Uncyclopedia:VFH/Samuel L. Vacuum

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Samuel L. Vacuum (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Samuel L. Vacuum	Score: 14 Blackuums
Nominated by:	Mn-z 05:39, September 29, 2009 (UTC)
For: 18	nom +4 A short, and possibly in-jokey, but rather funny article. Was on VFG --Mn-z 05:39, September 29, 2009 (UTC) First person, but funny. I can dig it. And I like the crappy picture! -- Roman Dog Bird 08:36, September 29, 2009 (UTC) FOR Something different, something good. Good Nom. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:50, September 29, 2009 (UTC) For, with two minor annoyances. First, 'dillo's right about the picture. Second, Mormons? I suppose it must be a non-sequitur, because it does not make sense. But then again that's why it's in trivia... • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:20, Sep 29 For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:47, 30 September 2009 For. ~ 12:11, September 30, 2009 (UTC) for. heh. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:09, September 30, 2009 (UTC) Bless. But it needs another picture. Don Puttano cHeDDs 02:19,1October,2009 For. Any article on mothafuckin' Sam is fine by me. Cause normally our asses would be dead as fried chicken, but Sam's in a transitional period, and righ now he likes being a mothafuckin' machine. Funnybony 20:07, October 2, 2009 (UTC) For. The rest of the article could say "BENSON WAS HERE" for all I care, I just want to see that image on the front page. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 03:42, October 3, 2009 (UTC) Godspeed, <insert name here>. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 22:45, October 5, 2009 (UTC) For. IronLung 22:50, October 9, 2009 (UTC) feels vaguely retarded. so I'll vote for -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 17:47, Oct 10 For --EMC [TALK] 21:28 Oct 10 2009 Weak For. I like it, but at the same time don't think it really belongs on the front page, but what the hell. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 04:15, October 11, 2009 (UTC) For. I laughed. But the against peple have a point, I just enjoyed it too much to go against. ChiefjusticeDS 08:31, October 12, 2009 (UTC) For. At first I thought too in jokey but it was just so MOTHERSUCKING Funny! Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 15:05, October 12, 2009 (UTC) For. Wow. I missed voting. Dam. Well screw you I'm still voting. MrN 22:44, Oct 17
Against: 4	Against. Just goes to show that jokes can date badly as well, RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 21:27, September 29, 2009 (UTC) Against Good piece but too meta, and a one trick pony. Fine for the site, but not FA. --THINKER 10:11, October 4, 2009 (UTC) Against. I'm with the THINKist on this one. --UU - natter 12:37, Oct 4 Against. Humour is in the eyes of the beholder. My eyes must be shut. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  16:33, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Conditional For. Surprisingly good, but change that awful picture and you get my for. ~ 06:44, September 29, 2009 (UTC) Oh what the hell. I'll stop being an anal prick. Which is an oxymoron really. Also, Socky, it's much better. ~ 12:11, September 30, 2009 (UTC) Okay, I changed the image. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:24, 30 September 2009 Comment. I think the image is supposed to be intentionally bad. Mn-z 16:58, September 29, 2009 (UTC) Is this better? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:08, 30 September 2009

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.