User talk:Cajek/Archive12
Ok, I'll tell you what the fuck is going on.[edit source]
Saw your mods to the Pee guidelines... Nice. Think you have made some useful suggestions there. I have taken a copy of the whole thing, and am editing it in my sandbox. Will paste my mods into the "real" guidelines when I have done some work on it. Just saying this now in case you were thinking of doing some work on it yourself. Hope your having a goods day. MrN 13:42, Dec 7
- can't wait to see your mods. • <-> (Dec 7 / 13:55)
- I'm working on it now... Give me an hour or so... MrN 14:26, Dec 7
- NO, FUCK YOU, I WANNA SEE EM NOOOOOWWWWWWW • <-> (Dec 7 / 14:28)
- OK. It's at: User:MrN9000/Sandbox1. I'm off to get some dinner... Have an edit of whats there. I think it's best that we do not mess with the "real" page until we are a bit more happy with it. I have tried to not "lecture" people if possible, I think that's the best thing to do, just keep it to friendly advice if possible. MrN 15:58, Dec 7
- We should probably get Led or someone to review it first, before we change the "Real" page I think...MrN 16:06, Dec 7
- OK. It's at: User:MrN9000/Sandbox1. I'm off to get some dinner... Have an edit of whats there. I think it's best that we do not mess with the "real" page until we are a bit more happy with it. I have tried to not "lecture" people if possible, I think that's the best thing to do, just keep it to friendly advice if possible. MrN 15:58, Dec 7
- NO, FUCK YOU, I WANNA SEE EM NOOOOOWWWWWWW • <-> (Dec 7 / 14:28)
- I'm working on it now... Give me an hour or so... MrN 14:26, Dec 7
- Hea! I was editing that bit too! Edit conflict! Grr! MrN 21:26, Dec 7
- My middle name is EDIT CONFLICT • <-> (Dec 7 / 21:28)
query[edit source]
hey cajek, quick question. i noticed you're one of the more prominent pee-reviewers in the business, and i also noticed that for the 'humor' section of your reviews, you break everything down by section. i think that's a great idea, and i would like to start using it in the reviews i give, but i wanted to check with you first in case you...um...didn't want me stealing it, i guess. anyway, i think that it really helps pinpoint where an article needs more work, and should be encouraged in all reviews, but again, only if you're cool with it. i'm just rambling now, so i'll stop. -- 22:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- yes, copying me is good for I am Cajek. Breaking down the humor section by section is something that I wanted to catch on, and which I think is REALLY helpful, like you said. If you ever have a question about something, just ask yourself:
“ | What Would Cajek Do? | ” |
Also, try to use {{Pee}} in the miscellanious box. • <-> (Dec 7 / 23:08)
- sweet. i think WWCD will catch on fast. i generally like to do different things with the misc box, like how well the article stands up against my expectations, or bonus points for an outstandingly awesome part, but the Pee template is great for those times when i can't think of anything. thanks, and keep up the good work. -- 23:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your contributions, Gerry! Get to the pee-ing! • <-> (Dec 7 / 23:30)
- sweet. i think WWCD will catch on fast. i generally like to do different things with the misc box, like how well the article stands up against my expectations, or bonus points for an outstandingly awesome part, but the Pee template is great for those times when i can't think of anything. thanks, and keep up the good work. -- 23:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
A little bit Unhappy[edit source]
I was surprised to see that you had posted our efforts on the pee-review update here without consulting with me first. I was under the impression that we had agreed not to do that until we had obtained approval from a larger number of senior users. If I remember correctly we came to this as a compromise as I wanted to make a post "elsewhere" and you did not... What happened? MrN 18:18, Dec 8
- The version that you have done is so good that I know we would be wasting out time asking people for advice. • <-> (Dec 8 / 18:21)
- So you just disregarded our agreement? Should I do the same? I will not...
- It's not a matter of how good we/you think it is. It's a matter of getting some sort of approval from the community before doing something which in many ways represent a change in policy within Uncyc. Do you not understand what I mean? If you act in such a sweeping manor I feel that our changes are more likely to be rejected...
