From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: HowTo:Exploit 9/11
|
Score: 1.5 people who have not forgotten
|
| Nominated by:
|
MrN  19:17, Oct 22
|
For: 5.5
|
- Nom+for Written by some unknown individual. Got more than enough giggles out of me. MrN 19:17, Oct 22
- For Listen, people. I read in some encyclopedia that anyone can edit that one of the ideals of satire is to bring about change in the thing being satirized. If you love America (but despise hideous opportunism), you will vote for this article to be highlighted twice. This is what satire is, and this is what satire is for. That's all, thank you (and I'll just leave the soap box right here, I'm sure someone else will want to use it). --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 22:38, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
- For Not perfect, but quite good enough. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 23:29, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
- Oh yes! Please. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:34, 22 October 2009
- For.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  10:01, October 25, 2009 (UTC)
- For. Amazing. 70.179.49.110 18:39, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 4
|
- Against. Now don't get me wrong. This is not because I was offended. Put the noose away. I thought that while parts of it were funny (dust bunnies, for example), the rest of the article is mired in near-incoherence, dullness, and awful formatting. This has a lot of work left. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 03:39, Oct 23 2009
- Against. Besides the self reference to a certain website...is this really any good for a VFH ? I am also not a fan of the idiot narrator approach either .
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 11:33, October 25, 2009 (UTC)
- Against. While I like the idea, and some of the stuff, I ended up being more confused than amused. There's a brilliant article to be got from this, but at the moment it's a way off where it should be, for me. --UU - natter
 11:56, Oct 28
- against. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:37, October 28, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- Comment. Holy crap! Thank you Mr. N, however I would like some feedback on this first. It really is "nearly incoherent" Le Cejak • <1:42 Oct 27, 2009> 01:42, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
- Comment. Here's some feedback. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA. It's meant to be like that cos it's silly. The author does stuff like that sometimes. MrN 22:14, Oct 27
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
19:17, Oct 22
