Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive21

Elion

Deleted --—rc (t) 03:38, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Delete - was a QVFD, but didn't make the cut. --Keithhackworth MUN F@H 18:41, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Fast deletion--Rataube 02:21, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I think I'm missing the joke. --Trevie 15:14, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Keep -- as an estonian, i think that this is an important piece of information:D ...or do you like an article like that: http://www.elion.ee/wwwmain?screenId=html.main&locale=en
• Delete As a Latvian, I still don't get it Prettiestpretty 03:24, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Albert Carter

Deleted --—rc (t) 03:38, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

If it looks like slandanity, walks like slandanity, and quacks like slandanity, it must be Deleted. --King In Yellow 12:38, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Jewcember

Deleted --—rc (t) 03:38, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I vote ReWrite. It's way too short and pointless, but I think someone might be able to run with it. --Simulacrum Caputosis 21:37, 6 Jan 2006

What{s wrong with this people. grrrr --Rataube 02:48, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Abstain for the moment. I thought it was sort of funny, but a bit short. --S P I N N I E 15:24, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Malice mizer

Umm... not funny.. plus i think it was already deleted once, by rcmurphy   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 22:41, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Moved to QVFD, too much of a nuisance for regular.QVFD--abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvWXYZ(talk|contrib) 23:30, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Cockring

Deleted --—rc (t) 03:38, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Um... just kill it. --Zyrac 13:05, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Again, another example of missing the funniest aspects of the word by delving into complete eighth grade humor. Nuke it Prettiestpretty 14:30, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Have you seen The Ring movies at all? ---Kakun 14:35, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Colonize. Acid Ammo 16:06, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Burninate. The only humor I have ever associated with cockrings is Mr. Show's excellent ad for Cock Ring Wearhouse and the time my former girlfriend asked me if I would wear one for her. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 16:14, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• F!N INSTAHUFF in my very humble, not at all strident opinion --King In Yellow 15:36, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Bowling ball

Deleted --—rc (t) 03:38, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Pretty much a perfect example of what an article shouldn't look like... Hits almost all the points of HTBFNJS! That's frankly pretty impressive ... but not impressive enough to prevent me from voting Huff'er! --Oracleoftruth 04:32, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Gutter Ball This should have been as easy as picking up a seven pin spare; turn it in and spray fungicide on it. Prettiestpretty 14:34, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Re-write, unless there's already a seperate bowling article. This article has a couple of flashes of could-be-funny, and a bowling ball has more inherent comedy than some other balls. I'm looking at you, tennis ball. You're just not funny. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 16:18, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. --Rataube 18:17, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Huff, puff, and suck. --King In Yellow 15:37, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Battlefield 2: Special Forces

Defeated --—rc (t) 03:38, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Terrible article. Not funny, doesn't make much sense either. Kill it please. --Give word to The Word 03:41, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Delete. Stupid rant by someone who spends all his time playing BF2. Harp Heaven 03:46, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Snipe it. This is kind of like the Metroid article I re-did - the author really, really likes Battlefield 2 and wants to write about it. Unfortunately, daring to limply mock that which he/she loves begets only unfunny ranting. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 16:10, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Euthanize the author -ERM!- article. --King In Yellow 15:39, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Legos

Killed. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:38, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Pure crap. Kill it now. --  IAN WELLER-- TALK -- F@H -- VFH -- VFD -- RAND    20:49, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I thought it was funny. -IQ

Die, Die, Die Another example of an article topic that should hold great promise but what has resulted simply doesn't make sense. Prettiestpretty 23:13, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, it has potential but currently it's shite --Eldarion 00:31, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Delort. Sounds like someone got chewed out for calling LEGOs "Legos." What a disaster. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 00:34, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Re-write untill nothing is left but a bit about how LEGOs eat humans Pieinbubsface 18:13, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)

It has a lot of potential. Let's keep it for a little while and see if it improves at all. -- PinkDeoxys 18:26, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Bob Hope

Done. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:42, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Delete. Random and not at all funny. --Zyrac 20:11, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Delete for my rationale, see my comments for Legos listed above. Prettiestpretty 23:14, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Random but not very funny. Delete --Eldarion 00:45, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

uncyclopedia.wikia.com

Gone -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:42, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC) Delete; Uncyclopedia:About doesn't want to eat this. --DWIII 19:50, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Delete I can say nothing about this article that it doesn't already say about itself... Prettiestpretty 23:16, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Delete. Lame article. --Eldarion 00:49, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

i found this on QVFD and tried to save it but it obviously didn't work. Oh well. --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 15:23, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Ronnie rokta and Peter David Game

Will never work in this town again. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:42, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Short, unfunny, and just plain weird. Neither offer anything special, and I don't believe that either are worth saving. Still, as the second one has been around since September, I hesitated throwing it on QVFD and instead posted it here. My thoughts: Nuke 'em. --King In Yellow 19:15, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Faster Pussy Cat, KILL, KILL These articles are poster children for insipid nonesense. Maybe they should be kept as examples of what NOT to post. Prettiestpretty 23:18, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Implode. Prettiest and King have it right: destroy this inane duo before they destroy someone looking for a clever laugh. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 00:39, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Food and Drink of Lithuania

Delete! The jokes are bland and overused, and it has no point. Simulacrum Caputosis 21:06, 4 Jan 2006 Delete. Too many jokes (I believe) in Lithuanian. Acid Ammo 19:06, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Kill 'em all. I for one am quite sick of all the Lithuanian, Romanian, Moldovian, Sumerian, Etruscan, Whathefuckean and/or Cetacean in-jokes that have been springing up around here lately. This one is just another example of such obscure dreck. --King In Yellow 19:20, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

The meta-humor makes it work for me; Keepsies. --DWIII 19:18, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Delete, it doesn't have a broad enough appeal, if indeed it has any. --Eldarion 00:50, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Send to gulag. I enjoyed the guy who fell over his chair (Kiek Galima??? That's comedy!) but, um, this article needs to be killed. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 16:21, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Deaded -- T. (talk) 02:35, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Non-USALand

Deleted --—rc (t) 03:38, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. This surprisingly long article just plays on stereotypes and has nothing new to offer. --Trevie 15:03, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• huff: Trevie's analysis is accurate even though he forgot to add the {{vfd}} tag to the page. --Sir gwax (talk) 15:08, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Completely rewrite as Non-USAland needs to be described as one unified country, not many. The Onion map which had US and Them as the only two countries was amusing, this in its present form is garbage. --Carlb 18:24, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Destroy. Not only is it stupid, its purpose is already fulfilled by Rest Of World. --Zyrac 20:15, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• delete Not funny, not cool. --Oracleoftruth 04:34, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Racism kicks ass.

UPDATE: I fixed parts that sucked. Some humorless foreigner vandalized the page once and it basically degenerated into a big pissing match. Good enough now? --152.163.101.10 02:12, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• crush kill destroy some content might possibly be moved to existing USA articles. --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 15:36, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. There is a difference between clever satire and outright bigotry. If satire on actual American supremacism were inserted in the article then maybe it could be redeemed, but I'm not sure it's worth the effort. - Apollyon 07:49, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• huff--Rataube 03:21, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Runcible

Deleted --—rc (t) 03:38, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I hate to do this, but this page is apparently both unoriginal and true [1]. Can we perhaps get a rewrite for such a worthy topic? --S P I N N I E 19:17, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

rewrite or deleate: Spinth is correct, it is a fantastic topic, so I propose a rewrite or delete approach. --Sir gwax (talk) 19:36, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

TFAODP --EvilZak 00:31, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Delete - not even worth a rewrite Keithhackworth MUN F@H 13:51, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Smurfs

*Redirect to The Smurfs. Probably candidate for QVFD or NRV, but there is some content Keithhackworth MUN F@H

Redirected; wasn't worth waiting for the full vfd process. --Sir gwax (talk) 18:06, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Holocaust Denial

I fucking hate holocaust deniers, and i love when someone makes fun of them. But the information in this page is almost true!!! This is not the kind of humor we apreciate in uncyclopedia. --Rataube 03:32, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Rewrite / Nuke Maybe a rewrite could redeem this... Else, nuke it. --bdanials 03:39, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Keep. Read Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid, and don't make any more asinine assumptions. --EvilZak 03:53, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Sorry. Done. However, i would still send a good part of it to the Uncyclopedia:True Facts and Other Deleted Prose. The top is almost completely and nakedly true.--Rataube 04:18, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Keep. -- T. (talk) 13:23, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Keep. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 13:31, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I'll take the nomination down if someone adds some kind of warning-this-article-may-have-accurate-factual-useful-information template. I think this is a serious issue, i wouldn't like people to think those facts are just jokes. Maybe uncyclopedia has no moral standars as stated in the "did you know" section, although wikipedia claims otherwise. But i do have. There are certain things, that must be taken with resposability when making jokes on them. --Rataube 14:54, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Keep.' Made me laugh. I don't see the problem with this article, fine as it is. IMO. Herostratus 17:29, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Nuke. This is all true, except the nile part. Kakun 22:14, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Keep --S P I N N I E 22:55, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Kept: While I agree with Rataube that Holocaust Denial is a serious and very offensive matter, I feel that this article presents it in a rather ironic light, which coupled with the votes in favor of keeping it, justifies its preservation. --Sir gwax (talk) 13:13, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Whale Blowhole Power Plant

* Delete it -- it's just stupid, me thinks. --Fungi 16:15, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

ACME pantented manhood enhancer

• I'm not voting because I can't decide whether this is redeemable. Just want to hear your opinions. --Unissakävelijä 10:49, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Quick Deletion--Rataube 12:45, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy huff. Make it quick, we're not sadists, are we? - Guest 12:54, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Huffed: The pun was good but the article didn't capitalize on it and has moved on to greener pastures. --Sir gwax (talk) 16:17, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

C. Allsow

• Poorly written, not funny. Has very little potential so if anyone out there has time, go ahead and try to rewrite. --Unissakävelijä 10:49, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Nah, just delete--Rataube 12:48, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Huph. Who the hell is C.Allsow? — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 15:50, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• I think it's a pun on "See Also." Anyway, it eats. Blast it.--King In Yellow 15:55, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Sunol

• Delete Non-notable, possibly slanderous. --Algorithm (talk) 06:14, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Zzzzzz--Rataube 12:42, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Baleete. Wow, John Sunol must be fuming over this awesome article of contrived personal attacks. Who the hell is John Sunol? — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 15:53, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Huff.--King In Yellow 15:56, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Baleeted: So be it. --Sir gwax (talk) 16:15, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Etruscan

• Delete This page isn't funny, I don't think it is rewritable either. Bloo 14:18, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Implode. --Rataube 12:39, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Kill. --King In Yellow 15:58, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Baleeted: Thy will be done. --Sir gwax (talk) 16:13, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Final Fantasy: Hebrew Hammer

grrrr. --Rataube 00:44, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. It doesn't seem all that offensive (if that was the author's intent) or all that funny (if that was the author's intent). In its defense, it does mention shul. Shul rules, especially if you stay in it. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 16:00, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Baleeted: Not one drop of funny in there. --Sir gwax (talk) 16:12, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Ark of the Covenant

Just five unfunny lines. --Rataube 00:40, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Rewrite. For such a mystical item so ripe for misinterpretation and/or blasphemy, I think we could do a bit better than the five lines there - even an entry that doesn't mention Indiana Jones. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 15:37, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Ding! Start again. --King In Yellow 16:05, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Etc

Delete this page only has one word that is repeated. Bloo 17:46, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Deleted, but QVFD next time. KATIE!! 06:50, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

i don't even think thats spanish. Delete   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 22:26, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Sorry to disappoint u but that is spanish. It still sucks. i wouldnt delete it, couse there should be articles about every country, but the please-expand template must be added.

Deleted. This sort of thing doesn't require voting. --Algorithm (talk) 00:01, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

A one line article. And the line is just to ask for its deletion. --Rataube 21:50, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

lol qvfd   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 22:17, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Husband of Captain Picard

Delete; appears to be part of an unfunny agenda-pushing campaign across many unrelated articles. --DWIII 18:04, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Delete; I put this on QVFD earlier... I also put another version of it (Husband of Captain Piccard) on there. That one is gone. Jlove1982 18:24, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

All gone! --DWIII 19:00, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

The Turks

Delete. I don't know if you frown on nominating more than one article for deletion per 24 hour period, but this thing is really bad. And don't even try to tell me this is some kind of inside joke. I don't care.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 06:39, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Deleted. That's more of QVFD material. KATIE!! 06:43, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Face implants

Delete. Yet another page that is crap and it is stupid, not funny. So My Opinion is just delete it, and this page has an NRV tagging on it.

Patience. It'll be deleted soon. KATIE!! 06:35, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Solar system

Am i missing something. please Delete.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 06:16, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

It's a disambiguation page. It points to other pages. Of course those other articles ought to be made, but don't take it out on the messenger. KATIE!! 06:18, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I still dont get it... but uhh... i guess as long as it has a purpose...   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 06:22, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Fixed with a couple deletions and moves. --Sir gwax (talk) 18:40, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Strong Bad

Burn and Delete. This page is not funny, so unless someone can make it funny by Rewriting. it, go ahead and make it better. But It better be good. Bloo 06:09, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Give me 48 hours unless I can't get to it... then Baleete - I could probably at least churn out some decent idea that could be expanded further (I'm finding I'm more of an ideas person than a writing or drawing person). Jlove1982 06:38, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Comment - OK, I've started something. I can't finish it at the moment, so I'm going to put the "Under Construction" sign on and take off the rewrite. I'm leaving the VFD one though in the case my idea isn't up to quality, and so an Admin can deal with that. Jlove1982 18:51, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

NRVed: you've got one week to bring it up to snuff. --Sir gwax (talk) 18:32, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Delete. Now this article isn't even in english, and it is so short it is a waste of a page (Most of the time I find bad pages when I click on Random Page). Bloo 20:04, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Deleted. Not because I hate Spanish, but because there's a rule against one liners, and I don't think there's a Spanish undictionary. KATIE!! 06:28, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Dustin The Wind

Delete. This page is very very crap, even an admin is threatning to delete it. Bloo 19:56, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Bunny Suit

Delete. I'm not that into J-Pop, but I don't find this funny. Jlove1982 20:35, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Instahuff. I'm throwing it on QVFD.--King In Yellow 20:38, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Snook

I was going to just insta-huff this, but maybe I just don't get it? --S P I N N I E 19:00, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I almost threw it on this list myself, but the writing quality was higher than normal, if not at all funny. I'm tempted to say delete, but perhaps a NRV tagging would be better?--King In Yellow 19:04, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I don't really get it and it doesn't make me laugh but it has a strange sort of charm to it; I would like to see it kept around, at least for a while. --Sir gwax (talk) 19:41, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite. I'm still unclear as to what a Snook is, but the author has some skeelz and this could be funny with a little elaboration, and maybe a picture of said Snook. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 23:18, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Kill it Prettiestpretty 18:22, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite I think a Snook was one of those imaginary birds that Foghorn Leghorn used to fool the Chicken Hawk with. This article does not appear to be funny, unless it was meant in Random humor or something? It can be rewritten. Like perhaps make it the point of a Snooker game, or a Snook is slang for one of Snoop Dog's Hookers, Sn+Hook-h-er = Snook? ----Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 23:47, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

NRVed: it's the right thing to do in this case. --Sir gwax (talk) 18:28, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

