Talk:Main Page/archive3

Dustin time

How you like my dustin your mouth, TSA?

Today's featured article, Smells Like Teen Spirit, single-handedly caused a surge in Dustin searches on Yahoo! Buzz, beating out all terrorist-related searches. Looks like people finally have their priorities straight. Way to go, Uncyclopedia! --Namtar 13:44, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Lance-brick link

Whenever you see the picture of the lance with the brick on the end (love that picture) the link beneath it is wrong, it should actually be this. --80.3.0.42 15:09, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Copied again

I've noticed that MAD magazine has been including parodies of wikipedia in their magazines. They call it "wackypedia" and they put it in the section full of random drawings and shit near the front of the magazine. Was anyone else aware of this? --Testicles 22:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

that is so retarded. --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 15:36, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

• I'm amazed there isn't an Uncyclopedian article on Mad magazine as of yet. I would have thought there were at least a few more fans besides myself on Uncyclopedia. MadMax 00:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

yes, and isn't that surprising? weren't they the first uncyclopedia? i have no idea what they're like now tho.

Alfred Neuman for President, anyone?

-- mowgli 08:28, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Fictitious Invention Story Day

Not that it probably matters, but the B.C. dates in this section are mixed up. For example, 1453 B.C. comes before 1460 B.C. and the events about the lawn, although probably intended to be marked as A.D., are in the wrong order too. --213.40.131.65 07:56, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

STFU! Mr. IP man! Must be a wkipedian..., myeah, ok, we got it. --HP talk 09:20, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Are we aware of this?

Exhibit A -Joachim22 Can't bother to log in

Yeah, there's alot of those, we don't really care much as long as there aren't alot of users, or profitable ads on the site.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:54, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

You can't even edit it like a real wiki. This has to be the lamest ripoff yet. --Testicles 17:17, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

That's stupid.... They trie, and they fail... --WeepingWilly

They suck. We pwn them. And their formatting sucks. --(Some crazy guy) The consequences will get you.[MUN] [FUN!!] 23:23, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Ugh! major css faux pas -- Kaizer the Bjorn takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 20:04, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

4th of July Reskin sucked

Usually I post here saying "That was awesome!" after a holiday but, in this case, it just ... wasn't funny. Where's the odd twist on the holiday, like last Christmas or that nasty bloody heart thing on Valentine's Day? The "Uncyclopedia Americana" thing was just, cliche and boring. I suggested we redecorate to look like Mexico on the 4th, but nobody listened. But really, even AAAAAA! would have been better. --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 16:41, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

So where was the completely awesome reskin you made up that we should have used instead? Rather than complaining, do something - you have the power. If you want something done well around here, grab a few like-minded individuals and get it done. That's the point of a wiki. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 22:10, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

I had a reskin, but it also sucked, and i felt that carl's worked better... Mine was An:, in case you were wondering.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 22:19, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Yours was better Tompkins. --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 15:35, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Double interwikis

All the interwiki links to foreign uncycs at the sidebar are repeated twice. Can someone fix it?---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 22:10, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Fixed by Carlb.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 03:37, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Featured article

So, do you guys plan ahead your featured articles or is it just whatever the first sysop wants? Sheneequa 00:13, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

For the answer to that, check VFH--<<>> 00:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Actually, I just spin around in a circle with my eyes closed, and when I open my eyes, whichever article I'm on is the one we feature.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 03:23, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Main Page Subtitle

Does anyone else think we should change the subtitle on a daily/weekly/etc. basis? I'm talking about the "The Content-Free encyclopedia that anyone can edit" subtitle. Surely it's a huge opportunity for some great humour? Just an idea. --Joachim22 08:19, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

We could start with "Surely it's a huge opportunity for some great humour?" --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:25, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Then "Just an idea" --User:Nintendorulez 13:38, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Not a Social Networking Site

"Just in case you were confused, we're not a social networking site.".. whats all this about? What is it in response to? --Huffers 23:57, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

I dunno, but I like it being there. It reminds people that we have vanity policies. The only thing missing is a link to them. —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] 00:00, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

What we really need is "sanity policies" --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 15:38, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

German Uncyclopedia down

Can anyone tell us what happend to the german uncyclopedia site? Uncyclopedia.de --84.58.61.88 10:56, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

It's down - http://uncyclopedia.de

According to my German skills Google translation:

Welcomely to the German-language Uncyclopedia!  Because of change work is the Uncyclopedia at
present down!    It continues soon again! The Uncyclopedia forum is available further.

—rc (t) 14:36, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

I think this is the current URL: http://de.uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Hauptseite -- Krankman 19:09, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Chinese uncyclopedia needs integration

It should be taken into attention that the Chinese version of uncyclopedia now has two portals, one is Chinese Simplified and the other Chinese Traditional. It is suggested that these two portals could be integrated via some inter-conversion methods just as wikipedia does, or both portals would result in less information and requires repetitive manually work during text converse. Endeneon 04:46, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

WOTD

HEY COULD YOU BRING BACK THE WORDS LIKE DELETE "TRY TO USE IT IN CONVERSATION" THOSE WERE HILARIOUS -– Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.174.135.175 (talk • contribs) 25 April 2006

The word of the day was voted off the island (or the main page at least). It still exists but is no longer on the main page: Template:Wotd. --Splaka 03:43, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

HEY COULD YOU TYPE IN LOWERCASE THAT WOULD BE HILARIOUS --Bleachie talc 20:30, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Hitler reskin

Love today's reskin.

Hopefully we'e scared away all the close-minded, hateful, idiotic, no-sense-of-humor contributors. Except those few Nazis left in the world. No, wait, the featured images probably got rid of them, too. ^_^ --User:Nintendorulez 18:41, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

From Talk:Holocaust Tycoon

Wow....

At least the spelling andgrammarcould havebeen cleaned up.... It is very offensive. Especially the fact that this is the whole theme today. It's not funny.

Just so you know, this wasn't a majority-decission of the sysops here at Uncyclopedia. I'd tell you who created the reskin and subsequently forced it upon us, but I'm not one to "snitch". Anyways, on behalf of the opposition (of the reskin) sorry about the whole thing and we hope this doesn't lead you to form a very very negative image of who we are and what we stand for. --~ sin($) ^tan(€) 16:50, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm not an admin or anything but i'd just like to point out that Hitler is the butt of the joke here... nobody is promoting or endorsing what he did. George VI 17:20, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Agreed, it's a joke. But considering that this might be the first time some users have stumbled upon Uncyclopedia, this should not have been on the frontpage. Ever. Also, today's the date Hitler was born. I'm not saying this is honouring that or anything, but it sure as hell is letting the people know (whatever that means). Even Wikipedia was smart enough to leave it out of their "On this day".... --~ sin($) ^tan(€) 17:28, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm not new to Uncyclopedia, and I realize that this is a joke on Hitler, but I still think that the total reskin and the poorly executed entry could have been done in a more obviously inoffensive way. And it is nice to knoe that this was not a unanimous decision.

Meh, nothing wrong with a little Hitler worship. You have to show the Fuhrer some admiration on his birthday.

I would've prefered trying to make it as offensive as possible, to the point where it becomes immediately obvious that it's not taken seriously. And besides, anyone who got offended and left probably isn't someone with much of a sense of humor. Not the kind of people we want to see writing articles if they get offended like that. --User:Nintendorulez 18:43, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

that sort of joke is like the Japanese Blowfish meals... a delicacy that takes expert preperation to get just right --Huffers 00:54, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Rave Reviews!

We should put this on the front page some time:

"I read an Uncyclopedia article and it almost made me cry, because I realised that whoever wrote it must have a lot of hate in their heart to think of things like that. I don't think it's funny, and if you do, I guess you're entitled to your own opinion, but so am I, and I think it's twisted. I'm sure there are better tings to do with the Internet. And copying a site that does such a service like Wikipedia, or 'parody', if you are offended by 'copy', just makes it sicker. I don't know what the point of writing this is, I just feel saddened... the world will be a better place when twisted people like Jonathos Huang and Jack Thompson decide to end their miserable existances."

