Forum:Kitting Huffing is no laughing matter

Forums: Index > BHOP > Kitting Huffing is no laughing matter

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6104 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

I'm writing to express my strong feelings about kitten huffing. This article is harshly disrespectful to cats which are intelligent feeling creatures and treats them as something that should be consumed by people to get high in a cruel, animal abusive practice called huffing

I demand that this article be erased immediately and replaced with an apology to all the innocent little kitties who have been mercilessly huffed because of this article. Think of the damage done to all the innocent kittens who were searching for kitten information on the internet, and instead found this awful page about killing them for recreational drug purposes.

Rather than just going to one of the other multi-million sites on the internet, I'm going to stay on yours and bully you with my opinion which is oh, so important, until you give up and let me take over and rule you.

ANON IP!!!! 14:56, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

I propose that we strip the site of ALL offensive material right now, making Uncyclopedia a safe and friendly place for visitors, up to and including anonymous IP passersby with delusions of grandeur. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Or just ban everyone. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 16:16, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

For The banning of everyone (and anyone) --Anyone 16:41, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

If I were a Sysop, I would ban myself, just on general principle. --  cScott (talk • log) KUN PIE NS FP 21:29, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm certainly for taking down the internet, using any means necessary, to stroke my ego in a self-righteous crusade.--<<>> 16:48, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Vote to Shut Down The Internet so nothing else Controversial and possibly Offensive ever gets written Ever Again (at least not on the Internet) and No-One's Feelings get Hurt and we can all Sleep Better at Night knowing that We're Better People for it and can relieve our Daily Stresses by just Going Home and having a nice Cry over a Bowl of Soup or something

Score: +7 people who failed at the internet/intranet/innerweb/interweb/internets/series of tubes/other cliche internet terms

• For. ~ T. (talk) 17:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Doublefor.--<<>> 17:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• FTW --Anyone 17:15, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• [insert witty variation of "For" here] - Sikon 17:16, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - How DARE we allow us to do this for so long. --EMC ^[TALK] 18:09, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - Oh my heart bleeds for those poor kittens offended by our Aspie Humor and Wit. Let everyone be forever Banned from the Internet. Let me unplug my DSL Modem and Router right now, least I offend even more sensitive groups that have been backed into a corner and threaten to go on a rampage with an army of anonymous IPs, and a slash quote problem. What was I thinking? Please forgive me! (*&^$HG%FRF NO CARRIER--Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 19:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Aye - go and read a book. But a non offensive one, like the Phone book. --no, yuo chat 19:21, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• But books are offensive too! In fact, since any idea possible could offend someone, I say we ban consious thinking.--The One and Only Czar Yah 19:32, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Awesome idea! --User:Nintendorulez 20:53, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. But I do think that uncyc would be a greater site if it had less cancer pornography. We can do better than that. I express my symphaty with the guy form the Asperger topic here and in this way, couse the original topic got too long alredy...---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 19:42, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Oh, won't somebody please think of the kittens!  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 20:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Fuck that "First they came for the Communists kittens, and I didn’t speak up,: because I wasn’t a Communist kitten...--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:23, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• For I remember that time Famine blocked the entire internet...let's get him to do it again! --Sir Zombiebaron 01:23, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
• against because I'm obviously a self-righteous bigot who doesn't care for all of your opinions, and I love nothing more than to mock and insult EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU!!! -- Soul101 ~_MA^REPENT! 07:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. In my day we didn't have the internet. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 14:27, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. --User:Nintendorulez 20:53, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. It all started with the phonograph and the moving picture. Then came those demonic devices the radio and the telly-vision, and finally the computer and that cesspool of sin, the internet. Let's just ban electricity and live a simple virtuous life like the Amish. --Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 19:58, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. me krog no like the internets. Jboyler 18:02, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
• Reluctant Against. While I agree that this whole "Free Speech" thing is overrated (in fact, I really shouldn't be able to say that), I am also forced to ask the question that no one else has: What about all of the porn that would suddenly be left homeless? --  cScott (talk • log) KUN PIE NS FP 21:19, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, I hate that place!--Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 00:25, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• For The internet must be destroyed at all costs! --General Insineratehymn 19:19, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against, Every time someone shuts down the internet, the ferrets cry. Please think of the ferrets. Sara 18:24 29 October 2006

Proposed amendment: First we painlessly gas all the ferrets, then shut down the internet. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 07:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Against: You can't kill ferrets. They've gained immortality after centuries of sneaking around sock drawers. --Sara 2006 30 October 10:51

AAAAA! is no laughing matter

When I see AAAAA! I see all the great people of the world who have screamed AAAAA! before. This simply besmirches their memory and brings infamy to their legacy.

Agreed, no more jokes about people yelling AAAAA, and now the ones who yell AIIIIEEE and YIPE and EEEE have added into the protest, threatening to blank and vandalize our pages here. Now we have Xena and muslims who yell Iyiyiyiyyiyiyiyi protesting, gee thanks. --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 22:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

I agree with this one. But AAAAAAAAA! is a laughing matter. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 20:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Fisher Price is no laughing matter

It is a work of art and it is no more than petty libel when you degrade it like this.

We got protest letters from toy makers and toy stores about this one. It seems as if our article here caused people to stop buying Fisher Price toys and other toys for birthdays and holidays. The toy makers and toy stores threatened lawsuits over this and want the article removed. --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 22:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

I maed a yuky doody is no laughing matter

It's basically a discriminatory mockery against retarded 3 year olds with no bowel control Mr. Briggs Inc. 19:48, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. I voted to delete when it hit VFD, but there are fans of poop among us, apparently.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:07, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

This could offend pretty much any lifeform that produces excretion on a regular basis. I say we kill it. --User:Nintendorulez 23:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism/example on wheels! is no laughing matter

It's ANOTHER Sandbox! -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 20:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Naruto is no laughing matter

Just because it's a fucking anime means it sucks, yeah right! If you'd just look past the fact it's a Japanese cartoon you'd see the solid plot and great animation!

Yes it made the Ninjae cry over that one, Naruto is one of their favorite anime shows and how dare we mock it. Mocking Naruto is like mocking the Ninjae, and the Ninjae have threatened to go on a violent rampage unless we take the page down. --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 22:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Oh, puh-lease! I'll give you the solid plot, I'll even go so far as to stipulate beautiful, gorgeous, stunning artwork, but anime is not good animation. Low frame rates and jerky lipsync, repeated cels ad nauseum. . . anime is crappy, cheap animation. But awesome stills. Give me the old WB shorts any day, but for good animation, one has to unfortunately acknowledge disney. @%#^$& disney. . .  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 22:38, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

And Miyasaki. He has good animation, too, and isn't Disney (though Disney is his distributor in America).--<<>> 22:41, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Anyone seen Read or Die? No, of course you haven't, but that is some top quality stuff. Maybe Naruto (I was mostly taken by the character design and stuff) and some other crap isn't too good, but you can't group all anime in the same category! Mr. Briggs Inc. 19:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Is it just me, or did just get awfully geek in here?--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:43, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Oh great, now you just upset the geeks and now the nerds have joined with them in protest. It will be PalmOS PDAs at noon for you. Either that or plastic light sabers or Nerf(TM) guns. Can't we all just get along? --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 22:48, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes, it is very geek. The insensitive call me "White and Nerdy." You should fear me. The slightest provocation could send me on a killing spree.--<<>> 23:17, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

You mean you find the article White And Nerdy to be offensive to nerds like yourself? We need to delete that article too, then! Sorry about that. --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 00:09, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Hell, if'n you want geeky, I could fill pages critiquing the design of the Excelsior-class starships, or the finer nuances of Dungeon Mastering, or verbatim Monty Python, or. . .  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 06:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Ooooo! Angry nerds. What, they're gonna come here and get stuffed in their lockers? "Beam me up, Captain Spock". Again, ooooo!--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:26, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

If you don't like anime, don't watch it. I, meanwhile, will be examining how everything Japan does kicks more ass than anything the US could ever make. --User:Nintendorulez 21:41, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Say what? Keep your foreign big-eyed sailor uniform wearing freaks to yourself...I'm watching Venture Bros.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:44, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Heh. I like it just fine, but I'm realistic enough to know that, technically, it's very cheaply produced. I love the concepts and images, but face it: anime became popular as a "style" after countless greedy american animation houses started farming out production to cheap asian producers in the 60s and 70s. After growing up with the WB and disney stuff, the rash of cheap crap in the 70s (which were nothing more than half-hour marketing campaigns for whatever new toys or action figures the manufacturers were pushing that week,) was glaringly inferior. Only later, when we began to see "real" anime (conceived, written, and executed by asians for the asian market, rather than cheap production of western concepts,) that I saw the merit in it.  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 01:48, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Euroipods is still no laughing matter

I mean, how long has this debate gone on for anyways? Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 01:19, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Kid1 is most definitely a laughing matter

Seriously man...

Seriously we got complaints from hyperactive fat children over this one, they don't like the way the kid is being mocked and laughed at. If you ever had to watch an hyperactive fat child, you'd know the danagers of when they get upset and fustrated over being mocked and made fun of by others. I mean if you really know your Child Psychology you'd know how to treat children for these sort of issues. They really can do a lot of damage when they want to, and I wouldn't want to be left alone in a room of hyperactive fat children after they have been mocked in the way this image mocks them. --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 22:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

The fat kid is kind getting mocked and I thing we sould take it off the site. Even though this is a houmor site we souldn't mock the fat. And the god.– Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.228.47.160 (talk • contribs)

Wha?! Most of our writers are the fat. And the god.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:06, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Main Page

I consider myself to be an advocate for freedom of speech but, frankly, this page makes me nauseous. I just threw up a bit in my mouth just now, thinking about it. I mean, what if kids were to read this crap? --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:17, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

You're right! The main page is offensive to countless groups of people, places and things. What were we thinking? We need to shut down this site right fucking now before more are offended. I mean gosh, kids actually read Uncyclopedia? I didn't know that. I thought this was a site for mature adults? I also heard that kids are using Uncyclopedia as a source for their school papers and essays, and that in doing so they have earned F's from their teachers. I mean, IWETHEY is right, Uncyclopedia is full of lies, offensive materials, and misinformation and should be removed from the Internet. I can see the news story now, the last UnNews article. UnNews: Uncyclopedia to shut down on October 31st, to avoid offending any more groups which cites this forum posting, and this one about Aspies as reasons why we must shut down Uncyclopedia before we offend any more people, groups, places, animals, dieties, prophets, things, and even stuff that doesn't even exist yet we mock it and make fun of it to offend it. We're so sorry, Uncle Albert, we know you invented the Internet for the cause of good, but we are abusing it and now must shut down. Good bye, good night, and good luck! --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 22:45, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Uncle Albert didn't invent the internet, silly! He casts the deciding vote in the Senate, and protects the space/time continuum. The internet was invented by DARPA, and is owned by Henry van Statten. But you didn't hear that from me.  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 06:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

The Science Guy demands your worship. All hail the Nye! Unite under his bowtie and together we will march onward...to victory!

Vote to engage the Earth's auto-destruct sequence so nobody anywhere can ever again be offended by anything expressed in any medium whatsoever, because the previous vote left too many opportunities to offend people (sung to the tune of Tom Lehrer's "We Will All Go Together When We Go.")

Score: 1 misanthropists with fingers on a button

• Destruct Sequence One, Code One, One-A  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 12:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Let's not go overboard, now.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 12:53, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment That's not a proper abort code! (Geeks of the Federation unite! You have nothing to lose but your virginity and your red shirts!)  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 13:01, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

• Destruct One-One-A, One-One-A-Two-B, One-B-Two-B-Three, Zero-Zero-Zero-Destruct-Zero --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 18:15, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

  Comment: I am particularly reminded of Hen3ry's heartwarming novel about a young necrophiliac who achieves his boyhood ambition of becoming coroner. (The rest of you can look it up when you get home) ---Rev. Isra (talk) 19:29, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Yeah Quincy M.E. was a good book and TV show. --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 01:44, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

• Pop that sucka --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 20:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against No more world means no more Ah-nee-may! Mr. Briggs Inc. 20:24, 25 October 2006

(UTC) Eh?

• Weak For I'm all about blowing up the world, but I want to do it in the most offensive way possible. Can we blow up the world while watching Birth of a Nation? Mrthejazz 21:05, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
  • How about a room with four walls, all of which are screens. One wall has Birth of a Nation, one has Goatse, one Lemonparty, and the other Encyclopaedia Dramatica. --User:Nintendorulez 21:34, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
    • That's probably not necessary- ED seems to actually contain every shock image (It was where, on my first and last visit, I saw the Goatse image, the trauma of which has meant I've been wary enough to never see another one of its kind again (hence I don't know what "birth of a nation" is, and I'm fairly sure I don't want to)) so just one huge screen with ED on would be plenty. In fact, that could be used as the ultimate aversion therapy... a bit like A Clockwork Orange, except you wouldn't need any vomiting drugs...--Sir Jam 18:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
      • A racist 1915 film Mr. Briggs Inc. 21:58, 26 October 2006 (UTC) Eh?
        • Haha... Birth of a Nation as a shock image... I guess it could be, just not in the same sense as goatse. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 23:02, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
          • Make a Birth of a Goatse. Or better yet, don't.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:51, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
• For me krog no like earths. Jboyler 18:05, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Force. I'm not sure you're all taking into account the gravity of the situation. --  cScott (talk • log) KUN PIE NS FP 21:38, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment That's a very electroweak pun. Bravo!  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 04:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

• For, who needs an Earth anyways?! --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 00:25, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Vote to Stop Voting, because the People who Voted for the Losing Side got a Bee in their Bonnet

Score: I can't tell...

• Against. What a stupid idea. No offense. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 08:09, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
• Forgainst. --User:Nintendorulez 18:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. --User:Nintendorulez 23:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

• Pat Buchanan. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 20:31, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
• Wibble. I have had it with these motherspamming eels on this motherspamming hovercraft! --  cScott (talk • log) KUN PIE NS FP 21:22, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against, voting is cool. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 00:25, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Gronk, Flubflub gritsh blap snoq piddlipom doorjing!  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 09:53, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. me krog no like voting. Jboyler 03:09, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Laughing Matters are no Laughing Matter

Perhaps we should limit ourselves to making fun of people that are hated by everyone, such as Hitler and that dancing guy from the Six Flags adverts. I take my humour very seriously (and with sugar and just a touch of milk) and I don't want to see its reputation ruined by one drunken night behind the cricket pavilion with that guy from accounting and the girl who works in the copy room... *ahem* All I'm trying to say is that if we go around poking fun at everything, we could put someone's eye out.

Seriously folks. I hate to be an alarmist here, but I also don't want to end up in a Special Hell. --  cScott (talk • log) KUN PIE NS FP 21:03, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

But even Hitler has his fans (where would "the History Channel" be w/o him?). Maybe we should just stop being funny; that way no one would be made fun of, and no one would be offended. I took that first critical step a long time ago, an have since consistently avoided writing or 'chopping anything that could possibly be construed as humourous. Reading VFD I see that there are many other users doing the same thing.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:16, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

I applaud your efforts, but you need to work harder. I've been reading over some of your stuff and it's still funny. --  cScott (talk • log) KUN PIE NS FP 04:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

I was fighting my inner-diva by feigning modesty. But, thanks. Just don't call it work. Uncyc is the opposite of that.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:21, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Au contraire, my friend. Laughing matters are precisely that: making fun of others and accepting that others make fun of you. It is those who are not able to do the latter that try to force "good behaviour" in whatever variety onto the former. Take it from me: them is nothing special, and the sooner they accept that, the sooner I will stop targeting their behinds. With my war-shoes. --di Mario 18:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

My cat has gas is no laughing matter

I feel this article is a smelly insult to real felines with gas problems. What if some poor cat with uncontrollable gas read this article and was offended? Curtains everywhere would die a horrible, shreddy death!

I demand someone eat this article before it causes more trouble. --Sara. 18:15 29 October 2006 GMT

I am absolutely the last person who would ever laugh at your poor, gaseous cat... so please let me know once everyone else has laughed, so I can have a go. Thanks. --  cScott (talk • log) KUN PIE NS FP 04:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

But think of the curtains! When you laugh at a gaseous cat, it shreds the curtains! Would you like your curtains shredded by a vengeful cat with gas? --Sara 1:21 30 October 2006 GMT

I maed a yuky doody is no laughing matter

This article could easily offend people who defecate on a regular basis. --User:Nintendorulez 23:27, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

But is it really sooffensive that it needs to be listed on this page twice?--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Hrm, coulda sworn I took this section out after I saw there was already an existing section. But yeah, I suppose it is that offensive. --User:Nintendorulez 01:43, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Repeated section listings are no laughing matter. My favourite uncle got carpel tunnel syndrome while trying to read a repeated section listing. Now every time he scratches his nose, he pokes himself in the eye, and there's nothing funny about that. --  cScott (talk • log) KUN PIE NS FP 04:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Goats are no laughing matter

They suck. End of story. --Sara 2:18 30 October 2006 GMT

I thought that was sheep. . . Huh. Learn something new every day.

“Hey! MacLeod! Get off of my ewe!”

~ A Scotsman on Sheep

  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 09:17, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Goatse is no laughing matter

That picture of the man distending his anus was the most horrifying thing I had ever seen in my life. I demand that you do something about it or I shall unleash terrifying legal action upon al ur a$$e$!!!11 --General Insineratehymn 00:46, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

"Forum:Kitting Huffing is no laughing matter" is no laughing matter

• This stopped being funny about ten posts in.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Ah, well done then! (re: your earlier objective) --  cScott (talk • log) KUN PIE NS FP 09:46, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Things that are this long as this are rarly funny unless there well writen and forums are not like articals were people edit stuff to make it funny Forums are used for flaming and other great things that people can do on the internet --JAL 200 20:41, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

What the hell is a "kitting," anyway?

¿¿  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 10:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)??

It's Spanish for penguin.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 10:04, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

As in "What's on the telly, then?"

"Looks like a kitting."

  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 10:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

I can answer this one. It's an accidental typo when I created the forum article that I decided not to fix because it was funny. --Hrodulf 10:17, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

A typo? On a forum? Colour me stunned!--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 10:20, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Satan is, as I type this, running the zamboni over his new hockey rink.  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 10:21, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm not going to say what "huffing" is Spanish for, but it's very rude, and not something I'd ever do to a penguin (except maybe that one time, but I was drunk and, to be fair, they did dare me). --  cScott (talk • log) KUN PIE NS FP 10:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, but remember the first time you blew a chimp? The look on his face?  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 10:31, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

You mean that look on his face? Benson 21:25, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Is that one of your puny monkeys, my lord? --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 03:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

He may be puny, but he has endured many a blowings, so I think he deserves our respect. Also, look at his windbreaker! Benson 20:51, 7 February 2007 (UTC)