Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Write a Techno Song (rewrite)
HowTo:Write a Techno Song [edit source]
I added an additional image. Yeah.
And I know I use commas a tad too much, although this is actually intentional, because when read over and over again the commas give the sections a certain "sick techno beat." Try it yourself and see!
--Guildensternenstein 14:16, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
I gots it...your being lazy like techno people are. I could review this if you want...I might be harsh on the lack of content, I like the concept though. Your choice. ~SirTagstit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 16:08, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- Do what you will, it doesn't matter to me either way. --Guildensternenstein 17:42, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'd be happy to review this article. --Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 21:20, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
| Humour: | 8.64 | Thank you. I hate techno music, and this is exactly the reason why. I looked at your first review, and I'm honestly surprised nobody mentioned the length of the TOC. The only problem here is that, althought the annoyance of the TOC goes perfectly well with the article, someone coming to the page might not realize that this is just the nature of the article. No big deal, just possibly something to think about. The article is great though. Normally I don't like articles without much "article-ness" to them, but this one is just very funny. Then the Bit where it Changes works great. It shows a good knowledge of techno music (or at least shows that you have listened to a techno song. |
| Concept: | 9.26 | Obviously, a great concept. The only reason it's not a 10 out of 10 is because it seems a little too simple. You can pretty much disregard this comment, I see how that is what you were going for, but I just tend to get that feeling that if it looks like not much thinking was put in, then it's not good enough. But I tend to overthink things, so, basically, it's good. |
| Prose and formatting: | 10 | Couldn't find any problems here. |
| Images: | 8.82 | The last image is great. A good addition from the last one. The only thing I can think of here is that it seems odd that the first picture is repeated multiple times, while the other two only get 1 showing each. Also, consider putting the BWIC pic on the left. If it doesn't look right, fine, but I just don't like everything on 1 side. I like balance. |
| Miscellaneous: | 9 | Once, again, a very good article (big fucking surprise). I'm assuming that some Guilder...something fan will nom it for featurement, and it'll be featured the next day. That'll make you a n00b with... 3 features? Nothing compared to my [cough cough] features, but fine all the same. |
| Final Score: | 45.72 | I'll vote for it. |
| Reviewer: | Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 21:40, 5 March 2009 (UTC) | |
I'm flattered you think so highly of this haha. And, to be honest, no one ever noms my articles. I have a long, proud tradition of self-noming. And, if you really think this is that good, I'll continue my incredibly self-serving tradition and self-nom this as soon as the most recent article I self-nomed fails, which should be soon.
Man, am I humble.
--Guildensternenstein 01:05, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Honk if you are as great as I am...[silence]... Yeah, didn't think so. No I'm not cocky. (my slogan)--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 01:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)