Uncyclopedia:VFH/Hillyard & Brickman Corporation (2nd)

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Hillyard & Brickman Corporation (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Hillyard & Brickman Corporation	Score: 13 satisfied members of the H&B global community
Nominated by:	THINKER 06:05, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
For: 14	Nom+Dig A So So original which I Thinkerized™ this afternoon. Careful how you vote; H&B is watching. --THINKER 06:05, 23 March 2008 (UTC) For -RAHB 07:26, 23 March 2008 (UTC) Holla. --So So 07:39, 23 March 2008 (UTC) What's that trendy thing Thinker says...Dug? Doog? --THE 15:50, 23 March 2008 (UTC) For, again. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:02, 23 March 2008 (UTC) Wow that's pretty damn funny!   Le Cejak • <-> Mar 23 (19:28) For. There are some bits where I feel the language gets a little too informal, but it's still a brilliant article. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  20:29, 23 March 2008 (UTC) For, because I can't imagine an outcome of a THINKER-So So collab that is anything less than great. This delivers, for sure. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:51, Mar 23 Heck yes per TLB. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:40, 23 March 2008 (UTC) For. MrN 03:55, Mar 24 For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 06:52, Mar. 26, 2008 For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:23, 27 March 2008 (UTC) FOUR Love it! --OptyC Sucks! CUN 19:00, 28 March 2008 (UTC) Innovates for great synergy paradigm! --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 21:25, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Against: 1	I think no But title is hilarity!--Randy Bentwick 16:39, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Sock? --THINKER 17:10, 24 March 2008 (UTC) I suspect so. Check out User_talk:Randy_Bentwick#Your_voting_on_VFH.2C_Do_you_ever_vote_For_or_do_you_only_vote_Against.3F This guy virtually only votes against...MrN 17:17, Mar 24

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.