| Article: David chung
|
Score: 2.5 sexy bellies
|
| Nominated by:
|
Roman Dog Bird 01:56, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
|
For: 6.5
|
- A great man. --Roman Dog Bird 01:56, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
 Sure. —Sir Socky   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:05, 4 February 2011- For I will not give my reasons. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:49, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
- I have arbitrarily decided that this is awesome
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  05:18, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
- For. I didn't laugh, but the architecture of the short article is crap on first reading and then extremely multi-layered - like the Bhagavad Gita - when analyzed. I can't believe I'm voting for this piece of crap (on first reading). Aleister 14:09 6-2-'11
- For. No explanation.
 Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 22:43, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
- For. I should hate this, but I love it. 137.159.94.172 07:15, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
|
Against: 4
|
- Against. WTF? ~
   14:03, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Against. An escapee from VFD? Seriously??
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:47, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
- I don't think so. 1234 ~
 00:47, 7 February 2011
 Against. Ummm... -- Sf13  2123 EST 10 FEB 2011
|
| Comments
|
- Comment. ill vote for if a really great picture is put in here. its helarious Shabidoo 01:46, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Sure. 
Against. Ummm... -- 
