Uncyclopedia:VFH/Special:Random

Article: Special:Random	Score: -3 articles picked out of a hat
Nominated by:	EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 19:43, Sunday 11 April 2010
For: 5	Omnomnom and For This is, without a doubt, the best article on the wiki. The sheer quantity of wit, humour, and patent nonsense contained within is truly a marvel to the institution of comedy. May Sophia bless the author, whoever he may be. Plus, hell, why not. EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 19:43, Sunday 11 April 2010 For Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 21:17, April 11, 2010 (UTC) For Clicked it three times in a row and landed on features all three times. If three features a feature does not make, then what is worth featuring? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:28, April 11, 2010 (UTC) For. Well, I clicked it again and the first thing I saw was this image, so I guess it ain't that bad. Besides, it helped me find the treasure once and I like tempting fate. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:16, 12 April 2010 For. My spin on the wheel brought me here, to a page I never saw before and now want to read. So not a bad nom, all told. Aleister in Chains 13:21 12 4 MMX For--Megaman126512 01:29, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 8	~~Against. Well, the link guided me here and I don't think that's a good article at all. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:47, 11 April 2010~~ I clicked the link again, to give it another chance at proving itself, but sadly I ended up here. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:49, 11 April 2010 It isn't the article's fault you don't know how to treat a lady. Try clicking soothingly, with your tongue. Maybe you'll land someplace interesting EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 19:52, Sunday 11 April 2010 Well, I clicked yet another time and landed on top of Hamlet. Too bad we don't have a very good article on Hamlet. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:57, 11 April 2010 Against. ChiefjusticePSX 21:18, April 11, 2010 (UTC) I clicked 5 times, and got Steve Howe, Delia Smith, Skeeball, WikiWars, and Ling-Ling. So NO. Che } 23:18,11April,2010 Against. Whoever wrote this is a moron, its constantly changing dammit! -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 22:49 EST 11 April, 2010 Against. Featuring a link that could lead to gold or crap. Act of desperation. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 09:05, April 12, 2010 (UTC) Against*. Do me a fucking favour. --UU - natter 09:09, Apr 12* NO. Alternate solution: Change the Random Page link to Click Here And Gain 2 Inches for one day. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 16:23, April 12, 2010 (UTC) Against. Per immense stupidity. --Matfen 22:38, April 12, 2010 (UTC) Bleh Could be better. Should get pee reviewed.--Director WILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 03:48, April 14, 2010 (UTC) Nawp. I clicked on the article 69 times (no, seriously) before I got a feature. So, no. Oh, and the fact that this is stupid. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 06:32, Apr 14 2010
Comments	Comment. I clicked the link 100 times in a row, and landed on this voting page each time. I think this page should be featured but since I'll be the only one, I'll pass. *Style* *Guide* 20:27, April 11, 2010 (UTC)