User talk:Zombiebaron/archive20

No Shit!

How do you reckon the improver was NXWave? ~ 19:38, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Well, sannse did a CheckUser to confirm my suspicion, but many of his edits seemed highly fishy, along with the fact that his first edit was less than 10 days after Nekami's ban. -- The Zombiebaron 19:40, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Good on ya Master Baron. ~ 19:41, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

But... but Improver wasn't being a dick!   Le Cejak • <Apr 27, 2008 [21:51]>

I dare say he flew his real colors with the latest NotM drama. ~ 21:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Yerr, I agree. It's easy to blend in when nothing controversial is going on, but when drama breaks out he just can't resist. Good job, Zombiebaron. Once again you've managed to solve all of our problems. =D ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 23:27 Apr 27

Hi Zombiebaron (I don't think I've said hi before so hi :) ) yeah I'm pretty sure that User:HonestUser is a sockpuppet of The Improver or NXWave. He joined and only voted for The Improver (NXWave) in NotM and left. Then I quired on Mordillo's talkpage and suddenly a few minutes later he starts running round doing stuff. Maybe we should keep watch until we are sure but I have my suspicions. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 07:49, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Oh, hello there Mr. Irreverent. While I do greatly appreciate your opinion on HonestUser (and I must say, it really does look suspicious), in the future I'd like to request that you voice such suspicions in a more private manner (PM me on IRC or email me), as, if it does turn out that HonestUser is, in fact, an honest user (Oh, the irony...), he/she would probably take very great offence at having other users accuse them of what is, de facto, one of the highest "crimes" an Uncyclopedian can commit. That being said, I do think that HonestUser's contributions are rather fishy, and I will have one of our faithful wikia staff members run an CheckUser as soon as I get a chance. -- The Zombiebaron 21:31, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

See, I wasn't going to say anything, but I did notice that his edits are mighty suspicious. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 21:39 Apr 28

Request for restoration of article

I haven't actually had an issue with an editor before, and I'm not sure that your talk page is the best place to hash such things out, however I noticed that you've deleted my article on "Nifty", which is about the website nifty.org, on the grounds that it appeared to be a vanity article. I wish you to reconsider this since 1) I'm in no way affiliated with nifty.org except as an occasional (okay, frequent) browser of that site and 2) the website contains 2.2 GB of stories, all carefully organized and catalogued, so it wasn't built by someone over the weekend who has had too many beers to drink. I know that I should have created the article on nifty.org instead of just "Nifty", so that it would be more obvious. The reason that Wikipedia doesn't have an article on nifty.org is the same reason that Wikipedia will never have an article on Encyclopedia Dramatica; it's just too controversial. However, it is mentioned in Wikipedia in its article on "erotic literature" with a one or two sentence description. I don't know if it counts for or against inclusion in Uncyclopedia but nifty.org has its own article on both Encyclopedia Dramatica and Urban Dictionary, so I think it's not obscure enough so that it doesn't merit inclusion in Uncyclopedia. Anyway, when you look beyond its pornographic nature the site is actually quite funny, and that in itself merits its inclusion in this website. --Serotonin deficient 07:20, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Nope. The only way that an article about such a subject would be "acceptable" would be if it appealed to the majority of Uncyclopedia readers. I couldn't, really, care less about what nifty.org is, does, or whatever. I don't care if ED and Urban Dictionary have entries. The best way to sum up the vanity policy at Uncyclopedia is the Codeine's Mum Rule: If Codeine's Mum hasn't heard of the subject of an article, it is vanity. However if Codeine's Mum could read said article, without knowledge of what it was about, and still find it funny, the article is alright. So, I suggest that you create your article at User:Serotonin deficient/Nifty, and make certain that even people like Codeine's Mum would find it funny, so that it can eventually be reinstated at Nifty. Oh, also, my talkpage is the perfect place for this. -- The Zombiebaron 16:03, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

This surprised me

(Block log); 01:14 . . Zombiebaron (Talk | contribs) (blocked User:AllysonTheGreat with an expiry time of 7 days: Removing ICU tag)

You know that this user created this article, and was actually "blanking it". I guess because they did not want to meet the requirements of the ICU. Anyway, no biggie, I'm sure you are aware of the situation... MrN 01:24, Apr 25

That's good. I always like it when I surprise people. They're all like "Hey, I didn't expect that Spanish Inquisition!", and I'm all like "Yeah, neither did I." Thanks for the feedback!!! -- The Zombiebaron 01:33, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi-could you restore my Ambrose Bierce page in my Namespace please?

I realize that i'm a little dryed up with this one, but I do intend to finish it (really). I would be grateful if you could do this:)--Sycamore (Talk) 08:47, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

• Done. -- The Zombiebaron 12:04, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
• Thanks Zombiebaron:)--Sycamore (Talk) 13:35, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Ueinlttd Cemmnot

Excuse me sir, but I just made an article about my tiny private high school that no one has ever heard of and you deleted it saying it was vanity. How do articles about frivolous, ambiguous topics qualify as vanity? And there's no way that thing at the top that says "ignorable policy" is a just a joke. That thing is forreal, man. sirsysrq @ 21:28 Apr 16

Is this the part where I explain to you about how you're wrong and I'm right – as evidenced by the fact that I, obviously, have some knowledge of rules that you do not have, which made and makes me an admin – only to have you, foolishly and entirely true to form, ask me where the fuck I get off being so knowledgeable about the things that I know and that you do not? Because, if so, do, do, carry on. -- The Zombiebaron 21:34, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Hold on a sec...are you saying that just because you've been here longer than me AND you're an admin, that somehow you know more about this site and how it works than I do? Well then in that case, I'm going to have to ask you to fuck yourself. Excuse me while I blank your userpage, which is obviously going to REALLY piss you off, seeing as how someone blanked my userpage recently and I still can't figure out how to get it back to the way it was. sirsysrq @ 21:44 Apr 16

Great, now I have to butt in and tell you how much of a n00b you are, how sexy Zombiebaron is, and end up with some witty comment about waffles or Furbies to avoid getting in trouble. Then I won't comment under this section again, leaving everyone confused as to why I made a drive-by comment. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 21:47 Apr 16, 2008

While I say something like, "Oh, no. Don't stop there, lad. If you only blank my userpage, it may look like police brutality when I ban you forever. No, no. You must blank more. You must blank articles – the ones that have the little ninjastars in the corner are worth double the points. That, truly, is the only way you will both be able to prove that you (and your tiny school) matter, whilst taking revenge upon this whole cruel community of sarcastic sadists," then mutter about how that "drive-by comment" caused an edit conflict. -- The Zombiebaron 21:54, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

That's it, now I'm actually going to do it. Expect a wave of user accounts from all my friends named Zombiebaron horny bitch tits fuck SkullHUMPER because he likes doing dogs in the FUCKHOLE to show up, moving your userpages around and such. Now I shall disappear, probably due to my being banned, and never act on these threats or post here again. Instead, I will find myself a new home where I will be loved and accepted. And they all lived happily ever after. Except me, I was stuck in the land of lulz screaming "UNCYC IS PHOR GAY FAGS!! THE MOAR YOU KNOW!!" sirsysrq @ 21:58 Apr 16

And I, for my part, will have a BLT. Possibly a BBLT. That other "B" is for "bread". I find it sometimes adds a certain quality to my BLTs. -- The Zombiebaron 22:02, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Untitled Comment

I'm sorry, why did you just huff the QHSSYC article? I just remembered this years seniors made the article about 2 years back or something, and checked up on it for the first time in maybe half a year, edited out some stupid asian gangsta note, next thing I see is the article gone (awfully weird timing) It doesn't really fall under vanity, and even if you can vaguely interpret it as that it's an ignorable policy. Our school has an article on wikipedia, so we made an uncyclopedia article, I don't see why it doesn't seem to be a valid article to you. Could you please think this through a little more? Thanks. If yo uneed a word from me my AIM screenname is shadic981...otherwise I don't know...I'll check back on your page? – Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.193.251.144 (talk • contribs)

No. Seriously. The vanity policy is "ignorable" in that sense of the word "ignorable". I mean, you could ignore it. But if you do, your acticles will be deleted. And, that page was vanity. As for the timing, that's mostly thanks that edit today. We hardly have the time (or willfulness) to scoure through every page, but when things pop up on Recent Changes, they make easier pickings. Oh, once again, that article was vanity. No "if"s or "but"s. For serious. -- The Zombiebaron 03:06, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

How? It's a small school with about 400 people (specialized highschool in new york city) but it gave us a good laugh reading it. It's provided a laugh for at least 100 people and it's on wikipedia as well. What's wrong with it? – Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.193.251.144 (talk • contribs)

Well. Its a small school. That's the problem with it. I've never heard of it, and I'm sure well over 5 billion people have never heard of it. And none of those 5 billion people would have found the article funny. At all. Which makes the article vanity. Nobody cares about your tiny school. The article violated vanity policy. Wikipedia is not not Uncyclopedia. Case closed. -- The Zombiebaron 21:05, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

why did u huff joppy furr, you are stupid

• I have no idea what you are talking about. Also, I banned you. Just in case you havn't noticed yet. -- The Zombiebaron 01:40, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

WTF, why did you huff Degobah Green? I wanted that as an article....

yo, do you know anything about this? USMC MOFO 16:49, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

And do you, kind dingbat, know the several headed eagle who lives under Neptune? -- The Zombiebaron 17:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Did you know that the "Upload multiple files"...

...doesn't seem to warn you when you're about to overwrite an existing file? I didn't. Now, I do. In the very least, I'll pay more attention next time. Or, less. One of those. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:15, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Sounds like a plan. I know a guy who'll sell you the grappling hooks, if you'd like his adress. -- The Zombiebaron 13:30, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

I'll buy your children. I need the blood for the Passover. ~ 13:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

That's strange. On this side of the Pacific, we normally just use goat's blood. -- The Zombiebaron

...Atlantic? On this side of the Pacific, we use pot. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 23:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

...for putting the PotM award on my page. Funny thing is, I had no idea was even nominated! Cool! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:06, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Yessir. If you check the PotM vote archive (there's a link on the voting page...), you'll also see that I nominated you. So, your welcome. :) -- The Zombiebaron 00:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Untitled Message (Whoops, nevermind)

I don't feel like creating a new header for this because it's kind of unimportant. I notice that you huffed one Americanflag.JPG some months ago. It should probably be brought back if possible because it's used in the featured version of Me. Please find more constructive outlets for your fervent hatred of America. --Syndrome 03:36, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

You say that as though people look at featured versions of articles. It was unused (I assume) on any current articles, and was huffed. Simple as that. Plus, what's the point of constructively showing my hate for something, when I can show it destructively? Exactly. -- The Zombiebaron 17:03, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Now, you know that you don't hate America, you just hate that it eclipses your home country of Albania.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 17:05, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

VIVA LA ALBANALUTION! -- The Zombiebaron 17:08, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

If I'm reading an article that's been featured, I usually read the featured version that was picked at the perfect ripeness by some underpaid migrant farmer in South America and delivered to us so that we colonialist pig-dogs can reap the rewards of our oppressive system at a very low cost, rather than the current version that's been all monged up with lists and one-liners and about a dozen Oscar Wilde quotes. Seriously, I don't know who that Oscar Wilde guy thinks he is, but he sure needs to shut up. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 02:24, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh. I see. Well, in that case, it looks like I stand corrected. -- The Zombiebaron 20:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Bullshit.

So now you're extending your leave? I guess your un-Uncyc life keeps you pretty busy. WHY, ZOMBIEBARON? WHY ARE YOU AVOIDING ME? WHY WON'T YOU LOOK ME IN THE EYE WHEN WE MAKE LOVE? ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 18:41 Mar 19

Psh. I'll still be around. I just won't be around as often. Like, for example, right now. -- The Zombiebaron 20:03, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh. Oh. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 20:13 Mar 19

Meh

Psh. -- The Zombiebaron 02:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

What the fuck, man?

Who's gonna do that thing for me on Tuesday nights now? Surely you don't expect Mhaille...Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Well...ummm...have you asked STM? He seems rather open to that kind of thing. -- The Zombiebaron 00:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

No comment.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:18, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Which is, indeed, a comment. Very good. -- The Zombiebaron 02:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

And who am I going to turn to when I need some hard decisions to be taken?!?! You don't expect Ljlego do you?! ~ 08:04, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

I resent that. I'm more of a douchebag than you know!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:57, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Its true. He IS a douchebag. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

THANK you! Oh, wait....Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:08, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Another header about your time off

You don't mind if I do some more VFDeleting while you're out, do you? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:53, Mar 11

Capet bomb the fuckers. Oh, and feel free to do whatever you like with VFD. -- The Zombiebaron 00:03, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Will do, Mr. Zombles! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:05, Mar 12

Victor Foxtrot Delta, Major. -- The Zombiebaron 00:56, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Time Off???

You can't take time off! You're Zombiebaron! What the hell are you playing at man! No seriously... Enjoy whatever you are doing... MrN 22:40, Mar 11

Sure 'Nuff 'n Yes I Do. -- The Zombiebaron

When adding noms to VFD

Just under the template which people copy when adding something to VFD you left the message:

DON'T MESS WITH THE ABOVE TEMPLATE. SERIOUSLY. -- Zombiebaron

Just wondered what that was all about? Personally, I would find it easier if there was a Delete vote already there. I actually changed it to say that myself a while ago, and have been wondering why you put it back? MrN 00:00, Mar 10

Your loyal Poopsmith also just thought of a few other things...

Maybe:

“ If VFD is full, and you want to report something as potential rubbish for us to vote on in the future, please proceed to the Poopsmith's Lounge. Just remember not to sit on the chairs. ”

Should read:

“ If VFD is full, or if you are a user of less that 4 days and want to report something as potential rubbish for us to vote on in the future, please proceed to the Poopsmith's Lounge. Just remember not to sit on the chairs ”

And:

“ Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, remember to check the article's talk page for prior nominations. ”

Should read:

“ Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page. ”

Just some ideas... MrN 01:13, Mar 10

I added your suggestions. As for the VFD-table, I, personally, do not find having a pre-made vote helpful, as I very rarely use "*'''Delete''' ~~~~" as my nomination text, and I'm sure many other users feel the same way. Its not that much of an inconvieniance, is it? -- The Zombiebaron 02:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

If it was

Keep
Delete	Delete
Comments

That would be slightly faster. No it's not that much of an inconvenience really, just a bit... I guess you prefer the current way as it probably encourages people to give a better nomination reason, so it's cool if it stays as is... Really I'm interested in your thinking mostly because I'm wondering if we could get a 'button' (somehow, I don't know how) which could be used to let people vote without having to actually edit the page. The voters could push the button, and a dialog box would pop up in which they could add their comment. Maybe this could also be done in a similar way with nominations... Could be handy in terms of cutting down on edit conflicts also, and probably reduce the chances of people messing up the page by mistake. I guess if the 'button' thing is possible it could be used all over the site... MrN 02:24, Mar 10

Yeah, its worth a shot. You may want to consult the java-scripting-kids about such an idea. My only concern is that VFD stay on my watchlist. VFH and VFP's downfall on my watchlist has led to me (and many other users) visiting those pages far less frequently. -- The Zombiebaron 02:32, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Ban warning

Dude, I don't check my Uncyclopedia discussion every single day. I have a life. Today, for example, I was recovering from a hangover, studied for midterms, and then worked for 4 hours. I would have been more than happy to remove the template had I actually gone on Uncyclopedia to see MrN9000's request. SteveSims 09:04, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I don't think you understand. The ban warning and my removal have nothing to do with you "recovering from a hangover". Had you, by some twist of fate, removed the tag by yourself, I would still have jumped in to point out that what you did was wrong. However, if you would like to be a Poopsmith (for real), you need only prove that you are active on VFD, and then ask me. -- The Zombiebaron 14:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Whatdoyathink?

Of User:MrN9000/G2?. I have been thinking about this one for a while and reckon it might be handy... It would be used on VFD to indicate noms which had been left in UN:Poop. If you think it would be a good idea to put this one in the mainspace, any input would obviously be appreciated as my template making skills are not the greatest, and I have never actually put a template into the main space. Thanks. MrN 14:01, Mar 8

I fancied it up a bit. I think it needs a better image, so I'll try to get you one (I'm thinking of just that poopsmith guy's head), and then you can Main Space it. -- The Zombiebaron 17:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Feel free the mainspace it whenever you like. You've got my thumbs up. -- The Zombiebaron 18:08, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Cool. Thanks for your edits. It looks a lot better now... The image is now a bit bigger than I thought we could get away with, but ya obviously think it's OK so that's cool... Maybe I should start filling VFD up to the max again for a while so I get a chance to use it. ;) Only joking... Oh, do I need to add a link to this template anywhere else so that people can find it, or just leave it as is? I will probably say something in the Poopsmiths lounge, but I was wondering about adding it to here also maybe? I noticed that {{VFDc}} was not there also... MrN 18:58, Mar 8

Psh. Just use it. People will catch on. -- The Zombiebaron 21:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Cool, also thanks for your last edit to it. Carting all this poop around is obviously making me loose my mind... MrN 21:34, Mar 8

Belated Thanks!

After months of poop handling and getting a wee bit tired Your UotM vote acted as Red Bull. Nasty, bad smelling and revitalizing. I now regained the strength to handle some more poop. Thank you! No, seriously, thank you

Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S

I don't get it. -- The Zombiebaron 21:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

I'll buy you a beer and we can discuss it. ~ 23:40, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Sure. But you have to cross the sea. -- The Zombiebaron 23:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Mayonnaise

So what was wrong with it? (And are you following me?!) Bassgoonist 22:41, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

The previous author (the guy who "rewrote" it to a version similar to the version before my revert) had obviously never read HTBFANJS. The current version is far superior. -- The Zombiebaron 00:02, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

That Jimmy Thingy

I changed the feature queue so the pictures linked to the article. I don't care if you mind.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:37, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

That doesn't change the fact that it looks wonderful on the Main Page. I can't wait to nominate The Best Illustrated Article Ever! -- The Zombiebaron 00:04, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

The Chav page

Hey i think that the old version of the chav page was much funnier (request permission to revert) -user:lumpolard

I'm not sure to which version you are reffering. However, go ahead and revert it, and you'll know if other people agree based on the responce. -- The Zombiebaron 21:37, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Aaaadition to AAAAAAAAA!

I have what I think is a good idea for something to add to it...Talk:AAAAAAAAA!#Aaaaaa.3F but it's protected...Bassgoonist 15:54, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but the page is already a bit painful on the eyes, what with all the images. So, I'm going to have to say no. However, please don't let this discourage you from making other images for other articles! We've got a long list. -- The Zombiebaron 21:35, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Just so we're clear, I didn't make an image, I made a version of the {{wikipedia}} tag(which I just put here) for the page(the talk link doesn't put mine at the top of the page view since it was at the bottom of the talk page). Bassgoonist 21:56, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh. My mistake. I've now added that box :) -- The Zombiebaron 22:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Wups

Can you huff this? I wasn't paying enough attention, or any attention, for that matter. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:45, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Sure. -- The Zombiebaron 16:31, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Hurrah! I love watching a master at work. You're okay, too. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 17:50, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Untitled Complaint

User:Lumpolard - Hola i am rather new here and have just created a GROUNDBREAKING article on meals, just wondering if you mights give me suggestions for it (via an edit including suggestions) also i was wondering why the WATO article was deleted as i would like to re-write it in a way that is more acceptable than what was done before (by my friend Harisson)

This is what I think of your article. And WATO was deleted because it was both slanderous to an entire race, and, at the same time, not funny. -- The Zombiebaron 01:30, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Untitled Complaint

User:Brown_Windsor - Why was my Estelle Getty article huffed?? I can remove this pic if it ws the issue -> http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Image:Sophia4.jpg

The article was delete, almost a month ago, because it was not well thought out and well written. I can recreate it in your userspace, if you'd like, though. -- The Zombiebaron 14:37, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Brown_Windsor - Yeah thank you, do that , at least so I can keep a copy for myself. Thanks :)

Here you go. -- The Zombiebaron 16:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Rick Steves

What's wrong with it, exactly?

The fact that it is short and unfunny. Please read HTBFANJS for tips, and look at Uncyclopedia:Best of for examples of good formatting. -- The Zombiebaron 02:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Thong'd!

Olipro presents you with this Brutal-looking manthong (which he is no longer wearing) Thanks for voting for UnNews:Olipro is wearing a thong, offers $10,000 to anyone who can guess what color it is over at that crazy VFH thing.

~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 04:04 Mar 2

• Yuck. I hate those templates. Can't you just type something like "Hey, Zb, you are super cool and hawt" or something? Its probably much easier to do. -- The Zombiebaron 04:09, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Hey, Zb, you are super cool and hawt. Super cool! And hawt! ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 04:17 Mar 2

• Very good. Now dance, monkey. -- The Zombiebaron 04:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

• /me dances to the tune of "Sexy and Cool -Club 140 Mix-" ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 04:41 Mar 2

Thanks be to you!

Thankings from Led Thanks muchly for the vote for me on VFS. Now to abuse my powers... 03:38, 1 March 2008 TheLedBalloon (Talk | contribs) blocked <insert name here> (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of infinite ‎(Muahahahaha!))

Thanks again for the vote, and also for being a cool, sexy, and helpful admin, - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 05:14, Mar 1

What? No burnt offerings? Get out of my temple! Oh, and you're welcome. -- The Zombiebaron 14:24, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Loads of Thanks

Zombie to the baron. You've been something of a rock to me ever since our very first (appropriately whoring-related) meeting in IRC. I even remember you explaining to me about STM and his insurmountable record of features. No joke. Cool stuff, this "memory". Er, anyway, thanks for both of your VFS votes, as well as your continued support throughout the several times that I have been nominated and failed to make the grade.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 04:13, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Psh. You say "appropriatley" as though either of us ever whore articles and/or images. But yes, you for sures deserve this, and I look forward to you doing all the manual labour type stuff for the next few months, before you realize that there are other new admins who can do it for you, and you become lazy and bitter, talking in long sentences, full of commas, about how you became bitter and lazy. Or something. Anyway, congratulations. -- The Zombiebaron 14:28, 1 March 2008 (UTC)