User talk:Flammable/Archive2

For more zany Flammable v. User goodness, go to User talk:Flammable/Archive1, or User talk:Flammable/Archive3

An Award

* \'\'\'nintendorulez\'\'\' (n=47e140e8@ross.wikia.com) has joined #uncyclopedia
\'\'\'nintendorulez\'\'\' Why the hell was I blocked?
\'\'\'Unissakavelija\'\'\' you vandalized euroipods I guess
\'\'\'Zombiebaron\'\'\' because of your genral studlyness :P
\'\'\'nintendorulez\'\'\' No I didn\'t. Check my recent edits.
\'\'\'Unissakavelija\'\'\' guess you removed a template or sumth..
\'\'\'Unissakavelija\'\'\' (Block log); 21:14 . . Flammable (Talk | block) (blocked \"User:Nintendorulez\" with an expiry time of 24 Days: Vandalizing Euroipods)
\'\'\'nintendorulez\'\'\' Vandalism my ass.
\'\'\'Unissakavelija\'\'\' mmkay
\'\'\'nintendorulez\'\'\' Talk about power abuse.
\'\'\'paulgb\'\'\' if that counts as complaining, flammable is in for an award
\'\'\'nintendorulez\'\'\' I simply removed a template that contradicted a template that was already there.
\'\'\'nintendorulez\'\'\' God dammit.
\'\'\'paulgb\'\'\' yup, thats complaining. congratulations flammable
\'\'\'Splarka\'\'\' you bitch about the page for months on end
* \'\'\'nintendorulez\'\'\' has quit (Remote closed the connection)

Feel free to add it to your user page:

{{:Awards/Bastardadmin}}

This is nintendorulez using a proxy. I wish to state that I have not vandalized euroipods in any way, and demand to be unblocked. Why would you block me for an entire 24 days when all I did was remove a template that was in confliction with an existing template on the page? --66.90.103.144 16:49, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

(18:41:42) Flammable: You're not obligated to be here.
(18:41:53) nintendorulez: And that template was necessary. The article needed to have jokes added.
(18:41:56) Flammable: However, if you do decide to stay, don't mess around with templates so much.
(18:42:05) Flammable: And don't kill the original voice of an article.
(18:42:24) Flammable: Your template addition was both unnecessary and disruptive.
(18:42:31) Flammable: Your own revert war on that page was disruptive 
(18:42:38) nintendorulez: It was necessary. The article needed jokes in it.
(18:43:03) Flammable: But you were still disruptive
(18:43:11) Flammable: which is perfectly legitimate grounds for banning. 
*Block goes up 5 mins later*

*Block is removed*
(19:01:09) #uncyclopedia: mode (-b *!*n=47e140*@ross.wikia.com ) by Flammable
(19:01:13) Flammable: Talk
(19:01:15) nintendorulez: All I wanted to do was improve an article. How is that a crime?
(19:01:22) Flammable: Except you didn't
(19:01:31) Flammable: You did nothing to improve the article
(19:01:36) nintendorulez: I didn't detract from it.
(19:01:48) Flammable: You added a contradictory tag
(19:02:08) #uncyclopedia: mode (-b *!*n=47e140@ross.wikia.com ) by _Dawg
(19:02:10) Flammable: And then, in an effort to prove your innocence, you claimed that 
you were simply removing a contradictory tag
(19:02:16) Tompkins: wow this is even better than the whole nerd42 thing
(19:02:16) anidnmeno: Tompkins: I have waited 2 weeks for this
(19:02:43) Flammable: It's like a theif saying that he was innocent becuase 
he opted for the emeralds instead of the diamonds.
(19:02:59) Flammable: Hey! I didn' steal the diamonds! Ergo, I'm innocent
(19:03:13) nintendorulez: No, because I did NOTHING wrong. At all.
(19:03:18) Flammable: Which is a complete and utter nonsequitur
(19:03:32) Flammable: Now, unless you have soemthing else to day, I, for the final time, bid you adieu
(19:03:38) Flammable: say, even
(19:03:48) Rataubes_sockpup: We have a saying around here
(19:03:59) Rataubes_sockpup: DONT BE RIGHT, BE WISE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(19:04:09) Flammable: Damn straight Rat sock.
(19:04:54) anidnmeno: to what?
(19:05:02) Flammable: Adieu
(19:05:05) #uncyclopedia: mode (+b *!*n=47e140*@ross.wikia.com ) by Flammable
(19:05:08) anidnmeno: no +b
(19:05:13) nintendorulez left the room (Kicked by Flammable (Flammable)). 

BONUS FOOTAGE!
(19:05:18) anidnmeno: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

• Edited for conciseness, spelling correction. All lines spoken neither abridged nor censored.

I rest my case--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 00:26, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Also, it seems Darth Vader logged the whole chat here - Nonymous

Dude...

"You're like the guy who adds the unnecessary description of the joke's punchline"

We just wrote the worst straight man schtick EVAR. May you be darned to heck for several hundred seconds where you will have to listen to people with bad timing recite "Who's on First". Fool 16:34, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Go away. You irritate me. Besides, I do not take kindly to that kind of crap. While I don't mind having my own errors pointed at, I don't appreciate it done in that way, even for humor.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 16:46, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

And... breathe. I truly, honestly, didn't realize it was actually an "error" for you to use the discussion page for voting. Sorry to have challenged your wikiskills. Fool 16:59, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

No, my problem is that I don't like your attitude. I didn't like it when I saw you in IRC, and I didn't like your reply. My impression of you is that you've got something out for the admins here, and I really don't like that. I saw you do the same thing to another admin, and while he might not mind so much, I do. Now, unless you've got nothign better to do than make snarky remarks in attempts to make me look bad for making otherwise trivial errors, I suggest you shut up and do something productive.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 17:06, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Ehhhh.... no. The other place you saw me do it was in my own un-nomination for admin, yes? That whole section was a joke too. (In the unlikely event that I become an admin, I would ban all of you, but that would be a joke too, not as an expression of hatred or anything like that, good heavens.) This paragraph is about as serious as it gets for me on Uncyclopedia -- yes, even outside the article space (OMG is nothing sacred around here?) If you still think I'm being unduly cruel and have it in for you, then I'm sorry to have to differ with you once again. And shame on you for saying so, may you be darned to heck where you will have to constantly deal with whiny people who think you are being unduly cruel and have it in for them (Harrr harrr! Geddit? YOU'RE AN ADMIN! GEDDIT?) Fool 17:55, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Except you're not funny, just stupid. Can the routine where you tell me I have no sense of humor. I still think it's funny that you shoot disparaging remarks when you're "serious" instead of, say, actually being serious. I'm sure the 1 week ban will cool your heels in time for you to learn absolutely nothing and garner a UGotM award after next month's nominations.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 19:58, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

vfd ramen

um. why did you revert my VFD for ramen? if it was because i said i didn't read the page, well that was sarcasm. --LOLMOLE 22:30, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Becuase I was busy reverting other vandalism, and probably accidntally clicked rollback on that article too.--Sir Flammable KUN 22:40, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Uncategorized busy box

wy did you re-edit my 'kill'? well, the addition isn't probably best of the best, but hey, i'm trying. 83.27.214.215 is actually me, i just was too lazy to create an account before, so please, wait for the final effect (and i will take the WiP sign off when it's, at least for now, done), and than change what you do not like. --Czterech 16:09, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Take a look at entry Flammable in undictionary. Redirects to Gay, unless already removed. --Suresh 19:13, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Fixed. Was eating lunch. Low blow, eh?--Sir Flammable KUN 19:19, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Thanks! I haven't yet figured out how to do a redirect. No, no, don't tell me! I'll figure it out myself. --Marcos Malo 00:59, 9 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I guess you better tell me after all. --Marcos Malo 00:59, 9 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Use the command "#REDIRECT ((Article name))" using brackets [] instead of parentheses.

You're my BFF* (*for a limited time only)--Marcos Malo 01:06, 9 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Arse! I read the text, what happens now? --IMBJR 15:30, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I Don't know! No one's ever gotten that far!--Flammable 16:55, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Dude, your comments this evening are cracking me up! Nice. -- Codeine 20:38, 3 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Had to shut off a lab machine thing. It should have been, "Article" not "Russia". Oh wellz. I sux.--Flammable 20:39, 3 Aug 2005 (UTC)

You have no idea how happy an animated River City Ransom template makes me, so I will tell you: very, very happy. NES forever. --Rcmurphy CUN 04:28, 4 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Glad to be of service. However, I didn't wnat to make a template for it yet, seeing as it might only end up being used on your page--Flammable 04:29, 4 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Stop deleting good articles.

I have to agree with my anonymous buddy. Mermaids was a really good page and you should restore it because it made everyone laugh. Also Dilbert was very very funny, probably VFH material. --Rcmurphy CUN 19:54, 5 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Brad Conn5

Uh, reason for deleting 'Brad Conn5' article was "i dont care about you or your AOL buddy"...what AOL buddy? What the hell does that mean? Was there a real reason for deleting the article? "Stupid/Random crap" i could accept but "i dont care about you or your AOL buddy" doesnt actually seem to tell me anything about why it was deleted :S --Numagor 09:44, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

To put it snarkily: Who the hell is Brad Conn5, and why should I care? The article Brad Conn5 descriabes a Nonnotable Person/Entity/Figment of your imagination. Because of the article's lack of humor and overall unimportance, it is unsuitable to remain an article.--Sir Flammable KUN 09:52, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Lol, snarky indeed :D. Just read the vanity policy (thanks to a discussion below) and realised that it would classify as a vanity page so i see where you're coming from now.

ps. your obviously not one for random humour :P

pps. You also say that you don't like people being snarky? *looks up at previous reply* ;)...i'll shut up now...

Also, you should delete the picture BradConn5WantsYou.jpg as in the absence of said article it serves no future purpose.. --Numagor 10:11, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

The Fonz

You wrote: "Please ease up on the redirects. While things like "Arthur Fonzerelli" are good redirs, "The fonz, doens't need every iteration of Fonz under the sun to point to it."

Point taken, but since no one has yet written a decent article on one of the several Fonz iterations that have links to them, do you really think you should encourage articles on all of them? Naughtyned 22:27 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

No, because some of the lesser-used redirects will likely never be used, and serve to waste space. Plus, if someone thinks of sometime creative (i.e. ambiguation), it's a deterrant. Also, strange redirects jsut make more small pages that take up unnecessary space and bog upt he "small apges" page. If you want to redirect, stick with common ones, as peopel will adapt to mislinks fromt he less common names.--Sir Flammable KUN 22:29, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Redirect Deletions

Flammable,

About your recent deletions of the redirects, I should point out those last three in particular are at the top of the list of the Wanted page. Wouldn't it be easier to redirect them instead of changing each one individually ? I could see if there were one or two links, however Federal Government of the United States (at last count) was links to over 12. Although the page changes so rapidly, it's impossible to keep track of all the pages (especially since the recent Undictionary project. MadMax 07:54, 28 Oct 2005 (UTC)

This is why you need to use your login more ^_^ --Splaka 07:57, 28 Oct 2005 (UTC)

• Lol. True, however (as I understand it) cookies arn't enabled on this particular computer. All I can do is sign the edit history, of course that's only when I remember to. ;-) MadMax 08:01, 28 Oct 2005 (UTC)

That's annoying. Ahh well. Btw, I linked around Undictionary:Futurrency (it was a link in the Anonymous template). --Splaka 08:16, 28 Oct 2005 (UTC)

My Smear Campaign

It's okay, right? General Specific 19:39, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

User:Wester

Even as you were burninating Arrrrrrrr, M. Wester was creating more articles, which you have since burned. At what point should an admin (which I seem to be, so clearly someone should be shot) put a temp ban on a user? Obviously, this is a question for IRC, but I'm afraid to install an IRC client... adding Special:Newpages to my bookmarks has already decreased my productivity at work by about 110% (I'm actually undoing work I'd previously done). -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 16:46, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Usually, the typical protocol for short page makers is as follows: If the user has made numerous bad, short pages, delete them, and give them a 20min-1hr ban, pointing them to BGBU or something similar.

If the user insists on making more of the same, ban him again, this time for 1-4 hours.

If the user doesn't stop. knock him unconscious; ban him for 1-7 days.

If the user comes back after that, 24-infinite, depening on how annoyed you are. --Sir Flammable KUN 23:54, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• Wow. They made me an admin, and I hadn't even found BGBU yet. I love this place! Oh, and thanks for the help... I think I'll leave blocking (unless I see something really egregious) to the more experienced folks. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 15:42, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Tolerance?

For someone with an arguably self-centered "touch my stuff and die" policy, you certainly don't seem to have any internal conflict with obliterating things I'm working on. Is UN in danger of running out of disk space, or is waste just a luxury available to certain tiers of membership? There are plenty of administration-level templates that are wasteful duplication (official/semi-official/unofficial/very unofficial). Might I suggest pointing your flamethrower there first? I think I've generated a fair share of tasty content in the last 8 days of work. A little room to breathe would be appreciated. Thanks for reading. </rant> -- T. (talk) 22:19, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Ahuh. Where did I ever say that you've never contributed anything useful? Projecting a little bit, are we? AFAIK, I've never even run into you until now. Let me know exactly where you used those templates and I'll restore them depeding on if they're worthwhile. Btw, take it easy, I'm sure if you read BGBU, you'd know that some admins shoot first and ask questions later.--Sir Flammable KUN 22:22, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Actually, that's just it. I never got a chance to embed them in any of the articles I've written because they were blasted too fast. I've been shot a couple of times by Splaka, so I apologize for being oversensitive. I understand that you guys have a job to do, and it can be useful/proactive to blast stuff as its coming in, but it's kind of disparaging to know that stuff I'm working on can disappear before it's done. Articles, I generally tag as construction, but templates? I figured they'd still be there if I checked back in a few hours. I try to do my part to tag lousy articles, but I always check the date and revisions first. If its new, I tag it WIP, recent:rewrite or catstub, or if it's old and stupid then maybe VFD, but I try not to kill on the first shot.  :) For what its worth, kudos to MadMax for finding my stuff (before I got into self-tagging), but treating it gently. -- T. (talk) 02:27, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Countries that are not the United States

Aw, come on! Links only from one article - Arlington National Cemetery - where it makes quite a funny point. In context. Honestly. And it's an old joke... though whether that recommends it or not, I don't quite know. 83.104.158.102 23:02, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

It's not worth its own page.--Sir Flammable KUN 23:03, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

<blows raspberry>. Okay then, you win, philistine ;o) 83.104.158.102 23:10, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Dead flounder

Hey, why did you delete my "dead flounder" article? I thought it was pretty good. People are allowed to say things like "Pi equals 3 because Jesus proved it in the Bible, which was written by Bush," but you can't say "The dead flounder was invented by Bill Gates in 1732"? Come on, I only wrote the article because my friend wrote the one that links to it. I still have it saved on my computer if you'll allow me to post it back up. Please?

Post it up again. I'll read it to see if it's keep-worthy. Fair enough?--Sir Flammable KUN 18:04, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Thanks.

Hm, deleted again, eh? Even the new one, which was completely different and even better. Oh, well, eventually I'll come up with a good one. Or I could just give up and continue editing other things. Looking at what I've posted and what's actually stayed up, apparently stuff that's random and made up on the spot is better than real humor. So I'll go with that. :-D

Organized Crime Circles

wtf are you doing??? another time you delete it your out!

okay, let me explain a bit. I'm assuming you're a reasonable fucktard person who can deal with this like an adult. what you're doing, deleting the redirection from organized crime circles to olympics, is destroying a link in dating women. I read a bit about your stance, and you seem to be a supporter of circumventing vfd or even qvfd. why don't you do a bit research or explain in a user's talk/discussion page why you delete something? what you're doing is fucking frustrating. you don't deserve to be an admin you fucking moron.

(what has been stroke out is honest from my heart, but you may not want to know it)

--Pikine 08:16, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

It's a worthless page. If you'd bothered to read HTBFANJS or BGBU you'd see that the page you made was COMPLETELY USELESS.--Sir Flammable KUN 08:18, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

P.S. It's funny how you're not an admin. Want to never post here again?

Post-edit post: Ahuh. You're gone. Btw, bad links deserve to die. Boo Hoo. It's killing a link. It's too bad it sucks.

Willy on wheels!

Sadly no, I am a filthy imposter. The real W.o.W. has appeared to fall off the face of the earth. --Willy on wheels! 21:44, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)

no response?

when I got banned 2 days ago .... I'd PMed you on the IRC channel. Did you get that message? I never got a response --Nerd42 00:21, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Oddly enough, no--Sir Flammable KUN 02:39, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Too bad. --Nerd42 15:42, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

THanX #1138

Just read your reply to the student/dick on my talk page. I appreciate you guys having my back, but must single you out for being an especially talented bitch-slapper. A+++. Much obliged. -- T. (talk) 21:50, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Bisscuitt

You deleted my Bisscuitt article.

I can understand your sum:

user(Bisscuitt) + article(Bisscuitt) = dumbass idiot creating pages about himself.

However, I may share the same username as the North American Maori Long Haired Listening Sheep, but that is due to my shear devotion to this beautiful animal.

I know my spelling was poor, and my grammar terrible, but I was about to tidy it up when I noticed the page had gone.

So, in conclusion, I was writing an article about a fictional Mammal, and not about myself. --Bisscuitt 16:31, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Bah. My edit got lost. I suggest you change your username as not to comfoose the other admins. Generally we're very leery of atricles named after users, especially becyase 90% of them end up being vanity.--Sir Flammable KUN 18:20, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Biblical Literalism

Come now, I was working on it. Synomymous with Anonymous 22:35, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Then tag it with {{WIP|--~~~~~}} so we all know that it is, in fact being worked on. I'll restore it, so you can continue. --Sir Flammable KUN 22:38, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)

It's okay, I back'd my browser and am working on it Notepad. Do you like the idea though? Synomymous with Anonymous 22:40, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Don't start it off with a description of actual biblical literalism; try a slightly different approach. However, I'd be happy if you executed the "controlled substance" approach well.--Sir Flammable KUN 22:45, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)

NNP

I have not been able to find a reference to the abbreviation NNP listed as your reason for deleting the sherwood schwartz article. I am still a petty new user, and I apologize if there is some such aspect of it that makes it unfunny or unworthy. My sense of humor is far different from most, and it could simply be that. However, if NNP is a small transgression I would respectfully ask what it was, and if it is able to be remedied.

NNP = Non-Notable Person. See Uncyclopedia:Vanity_Policies --Splaka 06:46, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Kevillips replies

How notable does a person have to be to rank? Sherwood Schwartz is widely known as the creator of two of the biggest TV shows in history. He's been featured on TVLand's TV Moguls. With all due respect, this man is probably second only to aaron spelling or maybe norman lear when it comes to producing TV shows. I have no connection to him whatsoever, I just picked him up from an already created link from "gilligan".

I put forth any person that is a big fan of either the Brady Bunch or Gilligan's island would know this person. That the editor is unfamiliar does not in and by itself make him Non-noteable. It may just make the admin non-informed.

Citing the VPP, (vanity policy page)

• Google hits "Sherwood Schwartz" 39,900
• Wikipedia currently has a stub on him
• Imdb has an extensive filmography on him, but not much of a personal biography.
• Have the admins heard of him, apparently not
• Is it funny? Funny is as funny does. But comparing the writer/creator/producer of the brady bunch to shakespeare is funny because it has a ring of truth to it. Shakespeare was the light hearted topical humor of its day. Just as the BB was. People quote BB just as they do Shakespeare, comparing the archetypal characters of GI to the seven deadly sins is funny because its true. The thematic use of the comedic THREE in the GI piece follows the classic humor formula of things are funny in threes. Comparing some of the real sequels to the fake sequels also follow a rule of three. But as they say, if you have to explain a joke, it is probably not much of one, or rightfully belongs on my blog.

Now applying the same criteria to "his boy Elroy"

• Google Hits "Elroy Schwartz" 237
• Wikipedia has no article, and only 5 "hits in search"
• Have the admins heard of him, doubtful.
• is it funny? N/a

I would agree if the article was about his son Elroy it would be a NNP.

But I respectfully disagree on the summary decision that Sherwood Schwartz is a Non Notable Person.

further

• Google Hits Tammy Faye Baker 49,300
• Google hits "my actual name in quotes" 138
• Google Hits "teresa Isaac" Mayor of my city 345
• Google Hits "Eleanor Mondale" 949 - although admittedly I wrote an uncyclopedia article about her and am probably opening her up to NNP status too.
• Google Hits "Charles Nelson Reiley 613
• Google Hits Gene Rayburn 32,300

In the Googleplex, this poor man ranks between the long time host of TV's Match Game and a defrocked former minister and christian bible theme park creator, ex wife of bible filanderer.

I am unfamilar as to what it takes to be notable. I do insist this is not a vanity page. It has been a long running humor theme of mine to compare this man to Shakespeare. I have been doing it since the last century. Heck even the last decade.

-- k3vin

Fine fine. Link me to the page and I'll restore. I looked over the article text and it seemed to be rather stereotypical of vanity articles. While I appreciate the reply, try not to be so snarky or tongue in cheek about it, especially if I haven't responded to you proper. Me and other admins value civility, and you'd do best not to take that kind of attitude when an admin makes a flub.--Sir Flammable KUN 09:48, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC) --- ===Admittedly=== I can wear my smarty pants rather high above the waist. Especially when I am wintering in Boca. I offer my humility. As I wrote my voluminous response, it occured to me that I probably put far more energy in my explanation than was spent in the initial deletion. As a newbie, I was not sure if indeed SS was a NNP or not, so I did not consider the deletion to be a flub, and was prepared to explain myself. I massaged it a bit, and it is currently sitting under my user page. Here -- k3vin 18:44, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Seems good. Feel free to post it under the original heading when you're feeling confident. The "Evil genius" line threw me off hardcore. Apologies for th einconvenience--Sir Flammable KUN 18:48, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Incidentally, my over the top response, and specifically my "smarty pants" self reference inspired me to write about the disease--k3vin 02:08, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Ewok hunting

Why deleting Ewok huntiung? Quality of page was better than most phantasy oriented pages. You mentioned this is not a Tabloid. Was page to flashy or news oriented? --Suresh 21:46, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Too, too, too, too flashy and newspapery. It felt too much like a pamphlet than an encyclopedia article. Remake it and I'll evaluate it closer, but My impression is that unless the subject matter itself is stiff, you should attempt to write it like an encyclopedia article.--Sir Flammable KUN 21:49, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)

It's not my article...--Suresh 22:19, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I looked at it again. 's not so good that I'd want o keep it. Granted it IS better than most stuff, but that's like saying a scrape hurts less than a bullet wound.--Sir Flammable KUN 22:30, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Trying to get your standards I still find deletion not necessarly harsh but inconsequent. An NRV-tagging seemed more appropriate, since reason for purge seemed more to be about style than content. --Suresh 22:58, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)

If you'll notice. i shoot from the hip, shoulders, arms, legs, eyes, and I think i have a head-cannon somewhere. That's a very good point, and I'll take it to heart by reverting and NRV tagging it.--Sir Flammable KUN 23:01, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)

A victory for Admin reasonability. Good luck with further huntiung. The crap is out there.--Suresh 11:12, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Assholes, yes.

Hi.

I just wanted to tell you that you're an asshole. :o) Now bring back my brilliant article on dictatorships or I'll leave this place for good.

If you delete articles for being classifiable as 'crap', why don't you prune this entire site?? --Sinspawn 23:19, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)

5 dolla sucky sucky? I'm confused.--Sir Flammable KUN 23:36, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Piro Llama

Why did you call the Piro Llama article Garbage? --Jtaylor1 10:30, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Becuase it's substandard and well, Bad. Read BGBU and HTBFANJS to get an idea of what works and what doesn't.--Sir Flammable KUN 19:09, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Help.

if i can do anything to help please let me know thank you. 130.111.98.244 20:29, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC) i hope i can come up with something funny maybe iam not a funny guy but i try.

Popups

On the Satan article you made an edit with the summary "Popups assisted revision to revisisn blah" I didnt know popups work here (Unless that is a joke)--abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvWXYZ(talk|contrib) 22:28, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Holocaust

Hi. Wat's wrong with the image? Kakun 08:01, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Well, it's cropped really ugly. I don't know how to fix that other than to remove it completely.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 20:01, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Israel

Could you lock this please? Osama Bin-Laden tries to ruin it. Kakun 19:56, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Which came first? The chicken or the egg?

Which came first? Lugiatm speaking first person or Flammable speaking first person? I can't be bothered to check your history page. officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 20:31, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

signatures?

what's up with not being able/allowed to edit my own signature page??? --   Nerd42    chat  talk  h²g²  pedia  news  14:52, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Consider it a "Gift for stelaing Dawg's sig and wining UGotM --Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 14:54, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

OK I am seriously confused now

I was under the impression that a requirement for a page's survival was humor. So your saying "not every page has to be funny" has got me very mixed up now. Should I seriously have already known that? Is it on a policy page somewhere, and I missed it? (this is not sarcasm, I'm dead serious) I thought uncyclopedia pages had to be funny! --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 01:54, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Ugh. The ones in which we tend to do "serious" business. Fore example, VFP, VFD, VFH, QVFD, etc. should be primarily focused on getting votes through, not garnering a laugh. Just as Comedians can't be funny all the time because they have real lives, our business pages can't be too visually distracting. Besides your intended "addition" doesn't add any humor value.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 02:10, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

it hasn't been added, so how do you know? i should just do a seperate article called V.F.D. I guess. ;) --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 03:37, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Becauase you mentioned it on the IRC channel. I'm not stupid, you know. It's right up there with all of your other "improvements"--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 03:43, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Is it crap?

Mordechai Vanunu statue

---Kakun 03:21, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I don't even know what it is.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 03:23, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

It's an atom bomb, and Vanunu is Vanunu. Well? Kakun 03:29, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Unless you intended to make ti look like crap, yes. I'm sorry, It is crap.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 23:02, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, I think. ~ Kakun 23:55, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

God, If I could figure out (drunk, so it would have to be damn obvious) wtf you were talking about, I'd de;ete it. Damn crap. Taking over this website. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 01:05, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)

George W. Bush Oscar Wilde Quote

Ok, thanks. And I was just about to give up and go sobbing to my bed too!

Sorry, if I've done this wrong, newbie too scared to create an id until non-newbie :)

You're cool. I just missed the joke completely. Chalk it up to quality sake for the first time in a long time. Don't be scared to reg, btw. We usually don't bite. However, if you smell like bacon....--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 04:40, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Thanks.. No spam here, just misunderstood :) -- registered now User:Welsh Git 04:47, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Power Triping??

feel free to nrv tag my other article:The great 1927 riot of Poughkeepsy ps:have fun

Personally I foind Power tripe supernutritious and only slightly delicious. If you think NRV tagging is power tripping, you've got self-esteem issues. NRV is a way for us to ID articles that need expansion and/or humor content. When I say not to remove the tag, I suggest you don't remove the tag unless you have our okay. That's the way it normally goes. Now, since you can't handle yourself reasonably well, off you go.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 04:55, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I'm the baby? u banned me for saying u re power tripping if thats not power tripping then what is? U went and deleted my other article Super Ridiculus Engine within 1 day after NRV tagging it which gives it a 7 day horizon for improving? What pissed me off the most is that i didnt have the chance to save this one, by the way your user page is really so damn funny i ll need a new stomach after reading it

10:11, 8 Jan 2006 Famine deleted "Super Ridiculus Engine" (SRE seems to be down. Just a semi-RE here.)

Funny how if you look at the logs, I actually didn't. Calm down, or I'll block the rest of your godforsaken IPs.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 20:02, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

U cant block my ip's u pathetic little administrator, i'm using http proxy servers, but u wouldnt know u re just a kid... u didnt answer my original question... kid

Thank you, come again. Btw, if you knew how to read, you'd notice that I didn't delte SRE, but famine did. However, your immaturity rears its head once again. I suggest you cool your head.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 23:07, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)