| Article: Ancient Uncyclopedia
|
Score: 3
|
| Nominated by:
|
Funnybony    08:49, Jul 5
|
For: 6
|
- For. Funnybony 08:49, Jul 5
 For. User:Matthlock/sig2 19:59, July 5, 2012 (UTC)- For. --
 Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:17, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:40, 5 July 2012
- Yepsure
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  01:39, July 6, 2012 (UTC)
- I've liked this one. It's intelligent, thought out, and gave me a quick orgasm. Nice. Aleister 17:41 July 9 '12
|
Against: 3
|
- Against. Funny to Uncyclopedians. Excellent page to have around. Well-written. However, on the front page I think it would prove too intimidating to new users who want to "fit in" and stuff, while also encouraging them to write things that are in-jokey instead of things that aren't. -RAHB 03:43, July 7, 2012 (UTC)
- Against. Sorry FB, I have to go against for this to be a feature. Good navelism but not for the front page.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:53, July 7, 2012 (UTC)
 Boner. Not for me ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!)  08:26, July 11, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- Comment. Dudes, no need to apologize if you think an article not right for the front page. I appreciate the compliments and I'm happy that the article is at least good for Uncyclopedia. BTW: this article does glorify our glorious admins, and no need to be shy about it. Cheers! Funnybony 14:28, Jul 7
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
08:49, Jul 5
For. 
