From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Dear Mr. Hornet
|
Score: 13 Creepy paedophiles nice people that like to look at me from across the street
|
| Nominated by:
|
M'su Carencro - Talk - Contributions - Blag 05:31, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
|
For: 15
|
 Self nom and for. Self nomming? I make lineintegral123 look like Ghandi.--M'su Carencro - Talk - Contributions - Blag 05:31, July 17, 2010 (UTC)- For I'm a paedo. I mean, stranger. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 05:37, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- I lol'd --EMC [TALK] 05:38 Jul 17 2010
- For. 203.160.124.225 08:57, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- For Creepoid. I'm a little over half-for, but agree with Puppy's comments below that a couple of more paragraphs would elevate the page, and you still have time to put those in and polish them. And hopefully those names and addressed bear no relation to reality?! Aleister 18:15 17 7
- For. Suitably creepy and amusing. Saberwolf116 19:31, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- For High standard of it all. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:40, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Honestly, the pedophailia joke is terribly overdone. But you managed to pull a whole new angle- I loved it. --Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Sunday, 03:09, July 18 2010 UTC
- For. Have to appreciate such compassion in this day and age. Though some of the word choice is a mite repetitive, it doesn't really change the overall gloriousness of the fellow. ~
 Lyrithya *shifty eyes* (words) (actions) -- 20100718 - 04:11 (UTC)
- Pious.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  06:40, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
- For. —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew (r30qjd) 08:52, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
- For. I love it. Megaman126512 00:14, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
 Elegant.  Don   Puttano cHeDDs       03:53,19July,2010- For. It's funny because he's a pedophile! – Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.49.2.154 (talk • contribs)
- Hooray for Pedophelia! That doesn't sound good at all. --—John Lydon 18:08, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 2
|
- Against. It's ok but personally find it too creepy to vote in favour.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:00, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. Mostly because I didn't laugh. But also because it got a really pretty chilly reception on the Uncyclopedia Facebook fan page, which makes me wonder if it belongs on the front page.
 pillow talk 17:50, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
Helpful Pee review by John Lydon here. Thanks John!--M'su Carencro - Talk - Contributions - Blag 05:31, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Half-for, half-against I expected to dislike it, but found myself amused by it. Not lolling, but definitely sniggering. I felt that it finished just as it was starting to build up to another level. Maybe some more stuff relating to how she has issues accessing certain networking sites on the internet, which could be stifling her creativity, or why it would be a good idea for her to be getting more sunlight, which could be done by removing the blinds in her room? Good start to a longer article, but not quite there yet. Nominally Humane! some time Saturday, 10:36, Jul 17 2010 UTC
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
Self nom and for. Self nomming? I make 
Elegant. 
09:58, July 20, 2010 (UTC)