From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: American Psycho
|
Score: 3 British Socios
|
| Nominated by:
|
Matfen 19:53, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
|
For: 6
|
 SelfNom/Aye. Haven't failed anything on VFH for a bit, and besides in-jokes, its been a bit quiet lately. --Matfen 19:53, May 3, 2010 (UTC)- For. Worst things have been featured. And technically this is not first person, it's more like "dialogue". Not all non-encyclopedic articles are first person articles. ~
     15:56, May 4, 2010
- Nice enough. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:41, 4 May 2010
- For. Never read the book or saw the film, but still had quite a few good laughs while reading it. Sirrah Catsh
irE Chess the Striker2117 04:45, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Funnybony
   08:23, May 5 08:23, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Chiefjustice3DS 08:52, May 8, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 3
|
- Against. I love the movie. The article, well, not so much. I'm really getting tired of the 1st person articles... sorry Matfen...-- Sir SF13 (Talk)
 GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 23:26 EST 3 May, 2010
- That's cool, Skinfan. You are certainly entitled to your opinion. --Matfen 09:34, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. Can't quite match the tone correctly, a rambling read that isn't jarring enough to be shocking and too off-tone to be adequately satirical. The elements are there but the execution is wrong (no pun intended).
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  02:00, May 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. It's a good idea but I think it's overcooked. Some editing would help too.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:25, May 8, 2010 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
Pee Review by his excellency, Sir Chiefjustice DS. (Changes since implemented)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
SelfNom/Aye. Haven't failed anything on VFH for a bit, and besides in-jokes, its been a bit quiet lately. --
