Uncyclopedia talk:Sockpuppeteer of the Month

Note: This is a replacement to Tom Mayfair's "The Sockpuppeteer Award", which got out of hand. This is a new version. --AAA! (AAAA) 03:48, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Any nominee cannot have been banned for longer than a day, for at least the previous month.

I want to know, do you think this rule is worth keeping? --AAA! (AAAA) 03:02, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

See what I was sayin'? It's all up to you, AAA! 03:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

I'll remove it, because there aren't that many sockpuppeteers around. --AAA! (AAAA) 09:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

& see how people automatically think that they can vote on multiple people. Where do they get these ideas from that they can just make the universal rules themselves? 09:50, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

So...

Who is eligible to win this month? I can't figure it out because the page has turned into a talk/mock page. 02:41, 30 May 2007

It's most likely that Suilven will win this month. --General Insineratehymn 02:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Why the fuck does this even exist?

Uncyc has enough awards as it is, and this is just likely to cause more shit along the lines of what happened on UGotM. Please explain to me why this page exists. Thanks. —Hinoa talk.kun 21:14, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Believe it or not, sockpuppets are a big fucking deal. --  Le Cejak • <-> 21:16, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Really? I (an admin here for a year and a half) *never* would have guessed. —Hinoa talk.kun 21:52, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

They're dangerous, though! Whereas GOTM is for... uh, starting flamewars. --  Le Cejak • <-> 21:55, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Well

Now that I'm in AA and 60 days sober (woot), I may as well mention that I used to have a fairly annoying sockpuppet. pillow talk 23:07, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

We have a Dilemma

On January 31st, we have a tie. How ever, one of the two winners has been banned or has no userpage. Who wins? Me! --J-Shea 07:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Every time I see the word "dilemma," it makes me think of the word "diarrhea."

I hope this has been helpful. pillow talk 20:42, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Regarding TGLSoN...

Listen... The reason I claim that TGLSoN is inelligible is because he is a sockpuppet of Joe SheA. That is all. --Absolutely Not Benson 01:23, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Whoop a dee f*cking doo. Anyway, TKF already banned me and forgot to unban me once it got worked out for two days. I've already won it, so i don't really care. --The Great Lung Sphincter of Nebuchadnezzar 03:23, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

P.S. Mega, you aren't an admin, so don't touch my f*cking userpage. --The Great Lung Sphincter of Nebuchadnezzar 03:23, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

P.P.S. Bitch. --The Great Lung Sphincter of Nebuchadnezzar 03:23, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

we seriously need to be rid of this guy... pillow talk 04:34, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

He is not a sockpuppet of Joe SheA. The Great Lung Sphincter of Nebuchadnezzar is his main account and he does not use Joe SheA or Strechable Scrotum. Instead of incorrectly crossing the nomination out you could talk to him on his talk page. --Docile hippopotamus 04:35, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

 For. Hyperbole comes up with yet another bold piece of legislature. If you can get it done, you get my vote for UotM. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 05:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Oh yeah? I can still post that Sockpuppet template on your userpage. --Absolutely Not Benson 15:35, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

OK case closed. And this is what's going to happen: Meganew, you'll be staying away from anyone's page and stop acting in an adminesque attitude, yes? You're not one as far as I remember. Nebuchdnezzar - either you clarify exactly here whose sock/renamed account you are,and chose which account you're using - and notify us before you rename yourself again in the future, or I will run a checkuser and ban every account you run for good. OK? Enough with this already. ~ 15:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Im only using this account. I will tell you if I ever feel like getting a new name. Not like either I or Meg has any say in the matter anyway. --The Great Lung Sphincter of Nebuchadnezzar 20:10, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

You did not answer my question - which accounts did you stop using? ~ 21:07, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Not using Joe SheA or Stretchable Scrotum. --The Great Lung Sphincter of Nebuchadnezzar 21:18, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Narcissus Black? Either way, ban his/her/it's ass sometime in the near future or something, I don't know. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:12, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Agreed. Looking over the contributions for these three usernames, the user's sole contribution to Uncyclopedia over the last six months appears to have been writing the mediocre Laws of Physics and vandalizing the feature Hot indiscriminate sex. Besides that, nothing other than insulting people and wasting admin time. pillow talk 21:43, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Of course you would agree with banning him Hyperbole. And Laws of Physics is not mediocre. It's good. --Docile hippopotamus 04:10, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

And who exactly will judge if someone's contribution are not good enough? You? Me? I don't think so. I'm going to shut down his other accounts and that's it. But JShea, the next time you decide a nickname - inform one of the admins that you do. In fact, don't change a nickname, three times is more than enough I think. ~ 09:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Well, of course it's not for me to judge. It's for you. You're a 'crat, for crying out loud. pillow talk 17:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

What if

There's a tie? --The Great Lung Sphincter of Nebuchadnezzar 07:26, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

If it's between two people, they both win. If three or more, they could potentially all win, but it's never happened before... I think it would really cheapen it if they all won, so I propose some sort of run-off. Still though, that'd be rarer than lightning striking the same person in the same spot twice (though it almost happened on WotM), so it's nothing to worry about. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:33, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Nominations for April, 2010

Score: 1

• Nom + 4 HELPME had a little bit of a sock-puppet episode over April Fools day, why not resurrect the award this month? -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 12:13 EST 5 April, 2010

Err...no? ~ 16:55, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

• Against. BreakTheCode.222 wasn't him. --High Gen. Meganew (Stuff I've Done) (Chat With Me) (Get an Award!) FORCES ENLIST MUN 19:53, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

No One Talks to Socky?

Hey Socky, you only have one page after so many years? Where is your archive or do you delete it?--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:04, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

You'll find all that here, not here, this is the talk page for an old award. --ChiefjusticeGameBoy 15:10, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

hahahah. You're right and then I was feeling sorry for you! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:33, August 4, 2010 (UTC)