Uncyclopedia:VFH/Sophia (again)

Article: Sophia	Score: 1 hot potatos
Nominated by:	Syndrome
For: 6	CUNTYMINTS I had wanted to nom this well before Jan. 5th so we could have it ready for Uncyclopedia's anniversary but I forgot. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 21:26, January 2, 2010 (UTC) For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:30, 2 January 2010 For haiku in any format, and especially good haiku dedicated to a deserving beauty and a site tradition. Aleister in Chains 2 January, MMX Four. Leave it to Uncyc to make poems that I actually find humorous! —Paizuri MUN (Talk • Contribs • Poll!) 01:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC) ~o~ A classic in-joke. I love Sophia so much. This vote is a hai- ...ku. Dammit! ~o~ – Kip > Talk • Works •• 01:19, Jan. 3, 2010 For. InMooseWeTrust 17:25, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 5	Blasphemous Against. It's an integral part of Uncyclopedia mythos, to be sure, but on its own this article is not feature-worthy IMHO. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 04:51, Jan 3 2010 Against. Nice Inside Joke but that is what it is. Not fair to make it a feature. *RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 17:41, January 3, 2010 (UTC) Against*. Oh man, no. In-joke, plus it's very hit-and-miss. --UU - natter 13:39, Jan 4* I have a question for you UU, and I don't at all mean this to be mean-spirited, just a question. Do you think there is a difference between an in-joke and celebrating our history? It seems to me like this rides that line, but I'm not sure if other people think there is a difference between those two things. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 22:07, January 4, 2010 (UTC) I can see where you'd be thinking that, sure. I think it falls the wrong side of the line, myself, based on the fact that Mrs UU (who is my equivalent of UN:CM in matters of in-jokes) didn't have a clue what was going on with it. And even if it fell on the other side of the line, I'd still find it too hit-and-miss anyway. No mean-spiritedness detected in that question, and none found in my answer, I hope! --UU - natter 16:00, Jan 5 YOU BASTARD! I'LL KILL YOU! Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 19:41, January 5, 2010 (UTC) Still against. It's too awesome. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 15:21, January 5, 2010 (UTC) This page is just a bunch of bad haikus, most of which are not funny. -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:43, 5 Jan
Comments	UnAbstain. I don't get it, and hasn't the mass consensus so far been against featuring in-jokes? --Matfen 15:50, January 3, 2010 (UTC) Comment Tomorrow's the fifth anniversary of uncy, so why not feature an in-joke (which actually stands alone fine as an article aside from injokeness) on such an auspicious or suspicious date? Aleister in Chains Anniversary Eve, MMX Comment. Aside from the fact I wrote a very tiny part of this, I think it's something of a mixed bag. I think outsiders could get a kick out of it, but while I really like some of it I find many parts rather so so. So here's my worthless comment instead of a vote (but I reserve the right to reconsider). Also when you nominate an article please add the nominated template to the top so you don't get irritating comments like this from me (yes, I know it's a bit tricky fixing the template so it links to a successive nomination, so I'll add the template now). Happy editing! King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 22:01, January 4, 2010 (UTC)