User talk:Everyotherusernamewastaken/Archive1

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to the shinier Uncyclopedia. I'll spare you the welcome template since I figure you've been subjected to it already over there. I hope you have fun here. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribslogs) 22:38, 28 Jun 2014Uncyclopedia is a community site that anyone can contribute to. Discover, share and add your knowledge! UncyclopediaUncyclopediaIllogicopediai:fr:LogimalpediePaudurapedyjaFrithchiclipeidUncapaediaAbsurdopediaScotypedia

(You are watching this page, right?) What would be done if I created Every other username was taken as a redirect to my userpage?--User:Everyotherusernamewastaken/Signature.jpeg 08:34, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Probably nothing. I don't see it being an article title, do you? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Proudly bogan 08:36, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
I'm asking 'cos I just got blocked over there for creating a "flurry" of such redirects, which have all since been deleted.--User:Everyotherusernamewastaken/Signature.jpeg 08:39, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
We are not SPIKE. We don't ban people for no reason. Come to IRC, you are most welcome. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Proudly bogan 08:51, 10 July 2014 (UTC)


Saw your message on my talkpage. The thing is that there's lots of one-line articles all over uncyclopedia and I didn't find anything especially "new" on your page. However, you could make it longer and make it into an actual page covering facts about one-liners, in it's current shape it's pretty much QVFD-worthy. I've putten an ICU on your page, meaning you have a week of time to make it longer if you will to do so, if you don't want to edit it further, just tell me and I can delete your page. In my honest opinion such a short page isn't needed at the moment, we have a wide selection of pages like that. Thanks for (possibly) understanding. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz Zzz...morning? 17:33, 19 August, 2014 (UTC)

He can move it to his userspace. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 18:05, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
I've changed the question of "Will this article get deleted?" to something more like an essay. Does it need to be any longer?--Everyotherusernamewastaken(get dtf) 19:13, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Haha, that was nice, the answer made me lol. Yeah I'll remove the ICU now Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz Zzz...morning? 20:00, 19 August, 2014 (UTC)


Hi Every! Are you going to use this image for any comedic purpose? In my opinion, it's a shock image and the disturbance it may cause will outweigh the humour it may add to an article. But it's up to you! Anton (talk) 22:04, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Don't mind Anton, he was diagnosed with "I'm uncyclopedia's moral compass" complex, sadly it also means he has no humor. I on the other hand have plenty of humor and I just loved that dead guy image, it's confronting yet subtle. If you can'tt find a way tto use that image don't worry, I will find a suitable use for it because that's how I roll. Cheers and keep up the good work. Madclaw @ talk 22:17, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
I would put my own signature underneath "keep up the good work", but, otherwise, don't mind Madclaw! He was diagnosed with "chasing users away" syndrome and a lot of other scary stuff (he loves dead guys' images!). Anton (talk) 22:21, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Children please Explode fire.gif Explode fire.gifNeon Green Hammer And Sickle.PNG - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBExplode fire.gifCUNExplode fire.gifVFHExplode fire.gifWhoringExplode fire.gifMore Whoring Explode fire.gifat 22:31, Wednesday 20 August 2014 - Neon Green Hammer And Sickle.PNGExplode fire.gif Explode fire.gif
In my rectal passage Madclaw @ talk 22:33, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
I've used it for my first UnNews. I'm really not sure about this one. It might be too far. --Everyotherusernamewastaken(get dtf) 22:41, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Probably bordering on what is allowed and what isn't. Although we allow you to get away with a lot more than Wikia will, we sadly, will also draw the line somewhere. You can probably use it, but I'll ask that you maybe try and find something a little less bloody to use (if you can). As for Madclaw, yeah please grow a sense of humor of your own before you have a go at other people about theirs. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Proudly bogan 23:12, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
It was the first image result for "dead person". I didn't look at it very closely, but '' sold it for me. Changed it to something that looks faker--Everyotherusernamewastaken(get dtf) 23:24, 20 August 2014 (UTC)


Welcome to UnLegal!
Thank you for officially joining the Uncyclopedia Legal Department.
As always, if you have any questions, like "How do I tie my shoes?" or need assistance, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Cheers!
 –  User talk:Zana Dark User:Zana Dark Sheenicon.gif (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 09:48, 29 August 2014, Department Head


Hello, you have won the Noob of the Moment for August 2014. Congratulations.  Special:Contribs/Sir Peasewhizz Sir Peasewhizz ... Biblio . HOS . Awards 03:35 8.31.14

Noob of the Moment Award Noob of the Moment August 2014

Thanks for the award, don't you now have to change the entry on the main page? or was that a one-off thing? To be honest, I'd have no idea what to write about my articles and contributions here, other than I've written on my userpage.--EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 20:00, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
You could update it, please do, I'm lazy af  Kamek siggy.png ŤäŁķ ¿Ș₮áłĶ?฿¡฿↓¡ography 20:15 9.01.14
I can't. It's view source for me.--EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 18:46, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Lemme check it out.  Kamek siggy.png ŤäŁķ ¿Ș₮áłĶ?฿¡฿↓¡ography 00:51 9.03.14
Yes, {{MonthlyAwards}} is protected from editing. Anton (talk) 16:48, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

fuck chat[edit]

I just saw your new article creation and went to my talk page to see the image... shit!!! I found that on Today it has some new charmless ads, but not that exact one. I will maybe try searching it, but we might be the only people ever to actually LOOK for spam ads. Leverage (talk) 13:11, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Yup that's where I found it. They're quite hard to find on google and that, and they've not been written of extensively, so you have to try pirate or porn sites to get them.--EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 13:15, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
I found this, but I think the image is different.
Basically I went to one episode's page ( if you want to try) and kept refreshing, they show different saucy ads. --Leverage (talk) 13:17, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
I perused the full collection there and went for my one because of its tasteful sparsity and limited colour palette.--EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 13:22, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Ah ok, I thought you might want one to match the page name. I guess if you saved the above image as a jpg you could make it stop flashing at least. I have to admit I kind of got you confused with banzai, because he was the one I spoke to about these images when I put them up on my talk page. --Leverage (talk) 13:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

You're right about the page name correlation, so I said "also known as This Is Not a Dating Site", the fact that it flashes makes one think it's real adware, and it could be one of those flashy posters, but I don't know if they existed in the 40s.--EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 14:09, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

My Yu-Gi-Oh! collection[edit]

You voted for My Yu-Gi-Oh! collection on VFH and it was featured so I guess I can give you one of my cards. Put it in a safe place. It's in mint condition.


Thanks for your vote! --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:20, 21 September 2014 (UTC)


Dance the mash bro!

...starts NOW! You have a week. Go here to pick your topic.

Hey. Extending the competition by three days (giving you over three and a half days to get an article ready). :) --ShabiDOO 08:01, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Hey. Three hour extension in case you feel like sprucing up your article :) --ShabiDOO 03:12, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Time to [[1]]. --ShabiDOO 06:19, 12 October 2014 (UTC)


It got featured at the Spoon. Just in case you didn't know. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:02, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I had no idea! I haven't been there for a while.--EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 11:34, 5 October 2014 (UTC)


This was my attempt at creating a terrible injoke. But I also think it is so bad it is good.--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 02:26, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Ah. I think you could continue with it. But I don't think you can make it so bad it's good, because it's already a Mr winkler pastiche. Whatever you do, you must exploit it for full comic effect.--EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 11:44, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

UnDebate:Should women rap?[edit]

Thank you for your comment! I appreciate your opinion, no matter whether you vote for or against the article. I see you proofread it, which means that you looked at it closely, but would it bother you, if I asked you to, please, throw another quick look? Concerning jokes, I thought I had enough of them, but I might be wrong. Every audience intervention is a joke as such, as well as most of the arguments both Margaret and her opponents use. Same goes with the introduction and the preamble. In any case, I am not asking you to reconsider your vote if you feel like you are sure about it, but I will be glad if you could help me to give some additional suggestions for improvement! Anton (talk) 13:25, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

I think there are lots of jokes in this on second thoughts, but many of them don't appeal to my sense of humour. I've just changed some of the preamble, which is important as it's one of the reader's first impressions, to slightly less closely resemble seriously-put points of view. I think that it would be premature to feature the article now. I feel as though an article dies and becomes history once it is featured, and this one should be improved upon before that happens.--EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 14:34, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
That's an interesting point of view on featuring! Thanks for editing the beginning! I just undid the anarchist one, if you don't mind, because it went against the style, kind of, and I think that one was absurd enough (an anarchist talking about female rappers?!). Anton (talk) 16:22, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
I moved several parts from the beginning of the article to the end, as Peasewhizz said it started too slowly. Maybe this removes a part of your concerns about it as well? Anton (talk) 18:30, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Pulp Fiction Pee Review[edit]

If you have time,can you pee review my other article? Thanks!--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 23:27, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Yes I was looking at this earlier, but I don't think I could do it justice because I've only seen the film once and wasn't really a fan... a lot of the humour sort of relies on you having a great appreciation for it. I haven't heard of these theories about it but remember being pissed off that they were looking in that damn briefcase but I never got to see it. Maybe that's why I didn't like it.
Also, if you could, would you please pee review the article my hair? What I want is ideas for other directions of the article, and I want it to be relatable for everyone with a crop of hair, not just myself.--EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 17:05, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Random video[edit]

Tell me what your opinion is on this video. --Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 21:09, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Yeah you sent me this a bit ago... to be honest I don't have much of an opinion. I just looked into what it actually is, appears to be about some legend. I think the building's quite ugly, but I guess it's cool that it was made from special bricks. Are you planning on writing something about this? If so you should know that people outside of California (like me) will need to research before getting it.
Ideas for jokes: present the film as an extraordinary and unique piece of New Wave cinema, act as though the time the murder took place (the '20s?) is the dark ages or something, take the position that the legend is not only plausible but real, while naively pointing out all of its flaws. Is this what you mean by opinion?--EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 23:10, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

The third best non-loser[edit]


That's right. You didn't so much win as be in the top three of not losing. And that's what not losing is all about. I know I had fun reading your article. Don't forget to print off this image and show all your friends what a non-loser you are :) Thanks for participating! --ShabiDOO 21:03, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Ryan Gosling[edit]

I think a have a plan for a featured article.--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 22:01, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Okay, but I know jackshit about him.--EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 22:19, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Free Love[edit]

A song for you:--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 05:33, 18 October 2014 (UTC)


Mattsnow and Xamralco have been writing a good Nirvana article at User:Mattsnow/Nirvana. Could you userspace Nirvana (RDB's version) to his or your userspace? Thanks.  Kamek siggy.png ŤäŁķ ¿Ș₮áłĶ?฿¡฿↓¡ography 00:04 10.20.14

Your hair[edit]

The work in progress tag on your article expired and I assumed you would want a userspace copy. -- The Zombiebaron 07:54, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

The Prodigy[edit]

Ever seen the "Smack my Bitch Up" video?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 00:12, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Yup. I think it's overrated. I like the song though. --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 00:45, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

My opinion[edit]

I think that the video was creative by the first person point of view style, and sound effects.--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 01:00, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

I've rewatched it just for you, and it is a pretty good watch, and I also get why people like it from a more intellectual point of view, but I still think it gets more attention than it deserves. --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 02:52, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

A ray of light[edit]

Remember that video from Madonna?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 18:16, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Nope I don't listen to much Madonna.--EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 18:35, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Did you watch that voice farm video?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 18:55, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Yeah 'ts pretty good. --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 19:03, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Ever heard of SimSimi?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 19:14, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

No. --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 20:37, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Look at my John Lennon article.--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 20:50, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

I read it a while ago when I was going through the Pee Reviews. My problem with your articles on musicians is that they are far too praising to be funny. Compare our introductions on The Prodigy for instance, wher the only joke you made was with the Mozart pic. --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 20:57, 2 November 2014 (UTC)


I like his movies,but he is a fucking asshole.--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 23:07, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you.[edit]

For the venom pee review.  Kamek siggy.png ŤäŁķ ¿Ș₮áłĶ?฿¡฿↓¡ography 22:53 11.07.14

Awww... I didn't mention it but the image caption was very funny.--EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 11:44, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Pearl Jam Jeremy[edit]

Ever seen this music video?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 03:10, 10 November 2014 (UTC)


Do you like Beck's music?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 05:12, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

I am not sure about Beck, but I really like Beckett's music. The one he creates with words. Man, this is simply impressive. Anton (talk) 20:29, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

A letter[edit]

Thanks for your comments! They made me re-read what I thought didn't need anymore editing and spot a problem with the style, which does indeed make this teenage-written letter sound unnatural. There's a factor you might not have taken into account, which is that the narrator himself admits having read plenty of romantic literature. Therefore, the fancy phrases. And permit me, but I find: "there is no sacrifice I won't do for you and thus, under the shimmering light of a sole functioning lamp in our old house, shivering because of the cold November wind, I am starting my memoirs." is a suitable beginning to a boy's impossible love story just in terms of clichés (like pathetic fallacy) and ridiculousness.

That was my defense. Now counter-thesis. I did everything I think was necessary in terms of restoring funny-sounding awkward phrases and putting them side by side with long-winded stuff like the above will make them work even better. But I see that the last rewrite, which you criticized, kept many key phrases from the original version... Do you think anything else needs to be done? Oh, and what would you propose in terms of font?

Sincerely, waiting for your answer, Anton (talk) 20:28, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

I think the voice should write in reasonably short sentences, and as is mainly the case currently, no contractions should be used to maximise the voice's innocence, gullibility and of course awkwardness. "I am really sorry but I have to quickly end this composition here, 'cause it's suddenly becomes so dark outside that I am afraid I won't find a path to the nearest metro station and if the lamp I am sitting under ceases to work, I'll find myself in the most ridiculous situation one could ever imagine." could maybe be split up like "I am really sorry but I have to end this letter here. It has suddenly become really dark outside and I am afraid I will not find a path to the nearest metro station and if the lamp I am sitting under stops working, I will find myself in a really ridiculous situation."
I don't see how the bit about romantic literature adds to the comedy, but if you look up "romantic best-sellers 2014" you will see that romantic literature means different things to different people. I do think it's important that he sounds what I would call "a little less posh" -- he says "whom" when most would say "that", you'll see above I changed "ceases to work" to "stops working" -- the direct and literal talk has an air of earnestness, which given off makes the odd attempt at pathetic fallacy funny. Both the use of contractions and colourful turns of phrase give the voice a wit, which makes his "impossible love story" seem insincere.
At first the font was a fairly large Bradley Hand ITC, which, accompanied by the broken pencil with caption "I don't write letters very often", made me laugh but your re-write had it changed to oblique normal type (Helvetica), which to me took away a lot of the fun. However, it may prove fruitful to look at other common (and ugly) script typefaces, such as Comic Sans. --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 11:46, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
P.S. I found this article just under a year ago when I was browsing through the category "Pages that look like the things they're about", so having read the the title the first thing I laughed at was the lettering and the statement "I don't write letters very often", as this was the first thing to paint the stereotype of the average American teen infatuated by a celebrity, which is why type is so important to me. You have to remember that the article begins with an "A" so will get the most traffic from people browsing through categories, therefore the article is expected to fit neatly into its categories. Another note on writing style: I suggest using lots of simple modifiers--"very good" sounds much more to character than "excellent". --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 11:57, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
OK, I see what your point is. Could you look at this link, please? It's comparing the revision you wrote your critique on and the final version (I changed the page today, after reading your comments). Thank you for such a long message! It made me aware of several things I didn't spot in that article before. The fancy wording does make it look insincere and I tried to edit out most of the unnecessary spins of phrases.
However, I do find the romantic dimension very important to this article. And by "romantic", I at the same time mean a specific literary movement born around 19th century and all the clichés we have about love in literature. One of the things I am trying to show is that the narrator was also influenced by books: he took a lot of ideas from them, but only the ideas that justified his claims to a great love. Despite the important relevance of this letter to Americans nowadays, which you showed, this article actually talks about a well-known and old phenomenon of a teenage boy's impossible love, which, as far as I know, was even detailed in ancient Greek literature, although I might be wrong, because I don't have any specific reference. So a purpose of several curly and unnatural sentences is also to show that the narrator isn't the first and won't be the last.
In any case, I hope I made something resembling a literary text and literature should always be open for interpretation, so if you permit, I will keep just the right amount of words that'll justify the literature idea. Still, thanks to what you said, I re-added the natural style to the rest of the text, re-inserted the original first phrase, but also added a special font, which I think resembles a letter style more than the last one! I hope you find that the article looks better now! Anton (talk) 14:52, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
P.S. I hadn't noticed that the pencil on the picture wasn't broken. It's fine now! Anton (talk) 17:11, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your edits! I don't know why you prefer Bradley to Colibri, however. For me, the latter looks as awkward but, at least, actually resembles handwriting when italicised. Also, one of the reasons Nikau voted against the last time was because of the font.

And you should understand that I really don't want to choose between different people's votes. I appreciate your feedback in the same way I appreciate Nikau's, so I'm trying to implement different things at the same time. Not because I'd like to please everyone, but because I agree that this page needs some wit, even if implicit, but it also needs to sound sincere. That was just to let you know. Right now, I feel like I've done everything that was needed to be done, but please, tell me how you feel about the article! And do you have a specific issue with Colibri? Anton (talk) 13:15, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Calibri is not a script typeface, and when used in the article it doesn't give the impression that it was written by hand. I like Bradley because it's so ugly. There is a few other ugly script types worthy of exploration--for example Comic Sans--and I would prefer you use one of these non-italicised than a regular sans serif in italics, but ultimately I'm not going to start an edit war over it. --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 13:23, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Oh, ok. I guess some people are against Bradley precisely because it's ugly. I have no opinion and just think that it's better with some specific font, and I know that for others a font they don't like may actually spoil the reading, so I think I'll keep it more neutral. In addition, in Letter to Santa, which looks like a letter, the font is Colibri... And just a question: do you still wish to abstain? Anton (talk) 14:10, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

UnTunes:God Screw You Royally, Gentlemen[edit]

This is great! I would love to read more, but I guess you know what the right size for this is. Are you going to sing it or ask anyone to do it? Anton (talk) 14:03, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! I may make it so that the two verses I've written are alternatives and that there is a full 5-verse de facto version, but that sounds like work. I may sing it myself, or if you're interested you're welcome to sing it. --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 14:15, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Oh, thanks for the invitation, but even if I write something myself (I tried, but failed), then even then I'll probably ask someone like Leverage, RAHB or Kip to do it. Anton (talk) 14:19, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
I don't think it's so bad, in fact I laughed at one or two lines, both before and after listening to the song for the first time. I've now written 3 verses of mine, and although the original has 5 I feel I'll ruin it now I have fewer ideas. --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 15:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the compliment (although I know that I can manage better in prose)! Your new verses are very good! Anton (talk) 17:17, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Song search[edit]

What is that song from the late 90s about Summer that is a one hit wonder?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 23:10, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

I have absolutely no idea. I know a good one-hit wonder from the late 60s about summer--Chad & Jeremy "A Summer Song", which played in my favourite film of all-time Rushmore, which is incidentally from the late 90s--if that helps? --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 23:43, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Small Soldiers[edit]

Would making fun of this movie be a good idea for an article? I HATED this movie back in 1998.--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 01:07, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

I haven't seen it. But I would advise that you perhaps think more "philosophically" (whatever that means) to choosing your articles' content: you should start an article with one particular joke in mind (by which I mean a humourous concept as opposed to a one-liner) and sequence that out across the whole thing. It may be very short, but it's better than just saying "This film was made in 2004 by director him and produced by an anonymous studio. And it is awesome/crap/mediocre/look at me I have an opinion!". To avoid this sort of writing I think you should consider writing an article on a very basic subject for which a Wikipedia page would be no help at all and an IMDb page doesn't exist, in which you avoid pop culture references entirely (I realise that you like to make these but it is a common problem, with me, with most editors on Uncy, with just about all Hollywood parody writers, to make a reference but not really much of a joke, causing people who get the reference to laugh simply because it makes them feel clever). And because you aren't editing on the ominous other Uncy, you are free to write on something you've just made up, which can feel quite liberating. I had a lot of fun thinking about new directions in which to drive my almost entirely fictional Aliana y los Enanitos Grandes. So please consider these options. --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 17:35, 8 December 2014 (UTC)


This is a great new font! Thanks! Are there any problems remaining? Anton (talk) 19:43, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Steal my sunshine[edit]

Now I know what that song is! A great pop song.--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 00:08, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Not so much for me I'm afraid. A pleasant piano riff, but there's nothing else to the melody and it is ruined anyway by the cloying vocals. --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 00:52, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Do you think Nirvana are slightly overrated?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 22:31, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

That sounds like the sort of thing I'd say. But I haven't listened to them in a while, so I'd best keep my opinions quiet. --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 22:52, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

I GET KNOCKED DOWN BUT I GET UP AGAIN AINT NUFFIN GONNA KEEP ME DOWN.--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 02:46, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality ads: --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 21:11, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Amy's Baking Company[edit]

On YouTube there are parody videos of this god awful place called Amys Baking Company. They are hilarious!--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 23:49, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

OK TEN.--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 23:19, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Christmas Tarantino[edit]

Can you do a pee review for me if you can?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 01:09, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

I have just read it, but will only review in exchange for you reviewing one or other of my articles on Pee Review. --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 01:30, 20 December 2014 (UTC)


HA HA HA--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 01:14, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Eh... and to you? --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 03:15, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Your Woman[edit]

Remember this one hit wonder?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 22:10, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

I don't have the excellent music memory you think, plus I'm only 16, I just don't like to mention my age online. But I like this song quite a bit, so thanks for telling me about it. --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 23:25, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Every, which day is your birthday, if I may ask? Anton (talk) 14:48, 27 December 2014 (UTC)


Hi Every! I moved this page to your userspace, so only you will be edit it during the competition time! Good luck! Anton (talk) 19:38, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Okay sorry I may have screwed something up then. Sorry I didn't reply to your last question but for the purposes of anonymity I don't want to say. --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 03:27, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
No, it's fine, don't worry! It's my job (even though I don't get money for it) to make sure everything is right. Concerning the last question, that's why I added "if I may ask". Don't answer, if you feel uncomfrtable, and the reason I asked was that ... I am 16, too. Anton (talk) 17:10, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Forrest Gump[edit]

I don't know why,but I always thought this movie was kind of overrated.--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 22:34, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Putin on the Ritz[edit]

Ever seen this meme?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 22:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

I have now! --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 22:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)


Ever heard of this musician?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 19:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

No, is he/she interesting? --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 21:03, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Yes,but a one hit wonder who made a Puttin on the Ritz remake.--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 21:10, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Oh, I HAVE heard that version of the song before! Is it not quite old though? Does Taco do anything now? --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 21:53, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Not much today,sadly.--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 22:19, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Mountain Dew commercial[edit]

Tell me your opinion on this: --Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 00:46, 6 January 2015 (UTC)


I won't be writing a competing article on this subject on the other site but you can have the images I uploaded there for it. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:56, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

I saw that. I don't see why you can't, but I hope you write a good one on Raphael. With regards to Rembrandt I'm more interested in your comic ideas than images. --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 22:34, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
I had a read through. The article has a good structure with some decent jokes and is well illustrated. You discuss the self portraits and the ones that get left out in the rain. I would consider the 'commercialisation' of Rembrandt and that perhaps if he had cut his ear off too, well perhaps his pictures would be even more famous that Van Gogh's. That actually was one of my ideas for when I thought of writing about Rembrandt. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:21, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the little review. One thing: what do you mean by "the ones that get left out in the rain"? --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 01:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
That was my misunderstanding as regards the degradation of the paintings. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 14:35, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

The commercial[edit]

Odd? LOL--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 20:04, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

The link for it's broken, but I saw you post it elsewhere. All I remember was that there was some vintage effect the uploader had put on it and that he had ads for his channel all over it. --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 00:12, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Amy's Baking Company About[edit]

Shocking on YouTube,most insane couple ever.--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 00:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

I don't like Mondays.[edit]

Ever heard of this 1979 song?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 02:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Nope. --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 22:11, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Get your kicks... at the Ritz.--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 23:50, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

I reviewed your pee.[edit]

Fair deal for a review with me?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 04:59, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Done! Sorry I'm a bit of a jerk... ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 22:44, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Ever heard of Captain Beefheart?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 19:13, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Yes. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 16:00, 1 February 2015 (UTC)


You're the glorious winner of this edition of The Article Whisperer!

ArticleWhisperAwardGold.png Article Whisperer Winner
This person is a Grand Prize winner of the 1st Inter-Annual Article Whisperer Competition (2014-5), which they won for their article: Rembrandt in the Best Vital Article category

Anton (talk) 21:13, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

You might be interested to know your Rembrandt article is the only one that exists among the other foreign-language Uncyclopedia. I believe only the Dutch Uncyclopedia has one. MadMax (talk) 18:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for that. If only I knew Dutch I would have taken an entirely different approach. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 20:39, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Tarantino Christmas[edit]

What do I need to work on?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 02:28, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Slut shaming[edit]

Thanks for looking at it! I did not know that grammar corrections could be funny. Anton (talk) 20:10, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Look at my Aphex Twin article.[edit]

Can it be put in the mainspace?--Ketchup Boss has a openly gay crush on Bertie Wooster (talk) 03:52, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Spam month![edit]

Hey Every. I've seen you getting involved with the joyous occasion of Spam Month but unfortunately you keep getting booted off. Just thought I would recommend HexChat as opposed to Webchat/KiwiIRC as that throttles whatever you feed through it so that you don't get flooded off and even when we're not spamming it's about a million times better anyway. Just connect it to freenode, set it up with your nick and such, type /join #uncyclopedia and you're all set. Let me know if you have any issues, otherwise hope to see you continue sharing in our annual festivities. :D -- Lost Labyrinth It's Britain bitch! (t)(c)(a) 13:08, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Cheers! I was actually just looking around for other servers, tried to download this UnrealIRCd thing, didn't really work out. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 14:21, 4 May 2015 (UTC)


Your assistance is needed at the Illogicopedian Embassy. Thanks, Icons-flag-au.png XY007talkcontributions 08:39, 26 June 2015 (UTC)