Uncyclopedia:VFH/Miles Davis

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Miles Davis (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Miles Davis	Score: 12 notes in Miles' latest solo
Nominated by:	Knucmo2 15:02, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
For: 12	Nom & For This was listed as a rewrite-and I've effectively gutted the article and rebuilt in my own style. Its had two very constructive peer reviews, and I think it makes a difficult subject quite a funny read. --Knucmo2 15:02, 28 April 2008 (UTC) F♥r. I peed on it the second time and I feel this is definitely ready for VFH. This was a great article. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 15:07 Apr 28 Sure. I had to do a report on the guy a few weeks back for jazz band, so it's cool to read a parody piece like this. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:40, Apr 28 I came, I saw, I voted FORE! - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 00:29, 29 April 2008 (UTC) For --Dr. Fenwick 20:35, 29 April 2008 (UTC) For. A good read, rather than a lol a minute. I quite like that. Possibly a bit long for its own good, but good nonetheless. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:55, May 2 For --monika 11:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC) Well done. I especially like the introduction. Mightydandylion (talk) Fk 15:03, 2 May 2008 (UTC)  For.- a great article--Sycamore (Talk) 16:00, 2 May 2008 (UTC) Good --Moneke 14:06, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Floor Long but worth it --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:01, 12 May 2008 (UTC) For -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:14, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Against: 0	No against votes
Comments	Abs. I like it, like the subject matter very much, but the humor is a little off for me. Perhaps I'm misinterpreting it. --THINKER 13:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.