From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: UnNews:Man wakes up
|
Score: 17 excited dogs.
|
| Nominated by:
|
Ryuinfinity 17:01, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 19.5
|
- For. I nom'd. So I obviously vote for! Ryuinfinity 17:02, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 For some reason I seem to like this article. I can't help it. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC)- For. Gained some attention because UnNews has been outrageously slow lately;good article.Saberwolf116 18:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- For. 87.198.229.90 11:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. Amy Rose 23:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. PiRK 01:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. Puppy love.
 Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. 'sgood. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:41, Feb 2
- For. haha it's so damn true, and doesn't have any profanity. awesome. Djdorama 22:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- I like the word "bug". Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 06:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- I would like to see it worked on a little more, but hell, it is funny as is. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 06:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
this article is superb!!! my golly, I just couldn't contain myself. Nothing this exciting has ever happened before.!! it's such idiotic but also funny. 115.147.97.85 13:19, 3 February 2009 (UTC)- for. bad on the first read through, hilarious on the second. also, great caption. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- For hahaa, hilarious! and reported by a puppy! nope, nothing this exciting has ever happened before, OH MY GOD!!! Iateyourgranny 20:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. Dynex811 21:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- For looking past the steam of consciousness, I can see some satire here. --S'r Mnbvcxz 05:58, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Ruff! --Nachlader 10:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. Heh. --UU - natter
 10:39, Feb 11
- For. nice... Dwendeng itim 12:00, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- i love this article. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Bitchass441 (talk • contribs)
- 4 - T.L.B.
 WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 17:37, Feb 15
|
Against: 2.5
|
#Against good unnews, but its not feature worthy, too stream of consciousness-y. --Mnbvcxz 23:36, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
#:What's wrong with stream of consciousness? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:37, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- Against I disagree with Mnbvcxz's reason as I think the stream of consciousness is great, but it was a one trick article. with a bit of re-writing (to sound more like a column, say) I think it could be excellent. Come talk to me for further feedbac if you want. ~Orian57~
 ~Talk~  23:30 1 February 2009
ur so lunatic p-ple, such bloody, blithering, fucking ,scandalous, idiotic morning!!!!!!!! 115.147.97.85 13:23, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Time for bedtime 115.147.97.85 :) Mommy will tuck you in and tell you a story.Saberwolf116 13:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- Against.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  23:15, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 Against. –72.193.236.89 21:37, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
I love this article, so I decided to nom it.Ryuinfinity 17:01, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- Comment. Does anyone realize 115 147 97 85 has voted once for and once against? Which vote should I remove? Ryuinfinity 11:00, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
For some reason I seem to like this article. I can't help it. -
Against. –
08:28, 17 February 2009 (UTC)