User:Projectmayhem666/Archive

Hey PM666

Do you mind voting AGAINST me for Useless Gobshite of the month? Some asshole nominated me (personal dislike, and he knows it) and now I'm in lead. I honestly think most of the people who voted for me don't have any clue who I am, but were just following the dude's lead. Mind helping me out? I'm trying to be taken seriously, and Im pretty sure a Gobshite OTM never got an article featured.--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 20:35, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Haha, yeh sure no problem, made me laugh though. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 22:04, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, now if I can just keep it that low...--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 22:55, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

QVFD and moving pages and stuff

Hea dude. I saw that you were having a bit of trouble with HowTo:Write a funny article‎ and the naming and stuff... So that you know... If you want to get an article you have created deleted by an admin, list it on QVFD with a note saying "author request"... You can also use the "move" button (it's at the top to the right of the discussion tab) to move pages. That's better than creating a new article because you have changed the name... Hope that makes sense... MrN 21:37, Aug 11

Its more I'm trying to move it into the HowTo: section, its becoming ardorous lol.

Drive by Comment ~~~~!!! SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 21:39 11 August 2008

I've deleted the duplicate copy for you. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Cheers, Well its up now, my work is complete, now I have to make a powers that be article. A list of admins would pose useful, is there one? —The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs)

Here:)— Sir Sycamore (talk) 21:49, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

here and by "~~~~!!!" I meant sign your posts with tidles, if you want a fancy, colourful one I might be able to help you set one up. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 21:50 11 August 2008

Would be nice, I've tried stealing yours but its failed lol.

You never got Welcomed so...

Welcome Projectmayhem666.

Welcome!

Hello Projectmayhem666, and welcome to Uncyclopedia!

So what's this message all about? Well, I know it looks like this was automatically generated, and well, OK... you caught me. I'm lazy, so I paste it in. But... if you have been sent this it does mean that I have noticed your contributions, and think that you're going to do some good stuff here. So who am I? Oh, just someone putting his nose in where it is probably not wanted...

Anyway, if you have not already, I SERIOUSLY recommend that you read the link below:

• Beginner's Guide

Probably the second most important link for a newcomer is:

• How to be funny and not just stupid - Basically it's a guide to writing humours articles which has been edited and improved over time by the users of this site. It's not an insult, and it's well worth a look.

If you want to find out how we decide which articles to feature on the front page, check out the VFH page. Basically, we vote for them. Anyone can vote. Especially you! You might find VFH a useful page to look over as it gives an idea of the kind of standard which you need to reach if you want to get an article featured.

If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia, try these:

• About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
• How to get started editing
• Everything you ever wanted to know, but were afraid to ask
• Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue
• Our Vanity Policies - stuff we don't care about
• The FAQs - a few commonly asked questions answered for your convenience

If you need help, feel free to ask me on my talk page (if this message has appeared in the last few minutes, I'm propablly still on-line). A list of administrators can be found here. If you think you are going to be around a while, and would like extra help on a more personal level, you just might be able to convince someone at the Uncyclopedian Adopt-a-Noob program to take you under their wing.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

Again, welcome!  --MrN 21:51, Aug 11

I this has already been done (possibly by me) but somebody deleated it. (sorry if I sound cunty I don't mean to). SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 21:53 11 August 2008

I think you did actually, I don't remember, I probably removed it though lol. —The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs)

Hey, that talk tab looks familiar. I used to have one like that, got stolen though. Never found out who took it. Also if you click on the "my preferences" link at the top right of the page put that template in the signature box and click the "raw signature" box it'll mean you just have to use the four tidles and you get the date stamp and your new sig comming up automatically. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 22:06 11 August 2008

Sorry to complain again...

But I've become increasingly anal. I noticed you deleated some stuff from your talk page. This is very bad policy, even for your own talk page. If you feel the place is getting cluttered then create an archive page (User talk:Projectmayhem666/Archive1) and put the old text there. I tend to do this after about 20-30 headers, some people leave it to 60+ though. If you feel it's taking to long to get down to new messages put a request at the top asking people to leave tehir new messages at the top (Yettie does this). Or if you fancy you can just add bits to the archive as you go. Look around on different pages to see what other people do but bassically all I'm saying is don't deleate talk page stuff! Ta, and have fun! SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 16:58 14 August 2008

Oh I see, I didnt realise I could do that, I'll archive it in future, thanks Projectmayhem666 10:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

If you want I can get it back for you, and put it in that page I mentioned above. In fact I think I'll do that anyway, just you know cos it's good too keep stuff. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 12:22 15 August 2008

Actually I can't find it. meh, like you say make sure to archive in the future. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 12:26 15 August 2008

Dude

COME BACK! You need to finish The Powers That Be! We're all on the edge of our seats waiting for our biopics! -RAHB 04:52, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

The article really isnt funny though :p

Not in the least, but it holds a special place in the hearts of the admins. Also, there is some funny stuff in there. I can't be arsed to find it right now, but I remember laughing at it quite a few times. -RAHB 23:32, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

really hard to complete it at work though, still going at it though.

Skipped right to you but been very busy today.

Hey hey! I've been sitting around quietly waiting for my turn and you skip??? You're in trouble now! ~ 13:49, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Hahah! Wow, I haven't actually laughed at quotes in a long time. Good work so far. Mordillo's just bitter because his sig was a dildo for a week. -RAHB 19:19, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

About VFH

Hi there, just a quick word about that article you tried to nom on VFH. Or a couple of words, actually. First, you didn't create a proper nomination page - use the "nominate" box on the VFH page so it gets created in the right place (it should be in the Uncyclopedia namespace if done properly). Secondly, keep an eye on the rules - no self noms without a review. There is a reason for that, and it's not just that we're obsessed with rules. Thirdly, if you want constructive feedback, request a pee review. Even better, ask a member of PEEING to give you one, which should guarantee plenty of constructive advice. Hope this helps, any questions, give me a shout! --UU - natter 11:42, Feb 24

Actually I created it twice now, its just not coming up, looks like a glitch :s... --Projectmayhem666 11:45, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

The second time, you replaced your article with the vote table. I reverted that for you. You need to use the box on the VFH page, put the title in and click the "nominate" button, which should bring up a page to create the nomination. Don't change anything except the content of the vote table, and save it. But only do it if you've got a pee review or the nom will be removed as invalid. --UU - natter 11:54, Feb 24

thats it though its only bringing up my article page seriously, try it, I've nominated before.--Projectmayhem666 11:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

OK, here's the deal: get it reviewed, and if it does well, I'll nom it for you properly. Cool? --UU - natter 12:00, Feb 24

Ok deal.--Projectmayhem666 12:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

As I'm passing, I'll mention the problem that was causing all of this has now been fixed, so you shouldn't have any more problems nomming. Be sure to wait for either a review or the request to be on the pee queue for a week before you self nom though! ;-) --UU - natter 15:19, Feb 25

Really? I've been nominating manually after learning how. I'll use it as normal now. Thanks --Projectmayhem666 Talk 15:26, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Signature check

Testing it out. --Projectmayhem666 Talk 12:51, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Test 2 --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Hatstand

I am amused and nonplussed at the British use of the term "hatstand" for "crazy". I think it is simply ironic - using a term for something so far removed from crazy to express craziness. So I find it an amusing proposition to imagine a world where it is simply a de facto truth that, without explanation, the actual object simply is crazy. This is the reason the article has to be written straight, with the "nuts" twist. Not amusing? Hmm. I'm trying to figure out if the concept is iffy or the execution is poor, but nobody seems to get it. Anyway, thanks for the review.

You're welcome, like I said the idea is good, it's just lacking what would make it funny. I'm sure you'll work it out though. --Projectmayhem666 Talk 19:26, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Reviews

Hi again Projectmayhem, I promise I'm not following you all over the wiki or anything. Anyway, a short word about pees, if I may. First of all, thanks for doing some - we really do appreciate it when people take the time to help out, particularly if there's a bit of a backlog. However, that said, what you did was a bunch of reviews with one line per box, which isn't actually that helpful - the problem is, because you haven't really given much advice on improving the article, there's a good chance people will request another review, so the backlog isn't exactly cleared if that happens! We try to do more in-depth reviews so that people get the help they need and don't feel the need to keep coming back - have a look at the guidelines, and recent reviews by the likes of Tagstit and Nachlader to see what I mean.

Plus, doing an in-depth review can help your chances of getting one in return - particularly if you review an article by a good reviewer (such as the members of PEEING and ask for one in return. So yeah, thanks for doing the work, as I say, but maybe next time a little more quality and a little less quantity would be more of a help? --UU - natter 11:57, Feb 27

I know that but they were very old ones hence the quick reviews, normally I will do a full review, which is why I haven't done one for a while. Next time I get a moment I'll do a couple more but full this time since it is only a week behind.

P.S. yes you are stalking me, stalker. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs) 12:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

They weren't that old - when I started reviewing, there were requests three months old! Don't worry about the length of the queue, it fluctuates quite a lot! As I say, we really are grateful for the help, but more in-depth reviews tend to cut down the number of re-review requests, thus not only cutting the backlog, but preventing further build-up. Kind of like a good toothpaste on plaque. Or maybe not.

Also, about that sig - go to your preferences page, and in the "nickname" box add {{SUBST:nosubst|User:yourname/sig}}. Tick the "Raw signatures (without automatic link)" box, and you should be able to sign with the four tildes (~~~~) like the rest of us, avoiding filling pages up with several lines of code each time you sign. And if I was stalking you, I'd be doing a much scarier job. --UU - natter 12:11, Feb 27

Anything else oh great one? Although that checkbox was selected, I changed the code in it to yours.—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 12:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Nice one, looks good! See you around... --UU - natter 12:26, Feb 27

Hey thanks for reviewing and nominating The Redneck Elite. I didn't realise it was so hard to understand what the article was parodying; I tried pretty hard to put in as many blatant references as I could. I won't change much about the article at the moment as it has been nominated, but thanks for your advice. IronLung 23:45, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

hey Thanks.

Yeah, I saw some stuff did seem kinda lame when I re-read it. Glad you think it's better.--68.63.145.190 23:50, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!

Good day, old chap! Thank you indeed for your vote on my article, UnBooks:Hot Japanese Girls - Colourblind or Unable to Speak English?. As a sterling reward, I will not deliberately make this text extremely tiny around these pictures of some rather cracking Japanese girls I've supplied for you. ... I say, are you still there, old boy?

And extra thanks for nominating the article! ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 15:34, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Yo, man, truce?

It's seems like it's been really shit between us, and I'm sorry if I offended you. No more insults in either direction. We cool?--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 00:14, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

You didn't offend me, your review was just not what a review should have been.--—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 10:20, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

K, thanks. Not every body likes to be understanding, and I don't like issues to go unsolved. The review did kinda suck admittedly, but I tried. They've gotten better though, so I think that'll be the last one like that.--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods

On a 100% un-related note: Do you by any chance know how to enable DHCP? Tell me if you do.--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 03:37, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Depends, what is it? --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 10:04, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

No worries feller

Hey, no offence intended mate, everyone misinterprets things on the interwebs from time to time, it's the way of things. I remember this one time Spang thought I was clinically insane due to a misunderstanding over Queen lyrics! Anyway, you're just trying to help around the wiki, and I really do appreciate that. Seriously, keep it up. Like your reverting of that prick spamming the phone number everywhere, that was nice work, and will get you a cookie in a minute. One tip: if you see stuff like that, report it on ban patrol, so an admin can sort it out - otherwise we can miss things. Anyway yeah, keep doing stuff, the more you do, the more you'll get used to stuff. Oh, and I don't believe I've said this before, but I like the sig.

Under user has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

--UU - natter 17:03, Mar 5

Thanks for that, I was going to report him I just didn't know where to, I'll keep a note of that for future incidents, also I couldnt remove it from review so I just reviewed it. Will try to read far more cautiously in future. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 17:16, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

For the record, while UU might have Spang fooled now, I'm still not convinced he's not clinically insane. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:20, 5 Mar

Great review!

Thanks for reviewing the dongs, man, you presented me with an in-depth analysis that is immediately creditable. The comments are something I'll work with when I'm at school tomorrow or sometime (the £100 note can be found here but then I don't live in bagpipeland - I'll switch it to £50, they're in rare circulation at least). The review itself is a vast improvement since the last time you reviewed one of my articles and I daresay that you may be a RotM one month if you keep this up. A few comments though - the articles that you have a shine to, I've noticed the scores are a bit generous at times, but whatever you believe fits your opinion. Just bear in mind that some reviewees will assume that anything given a score over 35, it'll most likely be hinted for a VFH nomination, know what I'm saying? Speaking of which, you gave my article a 44, which I can't deny that it makes me glad to see a happy reader, what is your opinion on the potential of the article being nominated for VFH? Once more, thanks again for reviewing the article! ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 23:44, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Well the last section with more content and yes I do believe if could get VFH (I am new though). I know I'm generous however no-one ever gives a 10 away, which is silly if you can't find anything wrong with it. I'll be more conservative with the scores then I have given scores away over 35 to articles that I wouldnt put for VFH. UU told me off for writing short reviews so they're all long now. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 09:56, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

OK, those last reviews put you over the top, welcome aboard! Your reviewing has markedly improved, and the Withnail & I one was impressive. Keep the standard up, and well done! --UU - natter 09:42, Mar 7

Thanks very much, its really appreciated. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 12:03, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Hea there!

I noticed that you copied HowTo:Piss off Islam to your userspace. There is a "move" tab for doing that ya know! That's better as it keeps the page history intact. Did you want the mainspace article deleted now or do you want to move it over? You can't really leave it like you have I'm afraid... MrN 12:59, Mar 7

You can delete it for now, I'll move it over when I'm done, its just I have 3 rewrites to do, reviews, so making another article is going to take time. I'm very tired this morning, I just forgot sorry. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 13:20, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Tis no problem dude. I will huff it. Next time, use the move button and stick the redirect it creates onto QVFD. Have fun. MrN 13:27, Mar 7

Yo

Nothing bad happened I hope. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:12, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Since you said you'd only be gone for a few hours... -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:11, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

was knocked off my bike by a car my wrist is broken, i can't type well so I'LL just try give some ideas. Firstly, killing your parents, for inspiration on this look at the "my adventure with green day" story in the kerplunk album, mainly try to think of it like that, i cant type much so sorry, got this damn cast on for 6 weeks. try adding some more along the lines of, your parents are selfish and only see you as a possession, that they need you more than you need them (tax credits etc) and thats me done, massive pain now. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 00:05, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for the help. I wish you the best, Projectmayhem666. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:17, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

You Gonna Enter the PLS contest?

I will enter for Best N00b Article if I can come up with a new idea.--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 22:00, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

I'll try but with having a broken wrist it might be ever so slightly difficult. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 16:58, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey, if you get the chance...

DO ya mind checking out my PLS entree? I actually think it may have a chance. --Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 03:01, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh, and can you tell me if should go in best n00b article or if it's enough for best mainspace article? Thanks --Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 18:02, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

I'd stick with the best n00b article, just got around to reading it. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 17:57, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank You

Thank you for your support for the (FAILED) featuring of AFI. You will not be killed and/or molested today. --CheddarBBQ

Thanks for review

Rejoice, Projectmayhem666! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award

For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

---

On Low, thanks that was very helpful. I'll be working on the things you pointed out:)--Sycamore (Talk) 16:45, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 17:18, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the harsh review, honestly!

Thanks for pointing out my mistakes, I really appreciate it. I know my first few articles wont be so good... Now, take a look at the other article Nile (band), I created it earlier today, before you reviewed my KMI and had that epic battle with UU. It is more wikipedish with less nonsense, but it has no images yet, although I can already think of three. Ill add them later. I hope Im on the right way! -- Mahm00shA kills you! 22:32, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

That is alot better, you're making a mistake I first did by putting random things in it, like in the opening you've put 1993 bc, but just 1993 would work, its good to have jests and jibes but on their own they're one liners, you need to make it flow, you have done quite, and quite well after the first section it flows good and made me chuckle, I don't know the band as well which is quite impressive. You should still work on the other article, like I said, there is potential there it just needs alot of work. You really need to read HTBFANJS over and over again, it really helps. It wasnt UU, he hasn't said anything to me about it, it's just Mordillo, but he's in admin so I should probably (but won't) listen, especially since I don't see anything wrong with saying stupid, our main help article is called "how to be funny and not just stupid", so yeh. The crap I can see where he was coming from but I was using a metaphor in the miscellaneous section, I didn't call the article crap once :p. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 23:30, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

It was only Mordillo. Nice. ~ 09:12, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Let's get things straight. We had many noobs in the past that got a rough welcome in the past, which your review can be considered as such. Some of them left thinking "fuck that, I'm never coming back" - thus we lost another potential great contributor. Your review can be perceived as such, with your crap analogy not necessarily the right way to encourage the writer, even if you meant well. In this case, obviously, MahmOOshA likes you review, which makes this fine. The only thing I ask is that you be more careful with the wordings of your reviews in the future - because you might stumble into someone that might take offense, and we have way too much drama here as it is. That's it. Oh, and if you say just Mordillo again I'll cut your balls off. Carry on the good work :) ~ 09:19, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Will do, and you do have a bit of a reputation to be fair. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 09:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Which is? ~ 10:51, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Being an evil dictator instilling fear into all who cross you. That sort of thing. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 11:15, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

I think you are confusing me with ZB. ~ 11:59, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Don't remember who told me, but it was on MIRC, as an admin you can check as they have The Powers That Be (which I totally intend to finish soon after a review) on watch or something so he said. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 12:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Well, I tend to deal quickly with anyone who harm or mistreat other people on this site. As for crossing me personally, I don't really care that much. If that bought me that "reputation" - than I don't mind. ~ 12:12, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Wasn't me personally who said, hence being told, but you did get annoyed at the "Just Mordillo thing". I didn't mean it as an attack on the guy, I did offer constructive advice, even wrote the intro again to give an example and said not to copy mine but to see it as an example. I'll refrain from using words like crap, but I think the way I said stupid when referring to HTBFANJS was justified, but I won't use that either if you don't want, but in fairness telling them why I'm saying to read it is better than just reviewing it with, read HTBFANJS which implies I think their article is stupid and not funny anyway. So yeh, I'll maintain some sense of decorum anywho. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 12:34, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't mind you saying "stupid" or "crap". My concern was that you might offend the writer, which obviously not the case, so let it go and move forward. As for the personal issue, I was thinking, "well, I'd assume after three years here I'm entitled for a bit more than "just Mordillo", but were I to be the evil dictator that I'm apparently am, I'd be banning you for eternity following this one. Anyway, let's drop this whole issue and carry on with our lives. ~ 12:41, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Well met.--—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 12:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the review

It was very good.

You know the "docu-drama" section was in response to a request for it from the first review. Of course, Guildensternenstein is a huge Lynch fan, so, he'll like it. Maybe you're right about the two pictures though.

Oh, and you obviously missed my little note to you here. And I re-read the footnote sentence in question to myself several times. Perhaps you should re-read it. If you need the punctuation, which you don't, but if you do, either put quotes around "for instance" (yuck) or put a hyphen between "for" and "instance" (yucker).

But you will probably disagree. Take it up with the king (of the King's English fame).

Thanks! --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 15:39, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't read previous reviews, I do after but if I read before then you're not getting my opinion on the article, you have me comparing how it was before and after. The footnote section, "if you need a for instance." A for instance? It makes no sense to me at all, if you can clarify what you mean I might get it, its the a that makes it make no sense to me. Still a good article. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 16:00, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

I writes how people talks. Yet I write properly. Around these yoonited statesy parts, "a for instance" is used interchangeably with "an example". My father used it, and his father before him used it. And I will use it too god damn you. Also, you need to go back to those school marms that rapped you on the knuckles evey time you started a sentence with a conjunction and tell them to get out of your head and leave you be. It is considered acceptable English now, even in business writing. And even in the U.K. Look it up. --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 16:08, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

No it isnt, its fine for effectual language, even phonetical writings, it is, however, informal, inproper and incorrect. We use for instance here, but a for instance? couldnt the a just be a comma? If you suggest however that starting a sentence with a conjunction is acceptable because educational standards are dropping, it only means people are accepting it because they're more stupid than they were before, it still is not acceptable, I'll tear down (personally) anyone that challanges me on that. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 16:12, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Promises, promises. And I shall personally reject any challenge to my rightful use of the form. Tear me down, knave. Do your worst. It is acceptable, by any definition of the term. You and your pedantic lot are vanquished. --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 20:31, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Big words for someone without genitals! HA I TOOK THEM OFF! HA! --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 21:27, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Joke's on you! I lost those a long time ago. In an argument with a bigger douchebag than you! HA! HA! --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 22:29, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

If you have no genitals, no matter what, I'm coming out on top. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 22:52, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

That's about as TMI as it gets... --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 22:58, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

No one will read this anyway. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 23:00, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

In gratitouille

 In gratitude for your vote  

The GlobalTourniquet says "Thanks!"   Understandably, you voted for my article for featuring. Although your "for" vote was not extraordinary, as the article's genius was beyond question, it is still appropriate to acknowledge your dutiful participation in the process. So, in gratitude for your vote, I will dedicate the next time I hit myself on the head with a heavy object to you. Thank you. The following heavy objects are available for this honor. Please indicate below this template which one you would like me to use in dedicating my head-bashing to your user name. Ball-Peen Hammer Four-Post Bed Golden Happy Buddha Mickey Rourke

Reviewed your article.

my first pee review. I think i haz a boner.

Saberwolf116 03:35, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, will give the article a good going over, like the afformentioned mother. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 19:31, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

BTW, just because i'm curious, how was the review? It was my first, after all :)Saberwolf116 04:17, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Could have done with a little more advice rather than criticism, but aside from that it was ok. Good for a first. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 10:47, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

He actually gave me a really good review onHowTo:Get Over Jenny--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods

HowTo:Get Over Jenny

it's nommed. Do I have your vote?--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods

Are you still here?--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 21:42, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

I am but my wrist is broken so its hard to type, comes off a week on tuesday, what am I voting for? --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 22:55, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

sorry, thought it had healed. Congrats on gettin it off on Tuesday and thanks for your vote.--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 00:12, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

f

WHAT THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU'RE DOING!?!? Do you realize that by supporting HowTo:Get Over Jenny, you are supporting insane, demented, homicidal stalkers everywhere? You should be ashamed. --CheddarBBQ

Not really, its not like I'm giving you any money or anything :p --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 14:54, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

The Powers That Be has been reviewed.

Bring a tissue.