BTK

Delete. I read this page and what is taking the admins so long to delete this article, in other words Stick a fork in its eye, hang this page by its testicles and roast them over a large pot of boiling marmalade. thank you Bloo 21:23, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Not funny. Would be funnier as a "Bacon Tomato Kitten" sandwich or "Beat The Kids" page. Keithhackworth MUN F@H 17:34 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete: Keith, this would have been a good place to use {{NRV|~~~~~}}. --Sir gwax (talk) 17:47, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Whack dis losah, Benny.--King In Yellow 17:57, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete That wasn't funny. Jlove1982 18:54, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Kill it Its not funny, its not even garage bandworthy Prettiestpretty 18:21, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Is there really even a point of waiting for the NRV to expire?   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 06:46, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Batgirl

Delete. This is just stupid... Needs a LOT of improvement Keithhackworth 17:07am 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite. If someone with more than a 5th Grader's comprehension of spelling and grammar got ahold of it, this might qualify for a Bat Fuck Insane template. We needs more a dose.--King In Yellow 17:10, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete: It would take much more than being able to handle English to fix this page from where it's going; I doubt anyone with the skill will go after it. --Sir gwax (talk) 17:58, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• Heck, I'd do it if I felt comfortable enough with formatting and images. As it stands right now, the only areas I have mastery over are text and bloodhounding crap. So I guess I'm out...--King In Yellow 18:59, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete --S P I N N I E 18:56, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Baleete it. When the time is right, someone else could swoop in and make a near-laughable Batgirl page. Just not whoever wrote this version. — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 23:16, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite I think I have the perfect way of rewriting it, but I gotta make a beer run for the husband. Let me think about it... Prettiestpretty 18:24, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Rewritten look edit, contribute, but it has more content now. Happy New Year!

Rewrite is good enough to save for now. --Sir gwax (talk) 18:26, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Audioslave

Delete. This article is seriously not funny it is stupid, I don't think the authour read Begginer's Guide Be Funny And Not Just STUPID! Bloo 21:55, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete: yeah, not that funny. --Sir gwax (talk) 13:52, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Burn it. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 14:15, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Audioslave itself would have some potential, but that's not funny... BALETE! Jlove1982 15:55, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Anybody charitable feel like rewriting it?, otherwise whack it with a stick until it bleeds Karma Llama 16:23, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

No. Gots my cudgel oiled & ready ta WHACK this dreck.--King In Yellow 16:24, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete - Keithhackworth MUN F@H 17:11 30 Dec 2005A.C. (UTC)

Bizzled --S P I N N I E 18:53, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Slartibartfast

Balete. It's not funny, and I'm not sure what it was supposed to be about. Jlove1982 06:31, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite. Come on people, at least put a fjord reference in there. --Algorithm (talk) 06:37, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Huffed Pointless random 'humour' with no chance of redemption. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 11:18, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

QFE

Delete. I think the same as Keithhackworth WTF This page isn't funny either. Bloo 21:55, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete. WTF? --Keith Hackworth 16:28am, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Um... anyone got a line on this? Maybe it's just me, but I don't get it. I say fry it.--King In Yellow 16:31, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

huffed: QVFD material. --Sir gwax (talk) 16:31, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Hormones

Delete. Useless --Keith Hackworth 13:54, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

huffed: QVFD material. --Sir gwax (talk) 14:42, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

No Things Left Behind Act

Delete. Useless --Keith Hackworth 13:54, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

huffed: QVFD material. --Sir gwax (talk) 14:41, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Malcom Betruger

Unfunny; doomed^3 from the start. Delete. --DWIII 00:03, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Baleete it. Is it possible to have a stream of consciousness about inside jokes known only to the streamer? No. No, it is not, at least as far as making such a thing funny is concerned. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 00:38, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Folding@home

Not funny at all. The jokes all fall flat. Unoriginal. --Savethemooses 22:17, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• Keep: meh, [insert crappy joke here]. --Sir gwax (talk) 14:35, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Poke it with a stick, barry!: I have no idea what this page is about, i'm not smatr enough, so Keep Karma Llama 22:53, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Is this real? Um, I'm about to try this myself, to see if it is indeed "phunny" upon retrospection. (Keep). — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 23:20, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Chewy

It isn't even funny enough to be a dictionary entry. --Electrostatic 02:19, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

agreed. --Isra1337 02:23, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete. It might be funny if you hated Chewbacca. And Jews. And you were 12. Pathetic, really. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 16:50, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Kill it please, and save the grizzly.--King In Yellow 16:53, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete - A single joke. --Trevie 17:46, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete I'm only voting instead of burning because I want to mess with my signature. --S P I N N I E 08:03, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

huff: should have been NRVed in the first place. --Sir gwax (talk) 14:37, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Burninating » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 14:50, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Clairvoyance

delete: I don't see any humor in it. --Sir gwax (talk) 17:59, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

keep And I object. I think it is great fun and do therefore not want to rewrite it. In any case, I want more viewpionts first. --Suresh 18:04, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite it, or else Delete it. The idea for the article is great and has a lot of promise, but it seems too restrictive in scope. There simply isn't enough material that applies to virtually anyone who would read the article. As it stands, it feels more like a collection of "inside jokes" than accessible humor -- even the jab at Splaka falls into the confines of an Uncyclopedia inside joke. I just can't get a chuckle out of it.--King In Yellow 18:38, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I'm voting to keep, provisionally. I think the article could expand into something quite funny. I'd like to see more non-inside jokes in the "entries", and perhaps a random element? There's seven days to save this articles immortal soul. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 19:01, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep and rewrite Prettiestpretty 19:06, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Everything King in Yellow said. I wanted to chuckle, but couldn't. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 17:01, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Yep, We're all with King In Yellow on this one. Karma Llama 22:56, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Kept and marked as a stub. --Sir gwax (talk) 14:04, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for all constructive comments. I see that the page has been adopted. --Suresh 14:15, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Wow, I've even started adding to it. What're the odds?--King In Yellow 16:26, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Sercia and related

Sercia, Sercia/The Sercian War and Sercia/General Juncal are unfunny fictional universe articles created by a single user a while back.

• Delete All: I think they're crap and should be huffed (also, they're formatted poorly and use external images). --Sir gwax (talk) 19:07, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• I don't see the funny and know of no reason to have a different version of this content. Seems pretty expendable. --Isra1337 02:22, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• Obliterate the lot. This is just not funny; it reads like a history text.--King In Yellow 16:56, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• Huff. This is comedy? Am I missing something? Is "Sercia" an anagram for something humorous? Uh - C Raise? Ecar is? I scare? Hmmmm... — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 17:05, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• I hate to be contrary, but I vote to Keep. I'm frustrated by the author's lack of communication with the community, and the articles aren't all that great, but they're part of a larger web. When I poked around the user's contributions and links therefrom to see what other threads would be hanging loose by pulling these out, I came up with a half dozen (aie bee sea dee eee eff) before I lost interest decided to stop. Many of these are poorly formatted and/or crappy, but I don't think they reach the level of crapiness usually seen in the sort of mass delete under discussion. We've kept worse. I can't believe I just typed all that about these crappy articles. I think I'm going soft. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 18:03, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

That's kind of the point behind deleting them, and those other ones you pointed out, and anything else related. It's all one great big fictional world inside of Uncyclopedia, which is rather contrary to what uncyclopedia is all about: constructing a satirical and comedic encyclopedia of the real world. If these articles were being written to present a comedic representation of a well known fictional world, that would be one thing, but these articles are all factual accounts from within a false world that doesn't have anything to do with anything as far as Uncyclopedia is concerned. --Sir gwax (talk) 18:57, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Actually, I just checked and Codeine issued him an ultimatum about cleaning up his articles and addressing our concerns or he would be banned and his articles would be fair game for admin hunting season. He did not heed the demands and appears to have simply waited for the smoke to clear before continuing. I am going to offer him one last warning, giving him until I get home from work (as I haven't enough time now) and if he doesn't at least respond, his articles will be nuked and he'll be banned for two weeks. --Sir gwax (talk) 18:57, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

See User talk:Bobo for the remainder of this matter. --Sir gwax (talk) 19:12, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)