Forum:Rate each other's sigs! Happy fun time!!!

Forums: Index > BHOP > Rate each other's sigs! Happy fun time!!!

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6030 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Basically rate the sig of the last guy that posts. 1-10 scale.

Let's start off with me. --Nordamus (blab • crap) 03:11, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

10/10, it's a sig alright. --Narf, the Wonder Puppy/I support Global Warming and I'm 100% proud of it! 03:15, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

10/10, It's a legible sig, with good wikimarkup. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 03:17, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

6/10, because there are no links to your talk page. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:29, Sep 13, 2007

For Capercorn: 7/10: the essential links, although the "praise" is somewhat unoriginal. Color scheme is pretty good, nothing really obnoxious. The MUN link may not be necessary, perhaps replace with contribs? P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:52, Sep 13, 2007

6/10. Just a link to the userpage. Boring. But I like your font. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 03:31, 13 September 2007 (UTC) Ohhh... The last guy. Led:Coool. Nice couloring, and grabs my (short) attention. 9/10 --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 03:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

1/10. Major points lost because it's not my sig. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Humour:	1	It's too serious. You could certainly be a bit more cheerful about the bloody thing — it is your sig, after all. I'd suggest maybe a bit of Comic Sans MS or even a cheerful little icon. Surprising how these little touches really lift up the mood of the whole piece.
Concept:	10	"N"? I'm surprised you even thought of it.
Prose and formatting:	8	No one likes dashes. If you want to be fancy about it, I'd suggest using — or something similar. Two dashes just makes the whole thing look messy and unprofessional, as though a seriously mentally retarded monkey was telling you what to do.
Images:	5	One image, fairly decent. I'd suggest less images.
Miscellaneous:	3	Severe lack of miscellany. Get on it.
Final Score:	27	All in all, a good start. With a few more days of solid work, it could become somewhat more than a good start.
Reviewer:	– Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 03:41 Sep 13, 2007

Oh, of the last guy that posts? Oh, well. I was rating the first. Silly me. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 03:43 Sep 13, 2007

d'oh! /me did the same thing. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:48, Sep 13, 2007

/me reads other comments... I think everyone did. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 03:49 Sep 13, 2007

0/10. Not my sig. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 03:53, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Original. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 03:55 Sep 13, 2007

1) I gave it 0/10, that's a one point difference. 2) I was more concise, and as Shakespeare mused, "Brevity is the soul of wit." -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 04:02, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Savethemooses 5/10 I love both Bullwinkle and chevrons, but expandable sigs are out of style, gramps. Get hip to the static sigs, my bromide. —rc (t) 03:59, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Actually, now they're ironically hip. You must be one of those old-timers who woops shoop. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 04:04, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

4/10. Expanding sigs don't work in whatever browser it is that I'm using. This leaves the sig as just a pic and a double arrow pointing to the right. This means that Stm is steadily becoming more conservative, apparently. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:24, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

6/10. Functional, but all the letters make it very choppy. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:25, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

7/10 Well thought out, functional, but boring. Add more colour. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!

8/10 Attention-getting, a touch of color, and not too gaudy. Sadly, those two exclamation points are like tiny poison darts jabbing my eyeballs. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 06:11, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

8/10 Simple. ~

Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

13/09/2007 @ 11:17

(Which - the sig, or Cainad?) Anyway, 8/10. Not over the top, and does what it says. Yes. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:57, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Under user: 8.2/10. I like the understated tone, and the greys, but they can sometimes be a bit faint in certain lights. Also good links, User page/talk, contribs, and two freestyle, not too little, not too much - though you have to mouse over to know where each one goes. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 12:18, 13 Sep 2007

• Spang: - 9/10 colourful, humourous highlighty bits, Clear, does it's job. -- (Bonner) (Talk) 17:06, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
• Bonner: - 7/10 Gray and red. Reminds me of the Kingdom of Loathing. Automatic plus. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 17:17, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Lame/10 Go back to art school, you hack! -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 19:50, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Savethemooses: 3/10! You call that a mooses? That's a moose at best! Mr. Briggs Inc. 20:22, 13 September 2007 (UTC) Eh?

Mr. Biggs Inc.: 4/10! Genericness. Also StM, FU with savings. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 20:43, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

High Gen. Grue: 2/10. So dull and lifeless. Where's the love? --General Insineratehymn 20:48, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Boy, Han, you really got shafted review-wise. Three users who deducted points because they're egomaniacs and your sig doesn't link to their userpage. Here, allow me -12/10 - NOT MY SIG. Why isn't it my sig? 7/10 I like the colors you used, although perhaps you could change them up more, add more variety. Also, maybe more room between each link to avoid issues with seeing it as one big link (additional colors would also help this). P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:51, Sep 13, 2007

Vomit/10 Boy, that is UGLY! Seriously, the negative feng shui emanating from your sig could overpower the nervous system of a great yak. And not just any great yak, but the LEADER of the great yaks. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 21:19, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

SAVINGS/10 - Best sig ever... with SAVINGS!!! --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 21:22, September 13, 2007

Thanks, I know. That said, I rate your sig a 9/11 / 10. Blatant jingoism does not a good sig make! Your pro-Bush, pro-military, pro-abortion, pro-dogfighting sig makes me puke. I wish I could make a Constitutional amendment against flag-burning and then burn your sig in an act of defiance against the government fascists that made such an amendment possible! -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 21:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Can somebody rate my sig?--Sir Manforman 21:25, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Shoot me/10. Your sig lacks any artistic merit whatsoever. The mere fact that such a tactless load of crap could possibly exist makes me yearn for the cold embrace of death. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 21:28, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

As of now all Savethemooses reviews arre NULL AND VOID. MWAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAAAH --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 21:37, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Signatures are suppose to lack artistic merit, it's a sig Savethemooses. I'd like another judge to review my sig--Sir Manforman 21:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Shitpile/10 So much artistic merit I almost choked. Why don't you take your degree in fine arts from Oberlin and stick it up your pretentious ass. It's supposed to be a sig, not a goddam Monet painting. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 21:44, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Manforman: Wow. 8/10. I thought that there were no links in your sig at first. It's like Camo. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 21:42, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

STM: 2/10: picture is ok, text is all one ugly shade of brown, font is "meh", no link to talk page, and when your sig expands it looks archaic, and serves no additional use other than to link to your officer status, show off the in-joke you've created, and dick with the lines of text around it. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:45, Sep 13, 2007

I think STM missed the "happy fun time" part of this. Let them have their dreams, man! • Spang • ☃ • talk • 09:46, 13 Sep 2007

FU/10 I was going to donate money to help the cause in Darfur, but your sig was so terrible that I'm donating to the Janjaweed in hopes that the genocide there will quicken the arrival of the apocalypse. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 21:54, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

9/10. Includes savings. Lose the "savethemooses" and "grand commanding officer" part though — nobody cares. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 21:57 Sep 13, 2007

AIDS/10 There's a reason movies are now in color. GRAYSCALE BLOWS! How about this, why don't you and D.W. Griffith get together and have a nice cross-burning BBQ wherein you can discuss how crappy your sig is and how black people ruined America. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 21:59, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

5/10, with savings which contribute another 2. If you put your cursor just to the right of the arrows, you can make the bottom of the screen do a crazy crazy party dance. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:01, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Hell on earth/10 The colors are so mismatched that even Stevie Wonder thinks your fashion sense sucks. Also, Stevie Wonder is going to write a song about your sig entitled Your Crazy Different Fonts Make Me Wish I Were Deaf, Too. It's a new creative direction he's taking. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 22:06, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Surely STM must be running out of bad things to replace low numbers with at this point? /me waits for inevitable scathing review of my sig. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:13, Sep 13, 2007

I already reviewed your aborted baboon fetus of a sig above. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 22:15, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Led:Cool. Nice couloring, and grabs my (short) attention. Yay for recycling. 9/10. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 22:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

6/10 I like the bolded relaxing blue text, but I hate the color you used for the rest of your links. Points for making it nice and simple. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:37, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

7/10 I can't read the Boomer bit very easily. But I know what it says, so I don't really care. However, your sig appears to be on fire, so displays a poor grasp of fire-safety. To get a higher mark, it should stop, drop and roll immediately. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:35, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

8/10. I always have liked your sig. --General And Min. THEDUDEMAN 18:50, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Fate worse than death/10 Your sig reminds me of this guy who wore this blue-and-yellow striped sweater. He died of dysentery. Also, while you may think that a .GIF of two red-footed monkeys having sex in a vortex is edgy, I think it's just retarded. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 21:02, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

That's his nerd badge, dummy. It gives him something akin to street cred, but instead of respect, it gets him free boards and bags at the comic shop. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:19, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

7/10 Boring colours, nice use of sizing, sir. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!

3/10 You have an external link. That angers me. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC) I don't want this topic to die!

3/10. Flames... Not that good... ~

Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

16/09/2007 @ 23:18

5/10. Black, doesn't really grab my attention. kinda lengthy.--General And Min. THEDUDEMAN 23:34, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

5/10. The Camoflauge that makes you stick out like a sore thumb. Where would you be hidden? --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 01:11, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Hiding, Why would I be hiding? The colors are supposed to represent the floria gators. you get 7/10 for good coloring--General And Min. THEDUDEMAN 14:29, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

They told me I did good colouring once. I went on to pass my first year of school. Big things in store for you, ickle HGG. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:48, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

10/10...is not my true mark for your sig. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!

So, what about me? --L 05:53, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Go read the sig rules/10. but to make a score out of it, -3/10--Senator THEDUDEMAN Join UNATO 15:37, 18 September 2007 (UTC)