Saberwolf116 02:04, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. The prose I figured, proof reading is always my last thing to do, I tend to want to get all my idea's down first. I know I've said I will finish this soon but I am, my wrist cast is off on tuesday so it WILL be worked on. I'm going to follow your advice to the T, since it sounds very good and reasonable. Thanks again for the review. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 22:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

No problem. I enjoy PEEING, and this one was a bit dated. Saberwolf116 22:54, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

More Spam!

'FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN'

Thank you for supporting my recently featured article

Your support is greatly appreciated.

—Guildensternenstein

---

Oops, Sorry

I forgot to demand you to go here. Go there please.--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 02:27, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

First day back and I'm going places... --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 09:31, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

imawhore

vote for me please--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 23:29, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Done. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 21:02, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

For Mahm00shA

Helpful Whoring-- Whore cHeDDaR 19:17,6May,2009

Hey

It's that time again! YAY WHORING!!!-- Whore cHeDDaR 01:15,7May,2009

Wow

Four of my whoring comments in a row? That's a lot. But this isn't whoring this is campaigning. Vote Leprechaun for Highlight in '09! Rock the Vote! -- Whore cHeDDaR 23:17,11May,2009

I swear I should script this page to block your comments. Done. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 09:39, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Nope sorry, still commenting, but no new whores to present. Don Puttano cHeDDs 19:10,26May,2009

I meant done to voting. I could just put a script on that wont let your username post by using the (4 tildes) = User:ChedderBBQ/sig3 lol.

Go ahead. I only use 3 tildes. Don Puttano cHeDDs 19:14,28May,2009

They both bring up the same results so it would work. I'm that bothered really, although I've stopped reviewing and writing due to being absolutely exhausted, and the old girlfriend taking ALL my free time. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 09:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Oh, because everyone else is too much of a dick to do it, congrats on winning RotM. I remembered. Don Puttano cHeDDs 19:11,29May,2009

I'll do a couple this weekend if someone reminds me. Thanks. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 08:53, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

How's your arm?

Probably fine, I guess. It's been a while, just wondering how you're doing and stuff. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:56, 24 September 2009

Haha yes it's been fixed a while. I've been working lots, probably too much work. Slowly I'm starting to come back onto here, what I need is some sort of reminder I keep forgetting at weekends. How've you been? --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 12:40, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

Hey, are you finally back? Don Puttano cHeDDs 20:59,12October,2009

Yes I am haha :-p --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 09:27, October 13, 2009 (UTC)

Hello

Not meaning to start Drama or anything, but I was just a bit quizzified as to how you contributed to The Asylum-Seeker's Guide to Visiting McDonald's. --Matfen 13:26, January 21, 2010 (UTC) ‎

Well well, I've never even read that article, it has been a while since I have been on here, what makes you think I've contributed to it? --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 09:23, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Wow, you're back. Anyway, it was just that you have it on your userpage. Maybe an uber-mastermind vandal sneaked it on while you had disappeared. Welcome back, anyway. --Matfen 09:26, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Did they? Oh well I'll have to delete it then, may also change my password just in case. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 09:40, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Oh yeah, I just checked your userpage history. It was added by some randomer called NotAProfanity. That is vandalism at its highest level, my friend. Sorry for the 3rd degree interrogation. --Matfen 09:52, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

It's not a problem, can't have people claiming they wrote articles that they didn't, although I don't see why someone would say I wrote something I didn't, it doesn't acheive much, but oh well. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 10:19, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

'Ello, it would appear to be you. Planning on sticking around? --UU - natter 10:32, Mar 9

That is a possibility I have had a read and thought it could use some childish humour. You're going to ask me to do some reviewing? --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 11:27, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Last time I looked, the queue was almost empty, but you can if you want - I'm just asking if you're sticking around! Always good to see good people. --UU - natter 11:29, Mar 9

I will be to read the articles not sure if I'll be writing anything, depends how bored I get. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 11:56, March 9, 2010 (UTC)