Uncyclopedia:VFH/Photographer

Article: Photographer	Score: 2 socially valuable pictures of walnuts and sidewalks
Nominated by:	RA HB 05:34, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
For: 9	I demand this be featured right this very moment. However, since Uncyclopedia is a semi-democracy, I leave it to you all to decide instead. -RA HB 05:34, July 28, 2010 (UTC) Do it. Basically the only good thing to come out of today's drama. Andorin Kato 05:34, July 28, 2010 (UTC) For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 05:38, 28 July 2010 For. Hilarious and only slightly exaggerated. --<--Appletarded! 07:58, July 28, 2010 (UTC) For. Funny bony 13:42, Jul 28 13:42, July 28, 2010 (UTC) SF. Grrrr. pillow talk 15:22, July 28, 2010 (UTC) For. I knew a "photographer" my freshmen year of college. Her boyfriend was an "artist," in that he bathed irregularly, could play five chords on an acoustic guitar, liked Radiohead, and never actually did anything artistic. True story. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 01:45, July 29, 2010 (UTC) For. Every parent who bought their poor, naive, talentless darling an SLR before shipping her off to a state university so she could pass out and get involuntarily impregnated. As for the article, honestly it is one of the best written articles I have ever come across in my tenure at Uncyclopedia. Also, points for "amateurish internet" revenge. KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 19:30, July 31, 2010 (UTC) For. ^Dame 00:59, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 7	Against. Revenge is a dish best served cold. This is too hot Hype. *RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 07:16, July 29, 2010 (UTC) Against. Per Romartus ~ 07:24, July 29, 2010 (UTC) Thought it over** and I don't think there's nearly enough satire of photographers. I don't mean that it needs vitriol and fire and brimstone—it needs more content. Sir Mac Mania GUN—[19:44 30 Jul 2010] Against, sadly. I don't think it was quite ready. But could definately be a future feature... -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) Against. Um. Not as it stands. There is a certain amount of anger residue obscuring the heart of the article. I agree with that Mhaille chap here - it's not that far off, but I'm not down with it right now. --UU - natter 12:09, Aug 2 Against. Man, the article was funny and accurate for the people who post black and white pictures of roses on deviant art. However, I thought the style sounded like a boyfriend pissed off at his ex and trying to convince himself via a big bitchy story that she left him because she was a talentless, self obsessed slut rather than because he is a huge vagina who wanks off to her Facebook photos while sobbing. That is funny, too, but it doesn't really match with the critique of self proclaimed "photographers" and doesn't work if the article is considering photojournalists and pros who take photos that basically give your eyes a blowjob they are so awesome. --Nikau 04:18, August 3, 2010 (UTC) Against. As per above. It could be a little more subtle... - [01:54 4 August 2010] Pleb Yettie
Comments	Yeah, I know I left for the time being, but I was shown this and feel it necessary to say something. Ask yourselves if you are honestly voting for it because you think it's funny or if you are just voting for it because of the way that the woman behaved. Please. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 15:28, July 28, 2010 (UTC) I don't vote on VFH for articles that are actually funny, just for articles where a friend of mine's wrote it. pillow talk 15:35, July 28, 2010 (UTC) Hype, you my only friend. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 15:36, July 28, 2010 (UTC) Holding out on voting until all vivid memories of this photo debacle are past. Sir Mac Mania GUN—[15:45 28 Jul 2010] Comment. Yeah, I agree with Mac. --Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Wednesday, 07:05, July 28 2010 UTC Comment. I read all of that crap on Hype's talk page earlier today when I saw this nomination page. And while I wasn't there for for any of it, I have to say that I find it to be fucking retarded nonetheless. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 01:47, July 29, 2010 (UTC) Comment I read this again twice today, and it's well written. My only problem with it is the one I had on first reading it soon after it was posted--"a photographer is a girl". If the page can be changed to "a person", etc. or maybe different sentences for men and women which would open it up to many more jokes. The drama that inspired it might be taken to another level of creative work, a muse (which can be both positive and negative) used to their full potential. Lions laying down with the lamb, or at least the bones of the lamb where the good marrow is. So I want to vote for this, but "a photographer is a girl" still seems out of place to me on a feature article. Aleister 16:20 30 7 p.s. great pic too.