From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Why?:Burn a Furby?
|
Score: 15 flaming Furbies
|
| Nominated by:
|
sir sysrq @ 01:19 Apr 17
|
For: 15
|
- As if we need something else to clog up VFH. But this is sheer genius fresh out of Skullthumper's kitchen. Sure made me laugh. N♥m && f♥r. sirsysrq @ 01:19 Apr 17
- For Le Cejak • <Apr 17, 2008 [1:38]>
- For --The Improver talk • contribs • 01:41, Apr 17 2008 (UTC)
- For Let me tell you why this article is good. Why namespace has become a space full of articles telling us why to do absurd things. "Why?:Kill People," "Why?:Kill Children," "Why?:Kill Your Mom," "Why?:Kill <insert unexpected species of animal>." I thought this was going to be one of those. I thought I was going to read another article that just said "Furbies suck, so we should burn them. They also cause environmental issue of some kind, so we should burn them." Dr. S has a tendency to add originality to things like this. And he did this time too. That is why this article is good....but it still doesn't beat monotony... -RAHB 09:05, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- For --THE 10:46, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- For I used to own a few Furbies. They still haunt me. --PET
 16:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- For. Pass me the Zippo. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 13:28, Apr 18
- For This is a very fine Why and from this day forward may no Why be made if it is worse than this hard pressed to be better than this --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     13:51, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- For - Good, and the first paragraph is one of the finest, funniest opening paragraphs I've read here. --Knucmo2 20:38, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- For Simply awesome. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 05:04, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- For --
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  18:23, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- For VGD >=3 19:19, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- For -->:( 20:27, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- 4 - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
 (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:58, Apr 21
 Self-for. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 04:45 Apr 22, 2008
|
Against: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
Abst The first part was simply amazing but the actual why part felt a little rushed and didn't do justice to the first half as such I can't vote for. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 08:55, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's different from most of the Why articles. This article's aim isn't to tell you why you, the reader, should do it, but rather explain why you want to. Y'know what I mean? Dr. Skullthumper 209.158.177.14 17:21, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
sysrq @ 01:19 Apr 17
Self-for. 