- That said, I'm not really that bothered about the whole thing... I'm really just upset that you broke our agreement... Guess it does not matter now... I will paste our talk dialogue from my sandbox onto the talk page of here so that if anyone challenges our work we can at least refer them to that... Have fun. MrN 18:37, Dec 8
- You did such a good job, I doubt anyone will challenge the fundamental premise of the piece that developed during it's writing. I'm sorry MrN, I didn't realize you would feel this way! Friends? • <-> (Dec 8 / 18:38)
- OK Cajek. Apology accepted. But please bear in mind in the future: You can call me whatever the hell you want. Take the piss in whatever manor you see fit, fuck with my user space, or do virtually whatever you wish... That will not upset me. But... When I consider that a serious agreement has been been made I get upset if it's broken...
Hea[edit source]
I have now paste our conversation onto the talk page of the guidelines... I'm not sure if you want to go through editing out any of it for "whatever" reason... It's entirely up to you, just thought that you might, it does not make you "look" so good in a few places... :) MrN 19:14, Dec 8
Looks like Led has made a post in the dump...[edit source]
Check it out. MrN 19:56, Dec 8
- Spread the wohd, my chil'un! Now fall on yo' knees, n' say 'praise the lawd,' an' be hee-ahled! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:59, Dec 8
If you think[edit source]
That I'm going to wait for your pee on my Mister Winkel spinoff much longer, you are mistaken! WHERE IS MY SCENTED PEE?! WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON?!~ 20:12, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Somebody already revood it! Hold on, I'm going to have some people screaming at me in a second... • <-> (Dec 8 / 20:19)
- Man! I just promised I would review something for THE! I really want to review your thing, so I'll just post my review above Ggarfields' very subpar review, if that's ok • <-> (Dec 8 / 20:28)
Damn, boy[edit source]
Your talk page has turned into a playground. I didn't come on for one day (as per my guarantee) and the Pee guidelines have gone crazy! Crazy, I tell you! Unfortunately, I won't be able to give any good input for a few days, as I had a surgery yesterday and I'm gonna be hopped up on Vicoden for a while. Have fun! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 20:36, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- I hope you were awake during your surgery, because... that woulda b'n AWESOME. • <-> (Dec 8 / 20:38)
- Nope, but he moaned a bit when I... did nothing. I did nothing at all to him while he was unconscious. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:40, Dec 8
- Are you still doing that "thing" with organs, Led? Can I have a "cut" of the "proceeds"??? • <-> (Dec 8 / 20:45)
- Nah, I'll need these to keep myself alive in 80 years. I shall be immortal! Immortal, I say!! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:49, Dec 8
- MAYBE if I SHOUT the IMPORTANT WORDS at you, you'll reconsider: Can I have a CUT (wink wink) of the PROCEEDS (nudge wink wink nudge glace)??? • <-> (Dec 8 / 20:51)
- Nah, I'll need these to keep myself alive in 80 years. I shall be immortal! Immortal, I say!! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:49, Dec 8
- Are you still doing that "thing" with organs, Led? Can I have a "cut" of the "proceeds"??? • <-> (Dec 8 / 20:45)
- Nope, but he moaned a bit when I... did nothing. I did nothing at all to him while he was unconscious. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:40, Dec 8
- Playground eh? /ME Walks past juggling his balls... – Preceding unsigned comment added by MrN9000 (talk • contribs)
- How many balls can you keep in the air? enough to sign your posts???! HUH? – Preceding unsigned comment added by Cajek (talk • contribs)
- Balls, you got me... Your a good sport Cajek old chap. Ticketyboo... MrN 20:51, Dec 8
- =D I'm just glad you are too! – Preceding unsigned comment added by Cajek (talk • contribs)
- Hea, we all fuck up dude. I did a revert last night which almost got me in trouble... It was on a page which was created by a Vandal IP saying something stupid like "You know your stupid when:"Your a Croatian" or something... One of the other logged in users changed the text to turn it around on the IP who created it. I watched it happen and it made me laugh out loud. Proper funny. The vandal then changed it back saving something like "don't mess with my page", so I reverted back to the funny version. The admin watching the whole thing huffed the article straight away, but warned that if anything else like that went on she would ban everyone... I thought that was a bit harsh as it was an IP creating a Vandal article, but thinking about it now, the admin was right... I was being a dick, and my actions were likely to cause trouble... Though it was funny! We all mess up though dude, I think the trick is to know when to chill out. It's usually when that little voice in the back of your head is saying "should I do this??" Although that guy is no fun, an it's best not to listen to him too much. Have fun. ;)MrN 21:10, Dec 8
- =D I'm just glad you are too! – Preceding unsigned comment added by Cajek (talk • contribs)
- Balls, you got me... Your a good sport Cajek old chap. Ticketyboo... MrN 20:51, Dec 8
- How many balls can you keep in the air? enough to sign your posts???! HUH? – Preceding unsigned comment added by Cajek (talk • contribs)
/me rides in suddenly on top of a riot van aiming a water hose at everyone present. All right gents, clear off. Nothing to see here. MOVE ALONG I SAY! ~ 20:56, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- *grabs a sign and chants* HECK NO, WE WON'T GO! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:59, Dec 8
- grabs another sign off the pile* YEAH, I HATE CANADIANS • <-> (Dec 8 / 21:01)
- Whoa, dude. Is this like, a protest? Sweet, man. /me pops another Vicoden. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 21:19, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you, sir!![edit source]
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.
Thank you very much for reviewing Grass in the Mist 2. I wanted to make it stand out from the original in some way, so I decided to take a bit of a risk and really lay on the wild, bizarre, eccentric humor which I see you noticed. So scene four was weakest? Allright, I'll work on shortening that one, as this script is waaaay too long. Again, thanks for taking the time to give me input on what's possibly the most bizarre thing I've ever written (on uncyclopedia, anyway. Don't even get me STARTED on illogicopedia). --THE 21:17, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Whew! Done reviewing for today! That article on ?pedia looks funny, I'll have to look at it sometime... I wonder what the weirdest thing I've ever done would be...? • <-> (Dec 8 / 21:32)
- Yeah, 3 second rule is certainly quite peculiar, but in a totally hilarious way. And yeah, you'll have to let me know what you think of my Melville Amsterdam tale, it seems like it'd be right up your alley (though it might frighten you...it's about 900 times as random and absurd as anything I've written here) --THE 21:39, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- I think it's my weirdest because Hindleyite commented on it. Yeah, I'll have to look at it some time! • <-> (Dec 8 / 21:41)
- Actually, you seem just crazy enough to be able to moonlight on ?pedia, Cajek. You should try it sometime. Even I've written a few over there. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:43, Dec 8
- What's so weird about Hindleyite commented on something? She commented on The Color Problem also... (How's are my whoring skills doing Cajek?)... MrN 21:45, Dec 8
- Cajek would make a kickass illogicopedian, methinks. Let me know on my illogicopedia page if you decide to join, Cajek! :) --THE 21:51, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
new note[edit source]
Thanks Cajek. They are all over the place, but start here: [1] user:savethemooses also thanked me somewhere, but it was in peeReview, or their talk page. I have Also been voted for in NoTM by a few people I did reviews for. --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 14:25, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Nice n00bing[edit source]
Dam man! I mentioned to Ggarfield and AE that doing a few pee reviews might be good for their chances in the n00b of the month, and look what's happened! Those guys have cleaned the place up! There are almost no pees left to do! MrN 14:38, Dec 9
- Yeah! I've never seen so little pee in the pond! It's funny when the oldest and the youngest review requests are the same. I don't know why it's funny, but it is. Okay, it's not funny it's just interesting... okay, it's not interesting either BUT JUST LOOK AT HOW CLEAN IT IS!! • <-> (Dec 9 / 14:40)