From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD. |
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Cartooncruft. —Pelozurian (talk) 19:41, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
- Jesus Christ. This is probably the worst article I've seen in a long while. There's a whole Chuck Norris section. --Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Saturday, 08:02, May 22 2010 UTC
- Take it away Here is the only part which should be kept, copy and pasted directly from the coding itself: *Andrew, You are now my bitch. Your name is now Toby. First rule of being my bitch- you must obey.- Little Bill Al sans chains 20:09 22 5 MMX
- Delete. Thank you all for making my dreams of huffing this pile of shit into reality. --ChiefjusticePS3 20:11, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep. Jesu Becaust. += 15:01,15May,2010
- Keep. It's the most hamburgular page I've read all day. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:34, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Not bad enough. —Pelozurian (talk) 04:25, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. Meaningless. Older versions equally so, but with signs of vanity. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:58, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. AllOfMyFriendsAndI were at a kegger laughing about words we had created. I decided to do an Uncyclopedia article to make it catch on. --Sorry, kid, it never did. Spıke ¬ 03:12 15-May-10
- Delete. Pretty stupid. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 7:17PM 5/15/10
- Delete. It's lamer than the lamest llama I know. Also links off to other sites I don't care to be bothered with either.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:41, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
- It was these that convinced me that this article was college kids trying to make their latest in-joke go viral. Spıke ¬ 18:48 17-May-10
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- EXTERMINATE! There are WAY too many lists here. To rewrite would require dumbing all that shit down and performing quoticide. Afterward, I don't think there'd be much left. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 5:29PM 5/17/10
- Weak delete. So a bunch of IPs don't like the Melbourne, Australia railway or the corporation that runs it. This is barely a concept; the execution is listcruft. If there were an owner (or if one steps forward during the VFD process), I would be fine with user-fying this so someone can convert any good stuff to prose. Spıke ¬ 22:19 17-May-10
- Delete.. Way too ugly to stick on a cosmetic re-write. Shunt this into a siding. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:13, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. RabbiTechno drives the hufftrain. Choo-choo! Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 11:30, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep. Meh. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:59, May 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. It's not long, and it's not brilliant, but it is a real article about a real cricket player, which seems to be based on real and ridiculous attributes. Spıke ¬ 21:07 14-May-10
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep. It is relevant to several local topics and is likely to be funny to Australians. It's poorly written, but all of the changes by I.P.Anon since EoGuy's version of 16-Oct-09 are ungrammatical wisecracks, and I have reverted the article to that version. Spıke ¬ 16:28 14-May-10
|
Delete |
- Delete. The Wacky War makes more stories than the unwacky one. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 8:47 5/14/10
- Delete. It's not terribly wacky, is it? It's not terribly good either, but it's hardly wacky. Sure it has Hitler, but where are Chuck Norris, Stephen Hawking, Batman and Spongebob? --Count of Monkey Crisco 15:42, May 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. More acky than wacky. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:38, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep. I praised it in comparison to Sonic the Preggo, which we voted to delete. Spıke ¬ 18:29 17-May-10
- Keep. Really, it's fine. I see it as a little commentary about how we obsess about a subject's homosexuality and how silly it would be if we devoted the same amount of attention to a subject's heterosexuality. The writing's coherent, the formatting's fine; there are a lot of things that need deletion a whole lot worse. pillow talk 18:39, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
- For crying out loud This article got 6 total for votes on VFH and a 40 on Pee review from MrN9000. And what Hype said. --Mn-z 18:56, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
- What Hyperbole said This is way better than the gay shit that usually circles around Tails on the internet. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 3:47PM 5/17/10
- Strong keep.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Monday, 08:06, May 17 2010 UTC
- Keep. I don't think its very good, but it's no where near the standard that articles should be for being on here.--Sycamore (Talk) 07:18, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Mn-z put a lot of work in on this, and went through the process to improve it and VFH it. Why don't we let him consider the criticism here and do some more work on the page, and/or remove some of the IP things that have snuck in (he may have done that already, I don't know). Anyway, long winded, so keep. Al sans chains 1:21 19 5 MMX
- Obvious keep. —Pelozurian (talk) 01:16, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Obvious Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:08, 20 May 2010
|
Delete |
- Obliterate. Unfunny foxcruft. Gay jokes about Big T are NOT FUNNY. In fact, I think the whole Sonic section should be given a makeover. --GoshDangIt 17:34, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Set the hounds on this one. Gawd bleedin' awful. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:35, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete sorrry,im usually the keep guy but this is just an article about sexuality..and the character tails the straight dosnet exist.its just a made up of variation of an already existing sonic character. like making a weegee article.weegee is just a variation of luigi.--jupiterfox 18:35, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Hyperbole, above, explains how the article might be "about" something more than sex. And a variation of an already existing character--that would be parody--which would be, like, humor. Spıke ¬ 22:22 17-May-10
- okay i get you about parody.even though its """humor"" i just though uncycloopedia might be strict on making up fake characters like super jesus and the like..--jupiterfox 18:35, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
- No, they even allow Jam Jesus. Well, thank you for casting your vote to defend a policy you now know doesn't exist. Would it be too much, then, to ask you to reconsider?! Spıke ¬ 23:09 18-May-10
- Also, it's technically not a variation of an already existing character as this is the only Uncyclopedia article exclusively featuring Tails. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 9:10PM 5/18/10
- Kerkill Yeah, I think it's crap. If you disagree, keep voting to keep, but I openly want to disagree with the whole lot of you. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:18, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:12, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
- I don't see why we need this article. It's bad, it's not funny and keeping it for the reason of "it could be much worse" doesn't cut it. I say delete and protect from recreating. ~ 07:59, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- As this is nominator's first and only contribution at Uncyclopedia, I am wondering if perhaps he is the newest incarnation of a notorious, banned-for-life vandal with a specific interest in cartoon characters. Spıke ¬ 18:52 17-May-10
- I thought you needed 10 edits to get auto-confirmed, but that must only be wikipedia. --Mn-z 18:57, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
- First off, that one guy you were talking about Spike is still here. He never left. Secondly, it's a 3 day wait before you're auto-confirmed. Pretty sure that's the case on Wikipedia, too. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:36, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Kept 9-6. --ChiefjusticePS3 07:41, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep. per Monty Cristo. += 15:19,15May,2010
- Keep. gay clown who performs magic tricks.this article is one of hte most intelligent thigns ive read.it is pure brilliance.weegee/luigi is in it.
jupiterfox15:19
Keep. It seems like it would be a good page from the point of view of someone who enjoys this game and related games, which I don't. But who am I to judge another gamer's universe. And it's written in readable sentences with lots of thought going into it. Maybe Jupiter or someone who may know the games could put in a few minutes and lessen the length and the obscurity a little. Actually, I'm just feeling for the person who wrote it and put the time in, and any reader who may like this particular universe. Al sans chsins 17:52 17 5 mmx I've spent some time researching and re-reading the page, and nah, the guy did a bad job here. Someone who loves the game should do an article on this character, a pretty important Joker in this particular corner of Mario. Al des chains 15:20 20 5 mmx
- I know who the character is, and no, this wasn't funny in the least. Just sayin' —Pelozurian (talk) 01:17, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. It's just throwing pop culture references at the wall and seeing if anything sticks. It's as if the game Paper Mario was written by the staff of Family Guy and published as a short story. --Count of Monkey Crisco 16:32, May 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. I.P.Anon created this article about a year ago with the initial change summary: "If you haven't played Super Paper Mario and beaten it to its completion, do not ICU, NRV, or huff this article, as you won't understand the joke." In other words, obviously, "I am writing this article to myself." Sorry; I vote to huff anyway. Spıke ¬ 16:43 14-May-10
- Gay —Pelozurian (talk) 23:18, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. per Spike --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 6:06 PM 5/16/10
- Delete. Junior Uncyclopedia - and that would be a push as this is really a steaming pile of random. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:09, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep I see no reason to delete most templates, so I tend to vote keep. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:03, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Keep When we post it on forums addressing unpleasant cunts like Anonymous Slashy, it's acceptable and lolarious. When Hype has it put on a forum he starts, it's srs bzns. When is The Hyperbole Show going to be over? I want to watch Scrubs. --EMC [TALK] 01:07 May 20 2010
- You know, it's really not particularly cool to be a dick to an IP or new user, either. pillow talk 04:23, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. It's on several notable pages, including Uncyclopedia is the worst. —Pelozurian (talk) 01:15, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Seriously? But hype is right, it shouldn't be used like it was recently, which is against the Golden Triad. Al des chains 1:30 20 5 MMX
- Keep --~ 06:35, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. --ChiefjusticePS3 07:55, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. Serves absolutely no purpose except to aid someone in being a dick. pillow talk 22:43, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Could conceivably be used by A to indicate the type of humor an article uses, but a quick review of actual use (heavily in the Forum and in Talk) suggests that more often B drops a load on A's page to assert B's cleverness. Or to name-call, as Hyperbole suggests. Spıke ¬ 00:43 20-May-10
|
Comments |
Kept. Less dickery with it in future would save everyone some trouble. --ChiefjusticePS3 07:55, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Obliterate. Sucks hard. —Pelozurian (talk) 07:17, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. This one is not even humor of parochial interest to hometown fans, but cryptic descriptions of team lore that only hometown fans could ever decode. It might be offered to Uncle J, but when I suggested he take over Toronto Maple Leafs, he didn't sound entirely sure he had the time for that. Spıke ¬ 18:06 16-May-10
- HWMNBNIESHATWG (in a censor) What the hell? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 9:00AM 5/16/10
- Delete. FFFFFOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRR Be gone with it. Also, I'm a noob, does this give me permission to vote here? --SadisticWolf 20:03, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
- I think you're fine. You have to be here for 3 days or so to vote. You signed up on April 24th. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 4:08PM 5/17/10
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep. Thanks to Aleister for finding this in the change history; it crosses the line into funny. But the red links have got to go. Spıke ¬ 22:54 12-May-10 Done. 23:08
- Keep. Going by SPIKE's judgement. It's not that interesting of a page to me, but probably not huffable just because of its blah (which is always improvable). But I would hope that it's standard practice to go through the history of a page before putting it up for VFD. By the way, I know of a page which is a special case of randomness, it is a temple to randomness in such a balance that it is good. I will tell everyone if you promise not to VFD it. Al des chains 23:34 12 5 MMX
- It is standard practice, and MrN9000 was scolding several nominators during his most recent tour of duty here. Spıke ¬ 23:56 12-May-10
- Actually, it isn't just standard practise; it's required. You can be banned if you don't. Says so right there in the rules. Everyone has read those, right? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:14, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
My bad. I'm withdrawing my vote. Still if a version existed in the history but still wasn't totally good, is it really going to make a huge difference? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 8:55 5/13/10
- Hmm... No. I was just saying that you have to go back and see if there existed a less bad version. You can still vote to delete it if that less bad version is still crap. Let me lead by example. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:37, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
|
Delete |
Delete. I don't like the the direction this is heading, nowhere. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 4:13 PM 5/12/10
Delete. Yup, going nowhere. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:48, May 12, 2010 (UTC) Now I'm neutral about it. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:41, May 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Kerkill Sure, this version isn't as bad as what was nominated, but it still sucks. Clearly the only people interested in this will only make it worse (it's been demonstrated already). Logic says this would be back if we don't kerkill it now. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:37, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
changed my mind again --Wilytank 17:42, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
- okay now I just stopped caring altogether. --Wilytank 12:36, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete.. I think this article could be deleted and everyone could save the bother improving/mutilating it. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:47, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- It was better in 2007, reverted so have another look. Who knows. Al des chains 21:55 12 5 MMX
- This is a pretty important Jewish topic, and since the page already exists and has some information and funny on it, why not keep it and work on the thing. I've tweeked the lead just now, and got rid of the stupid quotes, and if everyone would put in a few minutes on it then we can have a good page. SPIKE suggested that I read the wikipedia page, which will be boring to do but I'll study up, and then put some more edit time in later. First I must pray, and tie a Tefillin or two around my toes to speed my prayers to heaven. Al des chains 14:16 14 5 MMX
- Give it to me for a while; I have the Wikipedia version right here and some ideas on jokes that actually relate to Judaism. (With apologies to the Chief, it was when Bat fuck insane entered this article that I had to ask you to read up and make this relate to something.) Surely the Cabal, though hindered both by the fact that it doesn't exist and if it did, it certainly wouldn't be Jewish, might have something to say. Spıke ¬ 14:57 14-May-10
- Somehow SPIKE is making this article Bat fuck insane. Al des chains 16:26 14 5 MMX
- New second paragraph of intro, Sec. 1, and Sec. 2 are (very loosely) based on something real. I defy Wilytank to flip his vote a second time. Spıke ¬ 16:22 14-May-10
- No VFD tag, by the way, until I just added one. Or was it stitched up inside, where I couldn't see it? Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 12:44, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
- No, the tag fell off when Aleister fished a better version out of the change history. Spıke ¬ 12:58 17-May-10
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Listy, unfunny, gamecruft by blipheads. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:06, May 14, 2010 (UTC)
- “This is Fuckable!!” Spıke ¬ 21:06 14-May-10
- Smite. The only thing I found enjoyable about looking at this article was the song "Genesis to Genocide" by Destroyer 666 that I happened to be listening to while reading it. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 6:16 PM 5/14/10
- Delete. --ChiefjusticePS3 09:21, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep. per The God of Pandas += 15:00,15May,2010
- Keep. On a quick look this is actually a pretty good article in the very-rough. Equating slaves with pandas works on a certain freaky level, and paying them in bamboo or making them work the bamboo fields is almost genius. I'll have to take a longer read of it, but for now, keeper. Needs some good pics of pandas working though. Al des chains 15:25 15 5 MMX
- Did edits and added pics right after seeing it, and will work on this one, I really like it. 'Al des chains 16:28 15 5 MMX
|
Delete |
Delete. Meh. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:21, 15 May 2010
Delete. Exclusively a demonstration of how much random crap the author can throw at his readers. We already have an Uncle Tom, though currently it merely redirects to Clarence Thomas. Spıke ¬ 13:51 15-May-10 Rescinded. Al has developed the panda theme, and thus the unifying misconception that the book is about pandas and not Negroes. Article still has randomness (Zeus-worship?!) that distracts rather than feed the effect. Spıke ¬ 23:54 15-May-10
|
Comments |
- Good point about the Zeus worship, the page should stick to the Tibetan Buddhism sector of religion, and I'll get to that when I pass this way again. Thanks. Al des chains 2:31 16 5 MMX
- I got most of it, and cleaned up the spelling and grammar. Spıke ¬ 02:55 16-May-10
|