Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnBooks:The Redneck Elite (Abridged) (2nd opinion)
UnBooks:The Redneck Elite (Abridged) [edit source]
In-depth only, thanks. IronLung 07:48, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- Also, bump. IronLung 05:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 |
Projectmayhem666-has stamped this article for review. |
 |
- I'll give this a go but you're going to be waiting until the end of the day for it. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 13:58, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
| Humour: | 9 | When I stamped this for review I had no idea what I was getting myself into, agreeing to do an in-depth review of something like this. However once I started reading it I picked up on the 1984 spin off at the end of the opening text, from here on I felt at ease. Reading the intro is actually quite amusing once you pick up it is a 1984 spin-off, however, the reason I believe it has been awaiting a review for so long is because its not actually that obvious, I just have happened to have read 1984, the readers here most likely won't have because it's run by The Powers That Be. However it starts of well and I was looking forward to getting into the rest of the article knowing this, so that long winded review says intro = good.
The first section works very well, although I think it is a bit condensed and skips quite alot of the book out, although it is an uncyclopedia article, it should still be expanded a little bit more. Its still very good and going strong, other than expansion I don't really have alot more to say on it. The second section is perfect, no need for expansion here, I especially love the "The New Dictionary was a joke, William knew. Normally it was just an old copy of the New York Post with some key words circled in thick red marker: words like "scandal", "side-boob" and "Pet News"." excellent stuff there. It doesn't really need expanding I also like the "Lets do something" bit as well. Absolute class. The third section could do with a little more much like the first article, the date-rape at the end is brilliant, however, rohypnol tastes salty (I'm work in pharmaceuticals, I'm not a weirdo). The final section, brilliant, the fingers part is excellent. One part I don't understand though is why they are jews, since they're the hate people in this. I probably just don't get the joke but I don't get that part. Very good article though, I enjoyed reading/reviewing this. |
| Concept: | 8 | The concept and implementation is very good, I'd have thought something like this would be pretty hard to pull off, but you've managed it perfectly. I don't think this is original though, a 1984 UnBooks spoof has been done before as well as redneck spoofs on other books. It is very well done and is a very good article. |
| Prose and formatting: | 10 | I will give this 10 (open for debate) due to the fact I'm British, I understand it is meant to be written like a redneck, however, I have no idea if it has been done right or not. For the sake of marking it down because I don't know if it is correct, I can't see anything wrong with it so it is a 10. |
| Images: | 8 | The images work really well, the Uncle-Dad one is brilliant, as well as the hate one, well they are all good except the surrender monkeys one, went right over my head I don't get it or see the relevance, this one could be changed perhaps? All in all good article. |
| Miscellaneous: | 9 | This article has something special and deserves the average of 9. It is very funny, it is very well written and the idea is great. |
| Final Score: | 44 | I am nominating this article for VFH, I will not its a 1984 spoof, I do think (hope) this has the potential to be featured. Has been good reviewing this. Well done. |
| Reviewer: | --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 22:54, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | |