Uncyclopedia:VFH/Booger King

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Booger King (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Booger King	Score: 0 schemes towards Burger King
Nominated by:	Sir Manforman 23:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
For: 5	Self Nom & For - Was a rewrite for UN:CW and is much better than before I rewrote it. I got it pee'd 4 times, and all of the suggests were taken into consideration and the article has improved each time it got pee'd, now it is ready for the front page --Sir Manforman 23:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC) For -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 00:12, 8 October 2007 (UTC) Id like fries with that     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   00:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)   For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 01:52, October 10, 2007 Weak For. There's nothing wrong with it as such, it's just not to my taste - but that's a reflection on me, not the article. RabbiTechno 15:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Against: 5	Weak Against Eh just really funny enough to me, didn't really enjoy reading it much. Sowwy! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 03:04, Oct 8 Against Just not funny enough. The Oblong Lobster 22:55, 8 October 2007 (UTC) Against I Pee'd it and I just don't think it's VFH worthy.   Le Cejak • <-> 23:42, 8 October 2007 (UTC) Nah. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:57, 8 October 2007 (UTC) Against -Too obvious.--Gaberou 00:35, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Comments	At the time you reviewed it, it wasn't VFH worthy, but I got it pee'd twice more, and it improved, so I thought I'd give it a go on VFH--Sir Manforman 23:53, 8 October 2007 (UTC) Still no. Sorry, m4m!   Le Cejak • <-> 00:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH