From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Eadweard Muybridge, Zoopraxographer
|
Score: 0
|
| Nominated by:
|
Style  Guide 18:36, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 6
|
- For. Zoopraxography - high time it got noted. Style Guide 18:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Very For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- For per my opinion that we should feature as many articles with NSFW pictures as possible. -OptyC Sucks!
 CUN21:08, 17 Apr
 For. - with proviso that the wobble boobs pic is changed. I think that may be too much for a VFH and give the site an NSFW problem. The other image of the naked woman should be kept as - after all - the nudity aspect of this experiment in locomotion was the whole point Muybridge's lasting fame. --Romartus 21:44, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- But satirizing that very aspect with blatant pron is somehow unacceptable on Uncyc? We should keep the serious picture and get rid of the funny one? -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:03, 17 Apr
- I have absolutely no problem with porn on Uncyclopedia. I just don't want it on the front page. People read the FA at work and school and stuff, y'know.
 pillow talk 23:01,17 April 2009 (UTC)
- I do know, that where I read it as well. But I understand your concerns. -OptyC Sucks! CUN23:03, 17 Apr
- For. - Because I'm seething that none of my articles are as good as this, and my overblown sense of entitlement is being kicked in the balls--Sycamore (Talk) 13:34, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- For. Fuck all you censorship pricks. CharitwoTalk 21:43, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 6
|
- Knee-jerk against per my opinion that we shouldn't feature articles with NSFW pictures in them. pillow talk 20:46, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Not really Knee-jerk against We should feature NSFW pictures if the article is good enough, here the article is fairly lacking though. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     05:17, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 Against. Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 10:32, Apr. 18, 2009- Against. I felt compelled to mark this down in PLS because it had no NSFW warning. My opinion hasn't changed. IronLung 11:21, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- Against.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  02:29, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- NSFW. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:22, Apr 20
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Guide 18:36, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
For. - with proviso that the wobble boobs pic is changed. I think that may be too much for a VFH and give the site an NSFW problem. The other image of the naked woman should be kept as - after all - the nudity aspect of this experiment in locomotion was the whole point Muybridge's lasting fame. --
Against. 
