| Article: Jack Bauer Facts
|
Score: -3 Mythbusters
|
| Nominated by:
|
Funnybony    20:07, Aug 27
|
For: 2
|
- For. Funnybony 20:08, Aug 27
 For. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:55, August 27, 2012 (UTC)
|
Against: 5
|
 Nope This is exactly what I expected it to be. A few short paragraphs and one giant list I stopped reading after the third entry. -OptyC Sucks!  CUN22:30, 27 Aug
- In Funnybony's defense, the paragraphs are of reasonable length, imho. The article could've used more of them, though. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:40, 28 August 2012
- Against. Listing badly in my view to make this a feature.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:52, August 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Living in the past much? This is shit. --Lee Harvey Osmond (talk) 23:13, August 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Eleven year old jokes. Parse those semantics however you will.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  00:21, August 28, 2012 (UTC)
- To be honest with you, I've never found Jack Bauer or Chuck Norris that impressive. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:38, 28 August 2012
|
| Comments
|
Article about a distinct genre of humor, however absurd.--Funnybony 20:07, Aug 27
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
20:07, Aug 27
For. --
