is actually abusing them in a way that you aren't. Closing down your talk page also does not help your case. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:03, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

It was my decision to give him rollback, because I thought he could use it, and it was my decision to take it away because I decided he did not have a use for it after all. You ought to have noticed that he does very little here compared with some of our other active users. You will notice I did not revert him again because I realised that removing his messages would not help anything, but considering the very low amount of useful work he does around here and the fact that he first used his rollback rights to revert edits I consider to have been made in an (admittedly feeble) attempt at good faith, I decided it had not been a wise move on my part to give him rollback. I locked my talk page because I had had enough of Madclaw and Supergeeky telling me that there were actually some sort of concerns with my behaviour. There was nothing I had actually done at all wrong before Madclaw began needling me so please consider not just blaming me. You do realise he was needling me, don't you, and that's why there is a 'case' at all and why I got terribly angry with him and did things that were perhaps unwise? Not that I should expect you to notice any more than a few edits to a page you watch, in all this, certainly. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 01:41, 6 Jul 2014

Then why not revert his user rights back to autopatrolled where I had set them long before you even signed up. And no I don't think he has been needling you, you have been needling yourself. You have been rollbacking edits that you simply aren't allowed to rollback (That thing in Madclaw's user space and that thing in my own), you then proceeded to remove user rights from Madclaw for two rollbacks (one which was to revert a rollback you shouldn't have done and the other was in his own userspace (something you and Snarglefoop have been doing quite a lot with no consequence) and then Zombiebaron showed me a diff where you had slapped your own personal agenda into the MediaWiki namespace, which I was astounded by. This doesn't even factor in all the drama about IRC in which you have picked fights with almost everyone that disagrees with you (can't say I was a fan of a log I read where you referred to Mr-ex777 as an outcast, ironic you call people out on being dicks to you, yet that is plain and simple being a dick). Stop trying to pick fights with everyone, it's wasting time and digging an increasingly bigger hole for you, that you might find yourself struggling to get out of. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!)

02:01, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Why is no one listening to me? Why is everyone attacking me, blaming me for everything? Not seeing what other people are doing wrong? I try so hard to do everything right. I try to do what people want and explain myself to them but then they just attack me anyway, they always expect better of me, but I give what I have... sure I get mad sometimes but that's when people don't listen, don't understand me, don't want to hear what I have to say... I know you will not understand what I am saying. You don't understand. Maybe you will never understand... this world is so full of people who don't understand, and I just want them to all understand but it doesn't work! I would try to continue explaining properly but this is just torture. Listen to me. Why don't you listen to me? From the very beginning you didn't listen to me, you just blocked me, you didn't care that I was right, you didn't see... no one sees... why do I bother even living? This life isn't worth living. Life is meaningless. We have no purpose. We might as well all just die but all I can do about that is kill myself. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:22, 6 Jul 2014

You can't respond like that as a legitimate comeback. I am pointing out mistakes you have made as an administrator, and you just want to shift the blame elsewhere. It's nobody else's fault you couldn't just shrug off what happened on IRC, it is only your fault. I have been listening to you, and I, like most people thing you are deluded to think it's Madclaw/SG1/Mr-ex777/whoever you are mad at's fault and not your own. Now you have two options here: 1) Keep going along this line, get yourself into a bigger hole until eventually a vote to de-op you starts OR 2) Accept what happened was you overreacted to a joke and move on. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!)

02:51, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Free Love

What do you think of that video?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 18:52, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

May I try to convince you about the Camera Obscura article?

Maybe over a cyber-lunch, or cyber-stroll? Your no vote may be sinking the ship, so I would like to explain more. (cyber-music picks up, dramatic and gangly). The original author, a professional historian, wrote a totally non-funny satire piece which he published on an internet site for peer review, and it actually fooled some of his fellow professionals before it was pulled. He then had the knowledge to bring it here (I know all this from emailing him years ago). When I first nommed it people wanted more funny, which I disagreed with but still added to the page, enough to hopefully make it uncyworthy. The entire joke is that the camera was not invented at the time, this was a totally made-up satire, and as such fooled professionals who thought it was a new discovery of the earliest example of photography. It's a classy piece, or used to be, and for me personally ties with being the best satire on the site {with 'Night of Broken Glass'). May I ask what your objection is, and if it can be overcome with sweet talk and things with wings? Aleister thanks for reading this note which was posted at 13:17 on 10-7-14

On Stuff

Hi there. I sent you an e-mail last week in response to your message on my talk page and I'm not sure whether you ever got it. Considering gmail really sucks at sending e-mails through relay systems like Uncyclopedia's, it's very possible it didn't actually even get sent to you, so just checking to see whether that happened. Also I still haven't done that review yet because I suck, and I'll try to do it real soon. Hope you're doing alright, cheers. -RA HB 03:27, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Sorry -- hadn't checked my email; I was afraid of stuff, or something. I'm reading it now. Thanks for letting me know. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 03:30, 13 Jul 2014

Ah cool, no worries. Just wanted to make sure you didn't think I left you hangin'. -RA HB 04:04, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Be good

Was missing you already and had noticed your absence. I know it's stressful here currently. Most of that is not your fault. I'm sorry. Thanks for popping in to say see ya. See ya later... Mr N 03:55. Jul 13

I second that emotion. I sent you an email too, I was rather disappointed with the drama after about a year and a half of chilled wikiing.

Leverage (talk) 07:58, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Notes to self about blocks

I admit part of it was simply my own perverted curiosity; I had wanted to explore what things I could and could not do. I was surprised by what I found.

I can do the following, and the following only:

Edit this page
Change the settings on Special:Block/Llwy-ar-lawr
View deleted pages through Special:Undelete, but not restore them

I thought I would be able to use Special:UserRights but apparently this is available in this condition only to Lyrithya. I also note that there is no special message for 'can't block while blocked' as I had thought. I just see the usual sheep.

I considered posting a long rant against the terrible, abusive admin who blocked me, but considering that said designation applies to myself, I realise I am glad that I was blocked at my own hand and my own will, rather than that of someone else, which I do not doubt would have come to pass sooner or later, had I continued editing. I know nobody will read any of this but I would like to thank those who have said kind words to me and treated me as if I were anything but a slimy bag of cat litter. The truth is that I do not know what is anything or nothing inside the large sphere of shiny pieces of pie. Am I there, or am I here? If so, why? Nobody knows... – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 18:38, 17 Jul 2014

Lol. Smile. Ha. No seriously... I think you are getting the hang of Uncyclopedia! :D - nobody 18:45, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. Perhaps there is something here... something to come back to rather than simply extend my block to indefinite and call it a day. Strange that we call it a day when it could just as easily be many months or years of work that we suddenly abandon for ever. A day is too short. Perhaps there is something here other than the shades of grey. I believe there are rainbows everywhere if we only seek them out. Sometimes we have to create them. However, I know that arguing is pointless, particularly with someone I will not name here because I have no desire to push the thing any further. I would be in danger of having my talk page access revoked, which of course I would not agree with but I know that Llwy-ar-lawr knows what to do with me, or thinks he does. Will I remain here with the knowledge that it is unfair to me? Will I be able to stop it from weighing heavily on my mind and causing me to entangle myself in stickiness? I do not know. The time has been too short. A week may not be enough. We shall see what we can see. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:12, 17 Jul 2014

It's a tricky one. I have never given advice to a user who has been blocked by themselves before. Perhaps you should send yourself an e-mail or perhaps go onto IRC and see if you can find yourself. If you are able to find yourself then you can ask you what to do. You probably know best after all... Mr N

19:26. Jul 17

What's fun?

“

Watching recent changes, and making edits to articles currently being edited by whoever happens to be online and editing, or who has edited recently and will probably return soon. That way it is possible to interact in semi-real time with human beings across thousands of miles and share a fantastic creative experience together.

”

-Source

Mr N 19:40. Jul 17

I do not know what I know. I once thought I knew something, but not I do not even know that. By extension, however, I also do not know if I truly do or do not know anything... but isn't that what I just said? I have no way of knowing...

In any case, I thank you for your advice but I am sorry to note that me, myself and I are all banned from IRC and we will be unable to find each other that way (unless I go through a number of contortions and jump through hoops of fire while balanced on an oily ball, which I could do, but I am too lazy, or indeed have some kind of preventative quality). As to anything else, do the pine trees know? What of the sheep? There is no telling, no knowing, never, for ever. No sense. Only nonsense. Such is the way of muffinhood. Until the day breaks, on a land with a yellow sky and blue vegetation, where the clouds are thick now; but will day ever break, when the clouds are so thick? We must forget the clouds. If we do not look their way, they may be invalidated. There is a chance. They may exist only in our heads. We may never know. We know only that our heads are as much the sky as the sky itself - for what would the sky be without our heads?

All that said, I made inaccuracies in my original statement. I failed to note that I can read pages (as the block message so helpfully points out, but those of us who have seen it a dozen times no longer pay attention to it, I reckon); aside from the abuse log, which of course I cannot read because it would enable me to more easily circumvent the filters that are used to deter disruptive folks like me. Ah, the irony... but we have all been on both the receiving and the giving end of blocks, have we not? We may not always call them blocks; but it is the same thing, as same as there is. I know I use many words. If you are reading what I say, I do not know why. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:22, 17 Jul 2014

gay

Omg you're back! Now we can make sweet sugary love on top of kip's cold dead corpse! ^__^ --The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 22:50, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Why, hello Denza. Good to see you again after all these... however long it's been. Am I back? Perhaps; but all the sources claim the contrary, and we must support everything with reliable sources or take it to AFD, no? I thought I was front, rather than back. Whatever that means. Something about melted rubber, I reckon. Indeed our love would be gay, particularly since I like sausages and detergent bottles. Detergent bottles are lesbians, actually. That's probably why they killed Kip. Poor thing. He should have known not to mess with detergent. It's got tails and ears and such. No, that was something else... anyway, I'm afraid the time has come for all good mice to eat cats. So I'll be off running away from mice. Yikes! They're eating me! – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 01:38, 24 Jul 2014

:(

That oppose hurt my feelings. Chaoarren Chaohead (talk) 12:57, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

I'm sorry about that. Don't feel too bad though--adminship isn't for everyone. In fact, it's not for anyone; we just pick people who manage to fool us into thinking they're qualified. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 16:23, 27 Jul 2014

I'm kidding around. I did that because you said that you hoped your opposes wouldn't hurt anyones feelings. *troll face* Chaoarren Chaohead (talk) 16:48, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Ah ok :) – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 16:49, 27 Jul 2014

:)

Thank you for being you. — S G 1|Hereish ^{[citation needed]} 03:14, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

I'm glad I'm appreciated. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 04:17, 2 Aug 2014

Message from TheRealSexyFluttershy

I was told by some people on IRC to tell you to pl0x calm down. Soooo, pl0x calm down. Radical Rocko ❤ (I'm listening...) 03:37, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Blind eating the blind

lol, blind eating the blind. lollol. Anyway, hi. Don't quit like a poppyhead (or poopyhead). Maybe take a day off, to rest ye weary bones. But I've seen vendetta's before, in real life and on the net, and you just have to know that lots of us net-love you and know the great work you've done both here and abroad. Do you finally see the good there is in having two sites? When one turns on its own you can play on the other one. But in any case, if you leave then the poopyheads (poppyheads?) win, and that, in the long run, hurts uncyclopedia very much. So it's on your shoulders not to let that happen. See how that works? Love ya, Aleister 00:02 4-8=14

I just read that stuff up-page because users were pointing it out as a point to deop you. How I read it was Frosty attacking you like a dog, and you trying to explain very nicely, and then him pissing on you again, and then you freaked out in a "why me, Lord?" rant ending in maybe committing suicide? Look, you are right in your actions and things here, imnho, you've been a fantastic admin. You maybe went overboard on the IRC thing but please, always remember, IRC is not uncyclopedia. It is a social chat channel which sounds very moronic from what I've read about it. Lots of us stay away from it. And for it to be used to hatch plots and horrible emotions is bad enough, but to then bring those emotions from another site (IRC is another website. It is not uncyclopedia), and act here like it is a continuation of discussions and agreements made elsewhere behind the backs of people who don't use IRC, fucking criminal imnho, bless their hearts. But the suicide threat? The loss you went though will be one of the top losses of your life, your mom died. She's gone. So is mine. It fucking hurts still, after 16 years, and I'm crying as I focus on her. That's what we have to live with, it's called life, and sometimes it kicks our ass. It kicked yours recently. Drink lots of water, take vitamin c, in tablets, lots of it, every day. Try to go vegan sometimes, it really rocks. And did I say water? Depression is almost always caused by not drinking enough water, even when it's genuine being hydreated keeps the bad stuff at bay. Yeah, this gets too long, so cool, keep on blistering the bytes, me friend. Aleister 3:02 4-8-14

llwy, don't take me the wrong way on this, but don't come back. You're too good for this site. I'm sorry all this happened. I wish I wasn't so useless, then I could have done something about this. Goodbye llwy, you were a good friend. --The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory

Llwy, I don't how this happened, but I am very sorry you are leaving! It was a pleasure talking to you on many different occasions. I will miss you. Thank you for all the things you have done here! ...and good bye! Anton (talk) 20:01, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

;(

I'm sorry this happened llwy, Good bye with deepest regrets. Chaoarren Chaohead (talk) 00:06, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

I hate to see it end this way. Please let fate prove this a bump in the road, and have you return after an extended period of cooling off. If this really is goodbye, just know that it was a real pleasure having you around. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 00:41, Aug. 5, 2014

Yes, if you do go (and I don't believe you will not come back, not for a second) I will certainly miss you. It will not be as nice around here, and as caring, that's for sure. Keep your head up, your hands busy with busywork, and your confidence in your having the right analysis of lots of things doubled. And don't let the door stab you in the back on the way out. Aleister 1:24 5-8-14

Goodbye spoon on floor. If you do leave forever, I'll miss you. You were a great writer and admin. — (talk) (contributions) 02:50:10 2014/08/05 UTC

Thank you, everyone, for the kind words. I really appreciate that there are some people here who are willing to treat me with some dignity rather than just compile 'evidence' against me behind my back. Believe me, I understand why it can be enjoyable to tear down someone you dislike, and I'm sure we've all attempted it... but that is not the way. This really is goodbye, I'm afraid. I wish it weren't, because I really did have fun here and I hate to disappoint you like this, but I can't see another way out of this mess. Good luck, and have fun. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 03:01, 5 Aug 2014

All the best Llwy. Bye. --ShabiDOO 11:55, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Seizure Page

Since the original article was taken our of my userspace and mainspaced by someone else, I'd like it to be returned to my userspace at User:Meganeew/Siezure Page, please. Thank you. --Revolutionary, Anti-Bensonist, and TYATU Boss ~~Uncyclopedian~~ Meganew (Chat) (Care for a peek at my work?) (SUCK IT, FROGGY!) 06:27, September 6, 2014 (UTC)

Hi Meganew! It's a pleasure to meet you, because I heard about several of your projects. Unfrotunately, Llwy has left this site and can't restore the page in question, nor can I, and so I would suggest asking any admin at UN:AA. By the way, have you actually come back or is it just for a week-end? Anton (talk) 13:11, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, the link was red, so I presumed nobody fulfilled your request. Now I see RAHB did it. Anton (talk) 13:13, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

It's k, RAHB got to it. Nice to meet you too - I assume you heard about Powershot? Revolutionary, Anti-Bensonist, and TYATU Boss ~~Uncyclopedian~~ Meganew (Chat) (Care for a peek at my work?) (SUCK IT, FROGGY!) 20:25, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Actually, I was mostly referring to the Uncyc Cold War. But I would be delighted to hear about Powershot as well! Are you talking about User:Powershot dude? (Because I couldn't find anything else) Anton (talk) 17:44, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Oh interesting. What is powershot? --ShabiDOO 19:58, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

How ya been?

Haven't talked to you for a while now!--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 00:38, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Re-feature queue

If you want, you can go to Uncyclopedia:Re-feature queue/Nominate and pick one featured article that you wrote to be re-featured. You can also pick three features written by someone else to re-feature. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:44, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

CAPTCHA

Hwy Llwy-ar-lawr! Would you like to expand this article? 154.5.169.5 (talk) 15:08, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm not active on this version of Uncyclopedia. If you want help, please find somebody else. Maybe one of these people. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:34, 14 Jun 2018