User talk:Splaka/Archive2

Hi Splaka

Hilf mir bitte, weil ich hier neu bin. Bébizokni ist auf Ungarisch/Hungarian/Magyar. Aber dieses Sablon finde ich nicht... --Dr. Steller 11:27, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Image ist aus diese Seite: http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%A9p:Socken_farbig.jpeg --Dr. Steller 11:29, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't comprehend. The {{Qua?}} template was simply to notify you that Bébizokni was in the wrong language area. Could you move it to Hu:Bébizokni (if it is Hungarian) please? I notice we also don't have any main Hungarian page at Hu:, start one if you like ^_^. --Splaka 11:43, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Actually, having realized that was German and not Hungarian: Um äußere Bilder zu verwenden sollten Sie sie hochladen hier verwendend Special:Upload. Ungarische Sprachenseiten sollten mit vorgesetzt werden: "Hu:" (eg Hu:Bébizokni). Es gibt ein volles deutsches Uncyclopedia an uncyclopedia.de. (Babelfish translation, sorry)--Splaka 11:49, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Dawg to Splaka

Hey, life gave me a lemon and I wanted a lime. If anyone wonders where I am (I figure you might), I'll be mostly offline until futher notice (not sure how long, need to order some new hardware for a certain recently-deceased machine that was freaking out earlier).

Apparently I was right about the database...

Well, drop me a message here or on my talk page. I'll try to drop by from time to time. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 11:44, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Bummer! Damn computers. Will do. Stay sane. Make lemonade. --Splaka 11:49, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC) PS: <chron> jason, you know our thing is doubly serialzed right? <JasonR> Yes.

I figured it was only a matter of time before the SysOp curse happened to you, too. It seems that most people drop out soon after being SysOped. I hope you come back, Dawg. --Paulgb 00:07, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Must be some kind of record. The ink's not dry on his congratulatory page yet.  :) Come back soon, Dawg. -- T. (talk) 00:21, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Actually, Splarka noted on IRC that User:ERTW has the record, of never returning after being sysopped. --Paulgb 01:29, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Yes, ERTW does hold the record. Sadly, the dead hardware is both expensive and hard to come by, even on the internet. I'm now a modern digital gypsy, almost like when I was a student and I carried floppies with me before the original zip drives became ubiquitous and when CD-Rs still cost a fortune. Now I live on a 1GB USB flash drive; the kids now-a-days have it so easy. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 10:40, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

About my block

Ummm... is there any chance that one of the admins you talked to about my 12-hr block was Famine? (reply on my talk, plz) --Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 20:32, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Why blocked

Can you please tell me why I am blocked? Something about American/English, or Poop_Cuisine, of which I know nothing about. My user name is Chocology

It is because you share an AOL proxy IP with a vandal. Your username doesn't appear to be blocked, just be wary of aol (it sucks, every edit can have a different IP, sometimes we have to ban the whole thing). ^_^ --Splaka 23:11, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Hey, I'm Sorry

I found Zach on CNN and a friend of mine had sent me the pictures (I'm the other guy on the Bad Boy'd? case) and I thought it would be funny. I was editing, loading, editing, loading, to make sure it looked okay, and you deleted it the first time while I was editing, so the reload was a mistake. I sincerely apologize and will not attempt to repost it. I just thought it was kind of funny.

--192.195.225.6

Fair enough. What annoyed us most was the use of bugmenot to recreate it and upload pics. There is no need to use bugmenot. Logins do not require email addresses or any personal information. I actually like and use bugmenot, but it is not needed for wiki sites. It can also be easily disabled by logging in and changing the password. If you create a login you can put the article back up (although mention it is obscure and not a friend of yours). Sorry for jumping the gun ^_^. --Splaka 07:52, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

IRC spoofing

Just a heads-up. Our old friend (I won't be Specific about his name, I'll just keep it General) has learned how to use /nick on the IRC channel. He's already practiced spoofing you, and I'm sure he'll play with mine next. I think it will be painfully obvious when it's really one of us, and when it's him. FWIW, I didn't hang around the channel to watch -- he's getting kind of boring. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 21:38, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Postman Pat

Hello, Splaka. I have no idea what are your plans with this article you have nothing to do (yet?) with except the MTU tagging. You've recently deleted in a hurry the stuff I write all this morning (funny or not that text). I've noticed you have been during the last week the one who ask writers to move/expand/delete just-made article stubs in next 7 days which in many cases take the fun off in stories and so far in writing, such a hurry. I think it needs lots of time and second thoughts to find the right mixes between the articles and not too much one person's quick decisions what to do with all this crap written. VERY BAD articles is a different thing, of course. Don't we all do this site together, mixing different ideas from different writers coming from all around the world? I'm not a native English speaker myself and I wellcome everyone (you included) to make this crappy article a lot larger and better. - 81.197.63.160 (IP at the moment) 15 Nov 2005

I MTU tag artcles as they are created, if they look short but worth expanding. Note that they are usually in no danger for 7 days or so. If you expand the article you can remove the tag. The tag is just our way of finding the artcles later if they never get expanded (you would not believe how many people come in, create a two sentence article, and disappear thereafter). If I deleted some stuff of yours it was either TOO short (or plain bad) for even MTU, or was about non-notable people. Can you give me names of articles of yours you feel were deleted unfairly? --Splaka 12:11, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC) P.S. As you were the original author of Postman Pat I'll undo my revert, it looked at first glance like vandalism ^_^.

OK, you are forgiven for this matter. ;-) But I must say that MTU tag can be quite frightening for us foreigners (at least) who write here at the first time and not be too sure of what the main rules are here. Stub tag is easier one to understand, a well-known thing from Semprini. There should be probably a simplier text written in the MTU tag to explain what it really means? --original writer 81.197.63.160 (IP at the moment) 15 Nov 2005

Hey, don't blame Splaka too quickly. I may be the culprit. I just got finished annihilating several articles that Splaka marked MTU, because in *my* opinion they were a waste of electrons. Sorry, Splaka... -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 14:58, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I'm sorry as well if I said things too harshly and like attacked Splaka personally. It's the practice I'm really talking about. I just think Uncyclopedia may lose good fresh writers here if you administrators react at once on every new stub by threatening them to be moved/deleted instead of marking them just to be a stub. I myself prefer a hilarious stub to a long story with loose humour (if these are the choices). But of course, it is easier to talk about the problems than being the one who put things into practice. You administrators also do loads of great job here, I can't deny that at all! --81.197.63.160 (IP still at the moment? or not) 15 Nov 2005

Peter Williams

• Splaka,

Just thought you'd want to know Peter Williams has been recreated again. MadMax 04:57, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Arg, he isn't even notable enough for Wikipedia! We don't want him. --Splaka 04:59, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Can I, can I?

---

Hi, Splaka. Ghostface said you're the man to talk to. So I am.

I'm a new user - Tryggvasson, however, before becoming one (starting to wear suits, ties and all and get some recognition (or not)) I have managed to chip in a couple of articles and a few contributions to others, as a mercenary (ip - 82.76.101.94), before I joined the regiment. (I've created Nightwish and Don't talk with your mouth full; I've completely rewritten Mintrubbing and Muie (yeah, you've guessed, I'm Romanian :p) - they were very small and really no fun; I've added a chapter to Mother Fucker (how do I choose my topics, I wonder?), plus three others to Gerbonia (language (except three quoutes), women and national sports) and a bit of minor contributions to various other articles.

I'd like to ask you if there's a way you can connect the IP to one user name or attribute all the "writings" of that ip (which is really mine, by the way) to my user name, so that I won't feel deprived of the past in my new capacity.

That's it. Thanks a lot (in advance). Take care! --Tryggvasson 22:59, 19 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Unfortunately that is rather complex and requires hacking the database. See Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Changing_attribution_for_an_edit#General_Notes for the policy on wikipedia. AFAIK it has never been done on uncyclopedia. Best thing to do is make a list of IPs you've used and say "I edited under these IPs". (The wikicities developer is also currently very busy trying to upgrade us to the next version of MediaWiki.) --Splaka 23:10, 19 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Jesus

Now listen. Why won't you let me say on the Jesus talk page that the page is unfunny63.19.207.215 22:19, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)

The talk page is a redirect, you shouldn't destroy a redirect to make a comment (instead, comment on the page it directs too). The page itself is a disambiguation page and doesn't need to be funny. --Splaka 22:26, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Parts of the article such as "Jeez-its" were obviously trying (and failing) to be funny. 63.19.207.215 22:29, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)

If you dislike the Jeez-its article (it isn't just a link) go to that page and complain. Also don't put {{vandalize}} on Jesus, thanks. `--Splaka

Rap music

• Splaka,

Just wanted to let you know I just merged the Rap music article under "Old School" in Rap. MadMax 02:34, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Cheers. I changed it to a redirect. --Splaka 02:39, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Ditto on Danish-Canadian War. And I was really waiting for a good article on that to... MadMax 05:25, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC) PS: Splaka, I hate to keep bothering you with these. Should I save you the trouble and add a redirect myself ? I would have already done so except for the MTU template. MadMax 05:30, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Yes, you may! Ta. --Splaka 05:32, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)

User talk:Famine

• Splaka, thanks for the kind words regarding my computer issues. Although it's really no trouble if I get blocked as I usally just log on again. Admittedly it's a hassle (and certainly after more then a year of editing Wikipedia I'm used to it ;-] ), but it's certainly justified given the massive amounts of vandalism that comes from AOL alone. Anyway I certainly apprecite the fact someone notices my contributions. :) MadMax 03:35, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)

User:SamuraiClinton

I saw that you banned the aforementioned suspect for a bit. I was wondering if you'd agree that his contributions are somewhat suspect as well: Wheely Willy is a redirect to Willy on Wheels, which looks to me like QVFD vanity. I think we can safely rollback his addition to Wikipedia, and the contribution to Jimbo Wales Jr. makes that page look even more huffable.

Update: The only link to Wheely Willy is Page move vandalism created by 69.209.170.251. Also from this fine auteur, Penguin shit island and edits to Penguin and (gasp!) Wheely Willy. I took the liberty of banninating this IP for a week as well with the excuse reason "Appears to be User:SamuraiClinton making anon edits. Stop it." I haven't deleted any of the pages, in case you need them for your doctoral thesis research, so please feel free to huff 'em at your leisure. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 15:51, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Image:PushOnce.jpg

Oiy, What did you do that for? now when you press the button in the Des Moines article (the only one it's on) it goes to the image page for it rather than the article about the button!!--MysteryShopper 11:04, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Image redirects don't work so hot, and well, are screwy. Use this code: <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Target_Article http://uncyclopedia.org/directlinktouploadedimage/PushOnce.jpg]</span> (the links have to be external for this to work). --Splaka 11:09, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

But I like image redirect's their like "old skool" (old == 2/3 months) + you get the image in the resultant article!--MysteryShopper 11:13, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Maybe, but it isn't your image, and making an image description page into a redirect is just a bad habit (for those wanting information on the image source and licensing). --Splaka 11:21, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

http://en.uncyclopedia.co/w/index.php?title=Image:PushOnce.jpg&redirect=no ............--MysteryShopper 11:26, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

You miss the point. You have to remove all the information to make it a redirect, which = bad. --Splaka 11:29, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Everything that was in the article is in the edit summary!--MysteryShopper 11:36, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Everything that was in the original upload summary maybe (and unparsed), however as there is no preview this is not always the final version of the description page. I'd argue that a simple link to the destination page on an image description page is hardly more inconvenient than a redirect, but why? Image description pages serve a purpose that is inconvenienced by redirects (which serve little purpose), so no. Also, why are you still arguing? You already used my code, I see. --Splaka 11:42, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For the principal! (also I'm 90% certain it I had replaced the redirect you would have blocked me) --MysteryShopper 11:49, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Blocked? Possibly. Lot easier than using a talk page ^_^. But until wikia disables external images, my alt method is fine (except the image appears unused, use Template:Notorphan so it doesn't get huffed). --Splaka 11:52, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I now would have been a pain to get myself unblocked :-)--MysteryShopper 11:54, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

You are almost being a pain to get yourself blocked. ^_^ If you wanna continue this come to IRC (before I sleep). --Splaka 11:57, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Who says I aint already? --MysteryShopper 11:59, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

FWIW, I actually wanted to have the image redirect to that article (or maybe a future article to be named later), but being a total n00b, I couldn't figure out how to do it properly. So TYVM to both of you! --Schnuggle Bear! 23:06, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Bill Fitchburg

It is an attempt to mainstream an inside joke. If there is anything I can do to make it funny on more of a mass basis, tell me. I don't want my page deleted if I can save it. --Kosmakos 22:46, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

The problem with inside jokes is, nobody else will get it. Allowed 'inside joke' vanity falls under the 'community' guideline, be it about a school, town, online forum/chatroom, or other group. Writing about a non-notable friend/classmate/sibling though just has no redeeming quality as it won't reach a wide audience (exceptiosn are made for user pages (which don't show on article namespace) and subsections of above mentioned allowed vanity). Uncyclopedia strives to be a satire of Wikipedia, but we can't do that without following some basic patterns of them (we allow school/university 'vanity' because of their policy of allowing a wiki article about every school). So the short answer is, if it is about a real but non-notable person (or reads like it is, even if you made the person up), it will be deleted by someone here. --Splaka 22:53, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

It's supposed to be an example of a generalization on the prototypical chavs/wiggers. If I can get that point across, is it saveable?I worked a good amount of time on it and so would like to find a way to save it. --Kosmakos 23:12, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I asked a brit:

<Codeine> Well, it *could* be funny
<Codeine> but it needs work
<Codeine> If he's prepared to put the hours in, I say give it a stay of execution
<Codeine> but I'd ask him if it's a made-up name
<Codeine> if not, he can change it to one

So, if you can make it more obviously a generalization and not about an NNP (photoshop the image, more made-up-ified name) then it could work. --Splaka 23:24, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Diarrhea

Since you were the last admin to touch this article I'll ask you if it's OK to revert 72.1.206.7's changes. Is it? Thanks for your time. --Naughtyned 05:32, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Yah, undone. Anonymous users who blank sections without an edit summary can ususally be undone (unless it is spam or vandalism or such). --Splaka 06:14, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Too many templates

Still not pretty, eh? --Logixoul 21:31, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Pretty ugly, maybe. --Splaka 21:41, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. --Logixoul 21:51, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Sk33lz0n3

Codeine marked this one as allowable vanity, but I think he missed the little "Splaka is gay" at the bottom. I'll leave it to you to decide how to respond (and to razz Codeine). -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 03:42, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Cheers. Feel free to CVP or delete it if they offend again. --Splaka 04:13, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)

False alarm, I guess -- they didn't go back to the Dark Side after your edit, so hopefully they'll follow the Straight and Narrow Path. They should feel lucky, though, that my bloodlust had already been sated by the enormous amount of crap being generated by k1dd13z home for the holidays. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 05:47, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Dacia Logan

Hi, I looked at the list of cars being written about, for example on page Automobile (at the bottom), and I'm not sure how to add the Dacia Logan. If you haven't read this article before I recommend you do it now, it's one of the most hilarious I've read about a car model. Anyway, I'd appreciate it if you'd add this link to the list of car model, thanks. ~User:Csaba

Done and Done. --Splaka 09:51, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)

UK Highway Code

We liked this, some of us, but somoene blanked it and it got deleted. Is resurrection an option? Also Hazard Lights was, IIRC, related. - Guy

Both were blanked by the original author (which is usually an indication that they wanted it deleted, we discourage blanking but for something that is MTU tagged and then subsequently blanked by the same person, we assume they just agree it should be gone). The last versions before blanking were:

UK Highway Code

This is but one of three different translations I have found of the Highway Code; it was originally written in Latin, probably by the Archbishop, Jeremiah Clarkesonn. It was in force for only a few months, when it was violated by the Minister of Transport. Just over a year later, with no conviction, the minister died, being succeeded by his 9-year old son, John of Prescotte. The Code (Codex) was reissued again, with some revisions, in 1216, 1217 and 1225. This Uncyclopedia text is the first revision since that date. The Major Clauses in the Codex Bicycle Lanes Hazard Lights The Time-out Principle Speed limits Use of mobile phones while driving

Hazard Lights

An innovative safety feature fitted to most modern cars, hazard lights provide a simple and effective means of parking a vehicle almost anywhere, a huge addition to the convenience of the motorcar. Before this invention, some motorists have reported having to park up to 500 yards from the corner shop, totally unacceptable when you consider the whole journey was only 1200 yards! OperationThere is this switch located inside the car, which is usually in an easy-to-reach-place from the driver's side but is simultaneously hidden in such a way as to take several minutes and a glance at the Owner's Manual to discover. The switch usually has a serious looking triangle on it, allegedly making it easier to find. When this switch is pressed or pulled, all the direction indicators blink. This is in itself fascinating, but not the limit of what this button can accomplish. It appears that when one's hazard lights are on, one is able to do anything without fear of reprisal. The original purpose of hazard lights was to warn other drivers that the car was stationary because it had broken down and wouldn't go any further. However, over the years the hazard light's purposes have been extended. Nowadays, leaving one's hazard lights on means you can park anywhere - there does not have be anything particularly wrong with the car in question. Leaving hazard lights on while parked on a double yellow line or in front of a fire hydrant means that the driver has just nipped into a nearby shop. Or if you see a driver who has pulled over to the side of a busy road and has stuck on their hazard lights they may be lighting a cigarette while holding a hot coffee in the other hand, or perusing a street map. It is rare to see a hazard-lit car exceeding the speed limit. Often they crawl along at a snail's pace when everyone behind it wants to go at 70 miles an hour. UK Highway Code excerpt :- 96: Hazard warning lights. These may be used when your vehicle is stationary, to warn that it is temporarily obstructing traffic. You may also use them as an excuse for dangerous or illegal parking. You COULD ALSO use hazard warning lights whilst driving on a motorway or unrestricted dual carriageway and you need to warn drivers behind you that you are using a mobile phone. Hazard lights were invented in 1979 by Luke Duke (of Dukes of Hazzard fame)

You can recreate them, if you feel they won't get deleted too quickly, but use proper capitalization this time, eg Hazard lights (although UK Highway Code seems to be a proper noun in that context). --Splaka 10:44, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Here it is...

You're probably the only person here that was helpful and influential to me during this first month that I haven't taken the time to write a decent letter to. I don't know why that is, but it may be because I see you in channel so often anyway.  :)

Much the way that you singled out Elvis as a good role model to learn from, I've been trying to learn from you. While my education here has been more observation than interaction (like you and E), it's still been very helpful. Everything that I've read about how you've changed this site for the better has been useful, and I've tried to do good work here though I don't have your range of skills.

I enjoy our sane/ridiculous conversations in the channel, and have appreciated you showing me the ropes in finding vandalism in the diff logs, asking my opinion on pages, editing my monobook, nominating me for awards, not being the least bit bothered that I shamelessly steal code from your userpage, and the other bucketload of stuff that has made getting up to speed here easier.

Anyway, lemme know where to mail the tuition money. It was well spent, I think.  :) -- T. (talk) 21:56, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Homosexual

Splaka, hate to be a snitch but Medieval restored the previous version of the article. I didn't want to start an edit war by reverting to the last version but I thought you'd want to know. MadMax 10:32, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Snitches rule, I've reverted him twice. I'll see if he does it again. Thing is, User:Spooner came in and asked us to watch the article, as someone had been borderline-vandalizing it with that version for a while. --Splaka 10:35, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Monobook.js

My most recent attempt to break uncyclopedia got me thinking, random logos, a la User:Algorithm's <choose><option> code! do you think I should :-)!--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 17:23, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Personally, I'm against the idea; I like seeing the potato in the corner all the time. --Sir gwax (talk) 19:07, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Arrr, my eyes, they bleed. It wouldn't be too easy to do but probably possible. However, we don't wanna make the side-wide monobook.js get too big.... ^_^ --Splaka 21:59, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I was wondering what that page was for. :) MadMax 04:54, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

France

Splaka, sorry I was cut off on IRC before I could get back to you, I think I was really pushing my luck with less then two minutes before closing. ;-) It's hard to tell from the exact moment when the article began going down hill but the was a series of reversion between the 20th up until a few days ago. I think there were just so many edits in between reversions, Admins could check out every edit before it. Here is a comparison though between my last (loged in) edit on Nov. 9 and the version before my edits. [1] MadMax 04:51, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Okiedoke, will take a peek when I can. Looks like a mess though. Buh. --Splaka 04:55, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

User talk:EvilZak

Do not put back abusive comments against me, which I deleted. The person who put that here was the biggest quinn on earth, anyway.

That person was an admin, and you have no right to remove abusive comments about yourself while putting more in, like this one. Anywho, you've earned a complimentary range block. Enjoy. Douchebag. --Splaka 05:03, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Idiotic Table

Fantastic work. It looks beautiful! Strong RadX 14:39, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Cheers ^_^ --Splaka 22:10, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

IRC link

I was just trying to find a link to the Uncyc IRC when I forgot it. And its source. Gimme a link, plz. (reply here) ----Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 01:56, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Try the bottom of the front page. Also, don't go back and 'edit' a mistake when you use [+], that adds a second copy of the post. --Splaka 01:59, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Hola

I'd like to submit a request for changing the title of the article "British Colombia" to "Coca-Colombia". Please instruct me in the pertinent procedure or don't.

Well, it usually isn't funny to have pages at incorrect locations. You can refer to it as such on the page, or you can create a new page about BC called CC (as long as it is big enough to warrant non-movement). Hmm. Consult Ogopogo about it, he's been cleaning up the Canadian articles. --Splaka 07:08, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)

{{skeith}} on Bunny

Do you think a {{skeith}} on the top of the Bunny article would be funny? --Logixoul 12:21, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Possibly at the bottom, at the top it would detract from the overall 'joke' too fast, I think.

Deadly right. There it is.--Logixoul 07:52, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)

The drummer from Def Leppard

I do not think that the article should be labeled NRV. If it was expanded it wouldn't be as funny; the whole joke is "This person's arm-related article is a stub." --PseudoChron 19:06, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)

A quote and 3 sentences doesn't make it very redeeming or even much of a 'stub' more like a sub-stub. Try expanding it a tiny bit more? --Splaka 22:47, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Notebook page

• Splaka, I just got your message on Report a Problem. Just wanted to let you know the categorization button works great. Apparently some computers may or may not use Javascript. I'd of told you in IRC but I guess we keep missing each other. MadMax 07:23, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Spiffy! Add the categories you want to it. I'll delete and recreate the religion page. --Splaka

How do I revert an article to an older version?

I just spent a couple of hours rewriting Armenia to get it funny and off the vote for deletion list and the original author (69.242.105.27) came back and put the previous (very lame and unfunny) History section back into that article (while deleting my new section). The original history was the whole article before and the main reason it was on VFD in the first place. I've never reverted an article before, do I just type it back in, or what? Thanks man Wiki Tiki God 04:48, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Click [history], click the date of the good version, click [edit] (you'll get a warning about it being an out of date version). Put in a summary like: 'reverting'. Click [save]. --Splaka 04:51, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)

U.S. Presidential election

This entry is one of the most wanted on uncyc... I figured I was doing my part to make the red links bluer. Is it just not funny enough, or what? -- Myronic da Chronic MUN NScx (h0lla) @19:06, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)

A red link is sometimes preferrable to a bad blue link. Don't try to blue all the red links with short articles of little content. 3 lines is not even a stub. Quality over Quantity. And such. --Splaka 22:28, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)

E_e_cummings

Um, before you huff this article, you might want to see some of his actualpoetry, whereupon you will realize it is brilliant satire and sing this article's praises. Seriously. --Hobelhouse 14:57, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• FWIW, I agree with Hobelhouse. He's a real person, and the article is written in his style. It needs work, but even as wide as I swing my sword, I'd spare this waif. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 15:14, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

(1) The correct page title (yes, we mostly want that here, Manitoba over Manisnowba) is E. E. Cummings , (location typoes are not teh funny, even if it is in their style. You don't see us moving pages to stupid titles all the time (well, you might, but then we move them back and ban the person that did it)), making the capitalization and punctuation of this one totally wrong. (2) even if it is funny, there is still no content (4 templates and 1 picture, vs 33 words to the article), making it definitely an NRV. --Splaka 21:46, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• I figured the alternative spelling would be appropriate, given that most folks think that's the way he preferred it (in fact, I didn't know otherwise until the so-called experts told me). Even they have a redirect at the lowercase spelling. Also, don't blame Hobelhouse for the templates... those are my doing. Perhaps the article would be funnier if someone could confuse e e cummings with t s eliot, and have ee as the creator of Cats. In any case, there are plenty of articles with less redeeming value than this one. Or maybe I just have low standards today. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 22:02, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

They have a redirect from the lowercase, but it goes to the above-mentioned capitalization. Most people use the correct linkage when linking to it too. Unless it is exceptional (eg No Orleans) then the wrong title is just not really funny. --Splaka 22:08, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Katakyuk Joe

You deleted this article yesterday, but it's back, created and edited several times by User:AirGunRunner (who also deleted an NRV tag added by EvilZak). I think it's still pretty much crap, probably vanity, but I'll leave it to you to swing the executioner's axe. Warning: the giant image on AirGunRunner's user page is a huge picture of a moose -- suitable for work, but not for dialup. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 14:55, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Meh. --Splaka 03:51, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Ruining my Fun

How am I supposed to carry out my sacred duties when you constantly undermine my authority? I mean, seriously. I ban people, and two minutes later you come along and negate 12/13ths of their ban. Talk about irresponsible and malicious.

Worse? Your banatorial was lame and uninspired. You are a disgrace to this website. Go write an article or something. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 01:12, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Hehe, sorry. I didn't see your ban. But anyhow, your ban takes precidence as it was first. I banned someone for 24hrs, and then for 1 year (after seeing more what they'd done), and they came back vandalizing 24hrs later. --Splaka 01:30, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I did not know that about bans. Good to know. Currently, I spend my time here watching this trainwreck. I swear, Pavlov would be rolling over in his grave right now. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 03:32, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Lol --Splaka 03:51, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Recent Oscar Wilde additions

• Splaka,

I was wondering if you've noticed the recent changes to Oscar Wilde in the past few weeks ? I've revised the latestest additions to Oscar Wilde's life [2] , however even after reformating it seems suited more to the OSCAR WILDE Livejournal. MadMax 02:50, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Hmm, that page gives me a headache, I just revert obvious abuse of it. Do what you want to him, I can't judge funny on it anymore! --Splaka 03:51, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

URGENT MASSAGE

Your ballot in the DYK vote was incomplete. Please specify whether you'd like the DYK to consist of lines from new or featured articles. Or create an "Other" option if you wish. Thank you. --Savethemooses 23:48, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Meh. I just removed it. --Splaka 03:51, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Something petty about Template:Moodring

Shouldn't there be a link to the template under your templates section? ----Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 02:12, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

He:

Hi. Could the definitions for the He: pages be changed to RTL (Right To Left)? It would make my life a lot easier. Thanx anyway, Kakun 03:41, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I am not sure I understand? You mean the content of these pages, or the links to them? Or something else? --Splaka 03:45, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• Splaka,

The Hebrew Uncyclopedia's text is displayed backwards and Elvis suggested asking at the Hebrew Uncyclopedia how their page is displayed and then to check with you if the display problem could be resolved by a javascript/css code. MadMax 00:42, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Ahh k. I think if we need a CSS to do that, it would be better for the hebrew uncyc to move to its own wikicity, like the italian, polish and french versions did. When Angela gets back next week I'll ask her about it. --Splaka 00:46, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Huffination

SPLAKA. Please can I finish editting my article before you delete it? I haven't used my mod powers for evil before, only for good, please don't force me to fall to the dark side. MY dad wouldn't stand a chance in a lightsabre fight.

Ok, what did I do now? --Splaka 09:09, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Ahh k Victim. It looked like an empty piece of fluff, we've been highly trained by chron to huff such stuff. Since you've been so inactive I didn't recognize you as a fellow sys. Apologizes. But if an anon IP or new user had made such an article, it probably would have been deletable by a dozen different admin ^_^. --Splaka 09:14, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Man, it's so tough watching all the yong padawans fall to the dark side. Easier, More Seductive. Yeah - I keep an eye on Uncyclopedia, but don't make many articles - the weight of rubbish that gets written depresses me. I remember the good old days. I would have deleted what I wrote too, if it were random IP stuff. But I've got pedigree. Although my browser has malfunctioned and I can't find the sign key :-p

Surrender to the dark side. Just type out 4 tildes: ~~~~ and you're sigged. --Splaka 09:32, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

4 tildes? Wha? -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 16:24, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

4 tildes. That cant' be too hard. although my browser is working so I could just click "sign"...TheTris 14:40, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Jesii solution ?

• Splaka,

I was curious what you thought of a 100 Worst Jesii list regarding the massive amounts of Unwanted Jesii the site seems to get regualarly ? It might prove to be a short term solution at the moment, but I thought the idea might be interesting as Worst 100 list's go. MadMax 00:36, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Sounds good. We could huff the unwanted template and most of the pages that it links to that have been created, and move the contents to that. We could even start moving some of the bad jesii from the main template too. --Splaka 00:40, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I agree. --—rc (t) 00:41, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)

If we can't just delete them all, and perma-ban all the editors, I guess that's a good second choice. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 00:46, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Glad you implemented WOTD

I'm glad you liked the word of the day idea and I am completely boggled by how well you implemented it; have another ninjastar: {{Ninjastar|Ninjastar.png|Original Ninjastar|I award Splaka a Ninjastar for the mind-boggling ludicrosity<br>that is his implementation of the word of the day.|gwax}} --Sir gwax (talk) 19:51, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)

End of the Road

I basically added that article to lend some completely pointless credibility to my much longer Orkut article. End of the Road, Kentuckistan also happens to be a place in the short story "Blackberry Winter" by Todd Keisling, but I didn't expect anyone to get THAT ;P Basically I just wanted a really silly redneck place to link to in the Orkut article. Is that too silly and pointless? -- Bringa 03:06, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Short worthless articles are pointless yes. "If it took you 10 seconds to write, it probably isn't funny." That wasn't even undictonary worthy. A red link is preferrable to such in most cases. A wiki full of stubs is not funny :/ Why not just put the info on the longer page until it is long enough to be its own article? --Splaka 03:08, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Alright, then it'll be deleted. I thought it was funny in an absurd way, and since no one's going to fill in the details of a fictional town for me, I may as well remove the linkage from the longer article altogether. --Bringa 03:19, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)

What, no attitude? No violent threats? We need more users like you, mate. --—rc (t) 03:34, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Actually, you would be wrong in that regard - plenty of us will fill in the details of a fictional town. It's not like we have to get the details right now, is it? And besides, getting something horribly wrong and smashing someone else's dreams is something we do well here. But yeah, what Slpaka said - cram it all into one big article. If it grows so large that parts need to be spun off, they can be. Plan for one big article, as it's more likely to get done well than many disparate short ones. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 03:32, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• FWIW: The so-called experts have never heard of this End of the Road, but they do have something about what I assume is the other end. "'End of the Road' is a 1992 #1 hit recorded by Boyz II Men for the Motown label." The article is part of the wikipedia:Category:Boyz II Men songs. Geez. They have a category for Boys, sorry, Boyz II Men songs, and they call us a parody? -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 16:40, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Another Recreated Article

• Splaka, The article Bush Family Tree was just recreated a few minutes ago. MadMax 06:27, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Yah, been keeping an eye on it. I thought at first it was vandalism, but it seems someone is just trying to make the code work, I'll give it a while. Btw, you don't have to tell me each time something is recreated, putting it on the QVFD is usually enough (we do have 40+ admin) ^_^. But thanks for the vigil, it is appreciated. --Splaka 06:29, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• Sorry about that. I only let you know as I noticed it was deleted by you a minute before. I did put it on qvfd although it was removed by one of the users who created the family tree image. I wasn't sure what the status was on it, so I thought I'd mentio it in any case, before reposting the burn tag. Also if an editor removes an nrv tag before the seven day limit, should it be replaced even it there has been changes ? MadMax 06:46, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Ahh k. The page is surely crap now, I'll have to huff it. And nrv/mtu tags should be readded if the page is not changed (except for tag removal). If the page is expanded in any way, it can be re-tagged with nrv, but shouldn't usually be reverted. If that makes sense. --Splaka 06:55, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Alright then. So basicly any changes to the page get an extended deadline ? MadMax 07:03, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Pretty much any positive changes. Use your best judgement. --Splaka 07:14, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Pie rats are small peg-legged rodents known to have taken over the SS Sara Lee factory ship.

