Uncyclopedia:VFH/Qin Shi Huang

Article: Qin Shi Huang	Score: 1 Terracotta blowdolls
Nominated by:	Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 21:52, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
For: 5	SN+For - Last nom for a while. My fingers hurt. ;D--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 21:52, 6 January 2013 (UTC) For. --EMC^[TALK]22:58 Jan 6 2013 For. You surprised me, I thought this was a spork and then going through your edits, it isn't. Nice work. Once again, you could polish it for another week or two and see what happens, but there's a lot of thought into it already and it seems feature worthy. One of these times you're going to try longer polishes and be glad with the result. Aleister 00:34 7-1-'13 That's the thing. I didn't polish more because I ran out of will because of the future move. Thanks for the compliment!--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 01:23, 7 January 2013 (UTC) For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:26, 7 January 2013 For. --Murder Frog (Argue loudly) Ride the snake...to the lake... 07:00, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Against: 4	Last nom for a while? Please. I know SPIKE isn't around on this site to beat you like you want it, but come on, there's no glory in pebble-dashing a new site in noms. Leverage (talk) 19:36, 7 January 2013 (UTC) What are you talking about? That's you're reason for an against vote? Because I nominated something and SPIKE isn't here? I'm sure I don't understand what you mean, no offense.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 20:25, 7 January 2013 (UTC) No offence taken or meant on my part either. My point is, you were banned several times on the Wikia site for constant nomming, and currently on this site you have nominated four of your own articles in the last nine days. It seems a bit much. Secondly, I noticed you didn't nominate them all on the Wikia version which suggested to me - perhaps wrongly - that you were taking advantage of the fact that SPIKE wasn't here to kick your balls every time you nommed, or that you were hoping that you could storm the new site and get featured a lot (and I think a few users are guilty of this). Just my impression. --Leverage (talk) 22:07, 7 January 2013 (UTC) I see what you mean. And no. Currently 2 articles of my own I have nommed on this site. Being I want a cookie and this one. ONLY ONES so far. The other two are from the old site before the move. And no, I am not taking advantage of SPIKE not being here. I nommed them to get VFH up because it was dead here. I was BANNED ONCE as a WARNING from TKF back two months ago and was not a result of constant nomming but rather the bad quality in most of my nominations throughout Sep-Nov. Where upon crap isn't really the majority of my nominations. In fact, I haven't been nomming that much at all if you think of it. Just recently a few more.ڰโ٣ Ṗ€Áʃeɰɧĩʐʑ ďé Ňөщ Y০гk Ťá\|k & ЯерlЧ Ѕтаlк 22:28, 7 January 2013 (UTC) Break it up y'all. Leverage: assume good faith and vote on the article on its merits. Anyway, since this is a voting space, let's use it to vote. If y'all wanna keep bickering then take it to each other's talk pages, though I recommend you just kiss and make up because that's way hotter. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 20:03, 8 January 2013 (UTC) Indeed.--ຮ¡г ♣ Ṕ€₳₰€₩ʰ↑zz (৳alk) ($৳alk) 03:06, 9 January 2013 (UTC) Spike DOES enjoy kicking balls, doesn't he... XD ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jan 8 '13 21:14 (UTC) Against Massively undercooked. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:10, 8 January 2013 (UTC) Massively overcooked, actually.--ڰโ٣ Ṗ€Áʃeɰɧĩʐʑ ďé Ňөщ Y০гk Ťá\|k & ЯерlЧ Ѕтаlк 00:33, 9 January 2013 (UTC) Against. --Equilateralperil 10:24, 12 January 2013 (UTC)