Forum:OH Internet scientology

Forums: Index > BHOP > OH Internet scientology

Note: This topic has been unedited for 4943 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Join your local Church of Scientology today!!!

I just went to OH Internet to look up the Scientology article, it accuses the Church of Scientology of brainwashing people and murdering former, important members who could spill the beans on that damn cult (which is true), and while I was read further, I noticed in astonishment that a freaking pro-scientology ad was playing on the top banner, redirecting to their site, scientology.org! I kid you not!

How much of a fucking sellout is that DeGrippo? And to think we've been writing so that greedy whore could sellout, expecting the userbase to follow and pulling the plug without warning. I'm pissed at some people's greediness who couldn't care less about the "masses" and who chew their 'morals' as soon as money is present. (Cooling down slowly) Mattsnow 07:17, May 29, 2011 (UTC)

You'll melt if you don't cool down faster.. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 07:32, May 29, 2011 (UTC)

I just threw myself in the freezer and I kicked out Frosty.

Mattsnow 07:35, May 29, 2011 (UTC)

Do you know what OhInternet said about Uncyclopedia? "Intended to be a scabrous, irreverent parody of TOW, it's actually about as funny as a third-grade geography teacher telling lightbulb jokes". I can make a funny joke about lightbulbs any day of the week! I could call the Arabian Scientists during the middle ages egg-heads, but Thomas Edison actually invented the light bulb, and the last time I checked, the closest he ever got to being Muslim was him oppressing ethnic minorities (Nikola Tesla much?) Baseless generalizations and racism all in one sentence!--User:CandidToaster/sig 11:04, May 29, 2011 (UTC)

Cool down Mattsnow (lol at the irony). One way to ease back on your frustration over this is to use L. Ron Hubbard's expanded gita technique, which is to create and destroy the object - in this case OH Internet - in your mind, where it all happens. To own your own space, your image of it, just...well, if I went through the whole technique with you I'd have to charge you 10,000 of whatever it is Canadians use. And it's better to run it in person, or you can just get Hubbards "Creation of Human Ability" at your local Scientology bookstore and learn it yourself, less expensive that. For this suggestion to purchase Hubbard's "Creation of Human Ability" I'll only charge you 5 or whatever it is you use. Aleister 11:46 29-5-'11

It's just astonishing that the very site who told us basically: be as offensive as you can in your writing, nobody can get us, we are Anon, we don't forget, we don't forgive and blah-blah, completely distanced themselves and now run pro-scientology ads. And Aleister, our currency up here is maple syrup cans and beaver tails: the richest man in the country has 95 beaver tails. Mattsnow 12:40, May 29, 2011 (UTC)

OhMattsnow, do you not realize that NOBODY CARES about your rants against DeGrippo OR whether she's a sellout? This is NOT the place for trolling against websites, unless the rants are funny (which they're not). I also disagree with your belief that Scientologists are murderers, though that's a completely different issue as nobody agrees with you on it. --Scofield & Friends 12:58, May 29, 2011 (UTC)

You should invent your own anti-Scientology religion and have your ads become more popular than the Scientology ones. ;) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk)

GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:16, 29 May 2011

You all do know that Encyclopedia Dramatica is up again?--User:CandidToaster/sig 14:14, May 29, 2011 (UTC)

Goddamnit people, don't make me paste a template of some kind here. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 23:48, May 29, 2011 (UTC)

What kind of template? ~

23:49, 29 May 2011

Oh my God, this one site had awesome templates. I think the site is called Encyclopædia Britannica or something. Wait! It was called Encyclopædia Dramatica! Damn was that an awesome site. I don't know why they got rid of Encyclopædia Dramatica... Encyclopædia Dramatica was an awesome site. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:53, May 29, 2011 (UTC)

@Scofield: Are you everybody? What? You're not? Well, how do you know then that nobody cares about Mattsnow's rant or that nobody agrees with him on the above described matter? In fact, some people even have responded to this forum (including you), which shows that these people do care to at least some extent, even if it is just telling him to cool down. Also, if you think that nobody cares about Mattsnow's opinion on that website or on Scientology, why do you assume that anyone cares about your opinion on Scientology? Schamschi, 00:15, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

@Schamschi This entire forum is actually just an immature rant against OhInternet and DeGrippo, and frankly I am tired of hearing how much she has "ruined everything." Furthermore, the site's vanity policies are pretty clear on the matter of using this site to rant about your personal opinion on stuff. This forum serves no constructive purpose, it was started by a guy solely to rant about "how awful OhInternet is" and our vanity policy clearly states that we don't give a shit about anybody's personal opinion about his teachers or any random website, unless he can channelize it into something funny to contribute to this site. Are these rants remotely funny? I don't think so. Has Mattsnow done anything other than bash OhInternet on this forum? I don't think so. Is Uncyclopedia affected in any way with whatever happens at ED? I don't think so. So I would kindly request you to stop being so self-righteous and annoyingly defensive about a forum topic which is of absolutely no value to this site. --Scofield & Friends 13:16, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

Ok, Ok I cooled down. I was just trying to say that having an article bashing Scientology while running an ad for them on the same page was highly hypocrytical, I'm not saying at all ED was the greatest site, Uncy is better. Let's leave it at that. There's nothing to see here, move along!

Mattsnow 13:19, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

As for my "opinion" on whether Scientologists have actually murdered anybody, I kind of find it ludicrous that such a widespread religion getting so much of media attention could actually get away with murdering anybody without the media and the police staring down their throat, that is all. I was never professing any of my own personal opinions on Scientology, as Mr Schamschi seems to be insinuating. --Scofield & Friends 13:26, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

There is strong rumors about that, even on the Wikipedia, but I admit in my initial post I stated my opinion, more than undeniable facts. Let's just forget about this forum. I should not have posted this.

Mattsnow 13:31, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

Matt, have they gotten to you? Did they threaten you to close or, even worse, "forget about" this forum. The only one that someone associated with Scien killed was stupid on their part, they dehydrated a woman to death (long after Hubbard died and I don't think they were even using any of his techniques when they dehydrated her. Just a couple of morons going rogue). So the score is Catholic: 49,384,599 Scientology: 1 . Aleister 13:35 30-5-'11

You're right, that wasn't so much about that religion as about the stupidity of bashing one thing and having an ad for it on the same page. Can't we just blank this place? :S

Mattsnow 13:44, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

Hi Matt, OhI Sysop here, welcome to the Internet! Given your angry rant I'd have thought you'd know a thing or two about lulzy internet phenomena. Ad Placement Fail is hardly a new thing, other examples include Neo Nazi websites and forums that often get gay dating ads on their top banner. This is because the homophobia and hate isn't recognised, it's just seen as a place where a lot of guys like to talk about gay sex all day long. I noticed that we don't actually have an OhI page for it at this time which is possibly why you were so confused. If you can get screengrabs the next time a Scilon banner appears over that page, feel free to upload it and we'll start one and certainly add it! -Wit 19:27, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Wit, and welcome to Uncyclopedia, your friendly neighbourhood wiki where people take every opportunity to explode about anything and everything. And then vote on it. This included random websites, growths on friends' armpits, the cabal, power companies, that thing my cat hacked up the other day, and so much more. Although we haven't gotten to voting yet here... but that's easily resolved. ~

20:05, 30 May 2011

Hahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha you're an oh internet sysop -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 20:46, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

Obligatory vote: Should Mattsnow and Scofield be dumped in a pit and forced to battle it out with feather dusters?

Scofield is seen here preparing his signature finishing maneuver.

Mattsnow 10:37, June 1, 2011 (UTC)

Score: -1

Duh. 1 2 3 4 ~ 20:05, 30 May 2011
Abstain. I'm quite an impressive feather handler, but I won't weigh on the matter since I am one of the hypothtical protagonist and the petty issue has been resolved. Mattsnow 20:17, May 30, 2011 (UTC)
Against. Because I'm allergic to both feathers and dust and wouldn't be able to watch. Boo. Make it jousting with brooms instead. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 20:26, May 30, 2011 (UTC)
For. My father was killed in a feather duster duel, so I can attest to their amusement. --EMC^[TALK]20:35 May 30 2011
Opinion! Insert unnecessary drivel here. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:42, 30 May 2011
Against. I'm not digging another goddamn pit just so that you can have fat people fight. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:58, May 30, 2011 (UTC)
Against. I want to fight with Schamschi, not Mattsnow. --Scofield & Friends 04:04, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
For. in Greco-Roman nudity of course --K evillips эвилипс MUN,CM,NS,3of7 15:59, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
Against I would prefer they battle in a Colosseum rather than a pit. At least that way we would all get a clear view of the fight. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 10:49, June 1, 2011 (UTC)