User:Cajek/Archive12
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at User:Cajek/Pee. |
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Jesus Christ Sponge by Gas Pump.Juuuust about, but I'm probably being generous. --UU - natter
11:28, Apr 4Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Bunny Shark by Gerry.Yeah. --UU - natter 11:37, Apr 4Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (Três) by Gerry.Well duh. --UU - natter 11:37, Apr 4Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/My mommy by Gas Pump.No. --UU - natter 11:28, Apr 4Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnScripts:Dungeons and Dragons: The Movie(resubmit) by Tagstit.But of course. --UU - natter 11:28, Apr 4Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/I fucked your mother (Re-write) by Saberwolf116.Nope. --UU - natter 11:28, Apr 4Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Rod Blagojevich by Aethix.This one I just couldn't give though. –—Hv (talk) 30/03 21:11Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnScripts:Dungeons and Dragons: The Movie by Aethix.See below. –—Hv (talk) 30/03 21:11Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Papyrus Containing The Spell To Preserve Its Possessor Against Attacks From He Who Is In The Water (quick) by Aethix.This and the above were borderline, so I decided to give one. Which one is for the mind to ponder. –—Hv (talk) 30/03 21:11Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Michael Jackson (Colonization) by MrN.Er, of course. --UU - natter 21:06, Mar 30Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Cactus (2) by Gas PumpFor a first review, yes, although it did miss the point a little, I think. --UU - natter 20:58, Mar 30Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/The Wizard of Oz Movie (quick) by Tagstit.One off the magic half century for Tags... --UU - natter 20:34, Mar 30Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Depleted Kitten (rewrite) by Syndrome.Wow, Syndrome's back! Cool! --UU - natter 20:34, Mar 30Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Jew by GuildyYup. --UU - natter 20:58, Mar 30Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/World Wildlife Fund (quick) by Gerry.Well duh. --UU - natter 20:34, Mar 30Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:ThomasPynchonsLeftNut/Anaheim Ducks by Gerry.Yep. --UU - natter 20:34, Mar 30Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/JetBlue (quick) by UU.Fine for a quickie. --UU - natter 11:05, Mar 24Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Balloon Animals (VFH Prep) by Gerry.Of course. 70 up, nice work Gerry! --UU - natter 21:37, Mar 23Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnBooks:Caffeine Cold Turkey (mid-write review) by PM666.Yup. --UU - natter 21:37, Mar 23Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Lord Sauron (2nd Review) by Kit.Yepper. --UU - natter 21:37, Mar 23Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Withnail & I (resubmit) by UU.Self check. You disagree, you SK, you change. --UU - natter 21:09, Mar 20Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Uncyclopedia Cures Cancer (3rd time lucky) by Luvvy.I... No, I can't. Apart from mentioning the prose feels a little fractured, what advice is there beyond "not bad, make it better"? I won't be cuddled into changing my mind either... --UU - natter 20:56, Mar 20Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnBooks:Diary of a Monkey Lover (2nd Review) by PM666.Yah. --UU - natter 20:56, Mar 20Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Do a Barrel Roll (Now with pics!!) by Guildy.Yuh. --UU - natter 11:24, Mar 20Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Nauru by GlobalT.Yes. Time to go askin'. --UU - natter 11:15, Mar 20Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Inland Empire (rewrite) by PM666.Yup. --UU - natter 11:15, Mar 20Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Dwight D. Eisenhower (2nd opinion) by PM666.Yes. --UU - natter 11:15, Mar 20Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/The Pointlessness (band) (in-depth) by Luvvy.Yes. I have to say, it's close though. Just about enough suggestions in the concept and images sections to qualify. --UU - natter 10:44, Mar 20Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Kurdish Military Industries by PM666.Overall in-depth, but a little unfriendly. --UU - natter 13:32, Mar 18Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Hotel California by PM666.This is good - encouraging and everything. --UU - natter 13:32, Mar 18Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Dwight D. Eisenhower by CBBQ.Hmm, well there can be no faulting the effort again, but again the point seems to have been missed. Has to go down as in-depth because the intentions are there, but I may have to have a word soon. --UU - natter 13:21, Mar 18Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Low (album) by Projectmayhem666.Yup. --UU - natter 21:09, Mar 16Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Lord Sauron by Cap'n Ben.Yes. --UU - natter 21:41, Mar 16Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Pig House/RuneScape by Luvvy.Yepper. One moar needed. --UU - natter 21:35, Mar 16Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Macintosh (rewrite) by Kit.Yes. --UU - natter 21:23, Mar 16Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Get Over Jenny (2nd Review) by GlobalT.Yup. --UU - natter 21:35, Mar 16Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Running of the Bulls by Kit.Yup. --UU - natter 21:23, Mar 16Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Pick Up a Nymphomaniac by MrN!Folks... This is how it's done. ;-) --UU - natter 21:09, Mar 16Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Knucmo2/Why?:Allow