Uncyclopedia:VFH/Penis Removal

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Penis Removal (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Penis Removal	Score: 3 operating mishaps
Nominated by:	RAHB 23:06, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
For: 5	SNF Probably a little early to nom this, but I'll give it a shot. Got a good review, and stuff. Let's see how it fairs. -RAHB 23:06, 29 July 2007 (UTC) For -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:03, 30 July 2007 (UTC) For --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 04:31, 30 July 2007 (UTC) Ouch --Kip the Dip 12:51, 30 July 2007 (UTC) Call the lumberjack....the giant red wood is coming down! -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 00:30, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Against: 2	Against Please don't remove my penis. I need that to masturbate to Lindsay Lohan. --General Insineratehymn 18:19, 30 July 2007 (UTC) Against Too cliche, and please, think of that picture of Lindsay Lohan.  Megalomaniac Martin “The Unfortunately Unfeatured” Ultima • (VOTE FOR ME!) • talk • (AND MY PICS TOO!) • contribs 14:44, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Abs - I can't condone mainspace articles that talk directly to the reader anymore. It isn't encyclopedic. Why?'s can. HowTo's can. This should be one of those. Its a funny article though, so perhaps I'll be changing my mind when the liquor passes.. ;) -THINKER 04:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC) Agrees     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)      18:07, 30 July 2007 (UTC) Abstain This rather nauseates me. I have a weak stomach, so perhaps when I can make it through this article, I'll vote for. But for now, sorry.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC) RE Thinker: What about Mr. Kearsy?-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 20:03, 30 July 2007 (UTC) Kearsy is a themed article in which two characters are talking to one another (and is a parody of those characters). Folgers Crystals is also themed. As such, they don't really follow any of the general structures of an encyclopedic piece. Articles like these try to straddle both, and it doesn't work (for me). In other words, in the aforementioned pieces of mine, it would be obvious that they are far exceptions from the standard mold; here, it sounds like my encyclopedia is talking to me. Not that I don't like the piece, or the set-up. Its just the combination in this instance (and the fact that we've had a number of similarly styled articles making feature in the last month or two) --THINKER 23:03, 30 July 2007 (UTC) Abstain. For similar reasons to Thinker. If it was a HowTo, I'd be For. --Under user 12:53, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH