Uncyclopedia:VFH/Hipster (again)

Article: Hipster	Score: 0
Nominated by:	—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:13, 26 October 2011
For: 5	Something something. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:13, 26 October 2011 Also self for. Making things long is for chumps. If it makes you feel better, imagine this is an UnTweets, which I think is a thing we have. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 09:05, October 26, 2011 (UTC) For. Most definitely. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:20, October 26, 2011 (UTC) For. I was unsure until the line "It was like my when my brother got hit by a truck, except this time it was unironically sad." QuackOfaThousandSuns 22:55, October 26, 2011 (UTC) Despite what the naysayers naysay, I liked it. Just like Hail to the Thief (Radiohead's actual best album). You just don't understand it. --Black Flamingo 13:59, October 29, 2011 (UTC)
Against: 5	Against. Alright, the 12 year old bitchy whining in gone. But its basically incomplete and looks kind of like a work in progress. So yeah, needs to be lengthened, funnier and added pictured, etc before it gets my vote. KittyKitty (t) (c) 08:33, October 26, 2011 (UTC) Against. Partly per Frosty. Sorry. Mattsnow 20:49, October 26, 2011 (UTC) Against. As an actual Hipster in real life... I find this less amusing than it could be. Sycamore (Talk) 11:32, October 27, 2011 (UTC) Putting sparse amount of work into an article that was barely spared from the VFD makes it worthy of being featured nowadays? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 21:16, October 28, 2011 (UTC) Weak damn I felt like going for a weak for, but now martial law has kicked in all the nominations have halted. Should give more time to add a slight bit more substance, because it is teatering on the edge.--Nikau 01:20, October 30, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	" the 12 year old bitchy whining in gone" - what? -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 09:05, October 26, 2011 (UTC) He probably meant "is gone" and he was probably referring to the pre-rewritten version being gone. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:15, 26 October 2011 Aaaaah. I see now! Also, just 'cuz, I added another section and image and reorganized all the organization. Plus, before I did all this, it was totally actually longer than Vasco da Gama, which you totally voted For for, Forsty. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 09:17, October 26, 2011 (UTC) It had slightly less bytes, though. Then again, Frosty is one of our more against-vote prone users. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:28, 26 October 2011 I see it as potentially feature worthy, but I just don't see it as there yet. Is that crime now? -- KittyKitty (t) (c) 09:31, October 26, 2011 (UTC) Surely not. But your original "needs to be lengthened, funnier and added pictured, etc" comment seems to indicate it needing a lot of work before it might get your vote. With it needing to be lengthened, are you referring to the overall length of the article or the amount of content contained in individual sections? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:57, 26 October 2011 As much as I would like to ruin the article and explain the joke right now, I think I won't, because I never really expected this to hop onto the queue anyway. But, just to reassure y'all, everything is intentional. As long as I may live, "not long enough" will never be a valid reason without something more contextual backing it up. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 20:52, October 26, 2011 (UTC) Comment. Pretty cool. But that Oscar Wilde quote is so fucking dumb it makes me want to kick someones face in. Anyway, I agree with Frosty that it could be more complete, but I only vote against total shit. Nikau 11:51, October 26, 2011 (UTC) That quote was drawn from real life, FYI. Let it sink in. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 20:49, October 26, 2011 (UTC)