Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive5

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Fat_asses

DELETE Should probably be a quick delete, but I'm mot sure how to nominate it for quickie. --Blat 09:37, 7 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Add it to the list at QuickVFD, deleted this one however.--Elvis 12:47, 7 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Face

Delete Clearly just random letters, not not slightly funny. --Bittervirus

Yeah, that's not even worth a vote. Blatantly worthless stuff like this could go to Uncyclopedia:QuickVFD. --Rcmurphy 21:09, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Pablo Noel

Baleeted --Rcmurphy 00:16, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete Its just garbage, "lets list some dated celebrities and some nonsequential idiocy and throw it under an unrelated title."--The Werle 19:49, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Delete This is more like quick VFD material--Nytrospawn 01:19, 6 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Delete--Spintherism 03:57, 6 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Delete --DWIII 00:08, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Neimi

Delete --Nytrospawn 03:32, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Also delete DarkTwilkitri--Nytrospawn 03:42, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Towards the DarkTwilkitri one, if any one else doesn't find it funny, I'm not going to take it personally. I vote for it not to be deleted though, because I did spend a bit of time on it... not much, but enough for me not to want it gone --WillforIV 09:33, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Neimi, Fire Emblem, and DarkTwilkitri all seem to be part of an ongoing inside joke/flamewar between a number of people. Check the history of Neimi, and if you're as anal as me, do some google searches on the various names + "fire emblem". You'll find quite a number associated with various web and forum admins and other community individuals. I'm voting for deletion without mercy, and bannage of anyone who recreates. That includes you WillforIV. This isn't a private flamewar forum, nor a repository for personal attacks or vanity pages. This crap is pointless and makes us look bad. --Famine 14:04, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Yeah, I noticed that as well. This isnt a forum, and unfortunately most of our articles do have a point. Vanity flame pages dont. --Nytrospawn 20:47, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)

You may also want to look at getting rid of FEP, FEFF, and FESS. --Twilkitri 04:04, 7 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, somehow those articles got passed the deletion hammer. Im not in a good mood, so I might delete the whole lot. Unless someone stops/bans me. Ill give by the end of the weekend for anyone to argue not to delete those pages--Nytrospawn 20:11, 7 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I have beaten you on mood, as this sort of crap seriously pisses me off. I put my deletion hat on and went deleting, and I have my ban pants on the floor next to me, in case anyone recreates them. All part of my BOFH outfit. --Famine 23:46, 7 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Jojo

Deleted

  • Delete Vanity/attack page on individual non-notable Wikipedian. --Carlb 12:01, 1 Jul 2005 (UTC)
And what part of the Deletion Policy does this criticism fall under? --SumYunGai 14:17, 1 Jul 2005 (UTC)
The part about sucking (1, 2, and 3, to be precise.) --Spintherism 23:35, 1 Jul 2005 (UTC)
If that's the case, then I contend the same criticism applies to most articles on Uncyclopedia (though I have the humility to admit that there will always be someone else who finds an article I find unfunny to be funny, so perhaps Deletion Policy point 3 isn't a reasonable guideline after all). Why then haven't all articles been marked for deletion at some point? From what I've observed there's a small group of contributors who are responsible for a disproportionately large share of Uncyclopedia content, and some people from this group are also the most active in nixing contributions originating from outside this group, while less actively nixing contributions from within the group. So it seems that this group believes they are the only witty contributors to Uncyclopedia (this is quite understandable), or perhaps there's some overt self-aggrandizement happening here. Whatever may be the case, lighten up everyone. If you're too discriminating this wiki will lose its more-chaotic-than-Wikipedia charm. --SumYunGai 08:00, 2 Jul 2005 (UTC)
The problem with the "my friend is a fag" articles in general is that most often they're only funny to you or to a small group around you. If no one else has heard of the person, or there's nothing particularly original to be said about them, why bother? --Carlb 10:34, 2 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Whilst your points are valid about trying to avoid turning uncyclopedia to cliquey, I also thought I should go through the reasons I voted for delete on this article
  1. whilst generalised "attacks" upon groups (who are big enough and ugly enough to stand up for themselves), i.e. British vs. American, Romania, vs. the world (it seems) are allowed, attacks on non-notable individuals are frowned upon (common sense).
  2. VFD and it's archives also exist as a sort of lose set of precedents and the last attack page that we voted on Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive5#Carlb was voted for delete (although in this case it was technically redirected).
  3. Finaly vanity pages are often only funny to small groups of users.--Elvis 10:39, 2 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Nytrospawn 13:20, 1 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete--Elvis 16:50, 1 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete--Madmerse 16:11, 2 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Free the Wzucuchian Six! campaign

Deleted

Delete --Nytrospawn 21:25, 30 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Famine 23:58, 30 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete I was unable to read the entire thing, so I'll assume that the second half is as bad as the first. --Spintherism 00:00, 1 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete I tried adding some formatting in to make it readable, don't worry spin you didn't miss anything. --Elvis 10:28, 1 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Double_Fisting

Glazed. --Chronarion 18:17, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Steve Johnsenson 01:34, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

^what he said it might be accurate, but it's not funny --The Hedgehog 01:43, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Those Faggot Goth Kids

Swimming with the Fishes - Not total crap, and I'm somewhat sad to see it go, but goth-bashing could and should be done with much more style. --Famine 00:01, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Modify Eh. I suppose it's not TOTAL crap, but not funny enough. It smells like SomethingAwful humor, which for the most part, sucks. --Chronarion 18:19, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete Several paragraphs of "They're gay and they look stupid!" crap. --EvilZak 05:49, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete Such an eminently mock-worthy subject. Pity the author forgot to make it funny. --Rcmurphy 06:52, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete If they really were gay, they would be wearing pink --Nytrospawn 23:20, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Possible rewrite? The pictures are funny. Somone needs to use those pictures if when the article is deleted. (revise that) Go ahead and delete. I just read the article again and I agree that it is pretty much crap. I still like the two photographs though. The images need to be recycled. --Steve Johnsenson 02:01, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I've added the images to Goths. --EvilZak 02:32, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I just noticed that. Cool. FGK can go as far as I'm concerned.--Steve Johnsenson 03:09, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

From QuickVFD

====Marin Cornea====

Delete --EvilZak 20:00, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Spintherism 20:48, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Redirected to What I Didn't Know about Romania. --Repairman Jack 09:35, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

====Adi Mutu====

Delete --EvilZak 20:00, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Spintherism 20:48, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Redirected to What I Didn't Know about Romania. --Repairman Jack 09:37, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

====Edit warrior====

Rewrite Got some potential Im think (but then I was responsible for Cruft Committee so what do I know :-) --Elvis 14:07, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Redirected to What I Didn't Know about Romania. --Repairman Jack 09:37, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Manele

Ok, Im getting pissed off. The Romanians, and some other nationality are fighting on Uncyclopedia. If I see someone continue this fight, I will give extra lengthy bans. I am fed up with these guys turning Uncyclopedia into their private forum --Nytrospawn
Keep Who's fighting? Let the page stay, ain't nothing wrong w/ it. -- User:82.78.27.82

Keep The page is funny. it shouldn't be deleted. -- Alinush

Delete Bit to vanity page for me. --Elvis 14:07, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Keep I like this fight. Remember flamewar guidelines. It's permitted as long as it's constructive, and this is clearly constructive. --Chronarion 18:22, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Kept Romania and Category:Romania are (or were) a mess of substubs which are being restructured through the efforts of User:Repairman Jack and others into a set of larger articles, What I Didn't Know about Romania, but this topic appears to be large enough at the moment to stand alone. --Carlb 17:23, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Votes for deletion (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log)

Hot sauce

Planet Peehole and Death Orb

Delete --Nytrospawn 20:36, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Cable

Delete --DWIII 21:18, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Rcmurphy 02:19, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete --The Hedgehog 14:14, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Gone --Famine 19:19, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Fire Emblem (long series of stubstubs), specifically FESS and FEFF

Resolved by merge. --Chronarion 18:21, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC) Specific-game-related message boards don't really seem like the sort of thing most people will have any connection to...

Anti-delete Note from a member of one of those boards. :)

Relaw. Those are simply a paradox of the Fire Emblem series and things related to it. It's meant to poke fun at the subtle things that people believe the game creators hinted at, as well as deal with some jokes only those who have been in the Fire Emblem community for a while, will understand. Anybody who speaks english and has been part of the fandom for a while, will likely understand the reasoning behind at least some of it.

Message from the original author I have begun the task of merging these, and I will delete the small portions. Sorry for all the mix up. No harm, no foul.

I realize that the majority of it is in-jokes, and I simply didn't have enough time last night to include things that people outside the fandom would understand. Sorry once again.

Edit: I have brough over all my work that I thought was good into it... the rest of the people who did stuff can work on the rest :P

I'll delete the extra articles now that they're all incorporated into the main one. --Rcmurphy 02:19, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

template:disam

Kept --Rcmurphy 00:28, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete We already got template:Disambiguation do we need more than one disambig template? --sColdWhat 01:10, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) Keep, I'll retract my vfd for this template, and experiment with the 3 disambig pages by "merging" them into the newer, better {{disambig}} one. --sColdWhat 11:38, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Keep We've already got a 1001 Stub templates, I don't think this can hurt. --Elvis 09:07, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Rename Rename like disambiguation2 or something. --Sophia 22:59, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Keep There's nothing wrong with it. --Evice 15:41, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Spanking

Deleted --Nytrospawn 20:40, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC) Delete I wikified it a bit but I'm still not enamoured by it. --Elvis 21:18, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete --slack 15:14, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Rcmurphy 02:19, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

From QuickVFD

Small Wonder

Dunno I played around with this a bit and thought I should present it to you all rather than arbitarily removing it from QuickVFD. --Elvis 13:30, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Repairman Jack 11:32, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Rcmurphy 02:19, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Gone Perhaps some day it will rise again, like a pigeon from the ashes...hey, that'd make a good article... --Famine 19:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Guess Who

Keep I've added to this but as it was on QuickVFD I though I should run it past you lot. --Elvis 18:58, 23 May 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite --Repairman Jack 11:27, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep Not bad enough to keep. --Chronarion 16:13, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Rcmurphy 02:19, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Rewrote and redirected --Repairman Jack 15:14, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Carlb

Redirected to User:Carlb

Probably not so funny to Carlb--130.95.106.154 04:40, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite The writer is clearly not funny... J/K We luvs ya Carl!--slack 15:37, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete I'll leave it to User:Carlb to do the honours however. --Elvis 16:40, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete While parodying a single user is perfectly fine, doing it in an unfunny fashion is not. --Sophia 23:00, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)


Image:1114046112215.jpg

Personally smitten by divine judgement. --Sophia 22:57, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Carlb 17:55, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete Already told you I'm tired of the Anti-pope anti-Catholic stuff, need some new material guys!--slack 16:11, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

'Keep Getting a bit overzealous, are we not?--220.238.98.64 08:47, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Overzealous about what. Pasting the words restart the ez bake jew ovens over someone's photo? Why not post something funny instead of this? --Carlb 15:25, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete I agree, the picture and the caption just plain suck. --Nytrospawn 22:38, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)


Babel fish

Except for the second last paragraph this is from Douglas Adams' HitchHiker's Guide to the Galaxy. --Repairman Jack 13:52, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

In my book, the entire thing is from Douglas Adams' HitchHiker's Guide to the Galaxy. It is copyrighted, so delete. User talk:Freibe

Thanks for the confirmation as I was in a hurry. --Repairman Jack 16:56, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete --DWIII 09:51, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete Although I think we should have 1 entry that pays homage to H2G2 given it's Uncyclopedia's ancestor, this unfortunatly is copyrighted to hell and back. --Elvis 11:24, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Rewritten - The Newfoundland offshore babel fishery. Parlez-vous canadien? --Carlb 20:33, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

UCTABTSSG

Delete Although it seemed slightly better than QuickVFD material. --Elvis 21:07, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete Just not funny. --The Werle 03:51, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete Stupid--slack 15:13, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)


The Univerity of Deception

The total content of article is "Allegedly based in Wales, we can neither confirm nor deny the existence of this institution."

  • The name is misspelled (unless this is some kind of in-joke of which I am unaware).
  • It looks like it took 10 seconds to write.
  • It doesn't elicit a laugh, a chortle, or even a sigh.

--Steve Johnsenson 05:41, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Kill Could be a QuickVFD--Elvis 11:09, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Focus On The Family

Delete; we already have Focus on the Family. --DWIII 08:04, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I don't even know why it was there - one line, and nothing links to that page. Regardless, I "merged" the one line on that page with Focus on the Family and deleted the page. That was more of a QVFDer than a VFDer. --Famine 12:59, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Rewritten main Focus on the Family article to add bits about drugstores and photofinishing. --Carlb 18:26, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Monsk, Monskie, Monskies, Monskervator

Either delete, or merge all with Monskervator or User:Monskervator. --DWIII 05:52, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Smackdown Aaaah....I was confused for a minute or two, but now that I look, they apparently were all created by Monskervator. I believe that this now falls under the realm of "das vanity pages" and, (sorry Monke) thus are prime candidates for deletion. My recommendation: Let Monskervator drop them on his userpage where they belong, and then whack them. --Famine 13:10, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

All moved to User:Monskervator's user page with a quick trip through the SpelChek™ bot to toast the resulting shipload of self-referential red links from this mess of sorry prose. --Carlb 19:42, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Aruba

DELETE --DWIII 15:42, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Template:....

KILLED --Chronarion 23:49, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)


It's annoyingly, page breakingly long --Elvis 01:08, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Moved to Template:Template:Template, but if "what links here" is finding nothing using this, why does it exist at all??? --Carlb 02:13, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • I can answer that. I needed a sandbox to play with templates for a little while, and distrupting the Wikipedia to do it seemed like a bad idea. Here, on the other hand... -- 69.29.215.152 02:49, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • If it is just a sandbox entry, it should be deleted then. I will leave that to someone else as I like the colors. --Paulgb Talk 20:09, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Urban75

Too Factual....? Whilst I have no problems with the site this page is about and there does appear to have been some attempt at humour/satire, I'm not sure it's been sufiently sporked yet from the Wikipedia Entry, it is still new however so I'm just putting it here for people to keep an eye on/mess with. --Elvis 01:02, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete Never heard of the site, although I guess you have. Still though, it didn't make me laugh. And I hate sporks, original work is so much better. --Paulgb Talk 20:17, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete The page is a reaction against the edit wars on Wikipedia, and as Paulgb says, it's not funny. Nicegravy 17:40, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete - unfunny drivel 81.152.107.108 14:25, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Furry things, Wookies, Kashyyyk

Another infinite loop. --Savethemooses 20:24, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Elvis 00:17, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete when will people learn that infinite loops aren't funny?--slack 15:38, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Deleted --Paulgb Talk 20:19, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Lanth

Delete *yawn* --Carlb 17:00, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Elvis 00:16, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Philidelphia (sic)

Please Delete; I have already merged content from this to Philadelphia. --DWIII 11:13, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Deleted, although I worry that I deleted the wrong one. The remaining page seems to be spelled incorrectly... --Famine 12:21, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Confirmed; the mispelted one was "phili". --DWIII 12:36, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Um, I was actually thinking that this being Uncyclopedia, we should have kept 'phili'. --Famine 00:46, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Jeff

Delete Seemed to a been a bit to much work to be QuickVFD, still not impressed however --Elvis 13:45, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Repairman Jack 11:32, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)


Some new Zork Pages

Kept by popular vote

Namely Zork/gruebarf, Zork/femalegrue, Zork/closet2, and the most recent revision to Zork/south

I propose deleting the first three and reverting the last. --PantsMacKenzie 21:05, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Keep I don't think it detracts from it and I think the idea of Zork growing in the same normal articles do is cool. --Elvis 13:48, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Keep I think it fits the overall Zork theme--slack 15:24, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Keep --Repairman Jack 11:32, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Keep They can always be improved upon by someone else. I find the expansion of Zork quite fascinating. --Rcmurphy 02:19, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Pisang ambon

Delete - It's part of the whole Gnasip which escaped VFD through apathy Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive3#Gnasip --Elvis 20:31, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC).

Delete - a religious vanity page --Repairman Jack 13:14, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)


Densest Object in the Known Universe

Merge then Delete with one the many current George W Bush pages. --Repairman Jack 13:14, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Okay I took my own advice and merged into George W. Bush. Can someone delete? Thanks. --Repairman Jack 14:32, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Asians

Deleted and redirected to existing Asia article. --Carlb 19:13, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete Meh --Nytrospawn 21:44, 31 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Repairman Jack 13:14, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete Though I have to say, when I saw an article titled Asians in VFD, I was expecting something far worse. --Cap'n Ben 05:22, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete -- Duh. Not funny --Idic 19:24, 7 June 2005 (EDT)

Main Page

DELETED I took care of that Cruft. It shall bother you no more! --PantsMacKenzie 17:29, 26 May 2005 (EDT)

This page is poorly written and not funny. I hate it. We should delete it! Who's with me? --Savethemooses 16:28, 26 May 2005 (EDT)

Good job. However, I find a number of pages which link to this page equally bad. Do we have a script set up so we can just huff anything that links here? --Famine 09:02, 28 May 2005 (EDT)

Hmm. You might be right. Does anyone know how to code any wikibots to delete any page that once linked there? --PantsMacKenzie 20:12, 28 May 2005 (EDT)

Where'd it go? Bring it back! Play back the entire message! --Luke Skywalker 01:51, 29 May 2005 (EDT)

No way, that page suxz0r3d teh big one!!!!111one --Peepantsman043 20:55, 31 May 2005 (EDT)


Governor

Redirected to Governator. --Carlb 19:12, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Governator already covers this, a bit better. --Gartogg 13:30, 26 May 2005 (JDT)

Merge Governor and Governator --Repairman Jack 09:19, 26 May 2005 (EDT)

Merge then redirect to Guv'nor or Guv :-) --Elvis 10:11, 26 May 2005 (EDT)

Okay Merged with Governator. Can now be deleted. --Repairman Jack 15:14, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

GEORGEFOREMANLEANMEATFATREDUCINGGRILLICON

Redirected to GEORGEICON

Substantial article here, but it still looks like so much trash IMHO. --Orborde 01:16, 23 May 2005 (EDT)

  • shrugs* Could be expanded, though the name's a bit too long, sure would hate to type it in... Keep I guess or rename...--slack 13:44, 23 May 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite change name and redirect. --Repairman Jack 11:27, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete Article name makes me hurt. --Chronarion 00:25, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite Agree with Repairman Jack. Not a bad article, name is wordy. Decent article body. --Androidtopp 16:37, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)


Intelligent women

Rewritten/expanded.

Another fake "404 not found" page... hasn't this already been done for everyone from MC Hammer to Jimmy Hoffa? --Carlb 18:02, 21 May 2005 (EDT)
  • Delete Two overdone cliches (fake 404 and misogyny) in one page. --EvilZak 18:24, 21 May 2005 (EDT)
  • Delete Unless someone wants to Rewrite it instead, because I smell potential! --Orborde 01:27, 23 May 2005 (EDT)

Well it's been expanded to include sane women and sexy women. Are these to be deleted too? As to overdone cliches, isn't this one of the amusing things about Uncyclopedia? Keep --Repairman Jack 11:00, 24 May 2005 (EDT)
Keep--Elvis 12:03, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

  • Delete The addition of the opther pages only compounds the evil. --Gartogg 13:52, 26 May 2005 (JDT)

Keep Admittedly, my vote is only because Sexy Women's picture is hot, and chronarion is easily influenced. --Chronarion 00:24, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Bluebeard (from QuickVFD)

Kept, with attribution.

Bluebeard (plagiarized from Grimm Tales Made Gay, Guy Wetmore Carryl (1902)) (vfd)
  • One question: if this is from 1902, would the copyright not have expired by now? --Carlb 21:51, 20 May 2005 (EDT)

Expand In the time taken to write this, I could have added some context for the poem, making the article relevant and appropriate. And yes, I'm quite sure the copyright is expired. --Spintherism 14:46, 22 May 2005 (EDT)

Credit and keep --Chronarion 00:27, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)


The Worst Movie Ever

Rewritten.

Not at all Wiki or funny. Baleeted! --Savethemooses 14:50, 19 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete Too UPOV: Unfunny Point of View. --EvilZak 15:02, 19 May 2005 (EDT)

UPOV I hope to see more of that word. --Paulgb Talk 21:30, 19 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Repairman Jack 16:44, 19 May 2005 (EDT)

Rewroted Went with a thread about Van Halen, and kinda tied it into Van Helsing, which is the movie the page refers to...God that movie sucked--slack 18:13, 19 May 2005 (EDT)

I like it. --Paulgb Talk 21:30, 19 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep/expand With slack's edits, I think it's salvaged. It could use a little more modification and expansion, though. --RadicalX 11:49, 20 May 2005 (EDT)


ALL CAPS

(FROM QUICKVFD) REWRITTEN.

KEEP I LIKE THE MINIMALIST SIMPLICITY OF IT --Elvis 08:42, 18 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete - it may be minimal and simple but not original. --Repairman Jack 11:35, 18 May 2005 (EDT)

Overhaul/Retrofit It could be a "The Shining" article --Nytrospawn 19:33, 18 May 2005 (EDT)

REWRITE PERSONALLY I THINK THAT WE CAN HAVE A MINI SEGMENT ON THE HISTORY OF ALL CAPS, IN ALL CAPS. THAT WOULD BE NOTABLY LESS STUPID. --Chronarion 17:53, 20 May 2005 (EDT)

rewrite while i'm not a fan of all caps, i believe that chronarion has a good plan. i will patiently await someone rewriting this, as my humor tank is running on empty. --famine 11:29, 21 may 2005 (edt)

REWRITE MAKE IT SOMETHING ALONG THE LINES OF THE TYPO ARTICLE --Evice 13:48, 21 May 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite I like the ASCII art, but it's kind of repetitive... --Orborde 01:36, 23 May 2005 (EDT)

I think thats the idea --Elvis 03:58, 23 May 2005 (EDT)

Massive Rewrite Could be brilliant, but totally isn't. How about using it to insult those who insist on emailing/IMing in all caps? --Androidtopp 16:39, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

What class is this

(From QuickVFD) Rewritten

Rewrite - I think it may have some promise. --Elvis 12:26, 16 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep - I'm in a good mood --Paulgb Talk 17:53, 16 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep I added a bit of verse, playing on "What child is this"--slack 18:22, 23 May 2005 (EDT)

slack's addition makes it a keeper. --Repairman Jack 15:23, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Auschwitz

Delete --Carlb 17:08, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Candidate for VFD within 6 minutes of creation. Is this a record? But I agree, Delete --Repairman Jack 19:26, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I don't see what's wrong with it... other than it being satirical and about a Concentration camp... --PantsMacKenzie 20:40, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I've deleted things 2 or 3 minutes after creation. There's nothing special about this one, but I'd lean towards Delete. --Savethemooses 00:30, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete or maybe Rewrite it's biggest sin is just not being funny. --Elvis 13:49, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete; the writer's other contribs seems to (mostly) indicate a 1 track theme. --DWIII 10:05, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Cap'n Ben 05:31, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Gone perhaps it will be reincarnated as a funny article... --Famine 14:10, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

From QuickVFD

Rubbish

Delete Lots of peps editing it thought that they might want to add to and/or redem. --Elvis 20:24, 31 May 2005 (EDT)

Merge then Delete with Republican Party. --Repairman Jack 13:14, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I merged it into Republican Party. Can someone delete? Thanks. --Repairman Jack 14:37, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Damn block-compressed revisions....consider it indisposed. --Famine 14:13, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Baptist Jihad

Delete --Repairman Jack 09:46, 29 May 2005 (EDT)

Behead Keep the page name, delete the page text. A Baptist Jihad is a god damn funny concept. The page as it is, is a steaming pile of crap. --Famine 21:27, 29 May 2005 (EDT)

Ditto Make sure you get the tapes to CNN otherwise the infidels will ne'er learn.--Machinecurse 22:23, 29 May 2005 (EDT)
I agree. Let us KILLX0RZ!!! the text. The title is a hoot.--Flammable 22:29, 29 May 2005 (EDT)

Modded I did my best, and copied and pasted the exact text of the 10-point code of ethics created during the '99 Southern Baptist Convention. I was going to change it a little, but it looked good to me as-is. --Famine 23:44, 29 May 2005 (EDT)

Axe deodorant

From QuickVFD.

Delete Maybe could be redeemed without the lame "Japanese men" jokes, but it's probably not worth it. --Rcmurphy 22:21, 28 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep Good to see something different that's also comparatively tasteful. --Sheep 23:15, 28 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete --EvilZak 23:30, 28 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Repairman Jack 09:46, 29 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete I reverted the edit of 84.248.19.212 who blanked most of the page. Still, it's not that good. --Famine 21:31, 29 May 2005 (EDT)

DELETED--Elvis 13:54, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Super AIDS

Rewrite Might be salvagable if it wasn't written like one of those attack-vanity "MY FRIEND IS A FAG" pages that show up by the dozens on Wikipedia. --EvilZak 23:30, 28 May 2005 (EDT)

Vanity page? Delete it. --Repairman Jack 09:48, 29 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete UPOV, Attack-Vanity. --Famine 21:21, 29 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Machinecurse 22:29, 29 May 2005 (EDT)

Borange

Delete More like Boringe. --EvilZak 23:30, 28 May 2005 (EDT)

What do you call it when something references itself? Oh yeah, recursion. This page is Borange, delete --Repairman Jack 09:51, 29 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Famine 21:25, 29 May 2005 (EDT)

Delet so poor I couldn't spare the third 'e'. --Machinecurse 22:28, 29 May 2005 (EDT)

Strangle the user. Delete the article too plskthxbye. --Flammable 22:33, 29 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete forthwith, in haste. --DWIII 00:05, 30 May 2005 (EDT)

Banished The electrons have been cast out into the wastelands to die. --Famine 00:15, 30 May 2005 (EDT)

SARS

Deleted as copyvio of rotten.com page. --Carlb 08:48, 28 May 2005 (EDT) Does this long article belong in Uncyclopedia? --Repairman Jack 11:54, 27 May 2005 (EDT)

Someone needs to rewrite it in a childish Uncyclopedic fashion ie SARS= Stupid Ass Retard Syndrome--slack 12:16, 27 May 2005 (EDT)

Tidy Up and Wikify The Authour seems to be contributing a few, makes a chnage from the usualy one liners at least. --Elvis 12:57, 27 May 2005 (EDT)

Kill It's f'n plagiarism. Word for word. Get an original idea, please. --Savethemooses 19:42, 27 May 2005 (EDT)

Our no-name friend is right! Kill it, before it spreads--slack 16:52, 27 May 2005 (EDT)!

Anorexic

REDIRECTED to Anorexia. --PantsMacKenzie 09:51, 27 May 2005 (EDT)

Crap and a half. --Savethemooses 23:18, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

Redirect to Anorexia, a funnier and less factual page. --Rcmurphy 23:59, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

I also agree Redirect to Anorexia --Repairman Jack 11:08, 25 May 2005 (EDT)

Obliterate Hell, I wouldn't mind seeing them both go. Anorexia isn't VFD bad, but it could be done much better. --Famine 16:24, 25 May 2005 (EDT)

Boobasaur

Craptastic --Savethemooses 19:55, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete this stinker. --Repairman Jack 11:08, 25 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete almost a QVFDer of an article. --Famine 16:25, 25 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep Far worse crap here, plus it's funny anyway. Might be better with a picture. --Sheep 07:08, 26 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete No redeeming qualities. --Famine 21:33, 29 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete We have enough blunt sexual metaphors on this website, another one would just melt the internet --Nytrospawn 22:28, 29 May 2005 (EDT)

Gone --Famine 22:45, 29 May 2005 (EDT)

The Right Hon. Dr Sir F U Beatgh CBE PhD MRSA GBH HSBC FCUK CNN Esq.

Deleted I forgot that I deleted this a couple days ago --PantsMacKenzie 09:52, 27 May 2005 (EDT)

Poo. --Savethemooses 19:34, 23 May 2005 (EDT)
Keep I like it the page name is ridiculously long but then thats the point innit--Elvis 19:41, 23 May 2005 (EDT)

Could do better Sharpen up the format, add a picture, remove the phenomenally pathetic first person bits ("Who cares .. I don't" - then why write the fucking article?!) and it might be redeemable. I can't be bothered to, though. --Machinecurse 19:45, 23 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete - It looks like the author doesn't care. --Repairman Jack 11:27, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Rcmurphy 13:02, 25 May 2005 (EDT)

From QuickVFD

Magna Carta

Moved to Undictionary --Carlb 21:16, 27 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep I know we are trying to cut down on the stubby articles but this one really mademe laugh. --Elvis 12:33, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

I love it. Keep. --Chronarion 15:51, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep --Repairman Jack 11:08, 25 May 2005 (EDT)

Tea Bag - Nut sack - Stealth Teabag - Ninja Teabag

'ST and NT nuked. --Chronarion 15:50, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

: Four tasteless, unfunny and poorly-written substubs which should either be deleted or rewritten and heavily cleaned up to be consolidated as one article. --Carlb 12:45, 21 May 2005 (EDT)

I'll admit that my original toilet (and other things)-oriented Tea Bag article was ruined when the testicle crap was added. --Evice 13:44, 21 May 2005 (EDT)

Ninja and Stealth deserve deleted, I kinda thought Nutsack was funny, especially the "That explains the black eye" bit--slack 15:35, 21 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete all but Tea Bag and Nut sack The ones to I, and Slackerboy, feel need to be deleted are just full of crap about nut-sucking. I don't know why I didn't vote earlier. --Evice 12:40, 22 May 2005 (EDT)

I agree with Evice, Delete Stealth Teabag and Ninja Teabag --Repairman Jack 11:03, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

The William Woods IT Department

TBD

Delete - Non-notable outside that one school. --Carlb 17:39, 19 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete or even better, move to "Uncyclopedia High Tech Department" and fix the words accordingly. --Paulgb Talk 21:27, 19 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete - beware of the wrath of the "angles" --Repairman Jack 05:16, 20 May 2005 (EDT)

Move Move to William Woods/IT Department? Personally I don't mind vanity pages as long as they keep it in one page. --Chronarion 17:51, 20 May 2005 (EDT)

Arnulfo

Um, who is this, anyone of note or just a long series (Wild boar, Image:World.JPG, Imbecil-ized, Cara de Jabalí...) of interlinked vanity pages about someone's nose? --Carlb 23:47, 15 May 2005 (EDT)

Does Uncyclopedia condone vanity pages? --Repairman Jack 12:11, 16 May 2005 (EDT)

I'm not really sure.. Should we? --Chronarion 15:12, 17 May 2005 (EDT)

Vanity pages are pretty much crap. And since Uncyclopedia isnt Crapopedia, I do believe that doesnt belong here. Just my oppinion. --Nytrospawn 14:58, 16 May 2005 (EDT)

In that case Delete --Repairman Jack 15:21, 16 May 2005 (EDT)

Huff 'em (Huff 'em all) Yeah, that's right, up the nose, and ofa site. --Famine 16:47, 16 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete Personally I don't like this page, so i'd wipe it. --Chronarion 15:12, 17 May 2005 (EDT)

I was about to do my newly civic'ed duty by whacking this, but I got the "block-compressed revisions waaaah - I can't delete it" error. As I am newly empowered to delete here, what do I need to know about this? --Famine 09:43, 28 May 2005 (EDT)
Redirect it to Uncyclopedia:To Be Deleted, do a little dance, then add an entry for it on that page. --Rcmurphy 17:48, 28 May 2005 (EDT)

Dance Done Thanks for holding my hand during my first real sysop action, Rcmurphy. --Famine 10:37, 29 May 2005 (EDT)

Cruft

Crybabies bitching about their group's "leader" getting blocked for spamming references to Trent Reznor. Delete. --EvilZak 23:21, 15 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete - Vanity page, non-notable person(s) --Carlb 23:47, 15 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep - I think it does actualy fit into uncyclopedia (although I wholeheartedly agree about the blocking deleteing/reverting Trent Reznor spam), in fact I'm slightly jealouse of RcMurphy and EvilZak that they have managed to attract some much ire from them. I think we should try and absorb and subvert this page, much in the same way the rant about Uncyclopedia not accepting critisim in the news section of the Main page was wikified and stayed on for quite some time. </speach> --Elvis 04:12, 16 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep It's amusing, plus it links back to my user page, which in turn feeds my ego. --Rcmurphy 11:03, 16 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete Vanity pages are not even non-information. Uncyclopedia isnt MySpace.com --Nytrospawn 14:59, 16 May 2005 (EDT)

I changed my mind about vanity pages, Delete --Repairman Jack 15:21, 16 May 2005 (EDT)

Kerry I voted for it before I voted against it. If there was one page on Trent, and our spamming history of NIN pages was included there in humourous fashion, I would go for that. As it is, Cruft is just a vanity page trying to stir up a flame war. Whack it. And the Cruft Committee, which is just more baiting. Although very well done. --Famine 16:58, 16 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep As the leader of Cruft I would like to say how this is an open source web site filled with misinformation; and, we should not be thought of as a "Vanity page" for we glorify no one. Every one is entitiled to their own opinion and opinion is not fact! though we are thankful for the publicity and honor of having a page as interesting as the Cruft Committee made because of our opinion on humor. --drkdragon1313

I have to hold my hand up re:Cruft Committee it was only intended as a gentle dig and I think (hope) has been taken that way.--Elvis 14:31, 17 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep As a member of Cruft I would just like to say. Even though it seems that we are glorifying Mr. Reznor and his companions we really aren't. I guess normal people can't understand High Satire. Thanks for the healthy debate on our page, its really cool to see differing opinions, especially on the type of bullshit that can go into a site dedicated to misinformation. SpareRibs

I find it amusing that a discussion of High Satire appears on the same page as one on Intelligent Design. --Repairman Jack 11:44, 18 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep I think it's somewhat amusing. --Chronarion 15:59, 17 May 2005 (EDT)

Modded I hope I don't offend too greatly, but I ran out of coffee this morning and had to vent my irritation somewhere. I rewrote Cruft a bit, to try to make it less flamey and more amusing. In addition, I removed the VFD template, as it seems the majority here are voting to keep it. While I doubt it will make everyone happy, I'm hoping that everyone hates it equally. ;) --Famine 10:01, 22 May 2005 (EDT)

Redeemed - a harrowing tale of woe and such like. Needs salt. --Machinecurse 19:54, 23 May 2005 (EDT)
Keep I wholeheartedly approve. --Rcmurphy 15:13, 25 May 2005 (EDT)
Having so terribly abused your good name during the rewrite, I'm glad to hear that. It looks like I somehow didn't offend either side too terribly, which was my goal. Thanks for being so nice about it everyone. Now, back to our regular schedule of making misinformative articles. --Famine 16:18, 25 May 2005 (EDT)

Lt Col. Kneewheels

Delete or at least Rewrite - Not very funny, looks more like an extension of the Cruft vanity page collection --Carlb 16:25, 17 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep What vanity? there is no vanity. there is only an article about once glourious man. No one touches the Kneewheels --SpareRibs 00:07, 18 May 2005 (please sign your comments?)

Keep I don't see what this has to do with Cruft or CC, other than Reznor being in it. --EvilZak 20:31, 17 May 2005 (EDT)

VANITY OF VANITIES AND ALL IS VANITY!!!- Somewhere in the bible, after the Table of Contents. But seriously, this ho Cruft controversy is tedious, they write pages on topics no user but they(them) understand. While that is not always a bad thing, it does tend to clutter up the place with pages no one reads..speaking of, check out Coconuts, Beagle, Screamin' trots]...etc...etc...(mine are actually funny though)--slack 20:16, 18 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep Personally, I think vanity is OK, AS LONG AS IT'S FUNNY TO EVERYONE. If you spam trent reznor references, they must be very bleeding funny and unique. If it loses funny, pscham, you're shot. That is all. --Chronarion 00:31, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Even more from QuickVFD

===Poland===

Reverted - Page was reverted, I stubbed it and set it free. Grow little Poland. Make us proud! --Famine 09:09, 28 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete - Didnt QuickVFD it because it has a bit of history, and I wasn't sure if a revert would be better. --Paulgb Talk 17:50, 15 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep - I believe this is a reference to Bush's rebuttal to John Kerry naming the countries involved in the Iraq War during the first presidential debate, telling him "You forgot about Poland." I think Poland pulled out of the war somewhere around a week later. --Spooner 17:57, 15 May 2005 (EDT)

Revert as the current page is not self explanatory. --Repairman Jack 12:01, 16 May 2005 (EDT)


Women with 3 boobs

Deleted

Much like arnold in total recall, this article has been mindwiped. --Chronarion 20:11, 23 May 2005 (EDT)

A poor attempt at a Total Recall mainstay --Nytrospawn 16:44, 23 May 2005 (EDT)

This page has shuffled off this mortal coil. --Repairman Jack 11:27, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

Wireless grind, grind, grind/Eternity

Anal rind eaten. --Savethemooses 23:21, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