From the talk page of wikipedia's uncyclopedia article. That's humor writing at its best. We should enlist them. --Joachim22 03:58, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Geez. Talk about a fragile Freddy. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 06:52, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

should deffinetly be on the front page

and it should stay there too, cuz that is way funny 71.243.94.159 00:59, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

I had to stop reading that Talk Page because I had way to much trouble figuring which comments were sarcastic and which were not. :p But yes, this one is a great review.--Dandin1 00:27, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Deffinatly needs a place on the Main Page. --OsirisX 07:43, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Hmm... how about an "Uncyclopedia:Praise" eh? eh?   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 08:02, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Christ, I've heard of delicate sensibilities and all... but wow, that's unbelieveable... maybe it was just before they took their anti-depressants. still, never mind --Olipro Co-Anc (Harass) 01:14, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

What. The. Crap. What's so offensive and hateful about Uncyc? It's satire! Humor! Etc! What an idiot... --User:Nintendorulez 18:44, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

What happened to the edit link for Holidays?

Now there's more unnecessary mouse clicks involved, and we already show a link to the previous anniversaries underneath the current page. Now I expect we'll see less edits to the Anniversaries, and more edits to In The News, and we all know how that just makes the purging issue worse. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 11:50, 5 April 2006 (PDT)

Now there's no edit link for In The News either! What the hell? --User:Nintendorulez 15:46, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Hello? Anyone there? *echo... echo... echo...*

Maybe I'll have to bring this up at the dump. --User:Nintendorulez 15:55, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Reskins and Word of the Day

I've put more than a little bit of work into the Word of the Day and, frankly, I'm getting a little sick of people overriding it when they reskin the Main Page. I understand the desire to have specific words associated with reskins and I'm all for it but I would appreciate if, instead of skipping the scheduled word entirely, people would move the scheduled word to the end of the list (currently somewhere in late June) and replace it with the reskin word. This way, we will have an accurate list of previous Words of the day. --Sir gwax (talk) 15:11, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

I think your best bet is going to be to DIY, I mean, since when has anyone cared about anyone else's crap on here (except when their crap... is crap) --Olipro 21:13, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

• That's wierd, I just wanted an iPod! --TimeStopper 04:13, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Did you Know...

... that the Did you Know thing is slightly broken due to someone messing up choose tags? One such example is using

... that your {{RPG Stat}} has decreased by 1 for reading this sentence?

but instead of the acktual template, it has the code for the template. Very eye-stabbing. Can someone fix that? kthxbi --Ж Kalir _{where's my house?} 23:35, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

There's a slight flaw with the Featured Article template

Someone forgot to link to VFH. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 23:40, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Question, what does the H in VFH stand for? --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 08:21, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Votes For Highlight as I recall.--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 10:23, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 06:35, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

I forsee a reskin...

RE: You all suck. I think it's about time Babel:Wn got put on the main page, for obvious reasons. I'll leave you to it then... --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 17:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

I think it should look a bit more like White Nationalism's Main Page, other than that, I think it's a neat idea (not brilliant, but neat); also, it needs to use the term "Anti White Bias" alot.--Surreal Hamster 23:01, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Teehee, I just realised the header sounded like "foreskin". So yeah, the Babel:Wn is by no means finished, to feel free to add whatever you will to it. --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 08:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Just wondering, how many wikis is Uncyclopedia at war with? --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 08:18, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

A lot. I'd have to take my shoes off to count them all. This one in particular is like ED for black people. --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 21:20, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

I totally thought I had read "foreskin" when I saw this on recent changes. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 23:46, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

I resee a foreskin too..... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

heheh codeine is a 'ringleader'? :D fantastic --Huffers 04:30, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

AAA

aah!!

Aaaa? Aaa aaa aaaaaa aaa aaaaa aaa aaaaaaa? Aa? Aa aaaa? Aaaaaaaaa aaaaaa, aaa aaa aa aaa. Aaaaaaaaaaaaa AA:AA, AA Aaa AAAA

AAA! AAAAA AAAA, AAAAA AA AAAAA! AAAAAAA AAAAAAA AA:AA, AA AAA AAAA

AA AAAAA AAAAAA AAAAAA A AAA! How is it that you convert all this crap to AAA? if it's by hand... I certainly admire your devotion. if it's embedded in the wiki... then I'm interested --Olipro 02:38, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

I think some was by hand.. but there is a script... somewhere.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 02:39, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Script? I don't think so... Anyway, I convert small chunks manually, and for large ones, use a simple regular expression substitution [A-Za-z0-9] -> A, then manually reinsert links from the original text. - Sikon 06:00, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Actually, I once wrote a javascript that does precisely that. If we could get it embedded into AAAAAAAAA! somehow, then EVERYTHING would be As rather than just the logo and article. And it could be unlocked, and we wouldn't have to worry about vandals adding Bs. Hell, we could embed one or two on purpose, but they'd only show up when viewing the source. A bit of an easter egg within the article. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 23:44, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

It's easy enough to write a program that does it in PASCAL, C, or C++, so you can post your shit in AAAAs. This is in C/C++

char AAA(char string[])
{
for (int i=0; i<sizeof(string); i++)
if(string[i]!='.' && string[i]!=' ' && string[i]!=',' && string[i]!='?' && string[i]!='!' && string[i]!=';')
   string[i] = 'A';
return string;
}

That will probably work, but I haven't compiled it myself. --Poofers 21:34, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

News Story

Hey, I had an idea for an UnNews story but I don't have the time to write it: "Bill Gates doesn't care about black people" See herefor the reference.--Nybb 07:22, 17 March 2006 (UTC) OMG taht's s0ooooo funneh!!!! I get it, like that Kanye West comment, right? That's so original and hilarious!!! -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 23:48, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

ZOMG TAHT IZ TEH LULZ! MAYBEH NOW YOU CAN BE FUNNEH LIKE ED!!!111!! BEFOR TAHT UNCYKLOPEDIAZ WAZ TEH WORST!11!

"NOTHING HAPPENED" day

How many variations on this theme do we really need?

• Zero--Blat 17:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Negative bajillion --Nytrospawn 14:43, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

About the refeaturing of Euroipods

Could you maybe feature more than the opening paragraph? Today's holidays are rather short, so this winds up limiting how much news can be shown at a time and how much we have to remind anonymous editors to Fucking Purge. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 12:38, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Agreed, add the referals section, wait I guess I could it myself..........nah looks complicated--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 16:22, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

That would deny the very essence and clarity of the Euroipods message. --—rc (t) 21:19, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

I think Euroipods is funny and all, but I think it's taking the place of better articles that took actual effort. For instance, I believe that Pot v. Kettle and J.D. Salinger are both much more deserving of a spot in the top 10. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 17:24, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

And Zork. --64.9.10.166 19:44, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

That's how I feel about four or five of the others, but people voted on them. --—rc (t) 20:01, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Damn straight.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:00, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Do I get in trouble for threatening to ban anyone who continues to bitch about Euroipods? Seriously - it's getting more than tiresome - I'm about ready to continue start some major abuse-of-powers myself just to give people something else to complain about. Give it a rest - it's over and done with. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 01:39, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Unfunny

This website isn't funny, at all. Did you just try to ripoff ED, except G rated with profoundly unfunny people? -- 71.255.246.183, 05:14, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Yes, this is an exact ripoff of ED. --—rc (t) 05:33, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Dang, so that's why I've yet to laugh at anything I've ever read on this site. Why can't we blatantly rip off something that's actually funny, like My Cat Hates You or something?  c • > • cunwapquc? 06:16, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

ED Sucks Ass --Blat 17:41, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Hey, 71.255.246.183, maybe this site <<< (DON'T CLICK. YOU'VE BEEN WARNED. --me) would be a better site for you. It's way funnier than this crap site.

Awwww, shit man. Warn people before posting shit like that, seriously, advice to everyone, don't click the link above this post, you have been warned.--Surreal Hamster 23:12, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

I'm just glad my link worked. I was afraid the site would have been shut down by now and I'd look like a dumbass.

Yes, in fact. It is 14,000 articles and a few thousand users less funny. In fact, ED is a rounding error funnier. --Chronarion 23:05, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

ED just goes "HAY LOOK GOATSE LULZ LULZ LULZ!" We have actual jokes. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 12:38, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Wait, I thought ED was about simply writing about which LiveJouranls they were going to go harass this week. Jlove1982 17:30, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

You know, 71.255.246.183, you're right. When I think humor, I think articles about non-notable internet users filled with gratuitous profanity and shock-pornography. I'm leaving this horrible website. Who needs actual parody and cleverly crafted satire? -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 17:27, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Woohoo, a guy who hates something has to complain to the guys who like it (see Troll ), never seen that on the Interweb before. --Hexhunter 23:57, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

What the hell is ED?--Surreal Hamster 16:57, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Be glad you don't know. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 17:02, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

So, I visted ED yesterday. Let me tell you, it sucks. --OsirisX 02:31, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Help on making an image?

I had a sudden idea the other day, for the CD article, the image showing how a CD works could be the Enterprise firing phasors at a disk, with some witty caption. Here's a pic i was intending to use image:Enterprise firing.jpg Anyway, i was intending on making it myself, but i'm no good at photoshop...

You can request images at Uncyclopedia:RadicalX's Corner. If you're lucky some kind soul will make your dreams come true. --—rc (t) 00:12, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Why can't I vandalize the front page?

Or more accurately, who is in charge of updating the front page?

Any user can edit the Recent News, Anniversaries and Recent Articles sections, and can make suggestions for Word of the Day and Did You Know? The rest of it is locked because everything would just be a huge mess if it was open. I'm usually the one who updates the Featured Article and Image. --—rc (t) 08:13, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Oh really? So you're saying this isn't a huge mess?

Hey, The edit link for the news is dissappeared. What happened?--Witt E, 18:45, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Plagiat?

I've already this stuff before.. But where and when i forgot...

• It's called plagiarism, not plagiat. - Sikon 17:35, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

'Plagiat' is a French term. The corresponding English phrase is «déjà vu». --Carlb 03:46, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

AAAaaAaAaAAAaaaAAAA LOL SIKON/GUEST AaaaAaAaaA

I don't understand anything written in AaaAAAaAAaAa, so i'm going to vandalize... the VANDALISM BOX of course. Keep up the good work on SW: NWN Sikon!!!

• AAAAAAAAAAAA, not AaaAAAaAAaAa. Be canonical. - Sikon 06:02, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

AAA, AAA AAA AAAAAAAA AAA AAAAAAAAA. A'A AAAA AA AAA AAAA AAA AAAA, AAAAAAA! --mezzanine ^ 18:37, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Swap On this day.... and Did you know....

Should we swap them like Wikipedia has done (and add an article count)--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 23:26, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

I think the idea was that having the featured article and anniversaries on one side and news and DYK on the other would result in more even-length columns, especially since we usually only have two DYKs at a time. I'll put up the article count though. --—rc (t) 23:37, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Tomb of the Unknown Contributor and suggestion

Is the link to blocked IPs deliberate?

Yes --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 13:19, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Tomorrow being the day it is, is Uncyclopedia going to swap places with Wikipedia? Jackiespeel 13:10, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

maybe--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 13:19, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

I guess if we want to be able to make suggestions we have to be thinking alot further in advance --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 14:59, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Suggestions - either long month, (today is January the whateverth), binary dates, etc: I am floating the suggestion for others to consider (and starting a snowball can be as useful as turning it into a snowman. Jackiespeel 21:38, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

iFunny!

iThink iHumor iS iFunny! --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 16:51, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Yes iDefinately Think iT's great, nice job to the iPeople who did iT. iM just having a small iProblem with the iMenu formatting, iT's filled with iSpaces between the iButtons. (wow that was iAnnoying) Dandin1 18:45, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Yes, well the new iPage does not support iNferior iE iBrowsers... So get yourself some iNetscape or something, iMan.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 18:53, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

This iNew iFrontpage iS iFucking iHilarious! Excellent iWork! -- iPoofers 21:36, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

b35t 51t3 3v4h

I've been a long time reader, but I just started editing. Very funny stuff guys! Keep it up! File:Jimbo edit.png Hiedenberget Crap, I can't show my picture of Hitler/JimboWales... I need help... Hiedenberget

Well.. did you Upload it?   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:31, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Request

Someone should do an article on Jason McElwain, the autistic kid who hit all of those 3-point shots in garbage time of a high school basketball game. I'm not funny enough. But the potential for hilarity is there.

This is the wrong place to make such a request, might I recommend Uncyclopedia:Pee Review. --Sir gwax (talk) 14:01, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Edit link for news?

So, uh, would anyone mind explaining why the news here can't be edited at the moment? --Lenoxus 18:57, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Because the news headlines being put in sucked big time. ---- Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer and WotM 19:07, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

OK. An acceptable reason. --Lenoxus 17:31, 3 June 2006 (UTC)