User talk:Under user/Archive 6

Give up that V card, bitch.

Bam. Your talk page is no longer that beautiful creamy white. Now it's just red with shame. =D ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 16:38 Mar 9

6 and a half whole hours that lasted. I'm not sure if that's a good thing or not... --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 19:48, Mar 9

It's okay. Your talk page, she liked it. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 19:54 Mar 9

By the power invested in me by the Cabal, which does not exist

I hereby promote you to the rank of Lieutenant (or Huffer First Class), to show the non existant Cabal's appreciation on your contributions, with specific regards to the urination field.

Your new rank gives you the following rights:

1. Wearing your rank in any formal dress you may have, including your pajamas and underwear.
2. Get one (1) drink for free at the Uncyclopedia pub, were it to be created.
3. Use your rank as part of your signature.

The roster shall be updated accordingly. Dismissed!

~ 10:15, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I... Er... Crikey, that was unexpected! And it's in pretty pirtle (as my suster calls it). W00t! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 10:53, Mar 10

err.../me open Cockney-English dictionary trying to figure out what the hell UU said ~ 11:15, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh, you don't speak typo? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 11:17, Mar 10

I barely speak anything, I usually groan and moan :) ~ 11:19, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip

Thanks for your help with my article and helping me attempt to get a second review.

--Burnsbrianna 19:33, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

(honorific) Pussy!

This user is a honourific member of the UnHoly Sisterhood. He worships Sophia and so should you, <insert name here>.

20:36, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Would love to, but how?

I would definitally be interisted in archiving my old crap, but how? Please leave a message (prefreably on my talk page) about how to make an archive.

Warm regards, Javascap 22:03, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your assistance in creating an archive. Now... OFF TO PEE REVIEW!

Warm regards, Javascap 12:16, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you very much for your pee review of Nocturnal Hippie Artist. Your insight was helpful and appreciated. It will most definitley help towards the improvement of the article. To show you my appreciation for your review, I present to you a symbol of my gratification

A saxophone playing Chinchilla. He will play you such hits as "One", "Duality", and "Number of the Beast". Enjoy!

Jimmy the Hellhound 11:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Fantastic! That's got to be my favourite Pee thanking so far, and I look forward to hearing a rodent rendition of "Number of the Beast" - sacrifice is going on tonight! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 11:49, Mar 13

how to embed images

I created an article on Talking animals in bible. It is now facing the threat of deletion. There are some funny pictures in the external links . Can you please insert them in the article for me. I do not understand how to insert them properly.--Unnuli 15:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Get in there my man!

(Huff log); 15:41 . . Ljlego (Talk | contribs) (huffed "The Millennium": Weighed against a feather. It lost.)

MrN 16:03, Mar 15

I like the sound of it

Stalinist Purge...:) I might even put up an ignorable policy under that :) ~ 10:14, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello!

Hey Under User, I was wondering if it's okay to do another review with an existing "reviewed" page: essentially two reviews in one page. Or should there be a second resubmission of the article? Thanks! Mightydandylion 05:50, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Long time coming.

I still see you doing your part around here pretty much 24/7, and it doesn't look like you're getting your UotM this month. So, why not just give you a template of my personal recognition? I present to you the Wikikiller Award.

Wikipedia Killer Award For helping to make this wiki better than those bastards. Your actions have given them yet another reason to curse the name Uncyclopedia.

~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 17:31 Mar 18

Blimey, that's quite an impressive template. Thankies, I'll bung it with t'others. However, I don't know about this "getting my UotM" business, I'd be the first to tip my cap to MrN and his fantastic work. In fact, I can't complain about the other folks I got beat by previously either - and like it says on my user page, 3 noms without a win equals the site record, one more miss in April and that record is mine! I'm slightly more interested in seeing if I can sneak over the line for my 4th feature without ever having whored on IRC (yeah, OK, there was some talk page whoring once, but I've put that behind me...).

The thing is though, as I'm sure you agree, awards and that are nice, but the only thing that motivates me in anything I do here is wanting to see this site be as funny as it can be. Having said that though, you just keep on being friendly and helpful, so if I'm not careful, I'll have to create a new template of my own to shunt your way! Anyway, I'm off now to give the lie to that 24/7 comment by sleeping for my country for a few hours. Nighty night! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 21:45, Mar 18

is it okay to remove ICU tag

Have I done enough on my article on Talking animals in bible.Is it okay to remove that tag myself. I am not going to do anything anymore--Unnuli 14:31, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

I'd ask Ljlego if I were you, seeing as he added it. In my view, it's not now a bad article, and I'd remove the ICU if I added it, but the thing about removing tags added by admins is they tend to ban you if they don't agree. My honest advice to you is to take it to Pee Review, get it reviewed and work on it some more. I like the idea, but it needs more work. If you really don't want to do that, perhaps put the {{expand}} tag on in place of the ICU if it gets removed, then someone else may come along and give it the tune up it needs! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 21:54, Mar 19

I wouldn't ban you, Underman! /me pinches cheeks in embarrassingly patronizing manner.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:47, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Carrot

Sir Under User, I took it upon myself to edit the article on Carrots that you reviewed. It's quite different from what it originally was and I would prefer it if you reviewed it again rather than some other one-night critique. Basically I wanna know if you think it's still worth deleting. It's not like I spent hours trying to revise someone else's mess (don't worry about feeling sympathy, I had nothing better to do for I live in Oregon). --Beavnation 03:03, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Go over to the Pee Review page and raise a new review request (called, say "Carrots (2nd review)"), and mention in it that you'd like me to handle the review, and I'll get to it pretty soon. I'm busy at work though, and have the wonderous prospect of a day of DIY to look forward to tomorrow, so it may take a little while for me to get around to it! A swift skim through reveals it is a significant improvement on what was there, with appropriate images, plenty of content and the like, and it seems quite decent, so I'll look forward to reviewing it soon! Thanks for doing the work - it's always nice to see someone prepared to put in the work to make a page really blossom! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 12:13, Mar 20

Rigth back at you!

Javascap has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

For the template you gave to me. Much appreciated! =) Javascap 11:47, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Bugging you again.

Seeing as how you're here and all, care to help a brotha out? ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 22:49 Mar 20

I think we crossed messages a minute ago. I'm just dropping in while the missus is in the shower to check stuff and tidy stuff. Truth be told, I really need this break because I've worked my ass into the ground recently and am actually highly stressed and pretty close to burnout. As a result, I'm looking forward to a good night's sleep, which is where I will be heading very shortly. If I survive the day of DIY lined up in front of me tomorrow (I'm sure I said I need to relax, not hang doors...), I'll see what I can do then. Nighty night! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 23:02, Mar 20

Yerr, right as I hit save I got your message. Cool, you hang those doors good, you big strong man. Hang those doors real good. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 23:08 Mar 20

Hi there!

I know Mightydandelion has got his thumb on Royal Pointless Military Things Tournament, but I need some practice peeing on things and your article caught my eye. I left the entry at pee review alone and instead proceeded directly to your talk page, I hope that's okay (I don't wanna piss anybody off). So, here's what I got for you.

Humour:	8	Humor is the most difficult thing for me to judge. Obviously it's subjective and what's funny to me may not be funny to others. I do however feel that this will be enjoyed by the majority of people who read it. More importantly I think, it maintains the humor throughout; it's consistant. Too many articles start out funny but just kinda peter out as they go on. This, if anything, gets funnier as it goes. The only reason I didn't give a higher score is there just weren't any gut bustingly funny moments (not a critique as I still thoroughly enjoyed it).
Concept:	9	I think this is a great concept. Obviously, as a rewrite, this isn't your own, nevertheless I took the time to check the history and you've done a great job expanding the concept to the point where I think it will stand out as a great article. Of course, I'm still a noob so what the hell do I know?
Prose and formatting:	9	You don't need my (or anybody else's for that matter) help here. You obviously know what your doing.
Images:	5	It simply needs a few more, but you already knew that. The ones that you do have work great and I don't think it will be that hard to find a few more.
Miscellaneous:	8	Averaged and rounded up because I think you're swell. There's a list and normally I would take points off for it, but in this case it works due to the paragraph following it. One of the rare cases a list actually adds to the humor content. I would like to see a couple sections added covering some specific events of the tournament. Also maybe a section adding the US military in (an international tournament perhaps). Or maybe not.
Final Score:	39	Good stuff. Really the only problem I have is that I'd like to see a bit more of it. I think there's room here for some expansion without it becoming tired.
Reviewer:	OptyC Sucks! CUN 23:25, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

I know full well that I'm a noob, so I won't be offended if you disregard this entirely. --OptyC Sucks! CUN 23:35, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, some good points there, and more for me to think about. Actually, why am I thanking you here? Template on its way! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 10:19, Mar 21

Thanks!

