Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Obama: should he be committed?

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

UnNews:Obama: should he be committed? (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: UnNews:Obama: should he be committed?	Score: 3 are going batshit insane
Nominated by:	Mattsnow 13:08, June 10, 2012 (UTC)
For: 5	NOM AND FOR. Yet another great one by Weebils. Mattsnow 13:08, June 10, 2012 (UTC)  For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:35, 10 June 2012 For -- you bet your sweet a**! Weebils (talk) 19:12, June 10, 2012 (UTC) For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:14, June 14, 2012 (UTC) Excellent. --MasterWangs CUNT and proud of it! 09:49, June 15, 2012 (UTC)
Against: 2	Against. This is a clever, humorous and original piece of political satire. User:CandidToaster/sig 13:40, June 11, 2012 (UTC) Are you tired of political satire? -- Sir CuteDarkraiOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 22:22, June 13, 2012 (UTC) Didn't laugh. Sorry. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:47, June 20, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	As eager as I am for Obama to be lampooned, assembling the well-known litany of Obama gaffes and extrapolating to insanity is not clever enough to avoid the aroma of partisan advocacy. In any case, it needs a headline that looks like a headline. Spıke ¬ 11:03 12-Jun-12

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH