From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: 10 great reasons to de-op all current admins
|
Score: 3
|
| Nominated by:
|
MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:37, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
|
For: 7
|
- For Once upon a time, there was a brave editor of Uncyclopedia who decried the power and abuse of those in the admin class and who tried to herald in an age free from their tyranny. That user was me. About two years later, this article was expunged onto the servers of this site where it has laid in a quiet solitude waiting for a chance to be heard. While this article clearly drew great inspiration from the 2010 Why?, it added several low-quality photos and lists out the wazoo. Lists are quite popular with current webgoers. Lists are the life blood of popular sites such as HuffPo, Cracked, Kotaku, and others. Featuring this would be sure to bite into a chunk of that delicious, list-stuffed market share, thereby allowing Uncyclopedia to experience exponential growth. And it even has Hitler jokes in it! If you've been following American politics, you know that talking about Baby Hitler is vogue. It would be a travesty to not feature this literary masterpiece, especially considering the troubles its author has recently struggled through. Maybe the self-referential message of it being necessary to de-op some folks will sink in to some. Maybe, we will soon be able to de-op some undeserving, power-abusing admins. And we have this article to thank for that. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:37, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 For. good enough for me  ŤäŁķ ¿Ș₮áłĶ?฿¡฿↓¡ography 20:59 11.22.15 20:59, 22 November 2015 (UTC)- For. Simply brilliant GrammarFegelein
 (Chat) (Things) (CTAM) I Fuck Fix up articles. 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- Beautiful. And now I'm probably going to get banned for voting for it.
(Side note: if you want MOBS to vote for this article, you might want to remove the USERNAME template. Just a thought.) ~  19:39, 11/25/2015
- For. Like Mr-ex777. MyOwnBadSelf (talk) 21:58, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- For. Very true! Stranger195
 (talk • contribs • guestbook • wt • unf) 07:20, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- For. User:Matthlock/sig2 21:50, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
|
Against: 4
|
 Against. I am sorry Anton (talk) 15:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)- Against. Navelism. Leverage (talk) 12:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 It STINKS! -- Thankful Kippy  Share blessings Bountiful harvest 22:42, Nov. 25, 2015- Against. Kazimiera (talk) 12:07, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
For. good enough for me 
(
Against. I am sorry 
Comment. Definite Navelism but deserves a quasi-feature here for 
