Uncyclopedia:VFH/11-Wide

Article: 11-Wide	Score: 10 useless plays
Nominated by:	IronLung 02:21, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
For: 12	Nom & for. The ultimate tactical formation! IronLung 02:21, 20 April 2009 (UTC) Sure And ~~Kansas City~~ Washington will never be the same again. -RA HB 04:29, 20 April 2009 (UTC) For. One of the better sports articles Mr. Lavrenti "Digits" Hex 04:33, 20 April 2009 (UTC) For. An old PLS goodie. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:53, Apr 20 For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:01, 20 April 2009 (UTC) Very strong for. I didn't realize this wasn't already featured. My brother-in-law cracked up reading this one. pillow talk 17:19, 21 April 2009 (UTC) For. I went ahead and did a little tidying of the language this morning and will blue-link later. I'm on board now.-- 18:07, 21 April 2009 (UTC) soitenly. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:51, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Extreme For Funny = Win. Just as, Using the 11-Wide = Win. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 06:22, 23 April 2009 (UTC) For. Nice article. Zeitgeist 14:19, 26 April 2009 (UTC) For. I'm not a fan of the sport. But I get what the article is about - it doesn't take much effort - and found it funny. Plus, most of the misgivings I had about it in last year's PLS have been recently addressed, making it a very good article. --UU - natter 10:02, Apr 29 For.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:17, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Against: 2	Against. I really like the idea, but there's too much wrong with this. No links, the tone is inconsistent, and the 11-wide formation is clearly a punt-block defense. If this is fixed up then it's got my vote for sure, but as it stands now no way. —Sir Guildensternenstein 18:13, 20 April 2009 (UTC) Against. I just didn't lol, sorry RAHB. -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:35, 29 Apr
Comments	Comment. The 11-wide image has got to be replaced with a chop showing that formation facing a defense and not an obvious offensive unit.-- 04:51, 20 April 2009 (UTC) I was hoping no one would notice that... -RA HB 06:27, 20 April 2009 (UTC) Could always use a caption instead e.g. "....while a confused defence attempts a goal line block on the offensive 37-yard line" or something of that sort. IronLung 06:56, 20 April 2009 (UTC) I'll look into a chop for you, the key is finding the right two pictures....and lots of steamy cloning tool action. Perhaps something like this. Just needs a minor caption rewrite about #9 FLA stunning #1 LSU early and often with the 11-wide.-- 10:12, 20 April 2009 (UTC) Abstain. Don't watch NFL. Fan of real balls. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 15:37, 20 April 2009 (UTC) Abstain. Don't watch NFL, so can't say the joke NFaiL'd... like that one :/ --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 11:38, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Abstain. Always preferred baseball myself, don't know enough about football, yadda yadda yadda, don't get the joke. -- You know what the music means... Our time is up. 20:09, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Comment. I do like that prospective new image though. —Sir Guildensternenstein 18:14, 20 April 2009 (UTC) Comment DrS has done it again, and I'm adding his image to the article. The one there already though, while clearly being a defense running the supposed play, is one that I actually did myself using the same method as DrS did for his. The problem was that I had only noticed my error in chopping the wrong side when it was too late, the PLS deadline looming at the time. Not, as the source image clearly shows, a mere picture of a punt block. -RA HB 19:40, 20 April 2009 (UTC) Abstain. No idea about this. Need to know the game better to understand it . Like perhaps the Brits writing about the LBW rule in Cricket. --Romartus 19:46, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Comment As I said during PLS time, football is a mind-numbingly simple sport, and there's only a few things you need to know about it to "get" this article. A quarterback throws the ball, a receiver receives or catches the ball, a running back runs, and everyone else stands around and beats the living shit out of each other. The rest is explained well enough in the article. -RA HB 06:06, 23 April 2009 (UTC) And, all of the basic American Football terms have been blue-linked to Wiki-pee for non-fanatics or those unfamiliar with the sport to reference. Anyone who understands rugby knows what running the ball or passing the ball entails-- 08:13, 23 April 2009 (UTC) Comment. Someone tell me if it has any typos and obvious badness. If not, why not put it on front page? *Style* *Guide* 14:57, 23 May 2009 (UTC)