User talk:Flammable/Archive3

For classic Flammable v. User goodness, go to User talk:Flammable/Archive1, or User talk:Flammable/Archive2

Might want to Remedy That...

This is the search result for Flammable. You may want to remedy that somehow. Flameviper12 11:52, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

If that Insane Jester guy was regged, he'd probably take GOTM every month. And if there was a Gobshite of the Great Year, he'd probably win that also [[1]]. --Hrodulf 13:54, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

There's only one way to get rid of them, and it won't work all the way. Hrodulf, are you an admin? You should be able to help me, or at least get someone who can.

You have to recreate the articles, but with non-offensive content, THEN someone can delete it again. They'll show up no matter what, but at least Insane Jester's mark has been erased. So please don't ban me for recreating these pages. Flameviper12 14:33, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, but I'm not an admin, and it's not likely I'll ever be one, since there seems to be a consensus that we have enough admins. A consequence of the wiki-system is a lot of vandalism of this sort is difficult/impossible to get rid of. For example, if you look at the list of all registered usernames, there's an awful lot of "!!!!!!!!(insert name here) IS A (insert nasty comment here)." I prefer to take a different approach to this sort of vandalism which is to consider it as a black mark against whoever put it there, rather than actually offensive to the user it trashes. For example, recently someone vandalized my userpage with the P-word. Who looks stupider, me or the moron who wrote the P-word all over my userpage? It's an easy question for me to answer :D--Hrodulf 15:38, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I left Isra a note about your problem [http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/User_talk:Isra1337#Vandalism]. Good luck with the problem. --Hrodulf 15:41, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

See [http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Special:Listusers] for what I was saying before about the usernames, by the way. --Hrodulf 20:22, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Flammable, Are You Dead?

Erm...I was waiting for a response to my question below. It seems that you've answered my other question but somehow couldn't get to the one at the top...? Could you respond? Please?

Flameviper12 21:54, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

PS. I'm holding my breath.

<DavidBlaine>Hey, cut that out.

Rampancy...?

Hey Flammable KUN...just saying "hello" again. I realized you deleted my page. For the third time, albeit by different admins. Anyway, I wasn't exactly done yet. It had an image for crying out loud.

...So why did it die?

Erm, was it the tone? I thought it would be that. I was going for the completely unencyclopedic tone, as a joke. But if it's better as a professional tone, then I could rewrite it that way. Was it just a miscalculation in the delicate balance of nonsense and humour? You see, everyone's sense of humour is different, and I would value your input as well as my ideas to improve this article. If you told me what was wrong and restored it, I could fix whatever's wrong.

Then again, maybe you just think the topic's crap, in which case I will be forced to change my stance completely.

Hoping you reply to my message, Flameviper12 20:52, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Make sure you don't send messages like this to jtaylor1, because it'll get you a UGoTM nomination for reasons known only to the ancient powers of the universe and jtaylor1's psychologist. :[[2]], [[3]] :--Hrodulf 20:56, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Flattering...but that still didn't answer my question. Flameviper12 21:03, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

The answer to your question is 42. --Hrodulf 21:15, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

...that shall not be dignified with a response. Flameviper12 21:32, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Well, I admit it was a lot cooler in the movie, but not being able to read Flammable's mind and answer your question, since I lack psychic powers due to a (common) congential birth defect, I did the best I could --Hrodulf 22:42, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

You deleted my article about Teh Vesti. Why?

I didn't really see a reason, it just said that you deleted it.

AAAAAAAAA!Pod (deleted page)

Is there a 'no more AAAAAAAA pages' policy in effect? Just asking. And I'm not giving you a hard time, I'm just asking a question. Apparently some admins here, for some unfathomable reason, interpret people asking them a question about their actions as giving them a "hard time." [[4]], [[5]] Strange, isn't it?

--RudolfRadna 14:23, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Why?

Why, exactly, was my article crass and stupid? It's not nearly as bad as some other crap that's still on uncyclopedia. Couldn't you have just given it a NRV tag and given me a chance? --Heous

becuase

Sonadow, also known as Sonic/Shadow, That gay furry shit, The ultimate buttsecks

certainly has all the hallmarks of a reasonably intelligent, humorous article. I know you put a good deal of work into it, but tell me, is there any actual humor in that article, or is it all made up, derived, or nonsequitur crap with gay fursex thown in for shock value? Don't use the tired, "But there's so much other crap you could kill" line with me. If you've ever seen me patrol Recent changes, I delete that other crap you so willingly point out if it's not already NRV'd. Please, make the effort to come up with something more original and not push attempts to make us laugh by being crass and shock-centric.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 02:30, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Well, it was an attempt to parody several things, but It wasn't intended to be crass. If you could give me some advice on how to make it less crass i'd be happy to oblige you. ~Heous

Name at least three things that it parodies, not including furries, Sonic the Hedgehog, and homosexuality, and then I'll consider it.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 02:35, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Ok then:

• The Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal
• The Liberation of Iraq by the United States
• Detainment of Political Prisoners at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base
• (to a somewhat lesser extent) The War on Terror

~Héous

If I toned down the gay jokes and reconfigured it a bit, could I have a chance at reposting it? ~Heous

Um, hi~

Dude, you deleted ZZZZZZZZZ, I was just in the middle of uploading images for it, I think it was somewhat rude to just delet it. Fortunately, when I was converting it, I saved a copy, but what if I hadn't? What if I did it by hand? What if you had just deleted a week of painstaking work? You didn't save a copy anywhere or friggin' anything...you ought to not do that. Besides, I had never encountered any other clones. The sole reason I uploads teh fyles (sorry) is so Z⁹ didn't look like another A⁹clone. Maybe this is your discretion or some crap but I think a system of some kind is in order, or at least a warning before you go rampantly deleting hard work. You may piss someone off big time via doing this. Flameviper12 21:06, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

The reason you haven't encountered any other AAAAAAAAA! clones is because we delete them. AAAAAAAAA! is funny. Creating an identical (or near-identical) article is not. Why? Well, firstly because the joke is no longer original. I don't know if you live in a place that gets Little Britain, but that's a good simile for it. Remember how it was brilliant whwen you first saw it? Then the next series came out and it was exactly the same characters doing exactly the same jokes. Ugh. To me, that's getting pretty close to the antithesis of humour.

Some history of the clone debacle can be found by perusing these pages: Uncyclopedia:Village_Dump/archive15#Attack_of_the_Clones, Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/clones, User talk:86.132.133.154, User_talk:Codeine#You_had_no_right... (since you mentioned "You may piss someone off big time via doing this"), and it's pretty low on the Uncyclopedia food chain, too.

As you can see, you're not the first person to think of making an AAAAAAAAA! copy, and unfortunately you won't be the last either. But WE are responsible for content management on this site, and with the amount of crap we have to wade through on a daily basis, there just isn't time to enter into a debate about each page we think should be deleted. As far as how those decision are made - the "system" which you mentioned can be found here. Hope this clarifies things for you. -- Sir Codeine KUN VFP Bur. MDA NS UotM CM +S (Harangue) 09:58, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Ecch. What I meant by that...more like that you dhould give a short warning or userfy it. Here's a new policy...give a warning to the creator

1. . On their talk page
2. . On the article
3. . And userfy it for a day.

A short warning in itself may not work because if you are incapacitated from Uncyclo for a day or even an hour or two, then POOF it's gone. ARGH. Luckily, when I write an article there's a good chance it will be huffed so I save it in Word :). So if you could help implement that policy for (future) pages, that would be great.

Flameviper12 20:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Everyone has their own deletion style. Mine has worked for the year and change that I;ve been here. I've made people angry, but at least i've gotten their attention in a meaningful way. I drudge Recent Changes on a regular basis, and it's really a crapshoot in terms of good potential articles. The way I see it is that if someone truly is willing to take the time to write a good article, they'll be mature enough to message me in a sane way post-deletion, and as such, will be better suited to, in the end, produce a good article.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 20:48, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

More that it's a pain in the arse to go through undeletion procedures such as this. And takes a long time too. Flameviper12 21:52, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Man, you SO rock!

22:23 (cur; last) . . Flammable (Talk | contribs) (deleted "Forum:Wikipedian Guards":
That's enough of that. This topic is toast.)

Flammable, you are now tied for the lead in the "My Favorite Admin" contest! Thank you for all that you do here, man. I truly appreciate it.  c • > • cunwapquc? 03:35, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

UnNews:Queen puts Swift's proposal into effect; English start devouring Irish babies

I like the edit, I think it's a big improvement. I find that I have a lot of ideas, but my writing skills aren't so great so a lot of the time I get the idea out there and sort of just run out of steam. Maybe that will improve eventually. --RudolfRadna 14:27, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

But of course! I'm personally not an idea man myself, but I do very well building upon the foudnations others establish. Don't worry if your writing skills aren't on par. If you keep at it, you'll improve. If not, then you can always be an idea man, and on a wiki, they're often better than writers. --Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 14:30, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

I got this idea because I was talking to another user on the discussion page for Allah and he said he was trying to do a "modest proposal" style satire of christian views of islam. Somehow during that whole conversation the idea came to me, since I had mistaken the satire in the Allah article as literal, what if someone decided to take Swift's essay seriously? So it really all happened because of a misunderstanding, which is sort of interesting, since if I hadn't gotten involved in that conversation, I wouldn't have had the idea. I recall an episode of Sealab2021 that also used the swift essay as a gag, so it's not the most original idea, but it's sort of funny. --RudolfRadna 14:51, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

It was a good start. The key to making a good UnNews article is to make it topical. I knwo that avian flu is a serious thing, but people are freaking out about it a little too much for their own good. Swift's proposal happens to work perfectly for Britain because of their general meat problems (I.e. Bovine Spongiform Enceph.) ONe thing that I'd suggest is looking at current news stories when making articles for UnNews. It's as outlined in HTBFANJS humor closer to truth is better humor. --Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 15:02, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Providence country day school

please delete this page and all subpages before the freedom-hating school admins find out about it. they got pissed about the wikipedia page because of some copyright bullshit!

You have every right to post whatever you want here, as this site is explicitly one of parody and misinformation. We do not claim to present the truth, nor do we strive for any sort of factuality. I have restored the page to its former state. If you wish to delete this page despite your right to write parody material (please make sure it's more satirical than scathing) let me know, and I will rmeove it ASAP--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 06:52, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

get rid of it. i don't care about the copyright crap, i care about the school looking for samael775 and people posting things about the school online. then delete this message and the one about ben bharier. --Samael775 12:55, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

I have a question.

Hello Flammable KUN, you recently made a QVFD on one of my articles. I didn't immediately respond to your site but instead read your user, some more Ignorable policies, and some of your contributations. You seem like a reasonable person and I did perform a major overhaul on my article despite lack of explanation for the QVFD (yes, I admit the first one was rushed and unfunny). Please, can you help me and my catapult article. I don't want it to be huffed from the mainstream site. Side note (I am having a bit of an image problem, can you help me by putting up some simple ways to insert a picture). Thank You--Witt E. 22:25, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Bort the Butt-Sniffing Caveman

Wow, not even VFD'd? Was it that bad? Did you read it through to the end? --Iritscen 19:12, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Yes, and it really isn't the sort of stuff we're looking for. You can write scat-humor, but it really has to have some sort of wit or humor other than scat humor. Aim toward subtlety and witty humor. Also, I think the title is really, really, awful.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 06:55, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

You don't think the title was awful, or you do? I admit the article was a rush job; I'm trying to put more time into my other articles than I did with that one. In any case, perhaps I'll write a new version someday if I can come up with a better approach. But I'd like to know what you were saying in that last sentence, just for clarity's sake. --Iritscen 14:31, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Corrected. I do. Nyquil high, sorry.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 17:39, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Sitenotice

Hello, i'm a user of the new inciclopedia, and for avoid to spanish persons write here (in spanish), i want to you change MediaWiki:Sitenotice/es for:
"Nota: La sección en español de uncyclopedia, se ha trasladado a [http://inciclopedia.wikicities.com inciclopedia], por lo tanto, no debes escribir artículos en español aquí."
Or something like that. Thanks (The text in english says: "Note: The spanish section of uncyclopedia has been moved to inciclopedia, therefore you must not write articles in spanish here." )
Thanks and regards
--Alexan 18:34, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Taken care of. --Sir gwax (talk) 18:51, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

American Commitment to the Rights of Man

I find OEJ's argument valid and have restored American Commitment to the Rights of Man. I'm going to keep it on VFD and let people vote on the matter. --Sir gwax (talk) 18:14, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Ben Bharier

You deleted a page entitled Providence country day school/Ben Bharier despite the fact that it was a vanity subpage of an organization with a wikipedia entry, your reason being that the main page did not have a link to it. However, the main page certaily does have a link to it, under prominent alumni. Please reinstate that page. --Samael775 15:52, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Unfortuantely, the main page is still NRV tagged (due to insufficient expansion) However, I'm giving you another day to expand the main page, otherwise it, and all of its subpages are going to be deleted--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 18:58, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

How to NRV yourself in the Third Person

Thank you, thank you, thank you. --Some user 07:44, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Quaaa?--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 14:52, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Request

Flammable - Could I ask that you reinstate Angry young black man and that it go through the VFD process? Also, some feedback as to why you deleted it other than "What the fuck..." would be helpful. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 14:26, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

It sounds like you're trying to be witty, but the problem is that it comes off as angry, race-based rhetoric. It's not really subtle, or for that matter humorous. It ends up sounding like the author has thinly veiled race-inequality issues, and comes off as bitter and resentful, rather than humorous. It's the kind of stuff that people would finish with a bad taste in their mouth not because of their race, but more because it sounds like they walked in on someone at a really bad time.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 03:52, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Well, that answers that, but isn't Angry young black man and the bitterness that you zapped the article over one and the same? Oh well, that can't all be zingers. But it would have been most helpful if you would have stated that rather than "What the fuck". Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:44, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Look, I deleted it becuase of its tone, not becuase of any personal bias (as is usually the case.) Implying that my motives were such is an improper deduction. Something about judging not by appearance of the page, but the content of the article. I think the article reads like angry rhetoric presented in surround sound stream of consciousness, not from personal bias, but through the language itself.

Also, it's hard to fit all that into the comment box, dear. And to finish nitpicking, it was "What the hell." Much less... vulgar, if you will.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 18:36, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

You blow.

Why did you delete my article on the kingdom of Jessica Alba's ass? It deleted it within a few minutes, just because you didn't find it funny in its early stages, it hardly warrants a deletion.

My apologies. This page was NRV tagged and deleted for its lack of humorous content earleir today. I assumed it ws a remake. However, I think it's hardly coincidence that two people hsould make the article Jessica Alba's Ass in one day. It's getting NRV tagged unless you intend to build on it further. I suggest using a {{construction}} tag.

On a side note. As a rule, asking questions or inquiring as to your situation politely is usually vastly better than heading comments with "You blow." and being crass, defensive, and impolite. Be warned, if I see you act this way again toward admins or other users, I will block you without warning.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 02:41, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Actually... It's getting zotted anyway. I actually really read through the damn thing, and it's unintellectual, nonsensical rubbish. Mad libs are totally passe. We are a parody wiki, but we do have standards. I recommend looking through some of the featureds to get a good idea of what coherent, possibly satirical, parody looks like. I wish you better luck next time.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 02:44, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Oh noes, I was being 'crass', not that this site isn't crass already. The article was funny, and was supposed to be a foothold for others to build on it. By the way, I'd like to point out that your claim that it wasn't coherent is completely bullshittery. It's sad that users can't submit an article that doesn't get deleted in 10 seconds. There should be a vote for this kind of shit, not just some sweaty pseudo-admin with happy-go-lucky trigger fingered deletion tendancies.

I'm certainly glad that you're taking the time to tell me off as opposed to working to make your article better. I'm sure that if you ask any of the other admins, they'll give you the same response regarding your entry.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 18:07, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Would you please leave my articles alone?

I post here while stoned to contribute, but it is very dissapointing and frustrating to see all the fun and excitement to log in & write in uncyclopedia to be turned off by this some kind of harrassment I saw when you debunked several of my entries. I am here because I want to contribute, and I'm willing to learn and share ideas. Shouldn't you as a moderator encourage people, instead of being rude and just banning for 2 days?

Sincerelly waiting for your answer, QuidPro

I'm sure Flammable will reply to you himself, but please take a second to think about how Admin's have to deal with the thousands of "contributions" we have each day. We have to make a snap judgement on whether something is vandalisation, a pointless redirect, vanity, or just plain crap. This is a Wiki site, so we need to balance allowing "creativity" to flow with protecting the hard work that others have put in. I've not checked any of your edits, so I'm not able to discuss them individually, but for the most part Admins get it right (not to say mistakes aren't made). Discussing the matter with the Admin involved, as you have, is the best step to demonstrate that you are a decent contributor, though as a matter of course I would advise you to have a look through the Community Portal section for handy advice on what Uncyclopedia is aiming to be, and examples of good articles, etc. Don't forget though, that everyone has had articles deleted, its nothing personal. :) -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

The 2 day ban is there becuase of your tendency to make multiple redirects. Becuase multiple redirects not only clutter up the site, but also create a long, convoluted web of links to links, they are strongly discouraged. Additionally, your tendency to create frivolous redirects prevent the generation of individual articles (i.e. blueberry, gooseberry, etc.), thereby discouraging the creation of new articles for those links. The 2 day ban is to allow you the time to read the necessary rules and understand that although we are, in fact, a humor site, we do have rules, and that QA is very important here.

Also, PLEASE, PLEASE, don't move pages needlessly. We already instituted a policy for another problematic user regarding page moves becuase his rampant tendency to do so made things difficult for us. Please refrain from page moves unless they're ABSOLUTELY necessary.

Furthermore, I suggest you lay off the junk when you post becuase if you continue this level of posting, almost all of it WILL get deleted. NRV tagging is not intended to discourage expansion, but to give you a reasonable timer to finish expanding your work. Removing it in bad faith will not only result int he deletion of your page, it is almost a guarantee of some sort of block time. I take my job seriously as an admin, and I have no intention of restricting your creativity. However, there are limitations to the time you have, as well as the use of tools (i.e. redirects and moves) to prevent abuses and clutter--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 07:30, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 07:17, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Yay! AgainAgainAgain!

I love watching you make the poo pages go *POW.* YA RLY! Especially when you beat me to QVFD! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:04, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Christian Kragh

Why did you delete my artikel on Christian Kragh? It was under construction and definitely not done yet..! The reason you gave, "ROFLMAOZEDONG", wasn't a sufficient explanation..

Oh, the real reason was that he seems to be nonnotable. While he has a good number of google hits, it seems like it might be a common name. There's no wikipedia entry, and unless you can tell me who this person is, I can't keep the page. Sorry about the ambiguity, but we can't keep Nonnotables here.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 21:11, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Ok, fair enough. It was just because I saw a random article about some small norwegian town, and it seemed like that article had just been written by some guys wanting to write dumb stuff about their town.. So I thought it would be alright if I made an article about a guy from a town near me, who is kinda worshipped for fun by quite a few people actually, at high schools in the area. :)

No problem. Thanks for taking the time to talk. Better luck next time.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 21:45, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

FLAMFLAM

I HAV SONG FOR U. PLZ COME ON IRC. THX. --KATIE!! 06:15, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Sexual innuendo reskin?

What do you think about a main page reskin in the style of this article? It could have hilarious results if done right. - Nonymous 19:36, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Uncategorized Busy Box

Do you like to put that template on articles just for fun, or what? --Hobelhouse 17:33, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Yes, it has nothing to do with the fact that admins are here for a certain degree of quality control. Look, it's not a foreclosure sign. Just make the article stronger and it'll stay. As it is, I don't think it's really keepworthy. See Karl Rove for an example of insane political articles on uncyc.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 17:35, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Well, every article has to start somewhere. But I'll add some more later. --Hobelhouse 17:39, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Work on it. As it stands it sounds like someone's going on an insane liberal-flavored rant. It could stand to use a great deal more subtlety. HTBFANJS and BGBU flesh that idea out more.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 17:41, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Deasdl the Sandcrab

I strongly suggest you take a look again:

• Deasdl the Sandcrab
• Black-Robed Minions of Deasdl
• Precision air force (still WIP, but almost finished)
• The Great Empire of Deasdl

Personally I think you're just prejudiced against sandcrabs with a thing for world domination.

I'd have tagged these NRV as well. Also: "Inside Jokes" does not mean something that's funny only to you. Also also: Making up your own Deasdl Category was a no-no. --T. (talk) 12:59, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Listen. I understand perfectly well what "inside joke" means. (For the record, it was called an inside joke because the origin of the joke is the "inside" part – the general humor of the articles is by no means hidden. And if you have a problem with users creating new categories, you may as well just not run a wiki site that *ANYONE CAN EDIT* in the first place.) Update: Removed categories from articles. Happy now?

Please do us all a favor and find something better to do with your time than show off your prejudices against sandcrabs. It was just Martin Luther King, Jr. Day for crying out loud; just because he's a sandcrab doesn't mean you should hate him.

Besides, as I have already said several times all Uncyclopedia is is a fat load of bullshit anyway (which is the way it should be, so it's not at all meant as an insult), so why shouldn't I be able to post anything? Especially considering that Deasdl & all the companion articles represented a significant amount of effort both on my own part as well as my brother's, and I think that you could at least consider how much of our valuable time we gave up in order to contribute this perfectly ridiculous nonsense to your site.

Martinultima 02:11, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

See you later. Hopefully in a better mood. I'd suggest a trip to a pet store or something. --T. (talk) 03:39, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Effort is not indicative of humor. Try to make it funny before you put that much work into it.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 15:05, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

people with one name

Hi, I put a lot of thought into my parody of wikipedia's List of people with one name. People who frequent wikipedia are somewhat familiar with ridiculous lists of unrelated things, and I did put several jokes in there. That said, can you undelete my post?

Thought you might appreciate...

...this little Wikipedia nuggest I found: Reductio ad Hitlerum: the logical fallacy of the form "Adolf Hitler or the Nazi party supported X; therefore X must be evil." May come in handy in those bioethics debates. – ClockworkSoul 00:51, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

just a quick question...

I just wanted to check in with you. Recently, I wrote an article, which was seemingly deleted due only to it's temporary placement in the Childish Misogynistic Humor section, something which i changed. I understand that this article was again removed, and I would just like to know why. Also, I was wondering if you could help me to make my future articles better. Best regards, some swedish guy (yah) --Out-of-focus 06:25, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

The article itself was humorless and rather uninteresting. Please read HTBFANJS to get an idea of what we're looking for.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 06:29, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

0.999 Recurring

I made 0.999 Recurring a redirect to 0.999... shortly after creating the latter. You deleted the redirect, saying "Unnecessary redir. NO one's ever going to punch this in". I don't understand. Did the page cache show you an empty target or something? Melchoir 06:46, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

The problem is that the redirect you made was impractical. I doubt people are going to type in .999 Recurring any more than they'd type in .999... in a search, or, for that matter, make a link to it like that. However, since your main article exists on .999... I'll leave it in.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 06:50, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation! Actually, 1 (number) links to 0.999 Recurring, which is why I made the redirect in the first place. But that's the only link, so I'll just be italic and change it. Melchoir 06:54, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Wha?

Mr. Flammable, why do you delete my user page? I'm not troll/sock puppet, and I have a account in PT Wikipedia. I just paste the code in my page for use the image signature trick. Please restore my page. Regards. -- The Joker 22:11, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

If it's copy/paste, why not just make it again? This time with proper formatting, ne?--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 01:05, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Okay. Please don't remove. This wiki have a welcome template message? -- The Joker 03:28, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

My suggestion? Copy it to User:The Joker/sig

Stibs

Is it that bad? --TimeStopper 20:03, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Sorta. It's my template-phobia talking. Keep trying, though. Don't lose heart, brother! Write on! For justice! For love!

Delete

You deleted my article The Lair of the White Worm. Why? - Moneyobie

Hi.  :) I had a look at it, and I would have deleted it myself had I seen it first. For that matter, two sentences and 3 made up quotes about a bad film is not enough to pass the Quality Assurance (QA) test of any admin. I suggest you read some more good articles around here to get a better grasp on what we're looking for. If you have specific questions, we'd be happy to answer them. ~ T. (talk) 16:47, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

I wasn't done writing it.. I was going to provide a large humorous and subtly satirical plot outline. Maybe I jumped the gun and posted it too soon? In any case, is there a way in the future to have some sort of under construction tag? thanks - Moneyobie

Heh. You'd know this if you'd read BGBU, our Beginner's Guide.  :) Maybe you should do that now. The answer is there. ~ T. (talk) 17:17, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Haw Haw, Oops! I read it but guess I missed that. I think the rest of Beginner's Guide distracted me--it shouldn't be so damn entertaining. - Moneyobie

That is the curse of much of this site. The rest of it, we delete. Good hunting. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 23:26, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

---

• Please, I request elimination of of me user by transfer Wiki in Spanish, where from this moment I will carry out my work. Thanks and they excuse the inconveniences.--Cafe-olee 15:35, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

The REAL Uncyclopedia

>Flammable deleted "The REAL Uncyclopedia" (Don't give them more attention than they deserve.)

Why not have fun with it? They are no less deserving of attention than Encyclopædia Dramatica. --Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 05:32, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Far less deserving. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 05:50, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Agreed, they really don't deserve any attention. They're insignificant hacks, who, frankly, are far below the dignity of even ED.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 08:49, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Ooops. My bad. Shouldn't have written this (on March 12, if that spares me). ~ T. (talk) 17:31, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

May I know Why did you delete my post on Burj Al Arab?

amshaspand [at] Gmail[dot] com

thanks

YOU DELETED MY ARTICLE FOR BEING UGLY. CAN YOU SEE ME OR SOMETHING?

Why is it ugly?

I don't disagree with you saying it's unfunny. Everyone has their own sense of humour. I particularly enjoy creal

The placement of the image hardly makes it look encyclopedic (which, except for our gimmick articles, is generally at what we are aiming. Besides, your article is dead becuase it was unfunny. The ugly was just another extra something to make it go poof.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 21:53, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

My Dog Made Me

I only made a double redirect because I couldn't figure out how to delete my article and once I figured out that I made a double redirect I didn't have any idea how to fix it. That's what happens when you tell someone to do something but only beat them upside the head with your words, especially if your words are "Shovel" or "Rachet".

You sir, are a faggot.

You swine. You vulgar little maggot. You worthless bag of filth. As we say in Texas. I'll bet you couldn't pour piss out of a boot with instructions on the heel. You are a canker. A sore that won't go away. I would rather kiss a lawyer than be seen with you.

You're a putrescent mass, a walking vomit. You are a spineless little worm deserving nothing but the profoundest contempt. You are a jerk, a cad, a weasel. Your life is a monument to stupidity. You are a stench, a revulsion, a big suck on a sour lemon.

You are a bleating foal, a curdled staggering mutant dwarf smeared richly with the effluvia and offal accompanying your alleged birth into this world. An insensate, blinking calf, meaningful to nobody, abandoned by the puke-drooling, giggling beasts who sired you and then killed themselfs in recognition of what they had done.

I will never get over the embarrassment of belonging to the same species as you. You are a monster, an ogre, a malformity. I barf at the very thought of you. You have all the appeal of a paper cut. Lepers avoid you. You are vile, worthless, less than nothing. You are a weed, a fungus, the dregs of this earth. And did I mention you smell?

Try to edit your responses of unnecessary material before attempting to impress us with your insight. The evidence that you are a nincompoop will still be available to readers, but they will be able to access it more rapidly.

You snail-skulled little rabbit. Would that a hawk pick you up, drive its beak into your brain, and upon finding it rancid set you loose to fly briefly before spattering the ocean rocks with the frothy pink shame of your ignoble blood. May you ckoke on the queasy, convulsing nausea of your own trite, foolish beliefs.

You are weary, stale, flat and unprofitable. You are grimy, squalid, nasty and profane. You are foul and disgusting. You're a fool, an ignoramus. Monkeys look down on you. Even sheep won't have sex with you. You are unreservedly pathetic, starved for attention, and lost in a land that reality forgot.

And what meaning do you expect your delusionally self-important statements of unknowing, inexperienced opinion to have with us? What fantasy do you hold that you would believe that your tiny-fisted tantrums would have more weight than that of a leprous desert rat, spinning rabidly in a circle, waiting for the bite of the snake?

You are a waste of flesh. You have no rhythm. You are ridiculous and obnoxious. You are the moral equivalent of a leech. You are a living emptiness, a meaningless void. You are sour and senile. You are a disease, you puerile one-handed slack-jawed drooling meatslapper.

On a good day you're a half-wit. You remind me of drool. You are deficient in all that lends character. You have the personality of wallpaper. You are dank and filthy. You are asinine and benighted. You are the source of all unpleasantness. You spread misery and sorrow wherever you go.

You smarmy lagerlout git. You bloody woofter sod. Bugger off, pillock. You grotty wanking oik artless base-court apple-john. You clouted boggish foot-licking twit. You dankish clack-dish plonker. You gormless crook-pated tosser. You churlish boil-brained clotpole ponce. You cockered bum-bailey poofter. You craven dewberry pisshead cockup pratting naff. You gob-kissing gleeking flap-mouthed coxcomb. You dread-bolted fobbing beef-witted clapper-clawed flirt-gill.

You are a fiend and a coward, and you have bad breath. You are degenerate, noxious and depraved. I feel debased just for knowing you exist. I despise everything about you, and I wish you would go away.

I cannot believe how incredibly stupid you are. I mean rock-hard stupid. Dehydrated-rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different dimension of stupid. You are trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid. Stupid collapsed on itself so far that even the neutrons have collapsed. Stupid gotten so dense that no intellect can escape. Singularity stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid. You emit more stupid in one second than our entire galaxy emits in a year. Quasar stupid. Your writing has to be a troll. Nothing in our universe can really be this stupid. Perhaps this is some primordial fragment from the original big bang of stupid. Some pure essence of a stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond the laws of physics that we know. I'm sorry. I can't go on. This is an epiphany of stupid for me. After this, you may not hear from me again for a while. I don't have enough strength left to deride your ignorant questions and half baked comments about unimportant trivia, or any of the rest of this drivel. Duh.

the only thing worse than your logic is your manners. I have snipped away most of your of whay you wrote, because, well... it didn't really say anything. Your attempt at constructing a creative flame was pitiful. I mean, really, stringing together a bunch of insults among a load of babbling was hardly effective... Maybe later in life, after you have learned to read, write, spell, and count, you will have more success. True, these are rudimentary skills that many of us "normal" people take for granted that everyone has an easy time of mastering. But we sometimes forget that there are "challenged" persons in this world who find these things more difficult. If I had known, that this was your case then I would have never read your post. It just wouldn't have been "right". Sort of like parking in a handicap space. I wish you the best of luck in the emotional, and social struggles that seem to be placing such a demand on you. Bitch.

FEATURE! -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Bloody gold! --Hindleyite Talk 11:47, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

I laughed, I cried, I died a thousand deaths. When's the movie coming out? Seriously, if you put as much thought into your articles as you did into this message, Flammable would have no reason to delete any of your work. ~ T. (talk) 14:24, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Alas, plagiarized. —rc (t) 14:30, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Alas, banned. Twice today, so far. :) ~ T. (talk) 14:40, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Der Kaiser

Why did you delete the article? I wanted to expand it and add some more information soon... --Soul Provider 21:01, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Two reasons. One being a formality. You need to add {{construction}} tags to your work if you're not done with it. The other is that, from my experience (admin from close to the start), I don't see your article going anywhere good. You can finish it, but I'll bet you 5 bucks that it'll die.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 21:06, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

SHIT

I read the text. How much longer do I have to live?--SN W | T 04:06, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Have a toasted marshmallow . . .

. . . you'll feel better. Morton devonshire 23:55, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Rewritten version of Uncyclopedia:How To Get Started Editing

What is your opinion on the rewrite, since you raised issues about the previous version. --Hrodulf 15:57, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

In case you missed it

Yes yes I read the note at the top of this page. I just wanted to point out that I responded to your message, in case you missed that fact. Hope to see you back soon (cause its July now). --The Zombiebaron 01:21, 4 July 2006 (UTC)