Animal Testing? by CheddarBBQ.Fuck. Er, well A for effort, and as reviews are about opinions, they can't exactly be wrong, but this one may have missed the point. Also, criticising grammar in a review full of typos is a bit rich. Be careful, CBBQ. --UU - natter 21:16, Mar 16Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Craig David by Projectmayhem666.Yup. --UU - natter 21:09, Mar 16Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Do a Barrel Roll by Zheliel.Hmm, two borderline = 1. Part of the problem is inexperience though. --UU - natter 20:54, Mar 16Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Crazy Old Man by Zheliel.Er, kind of. --UU - natter 20:54, Mar 16Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Cactus by Guildy.Yup. Looks like I'm askin' him too. --UU - natter 14:17, Mar 11Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnBooks:Rorschach's journal (v2.0) by CheddarBBQ.Yes, there's enough advice here. Looks like I'm askin'. --UU - natter 14:05, Mar 11Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/negima by Nachlader.Yup. --UU - natter 14:05, Mar 11Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Deal with parents (in-depth) by Projectmayhem666.Yep, if a little harsh. --UU - natter 14:05, Mar 11Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnPoetia:The First Draft of "Song of Myself" by Hype.Of course. --UU - natter 20:00, Mar 7Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Cameras by Aethix.For a first review, very fair. --UU - natter 19:54, Mar 7Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Mahm00shA (quick) by CheddarBBQ.Yes. He asks, he's in. One more good one needed for me to go askin'. --UU - natter 09:50, Mar 7Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Adult Toys by Kit.Yep. --UU - natter 10:13, Mar 7Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Uncyclopedia Cures Cancer (2nd Rewrite) by Gerry.Of course. --UU - natter 10:50, Mar 7Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Withnail & I by Projectmayhem666.Definite improvements here, he's in! --UU - natter 09:37, Mar 7Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Inland Empire by Guildy.I did check this, I just forgot to strike it. Yup. --UU - natter 13:50, Mar 11Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Write a Techno Song (rewrite) by CheddarBBQ.Two borderline in a row = 1 counts. --UU - natter 09:50, Mar 7Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Vietnamese dong by Projectmayhem666.Yeah. --UU - natter 09:37, Mar 7Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Katy Perry by Nannerpus.No. --UU - natter 19:30, Mar 7Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Angry British guy by Nachlader.Aye. --UU - natter 10:09, Mar 7Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/AFI (2nd review) by Gerry.Yeah. --UU - natter 10:50, Mar 7Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnBooks:The Redneck Elite (Abridged) (2nd opinion) by Projectmayhem666.Out of the five, I gave him two of them. Two others were borderline, but I didn't think they had quite enough. However, I can't remember which is which, so one big comment will have to suffice. –—Hv (talk) 5/03 18:00Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Write a Progressive Rock Song (second opinion) by GlobalTourniquet.Yeah. --UU - natter 10:36, Mar 7Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Write a Techno Song by Projectmayhem666.Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Write a Progressive Rock Song by Projectmayhem666.Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Dr. Tran by Tagstit.Yah. --UU - natter 19:26, Mar 7Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Phrase (again) by Mnbvcxz.Yep. --UU - natter 10:27, Mar 7Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Prog Archives (quick) by Projectmayhem666.Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Louisiana Governor brazenly taunts volcanoes (quick) by CheddarBBQ.Borderline. --UU - natter 09:50, Mar 7Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Brute (rewrite) by Projectmayhem666.Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Nuance by Kit paddle.Yuh. --UU - natter 10:13, Mar 7Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Perfectionism (3rd review) by Nachlader.Yeah. --UU - natter 10:09, Mar 7Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/I fucked your mother (actual review this time) by TPLN.Yup. --UU - natter 10:03, Mar 7Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Claire Redfield by CheddarBBQ.Yep. --UU - natter 09:50, Mar 7Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Al Gore (Colonization) by UU.As tempting as it is to say otherwise, of course it is. –—Hv (talk) 5/03 17:25Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/The Typing Impaired Teenager (quick) by Tagstit.D'accord. --UU - natter 22:30, Mar 2Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Chuck Norris on secularism: the single greatest threat that America has ever faced (quick) by Projectmayhem666.Point missed, but a good faith review, so yeah. --UU - natter 09:37, Mar 7Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Uncyclopedia Cures Cancer (Rewrite) by Modus.Maybe I'm being harsh, but I just couldn't give that. –—Hv (talk) 5/03 17:25 You're harsh :-) I'd call that enough to be going on with. --UU - natter 09:52, Mar 7Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Wand of Gamelon by CheddarBBQ.Juuust about. --UU - natter 11:45, Mar 1Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Leonard Cohen (2nd submission) by IronLung.Yup. --UU - natter 11:45, Mar 1Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/fruitcake by CheddarBBQ.Yup, just about. --UU - natter 11:15, Mar 1
