From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: UnBooks:The Last Little Pig
|
Score: 13 wolves righteously struck down
|
| Nominated by:
|
– Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 02:17 Mar 26, 2008
|
For: 13
|
- Self-nom & for. I haven't self-nommed in a while. Which doesn't say much because I haven't been here in a while. But I think this one might be worth it. (PR) ([[Talk:UnBooks:The Last Little Pig|followup]]) – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 17:45 Mar 26, 2008
- I read, I liked --
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  02:24, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- For --Sir Starnestommy
 (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 06:56, Mar. 26, 2008
- Excellent I was a little disappointed by the ending, but some very good lines make it well worth a read. MrN
 02:05, Mar 27
- For I Peed this so it's only fair to make it famous! plus it is excellent!--orian57 03:15, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- For No Doctor, it does not beat Monotony. But god dammit, it still reminds me of how great the group of writers is that I come from. And it's still great, exactly what I've come to expect from you and your work. -RAHB 06:08, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- I choose... for!!! Loved this. Absolutely loved this. Wow... especially the font, that was perfect. Nice, man. --Fist of Judgement 18:32, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- For. A good read. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 08:37, Mar 30
- Against That last line suxx0red.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:40, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- For in spite of Ljlego's criticism! Le Cejak • <Apr 02, 2008 [0:21]>
- For I meant to vote for this days ago but I forgot. Sorry. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:55, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- Fuckin' Awesome. Now I'm ashamed it took me this long to read it. --OptyC Sucks! CUN 15:48, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- F♥r. Another amazing article from our favorite non-asshat. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 18:05 Apr 5
|
Against: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
- RAHB: It doesn't beat Monotony? Damn. I guess I'm just going to have to keep trying, then. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 15:15 Mar 27, 2008
- Don't get too discouraged about it. It's hard to beat something that is utterly perfect in every possible way. -RAHB 22:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, Skull, now you know what Beethoven felt like when he heard Für Elise again, or what Rachmaninoff felt like when he heard that stupid-ass Prelude in C# Minor. But the best analogy of all has to be when Mario Puzo saw The Godfather become his most popular book, or when Anthony Burgess had the same problem with A Clockwork Orange. Long story short, you'll never beat it. But at least it means you've succeeded in life.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oh he'll beat it alright. I'm sure he beats it every night.... alone.... with some porn.... his penis... that's what he beats....-RAHB 04:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
20:06, 6 April 2008 (UTC)