From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: UnBooks:A new lease on life
|
Score: 5 new leases on life
|
| Nominated by:
|
Aleister in Chains
|
For: 7
|
 Norm! and Flora My entry in Dr. Skullthumper's one-hour contest, and it surprised me when I read it a day later and liked it. Only minor changes, the graphics, and typo-corrections since. I'd seen the sweater movie a few day before this, and it must have stuck in my subconscious when I started the contest without a clue of what was going to come next. Aleister 15:58 27 8- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:36, 28 August 2010
- Good enough. It could use a few more pictures though. —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew (r30qjd) 05:46, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
- For. Good enough, yes.--Funnybony
   19:07, Aug 28
- Template:Balles
 Would you like a cookie, sir? 04:07,29August,2010
- For. I thought that the "creaming in his pants" part was a bit exaggerated. But after I had seen the film's fragment, I changed my mind. You were too delicate in describing the scene ;)
 Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 22:10, September 3, 2010 (UTC) PS: People in the scene look like they were high... or retarded... or both at the same time.
- For. Unpschyelopedia 11:24, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 2
|
- Weak Against. The sweaters thing is funny, as are some other moments, but it takes too long to really get the ball rolling. Plus, it really ought to be in UnBooks or something.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  17:44, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. I was hoping that General Patton would make an erotic entrance in this story (see photo) but he didn't. I think this needed a bit extra to make it a feature. Sorry.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:56, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
 Abstain because I actually read it and now have to say something. It's a decent article and all, especially for a one-hour thing, but... it has flash stuff embedded in it. I will never vote for something that has flash stuff embedded in it, at least not if I notice. Although why does it have it at all? Is it essential to the article? I mean... it seems fine without it. *wanders off, muttering* ~  *sqlorsh* (harass) (stalk) -- 20100827 - 17:28 (UTC)
- Flash? And the Killerfroggy is right-on, UnBooks it is. Aleister 17:57 27 8
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Norm! and 
Abstain because I actually read it and now have to say something. It's a decent article and all, especially for a one-hour thing, but... it has flash stuff embedded in it. I will never vote for something that has flash stuff embedded in it, at least not if I notice. Although why does it have it at all? Is it essential to the article? I mean... it seems fine without it. *wanders off, muttering* 