Is there some joke I'm missing here, or is it just dumb? --Orborde 01:15, 23 May 2005 (EDT)

Kill it, grill it, slap it on the Georgeforemanleanmean...sorry... Delete--slack 13:46, 23 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Nytrospawn 16:47, 23 May 2005 (EDT)

Delet and sterilise. --Machinecurse 19:49, 23 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete I don't get it either. --Repairman Jack 11:27, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Elvis 12:03, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

Gary Newman

Killed

Substub. --Carlb 20:57, 22 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Nytrospawn 16:46, 23 May 2005 (EDT)

EX-TERM-I-NATE! --Machinecurse 19:56, 23 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Repairman Jack 11:27, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Rcmurphy 00:29, 25 May 2005 (EDT)


Beating your wife for fun and profit

ANNIHILATED --Chronarion 17:49, 20 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete Jerkishness in its purest form. --Rcmurphy 11:06, 20 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete Battered women? No thanks, prefer to eat 'em raw. Also very poorly written. --Carlb 11:13, 20 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete There's nothing funny about beating women...unless you do it with a 12 inch black rubber dildo. --RadicalX 11:47, 20 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete Its in the first person. --Nytrospawn 12:16, 20 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Repairman Jack 15:13, 20 May 2005 (EDT)

Baleeted!!! --Savethemooses 16:13, 20 May 2005 (EDT)

Kill it...Now..please--slack 17:12, 20 May 2005 (EDT)

Gay people

>TBDed.

Delete --Repairman Jack 15:19, 20 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete/Rewrite Lame. --Cap'n Ben 12:02, 21 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep/Expand Lighten up. Sheep 12:03, 21 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete/Rewrite Too homophobic and Uncyclopedic. --Evice 13:47, 21 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete I think it's more of a bad attempt at satire than really homophobic, but it still sucks. --Spintherism 14:38, 22 May 2005 (EDT)

baleeeted! I've read funnier obituaries --Machinecurse 19:49, 23 May 2005 (EDT)

Kiddie love vs. Puppy love and Potential pedophiles vs. Kinetic pedophiles

Resolved

Delete as we already have more than enough articles on "kiddy fiddlers", "kiddy fiddling" and all the rest. --Carlb 15:11, 18 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete - enough is enough --Repairman Jack 15:19, 18 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Rcmurphy 15:23, 18 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep kinetic pedophiles, Rewrite potential pedophiles, Delete the rest. I thought "molestache" was funny. Sheep 15:33, 18 May 2005 (EDT)

What sheep said ^^^^^^ Barr --Elvis 05:13, 19 May 2005 (EDT)

Merge the two pedophiles into one page. Baleet, delteat, and del taco the rest. --EvilZak 05:56, 19 May 2005 (EDT)

Deleted first two, combined portions of the others to Kinetic pedophiles. --Carlb 17:10, 21 May 2005 (EDT)

Ayanna Williams

TBD

As amusing as I personally find this, it doesn't belong on Uncyclopedia. It refers to a senior-level English teacher at our school whom a lot of people here dislike. Sadly, the rest of you are probably utterly clueless about it, though I'm sure you'd find it dash clever if you went to my school. Plus, I'd feel really bad if she happened across it. --Orborde 00:21, 16 May 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite - How about changing the names of the innocent as everyone has a teacher that deserves a page on Uncyclopedia. Right, Buck? --Repairman Jack 12:07, 16 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete - Personally, if they aren't famous, I don't like having a page on them. Common kindness. --Chronarion 15:11, 17 May 2005 (EDT)

Anonymize by moving to Teacher. --EvilZak 19:37, 19 May 2005 (EDT)

Lord Zarquon

TBD

Delete - But unsure why Chronarion used the template rather than deleting it. --Paulgb Talk 17:50, 15 May 2005 (EDT)

Oh, because I can't delete block ed revision in version 1.4rc1. If I get around to updating, and they fix their buggy software... --Chronarion 16:00, 17 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete - Possibly a reference I don't get, but then again most people probably won't. --Spooner 17:57, 15 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Repairman Jack 11:52, 16 May 2005 (EDT)

Amnesia

Kept

Keep&Expand - It could be funny if it was longer. --Paulgb Talk 17:50, 15 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep - Entries don't need to be long to be funny, and really I think this is about all you can do with the topic. --Spooner 17:57, 15 May 2005 (EDT)

Expand - Where am I and what am I doing? --Repairman Jack 11:46, 16 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep for some reason which I forget at the moment, oh, never mind. Is there one on selective amnesia? --Carlb 21:58, 17 May 2005 (EDT)

John Paul 2.0

TBD

From QuickVFD.

Delete --Rcmurphy 00:23, 11 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete Too many threads that are not particularily funny --Repairman Jack 09:36, 11 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete How many Terminator references do we need? At least one less. --Spooner 17:59, 15 May 2005 (EDT)

Hello

TBD

From QuickVFD.

Rewrite --Rcmurphy 23:51, 10 May 2005 (EDT)

I'm changing my vote to Delete. I don't know why I thought it was at all funny before. --Rcmurphy 00:23, 12 May 2005 (EDT)

Bub-bye on the Hello part, Rewrite the Overheard part. --Repairman Jack 12:09, 11 May 2005 (EDT)

Goodbye --Evice 13:52, 21 May 2005 (EDT)

Retrieved from "https://en.uncyclopedia.co/w/index.php?title=Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/archive5&oldid=5756668"