From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Sophia
|
Score: 3.5 haikus
|
| Nominated by:
|
Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:59, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
|
For: 12.5
|
- ~o~
Divine beauty
Sophia is not featured?
What heresy!
- ~o~
 -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:59, 5 October 2008 (UTC)- For Hell yes! I was thinking about doing this earlier... -- MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:05, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- For. I will be goddamned! / This should have been a feature / long before today. ----OEJ 01:06, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- For. 220.233.64.132 03:11, 6 October 2008
- For. haikus are easy / but sometimes they don't make sense / refrigerator. Dark Ermac 15:13, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:28, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- For. Haikus are very very very good / God damn, this is hard! / Refrigerator. Le Cejak • <13:44 Oct 07, 2008>
- For. ~
 11:12, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- For. I don't know nothing 21:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- For. Amazing!
 Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate  00:55, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- 4 - Haikus have the pow'r / to make anything funny / even poor people. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
 (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 16:42, Oct 9
- For - Feature it ONE day / Its not forever is it? / others can win to! Dame
 GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 17:12, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- For. JudgeZarbi
 TALK 22:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
|
Against: 9
|
- Sad against. I hate to be joyless / but this page is not so great / She deserves better. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:20, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Hang on a sec... Are you saying that this article should be featured based on, not its merits, but its title? In that case, why don't you nominate my user page first, then we shall discuss on this article again, in great details? -- JoeMonco 12:24, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Just to be clear about this, that's not what I'm saying. The name makes it an important article, but the name itself doesn't increase the quality of the article. I just think the article itself, though it could be somewhat improved, is good enough to be featured. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:11, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- Against. Haikus and stuff are fine / but this page is no fave of mine / it's patchy you see / hence an against from me / oh shit, have I got this wrong again? (Per Modus). --UU - natter
 13:37, Oct 8
 It's a page of haikus. Most of which make more of an attempt to be a haiku than an attempt to be funny. If I wanted to read a bunch of things attempting to be haikus, I have a whole book of haiku poetry. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 01:02 Oct 09, 2008- Against. I like haikus, but / there are better articles / that should be featured. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 11:45, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- Against. - Per the others — Sir Sycamore (talk) 11:48, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- What JoeMonco said. ^ • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:13, Oct 10
- Against Per JoeMonco finally providing a statement that is useful. -RAHB 22:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- Against Per something or other... MrN
 19:18, Oct 13
|
| Comments
|
- ~o~
Though no article
may fully grasp her essence
Feature Sophia!
- ~o~
- -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:25, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- I hate pooping someone else's party just as much as the next guy, but I do believe that Modus has a point here. -- JoeMonco 12:24, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Well, ofcourse Sophia deserves better, but despite the lack of quality concerning some of the haikus (or non-haikus), I still think that this is a feature-worthy article. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Also, please note well / the pattern of syllables / is five seven five. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 11:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- Modus, as always, makes an excellent point. I would justify my vote on egalitarian grounds, indeed, grounds discovered just this morning in my coffee-maker: to wit, an article made up of haiku is sufficiently zany; a paean to Sophia is appropriate; and while I generally favor well-crafted articles Uncyc has a tradition of featuring non-traditional work (AAAAAAAAA! if you don't think so). But it's a fair vote and, really, I could argue either for or against featuring with just about equal conviction. ----OEJ 01:29, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
-
It's a page of haikus. Most of which make more of an attempt to be a haiku than an attempt to be funny. If I wanted to read a bunch of things attempting to be haikus, I have a whole book of haiku poetry. 
