User:Cajek/Archive38

• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Fred Phelps reads rest of Bible, disbands Westboro Baptist Church by Aleister in Chains. Uh... that's... well, okay. I mean, that... nevermind. 1234 ~ 08:32, 1 June 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Final Fantasy VII by JackOfSpades. Sure.
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Stargate Universe by Black flamingo11. Okay. 1234 ~ 08:32, 1 June 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnScripts:The Best Man by Mattsnow. Sure. 1234 ~ 08:32, 1 June 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Get into Heaven by Mattsnow. Yup, that's the stuff. 1234 ~ 08:32, 1 June 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Get Expelled from School by Tagstit. What a great day for reviews (yes). --Black Flamingo 22:19, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Communion by CandidToaster. Great for a first. --Black Flamingo 22:19, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:21-year-old black man successfully poses as newborn baby by Magic man. Good. --Black Flamingo 22:19, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Lake Baikal by JelloMold. Vast improvement. --Black Flamingo 22:19, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/DeviantART by Iwillkillyou333. Yes. --Black Flamingo 22:19, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Mahjong by ChiefjusticeDS. Yes. 1234 ~ 18:53, 22 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Democracy is not permanent‎ by Black flamingo. You could have retired. It's too late now. There's no going back. Also, that's a yes in case anyone cares. 1234 ~ 18:53, 22 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Death Race 2000 by Black flamingo. ITS! But yes. 1234 ~ 20:50, 21 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Sofia Coppola (2) by Lyrithya. Yes. --Black Flamingo 20:27, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Avant Garde Jazz (again) by Mattsnow. Oh, very well. 1234 ~ 05:14, 21 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Public domain by Shabidoo. Yes. 1234 ~ 05:31, 21 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Deranged scientist shocks world, himself by Magic man. Certainly. 1234 ~ 05:31, 21 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Fruit (revised) by Cat the Colourful. I feel loved, but no. 1234 ~ 05:14, 21 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Face Your Upcoming Death by NoNamesLeft. Nope. 1234 ~ 05:14, 21 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Drain-O Bombs by Lyrithya. Yes. --Black Flamingo 20:27, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Nazi Kittens by Shabidoo. Aye. 1234 ~ 05:31, 21 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnScripts:The Socialer Network by Lyrithya. Hope you enjoyed your waffles. Also, yes. --Black Flamingo 20:27, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Roses by Bob.kebob. Nope, (re)read the guidelines. 1234 ~ 05:14, 21 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Become An Hero (revised) by Mattsnow. Unfortunately no; that's not enough. Generally the lower the score, the more there may be to said. 1234 ~ 05:14, 21 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Encyclopedia Dramatica (Encyclopedia)‎ by Black flamingo. Yes. 1234 ~ 22:50, 13 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Write an Uncyclopedia article without reading any of the rules or directions or manuals or policies first (waffles) by Chief. I hope so. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 15:39, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Rugrats by Shabidoo. Yes, but try to be more encouraging, if you think the user hasn't done something right in requesting the review don't mention it, also try to be a bit more generous with the scores for newer users, the yellows are more encouraging than the reds. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 15:34, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Serenity by Lyrithya. Yes. --Black Flamingo 20:10, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Write an Uncyclopedia article without reading any of the rules or directions or manuals or policies first... by NoNamesLeft. Reviewing articles you like can be tough, but I'm afraid there still isn't enough. --Black Flamingo 20:30, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Uh oh by NoNamesLeft. Nearly enough, but not quite. You only really make one suggestion, and I don't see how it would help the article (I'm sure TKF would agree too). --Black Flamingo 20:30, May 12, 2011 (UTC)

• Don't be so certain, I'd say his review was pretty helpful and inspiring to make the cut. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:15, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Stupid Cats (Revised) by Magic man. Yes. -Black Flamingo 20:50, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Hypnotist (revised) by Imrealized. There are one or two decent parts but not enough. --Black Flamingo 20:50, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Does Mads Mikkelsen not speak one line of dialogue in Valhalla Rising? by Imrealized. Haha, no. 1234 ~ 23:02, 10 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/IDM by Lyrithya. Yes. --Black Flamingo 20:10, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Stratego (n+1) by NoNamesLeft. Sure, considering. 1234 ~ 23:02, 10 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Guru Maharaj Ji by Lyrithya. Yes. --Black Flamingo 20:10, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Sofia Coppola by NoNamesLeft. Eh, not bad, but not enough, either. 1234 ~ 23:02, 10 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/OhInternet by BF11. Thank you for reminding me how bad I am at reviews... you're impeccably to the point, as always. 1234 ~ 22:54, 10 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Stratego (Somethingth time) by Shabidoo. Yes. --Black Flamingo 16:26, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Britainy Spear by Shabidoo. Yes. --Black Flamingo 16:26, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Sarah Palin addresses the Australian Tea Party (revised) by Magic man. Yes, although a lot of the things you criticise aren't really issues, like starting sentences with "and" and the occasional red link. --Black Flamingo 16:26, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Become An Hero by Shabidoo. Aye. 1234 ~ 03:13, 5 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Sarah Palin addresses the Australian Tea Party by Shabidoo. Borderline - provides decent feedback and advice, but in a damned confusing manner. 1234 ~ 03:13, 5 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Punk by Username18. Even if it is a good article, really need more. 1234 ~ 02:22, 5 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Exterminate your Most Hated Retard by Username18. Aye. 1234 ~ 02:22, 5 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Lurg by Shabidoo. Considering what it is, that's about as good as can be expected. 1234 ~ 03:13, 5 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Fruit by EpicAwesomeness. Unfortunately not; it's good that you like the article, but just as important are what could be improved and how. 1234 ~ 02:22, 5 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Are motorists out to get me when I ride my bike? by Mattsnow. Much better, although further specifics and advices would usually be nice. 1234 ~ 02:22, 5 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Avant Garde Jazz (revised) by Black flamingo11. Lovely and clear as always... 1234 ~ 20:07, 4 May 2011
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Joe9320/Why?:Be a refugee from Encyclopedia Dramatica by Shabidoo. Unfortunately, as I can't even tell what you're trying to say with a lot of this, especially the humour section, since your writing borders on incomprehensible in places, that's a no. 1234 ~ 03:13, 5 May 2011 That's better. 1234 ~ 23:06, 10 May 2011