Hey Under User, thank you for the award and compliments! I enjoyed reviewing your article. Anyhoo, thanks for clearing up my questions, haha. Good luck with your DIY projects! Mightydandylion (talk) Fk 14:55, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Battle of the Sexes

Hopefully this does not count as whoring... Well, OK, obviously it does, but all your complaints about the absence of a new article from me have finally got the message home. So here it is. Please feel free to hack away as and if you see fit (thanks for the poke in the ribs)... MrN 02:04, Mar 22

Awesome, new MrN goodness! I'll look forward to having a good look at that after my sojourn. Make the occasional "short 'n' shit" vote on VFD for me while I'm away! ;-) --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 10:58, Mar 22

Och, not you too

It is the Cajek curse all over again :( ~ 10:53, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Nah, I'll be back right as rain in a few days, you watch. Takes more than a curse to stop me! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 10:58, Mar 22

I should have never wrote that damn thing. ~ 19:57, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Cajek was here today. He's writing a new article. __NOUU__ :-) MrN 19:59, Mar 22

Pointless Wilde Quote

Removing the Wilde quote because it was "pointless" was the most funniest thing I have ever seen. I am truly in the presence of a master. 81.152.75.202 15:56, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

It's true. UU really is the consummate master Mr IP. Written anything yourself? MrN 16:00, Mar 23

OK, how about this then: it was completely unfunny and added precisely nothing to the article? Will that do as an explanation? I could, therefore, turn your witty irony straight back on you with rather more accuracy. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:52, Mar 24

Could I ask a favor?

Would you kindly review this for me? Javascap (bless his heart) has peed on it, but judging from his comments here I kinda think he missed the point a bit (you can also see my comments and what I'm looking for there so I'm not gonna repeat it here). You don't have to bother with the review table, I just want an opinion from someone who's been here a while. I also realize you're on vacation, so you can do it when you get back -I'm not in any hurry. Thank you kind sir. --OptyC Sucks! CUN 16:54, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

A quick pee related question

I know you're having the week off and whatnot, but since I'm not familiar with Cajek, and SysRq's in Texas, I thought this'd be the best place to come. When someone (with no reviewing experience whatsoever as far as I can tell) does this to you while you are writing a review, is it still fine for you to still publish said review? I would have just gone to the guy's talk page and politely told him that I'd booked the review, but since I'm not an Attending Urologist, just a Fresh Stain, I thought it better to just do the review and leave it. You don't have to rush an answer, just asking out of curiosity. –—Hv (talk) 27/03 22:37

Hea, I don't know when UU will get back to you on this one, but I can tell you what I would do... First off, I would leave a message on their talk page asking them what exactly they think they are doing... Regardless of the fact that you are not an Attending Urologist, the fact that it's your review this guy is messing with makes it more than OK for you to contact him. The dude in question has probably not read the Pee Review guidelines, or would not be doing this anyway. Also, don't take all that "your not an attending urologist" stuff too seriously... It's just a guideline and so long as you are polite when you talk to people, I'm sure there will not be a problem. There are actually quite a few people who are not attending who do contact people over this kinda thing, and it's obvious that you know what you are doing, so I'm sure it's OK... I suggest you leave the message on their talk page, and do the review anyway. It's not a problem to have two Pee Reviews on a page. I would recommend that you watch the page however and make sure that your review stays on there, just in-case there are any problems in the future... Oh, Hi UU! MrN 22:50, Mar 27

Whoa, that's weird... ask the guy if he really wants to review the thing, Hv. If he does, give it to him, and ask him in the future to ask. Whatdyou think, MrN?   Le Cejak • <-> Mar 28 (00:23)

I think people should not be changing other people's templates, but whatever Heerenveen decides to do will be cool, I'm sure... MrN 00:46, Mar 28

Heerenveen: What they said, basically! ;-) All of you: hi guys! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 16:49, Mar 28

Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/G Rated Talking Animal Movie

Hey UU, you're online. wanna review some stuff?   Le Cejak • <Mar 30, 2008 [19:13]>

Right now, no - I'm just getting back up to speed and stuff, and I'll be going offline very soon. However, I always enjoy getting my teeth into a prime Cajek article, so if it's still unclaimed tomorrow, I'll see what I can do. Fair enough? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 19:16, Mar 30

Cool. I already asked someone else, but they haven't appeared yet. Add your template when you're ready, mon frere.   Le Cejak • <Mar 30, 2008 [19:17]>

Rightyho, if it remains unreviewed tomorrow, my template will surely appear on it. Right now though, the sofa, my missus, and a DVD are calling. Nighty night (UK time). --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 19:21, Mar 30

It's 12:30 in the afternoon you foreigner! THIS IS AMERICA   Le Cejak • <Mar 30, 2008 [19:28]>

UU, I remember in your review saying that once I've done some stuff with it that you would nom it. If you want to fix a few spelling errors first, that would be super-cool of you! Good review, obviously. I did a review, and you'll see on User:Cajek/Pee that I did some work on the page. See you when you wake up or whatever! Go congratulate Mordillo on WotM!   Le Cejak • <Apr 01, 2008 [3:25]>

OK, spelling tweaked, article nommed, Mordillo congratulated, and I've woken up. Will there be anything else? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:46, Apr 1

Thanks For Signing!

Thanks for signing my signature book, and yes it's good you Feel Free. :D - 12:02 31 MarchSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

Thanks!

Thanks for the nomination Under User! Also, I was wondering if sometime in the near future if you would be so kind to pee review an article that I've been working on. Take care, Mightydandylion (talk) Fk 09:03, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

You're kidding - thanks for the excellent work you've been putting in! And it would be a pleasure to review one of your works - point me in the right direction and watch me go! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:06, Apr 1

Haha, thank you! I'll submit the article to pee review in a couple of days. Night! Mightydandylion (talk) Fk 09:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the picture!

Optimuschris has been informed that you have recently helped him in some way. Therefore he has asked his assistant to create a thank you template for you. He trusts an appropriate image has been included. An image every bit as unique and personal as he's assured his recent interaction with you has been.

Seriously, it's almost exactly how I pictured it in my head. Could I see how it'd look without the corkboard background and thumbtacks? Thanks again. --OptyC Sucks! CUN 17:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Perfect! It looks great here. You have my eternal gratitude. --OptyC Sucks! CUN 00:17, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Eep

Ok, so I was replying to that message you left on my talk page and I realised I couldn't figure out how to get rid of the big weird square box thing with the date under my name. You seem to be good at the uncyclopedia, would you know how to fix this? --Sir Seeker (Call me?) |KUN|VFP| 03:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Honest answer: I haven't a clue. Sigs aren't really up my street. I'd have a word with that nice Dr Skullthumper, they're really more his forté than mine! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 08:03, Apr 3

RE...

Nm Talk:They're coming to take me away‎; 19:20 . . (+101) . . Under user (Talk | contribs) (VFD kept)

I have not been bothering to do that myself, as you can tell if it's been kept before by the fact that the "what links here" will have a link from a VFD archive page, but I guess it's cool if you want to add em... Just letin ya nose... MrN 19:25, Apr 3

Yeah, I think I'll carry on - I've been doing it for a little while now. I find them handy, and so might others who don't know to look at "what links here". --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 19:31, Apr 3

Damn, I'm dense

If Cajek done gotted an award for reinvigorating Pee Review, you get one too for keeping it alive. I haven't figured out what I'ma give OEJ for being such an excellent reviewer before it was cool, but anyway...(/me puts on formal speaking hat)

Dearest Under user, for your tireless efforts to urinate helpfully on nearly every jellyfish sting that are the articles of Uncyclopedia, your conscious humility in regards to this, your British reserve which is closely related to the latter, your tireless dedication to keeping everyone's rankings up to date, and generally being really Under appreciated, I hereby bestow upon you this:

Feather in Your Cap Award

This person has done something very helpful for Uncyclopedia, and thus is deserving of a Feather in their Cap. Respect this person.

---

Wear it with dignity, or toss it into the nearest brothel and watch as the prostitutes fight tooth and nail for it, it's your choice. If it pleases you to do so, wear the KUN it carries with it with the very same dignity. Right-o, then,

Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Er, I was only kidding, you know that, right? (Although I occasionally feel like mentioning that I kept OEJ company as lone reviewers for a while before the undoubted legend that is Cajek got involved (and even directed him to join PEEING in the first place), it generally passes!) Seriously, I'm not too bothered about getting awards (although it'll look nice with the others), more in ribbing Cajek! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 21:30, Apr 3

No, no, see, I was all poised to present them to both you and him at the same time. I had typed in my fancy statements and everything. Then a shiny object distracted me, and it appears I closed your talk page before my contribution got submitted. Uncyclopedia's running slow today and all. On the plus side, this time my fancy-speak came out much better for you.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:32, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

"Not too bothered about getting awards"???

Hmm, well...

You are not pants MrN9000 could not help but notice that you are not pants. As such, you have been awarded the Titanium Trousers by way of recognition. Any suggestion that this is a pants award will be treated accordingly...

I could not resist. Now, not only have I stolen your template, but also your idea for an award. Now you have another one. Dam things... MrN 01:52, Apr 4

Cool, it has indeed reignited me, and my flame shall continue to burn! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 07:55, Apr 4

User:Cajek/Pee

Hey UU, we're getting kinda backed up on the list here. I know you have a job, but you have responsibilities, too. Quit your job and help me!   Le Cejak • <Apr 04, 2008 [14:16]>

Dude, I have the house to myself this evening, and I'll be sorting out all sorts of stuff then. Give me a few hours, I'll rattle through the reviews, and may even do one of my own. Now, I have a request for you: I've seen your ideas list, and your challenges with other users and the like... And I want to start a new article while I feel inspired by my current feature (which I plan to make a thankies template for tonight - note to self!)... But I have no idea what to write. Soooooo, bearing in mind my "style", can you suggest a title for something I can write? Go on, help a Limey brother out! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 14:25, Apr 4

Oh, you honor me, UU! now let's see: your style of humor is laid back based around parodies... lemme see... Maybe in the meantime, you could think of something laid back for me to write!   Le Cejak • <Apr 04, 2008 [14:39]>

What, you don't have enough to be going on with? Well, since you ask... You could take a look at The Millennium and the review here. I want to add more to it, but figure what it really needs is some zip and pizazz, and I can't think of anyone more zippy or pizazz-y than you! So Cajek the hell out of it if you like... If that's not up your street, then I'll come up with another idea tonight. Now, back to the grindstone! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 14:47, Apr 4

I'm rewriting Brain Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Brain, and I think it's kind of your thing. Like the Millennium, I'm kinda stuck on that one. Give it a shot, see what you come up with. I'm gonna look at Millennium right now...   Le Cejak • <Apr 04, 2008 [15:00]>

OK, sounds interesting. I'll assuredly take a look. However it'll probably be on sunday, as I now have stuff to do. Have a good weekend! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 21:23, Apr 4

UnScripts:Average Cop

Because I'm a lazy fuck that usually doesn't arse himself to vote for things, I didn't read Average Cop until I featured it last night. I love it. Just, er, letting you know.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:55, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Coo thanks! Always nice to get feedback from one of the very best! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 21:13, Apr 4

Say there

I don't suppose you'd have any interest in pissing all over this would you? --OptyC Sucks! CUN 17:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Heads up, I've already planned on reviewing it right after I'm done with the review I'm about to finish. But if you want UU to review it as well I won't object. I'll just ask that he wait until I'm done so as not to edit conflict each other. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 17:27 Apr 5

Thanks Sys. Second opinions are always welcome if UU would still be interested, but if you (UU) got other things to do that's okay. --OptyC Sucks! CUN 17:47, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey Optyc, sorry to not get back sooner - I had a busy ol' saturday! I've already seen and checked SysRq's review on my rounds, and it's a good one - as such, I'm not sure what I'd add to it right now. So I'd suggest you work on it based on his advice, and if you want a second opinion when you're done with that, give me another holler and I'll happily oblige! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 08:49, Apr 6

PRIP

Yeah, go ahead and delete it, man. Which article is it again?

Tkotse 16:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

It was Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Chris Lawrence. I've removed the tag now. Hopefully someone will get to it soon. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 16:43, Apr 6

Actually, I've put it up for VFD. I felt it was necessary.

Tkotse 01:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Mightydandylion/Think Tank

Rejoice, Under user! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award

For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

---

Absolutely awesome Under User! I especially appreciated and enjoyed the following paragraphs of suggestions. Brilliant. I'll definitely work on it more in the following weeks with regards to all of your suggestions. Seriously, thank you especially for the ideas: I have a difficult time coming up with new ones. They are a godsend for me, hahaha. Thanks again! Mightydandylion (talk) Fk 16:44, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Wah ah ah... ah ah

Rejoice, Under user! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award

For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

---

Rejoice, Under user! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award

For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

---

(You get two)

Thanks for the review but I need a better idea for what I should add for pictures. Any ideas cos I've tried but they either looked like crap or were too strange? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 12:06, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I'll have another look and a bit of a think and let you know if anything occurs to me. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 20:06, Apr 7

Yeah I added some more when inspiration came. Just need one more pic and it should be done time :D --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:28, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

DONE :D

here :D - thanks for all the help via Pee Review --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 11:30, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

And almost instantly nommed. I really like this and fancy its chances, although I've been wrong before. Good luck! P.M., RotM, & KUN, Sir Led BallUUn (Sick Sock) (Contribs) 12:07, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

A Thanking

Thanks for that image. That's definitley what I was looking for. I have no cakes to give but maybe I'll present you with this...

A complimentary Zombie Abe Lincoln bobblehead doll. Enjoy.

Jimmy the Hellhound 15:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Epic failure...

Dang, I seem to be extrremly busy at the moment. I wanted to thank you for picking up the slack where I was unable to do a review. I was extremly busy in personal life, and I did not have enough time to tap into a computer.

Warm Regards, Javascap

Hell, no worries. You're still doing an excellent job Javascap, keep it up! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:55, Apr 9

Hurrah, you're alive!

Congratulations, my son! Unlike that naughty little friend of ours, the Big Bad Wolf, you have survived Ash Wednesday! As such, you have been awarded this "Get Out of Hell Free" card. You may use it only once*; use it wisely. Keep in mind there are over sixteen thousand recorded ways to sin, and the list is growing all the time. And God's just itching to practice his aim, if you get my drift. Have fun**! *Not valid for "the biggies," such as homosexuality or masturbation. Sorry. **Not actually allowed, it's only an expression.

SKULLTHUMPER

Thanks For The Review...

Thanks for the review... Ironically (is it ironic...probably) the huge quote was split into paragraphs, but then Mordillo changed it! Also the line under the picture "like most religious people he is Bat Fuck Insane" was not added by me....but squirming out of things aside ( :-D ) thank you, the review was excellent, I think I'm going to actually add those changes and also the two bits about the leader... I didn't think I was going to go back and change bits but your review has, er, "spurred" me on. - 11:07 8 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

Ah...I might as well give you a template:

Under user Has Been Awarded Official Thankies By YesTimeToEdit! This Is Not Just Thankies. This Is Unofficial YesTimeToEdit Official Thankies.

- 10:43 9 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

Uma Image

Hi, thanks for you're interest. I'm on holiday at the moment (roughly two weeks). I'm still doing the Uma page, however in my opinion its (aside from my award winning grammer) pretty much done. I myself have no complaints over the image that sannse did, if you want to have a go with another please do- I have no desire especially to keep the colour images, howeer if you do do another could you somehow integrate it with whats there, thanks:)--Sycamore (Talk) 12:30, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Pardon Me...

Would you still be interested in doing that thing I mentioned 21 or so headers back? I don't want to be a nag or anything. /me sheepishly ducks head and backs away --OptyC Sucks! CUN 20:33, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Oh, um... Probably... Er, my mind isn't really on this right now... Family... stuff... Not great... I'll see if I get the time and the inclination. Sorry to completely forget though, that's not like me at all. I'll definitely get on to it when things pick up, but right now... Dunno... Sorry to be so vague. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 07:56, Apr 10

'Sokay, I still think you're swell. Whenever you're up to it, I'm just looking for an opinion from somebody who's been around awhile. -72.24.227.116 14:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC) <--Optimuschris this getting logged out thing is starting to bug me!

Ah, I see you also suffer from "suddenly becoming an IP" syndrome... Yeah, just to elaborate a little, my Gran has had a heart attack, so I'm not really focussed on funny right now. Therefore this would be totally the wrong time for me to do a review. When we get some better news from the hospital, I'll be right there, promise! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 14:10, Apr 10

Good luck with grandma eh. I have no excuse not to be writing/peeing however... just laziness --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:17, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Aw jeez, now I feel like a heel for bugging you about such a mundane thing. Take care of your Gran, get back to me when she's feeling better. -OptyC Sucks! CUN 15:27, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry dude, you ain't no heel - I don't mind being bugged about reviews, especially when I should have done 'em already! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 15:46, Apr 10

Take care, UU. I updated... that... that list that I... that I invented... TAKE CARE UU! WE MISS U!   Le Cejak • <Apr 10, 2008 [15:39]>

Always do buddy... But I'm still here! I just can't stay logged in for more than about 30 seconds at the moment, the damn wiki won't let me! (see the Help forums). The only thing is I misplaced my sense of humo(u)r today, that's all! ;-) --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 15:46, Apr 10

Thanks for your help and advice!

--The Eternal Lord Grimlitz 13:32, 10 April 2008 (UTC)