From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Ancient Aliens
|
Score: 6
|
| Nominated by:
|
RAHB 01:03, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
|
For: 10
|
 Nom and boner. A more polished piece by SirPeasewhizz. -RAHB 01:03, 4 February 2013 (UTC) For. Sir Peasewhizz de New York 01:06, 4 February 2013 (UTC)- Fw—good, but kindof beating a dead horse per Kip ~Y KUN — 02 February MMXIII 22-34-06 ¿
- For. As someone who actually watches the show occasionally, I say SP got it dead right. Revolutionary, Anti-Bensonist, and TYATU Boss
Uncyclopedian Meganew (Chat) (Care for a peek at my work?) (SUCK IT, FROGGY!) 01:05, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
- For. ALIENS Madclaw @ talk 23:19, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:23, 7 February 2013
- For. -- Lost Labyrinth
 • (t) • (c) • (a) 21:33, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
- For. Because SirPeasewhizz wouldn't stop bugging me about it 24.99.25.56 02:01, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- For. HERO!!! (talk) 14:49, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
- LOL
 Sir CuteHoOhOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 01:50, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- For. 72.230.217.138 06:28, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
|
Against: 4
|
 Against. Not for moi. --MasterWangs  CUNT and proud of it! 09:58, 6 February 2013 (UTC)- Against. I thinks so much more can be done with this... So much material in the series and this article does not do it justice. The joke keeps repeating, yet the article never goes into the depth required to make it work IMO. If this fails, I will toss a few edits myself... MrN
 11:21, Feb 11
- Against. Excellent uncyclopedia articles, much like excellent wikipedia articles, will mislead and educate with a clear narrative that doesn't depend on existing knowledge of the subject. Being left baffled by the article means future uncyclopedians will also find themselves confused.
 » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 2013.02.12.22:12
- Against - I have no problem with the content of the article, as such. I agree that it's the most polished thing by Peasewhizz that I've yet read. The flow works very well. But, unfortunately, the humor is just not clicking for me. Way too many long lists composed of cliche jokes, and an over 9000 joke is usually a good way to get a knee-jerk negative reaction. I really want to see this one succeed, but not in its current form. ~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 00:51, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
 Abstain - Needs work. I don't know if it simply falls short of the POP or this Ancient Aliens joke has simply been beaten to death. -- Thankful Kippy  Share blessings Bountiful harvest 21:11, Feb. 4, 2013- Sadly, the weird formatting really didn't do anything for me. It needs to be far more readable. It reminds me of some (albeit humorous) vandalism articles. The formatting makes some sections unreadable in my browser. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 2013.02.07.02:11
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
For. 
Against. Not for moi. --
Abstain - Needs work. I don't know if it simply falls short of the POP or this Ancient Aliens joke has simply been beaten to death. -- 
