Uncyclopedia:VFH/Tails the Straight

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Tails the Straight (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Tails the Straight	Score: 0 Really, really, really straight Sonic the Hedgehog characters.
Nominated by:	MrN 17:52, Nov 15 17:52, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
For: 6	Nom+4 Well, Mnbvcxz has produced something of real quality here. He's used a comedic style which not everyone may appreciate, but personally I think it's awesome. Oh, if you don't vote for this you are now gay. Un-unfor more uncyclopedic than anything I've written. Also bush-goblin is the funniest thing I've read in ages. Thanks for this mnbvcxz! SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 18:15 15 November 2008 Alright, it was pretty darn good. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:36, Nov 15 For because I wrote it.--Mnbvcxz 21:31, 18 November 2008 (UTC) For Awesomes. Only place it dragged a bit was the straightness competition... along with the picture there. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 01:24, 19 November 2008 (UTC) For. Fixed up some syntax stuff. Left teh funniez well alone. There is enough of those funniez in this for me to vote for, which I am now so doing. Yes. --UU - natter 14:23, Nov 19
Against: 6	Against. It sucked badly. Probably less horrible than my articles but still bad. |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Kyurem CUN|IC Kill | 07:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC) Against Despite my gayness, some of the syntax and grammar [including in the images] is atrocious. Needs serious cleanup before I consider voting for it.--SirIsaac 23:16, 17 November 2008 (UTC)  Against. Um, no. Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 02:37, Nov. 19, 2008  Against.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:43, 19 November 2008 (UTC)  Against.--PaddyAtkinson 01:54, 23 November 2008 (UTC)  Against.----72.146.75.70 03:02, 23 November 2008 (UTC)  Against.--- I think it would be funny if I had some common ground with it - but I cannot relate to the character or to being hetero. Style  Guide 07:54, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Just of of curiosity, what is wrong with the syntax and grammar; can you give an example or two?--Mnbvcxz 01:21, 18 November 2008 (UTC) SirIsaac? You're gay!? And yeah what syntax? It seemed remarkably well written actually. Also poor grammar tends to be a bad reason for voting against. If it it bothers you so much you correct it. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 17:02 18 November 2008 Orian? You're gay!? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 01:24, 19 November 2008 (UTC) Fine... for example, the lead image has a blatant "you're/your" error. Also, I didn't find the article very funny. --SirIsaac 01:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC) Typoe dun been Correct'd in teh imaeg ; --Mnbvcxz 03:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC) Conditional For. I like this, but the prose needs work before it's a feature. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 04:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC) YOUR all GAY. This is awesome, very, very well written, and you guys are totally missing the point. Cos yor gayz. MrN 11:09, Nov 19 I voted FOR! You homophobe! SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 11:13 19 November 2008

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH