Uncyclopedia:VFH/Booger King

Article: Booger King	Score: 0 schemes towards Burger King
Nominated by:	*Sir* Manforman 23:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
For: 5	Self Nom & For - Was a rewrite for UN:CW and is much better than before I rewrote it. I got it pee'd 4 times, and all of the suggests were taken into consideration and the article has improved each time it got pee'd, now it is ready for the front page --*Sir* Manforman 23:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC) For -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 00:12, 8 October 2007 (UTC) Id like fries with that EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 00:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC) For --*Sir* Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 01:52, October 10, 2007 Weak For. There's nothing wrong with it as such, it's just not to my taste - but that's a reflection on me, not the article. RabbiTechno 15:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Against: 5	Weak Against Eh just really funny enough to me, didn't really enjoy reading it much. Sowwy! - UnIdiot \| \| Talk \| Contribs - 03:04, Oct 8 Against Just not funny enough. The Oblong Lobster 22:55, 8 October 2007 (UTC) Against I Pee'd it and I just don't think it's VFH worthy. Le Cejak • <-> 23:42, 8 October 2007 (UTC) Nah. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 23:57, 8 October 2007 (UTC) Against -Too obvious.--Gaberou 00:35, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Comments	At the time you reviewed it, it wasn't VFH worthy, but I got it pee'd twice more, and it improved, so I thought I'd give it a go on VFH--*Sir* Manforman 23:53, 8 October 2007 (UTC) Still no. Sorry, m4m! Le Cejak • <-> 00:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)