Was Pie rats are small peg-legged rodents known to have taken over the SS Sara Lee factory ship. too subtle a joke for Uncyclopedia? Probably ought to go ahead and delete Category:Pre-stub too, since it can never have pages with real titles and it won't be very funny without something illustrating it. Sorry I have such low-brow humor. I'll try better next time. It did have content however—the category tag. Qwerty Uiop 06:27, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

So...why don't you write a real Pie rat article? Or if it's not enough material for a full page, maybe add a section on pie rats to the Rat article? I suppose the joke has potential, but an empty page, not so much... --—rc (t) 06:41, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

As for too subtle, possibly, we sure don't get it. However, having the entire contents of an article in the title is, um, usually not funny. If the joke requires that, it probably won't work here. HTBFANJS. --Splaka 06:43, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Too Fast

damn that was quick - I'd just hit delete on Christiano Ronaldo, and get an error because you were there faster than the speed of awesome TheTris 10:43, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Better luck next time ^_^ --Splaka 11:00, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Thanks

THank you for re direct of my page. I just started with uncyclopedia and just immigrated and not fuly under standing things yet--Maddie's life 02:18, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Welcome, and welcome to uncyc. --Splaka 02:20, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Template:Wargame

Just when I think I've spent all night on IRC, y'all go and decide something without me. :( I added the Fall of Masada because it looks like it would have a particularly interesting ending. TK, big-time. On the other hand, it could have turned out to be total crap, which would of course have qualified it for VFH. Whining aside, though, I'd have to agree with removing it from the Bleeding Red Links unless/until I actually write the game... I'm just peeved that I didn't get to bitch about it on IRC first. Looks like I've taken care of that need, okthxbye. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 16:18, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Man, that was like days ago. I consulted with a handful of other users, they agreed that there were way too many red links on the template (more than blue), very few were worth keeping. --Splaka 22:14, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Blesses

Bless you for cleaning the AAAAAAAA! - Page

Gesundheit! --Splaka 22:14, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Danke o_O

Zombieminion

I belive I promised you and Dawg Zombieminions on IRC the other day for not blocking me...here it is.

--The Zombiebaron 15:21, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

User:Bloo

Splaka I assure you that I am not Masterbloo. Masterbloo came up with his profile name and I just decided to name mine Bloo. So it is just mere co-incidence. And can you please unblock me from the IRC, and when I changed names I was only testing that name change thing that Keitei told me how to do and I was just to seeing if I did it properly.

What's driving you?

Are you or anyone of the admins paid or is this sheer hobby?--Suresh 10:53, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Error at line 11867 in Admin.php, question not understood, please clarify. --Splaka 10:58, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Get paid? Hell, I've actually shelled out good money to play this insane game. Asking if we get paid to admin is like asking an alcoholic if he gets paid to drink. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 18:47, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I am not an admin and would refuse to serve if asked to carry a tray, but isn't Sir Splaka being driven by Dale Earnhardt Jr., BobBobBob (with newly overbored cylinders) by Jeff Gordon, and the Redoubtable Sir Famine by Matt Groenig in a stunning pink silk evening dress? I mean, I don't know what's driving them, but we can just imagine... ----OEJ 18:59, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I now suspect that admins motivs could add up to a nice conspiration theory.--Suresh 20:47, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Hey, there is no cabal. --Ogopogo 22:34, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Deletion of Nynorsk

Deletion too hasty? Consider NRV-tagging. Nynorsk is one of two official languages in Norway.--Suresh 11:35, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

No. Consider that we delete articles not only for being non-notable (as this wasn't) but for being total crap too:

Nynorsk is an old and habbitated languages. The language is mainly spoken by cocksuckers and thaiwhores. The goverment of norway has added this language to fuck up the system and be more like Russia, it ain't always easy being like a communist all the time (the bullshit philosofie tha only cocksuckers uses)

So stand together against Racisem, Nynorsk and Neo-Nazisem

Fuck Ny Norsk

Go on, I dare ya to tell me that wasn't instahuffable. --Splaka 11:44, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

That wasn't instahuffable. You were wrong. That article was "instahuffableNbannable". Because the writer surely needs time off to read the Beginner's Guide and HTBFANJS. After re-reading that, I'd guess a week or so. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 14:31, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Banned?

Uh, hello? I just tried to create a User page and have already been banned before doing anything. Hope it's over soon.--Mike Nobody ^=/\= 06:26, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I see no ban for that username. You'll have to be more specific as to what IP is blocked, which is affecting you. See: Special:Ipblocklist. Find the message that is displayed on the block text. Relay it to us. --Splaka 06:31, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)

OrgID: AOL 22000 AOL Way Dulles VA 20166, IP range 152.163.0.0 - 152.163.255.255; unblocked it for now, but likely the same problems will recur the moment anyone on AOL does something annoying. Get an ISP, darnit! --carlb 18:42, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)

lol @ Wiki Administrators & AOL noobs --Nerd42 22:37, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Removing banner ?

Relativity now seem to have some redeeming value. I guess that removing the banner won't stop the ticking in the Worthless article file. Is it writer or admins job to remove NRV- block in article after changing content? --Suresh 13:08, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)

The banner is what tags the article to the Worthless Articles category. If you've improved the article, remove the banner. If someone else reads the new version and still thinks it needs additional work, it might get tagged again (as NRV, or something else). -- T. (talk) 13:18, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Nazi cocksucker

Redirects to Splaka. --Suresh 20:29, 19 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Yah, it is kinda cute, pathetic vandals ^_^. I'll keep it for a while. --Splaka 03:28, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

New templates

I got fed up with the norwegian male vanity flu, so I edited an own banner against them for VFD.

Can I use it and save it as a template? --Suresh 20:29, 19 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Sure, call it Template:Vanity.no maybe ^_^. --Splaka 22:17, 19 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Please undelete Your Penis

Hi.

Please undelete Your Penis. Its content was more than just "Your Penis is probably smaller than My Penis". I also specially-created the Penis Stub Template so that it would read in this particular file, "Your Penis is a stub. You can help Uncyclopedia by buying Viagra."

The stub part was the joke, not the content. That was just placeholder text. Please undelete. Thanks. --RealGrouchy 05:46, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Sussed via IRC.--Splaka 06:05, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Tx:

added a mock up of proposed lynx-style homepage at User:Isra1337/testpage. If it seems promsing I will finish it. --Isra1337 13:18, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Mostly finished, but it should be tested on multiple browsers. --Isra1337 21:58, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

A Little Revert War Help

Hey Splarks, I'm wondering if I could get a little advice/help with a problem on Optimus Prime. I'm in a bit of a revert war (thrice reverted so far) with JumpinTuck who has done relatively little other than keep putting his crappy image up. Since it's not obvious vandalism, so much as just low quality material, I don't feel right going to ban patrol and since I don't have the complaining power of a SysOp, I thought that I'd turn to someone who does for help. Alternatively, if I'm wrong about this one, let me know. --Sir gwax (talk) 15:23, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

It's not so bad. Actually, the other pictures look very dark on my screen . Would he/you be alright with adding it later in the article as an Optimus unmasked picture? Have you talkpaged with him about it? -- T. (talk) 16:50, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Actually, never mind. Your feelings about the picture are abundantly clear.  :) # (cur) (last) 22:13, 12 Dec 2005 Gwax (the foreman prime image sucks; if you want a revert war, you've got one) -- T. (talk) 16:57, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, I guess I was a little too aggressive in my defense of Optimus Prime, I'll use the talk page and be a little more civil. --Sir gwax (talk) 17:34, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Thanks again, again

Thanks again for reverting my user page after a vandal attack. I've finally gotten my very own stalker, with User:Bob is a bum. joining User:Uncyclopedia is stupid. and User:Splaka is dumb!! in the pantheon of really, really stupid usernames that have been permabanned. And the no-underline style looks tastes great, *and* is less filling. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 16:48, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, it's kinda weird, but I've got one too. User:EMP doesn't seem to be on here for any reason other than to vandalise one of my pages. It's kind of sad that people with such cool user names could turn out to be such jerks. --Nerd42 17:16, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Nerd-o, I realize your teeny-weeny anti-humour brain isn't capable of understanding this, but none of the no-doubt multitudes of people who are disgusted and probably made physically ill by your favorite "article" are going to put it on VFD, because that would just get more people to read it, which of course is exactly what you want. In fact, if you put it there, and I haven't been banned for life at that point, I'll delete the entry myself. Try to get a clue, hate-boy. I hear they're 20% off this week, just in time for Christmas! (Oh, but I guess you people don't celebrate that, do you.) --Johnny C. Raven 18:03, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

And while you're at it, maybe you should get rid of that sick comment you made on the Slavery article, too. And don't bother telling me that was a "joke," either. --Johnny C. Raven 18:06, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• Nerd42, I'll let Splaka deal with Mr. Raven, above. Meanwhile, to address the issue you raised, I've posted a warning to User Talk:EMP letting him know that admins look poorly upon those who would declare "war" upon each other. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 21:09, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Xenotransplantation

I see you just made a change to the link put in my Undictionary entry for xenotransplantation. Big help, thank you. Now I can see how I should do it properly and copy it for subsequent links. Cheers. Ketlan

No problemo. --Splaka 02:28, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Huffination

Holy Crap with a capital K. Splaka is on a deletion roll! ]

1. (Deletion log); 23:33 . . Splaka (Talk) (deleted "User:Mobvok": content was: 'What a fag.')
2. (Deletion log); 23:33 . . Splaka (Talk) (deleted "Talk:2005": content was: 'blow me freaks')
3. (Deletion log); 23:33 . . Splaka (Talk) (deleted "Talk:Talk:Euroipods": content was: 'Euroipods r t3h 5h1zz.')
4. (Deletion log); 23:33 . . Splaka (Talk) (deleted "Talk:Talk:Talk:Euroipods": content was: 'It's good to talk')

all in under a minute, averaging out at 1 page deleted every 15 seconds. wow. --ONX 23:36, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Woot! Actually you'll see that a lot, when we huff things by category. I went through all the new non-article pages created since yesterday, opened each in a tab, went through either closing the tab (if acceptable) or clicking 'delete' (if crap), then cycling back through clicking [yes really delete this] on the delete page for the 4 that didn't make par. You'll see hundreds of deletions per hour when we clean out NRV and MTU and such. --Splaka 23:39, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Ctl-Shift-Click. w00t. Opera is teh 1337. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 16:06, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Thumb clicking is even faster:

1. 16:51, 26 Dec 2005 Gwax deleted "Root of all evil" (NRV:Dec16th content was: 'The Root of all evil is, in most opinions, considered to be seagulls. In some western parts of Russia, though, it's believed to be the headache yo...')
2. 16:51, 26 Dec 2005 Gwax deleted "Road rage" (NRV:Dec19th)
3. 16:51, 26 Dec 2005 Gwax deleted "Rendoosia" (NRV:Dec19th)
4. 16:51, 26 Dec 2005 Gwax deleted "Religiouseductionteachers" (NRV:Dec19th)
5. 16:51, 26 Dec 2005 Gwax deleted "Reggie Fils-Aime" (NRV:Dec19th)
6. 16:51, 26 Dec 2005 Gwax deleted "Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal" (NRV:Dec19th)
7. 16:51, 26 Dec 2005 Gwax deleted "Ratko Mladic" (NRV:Dec19th)
8. 16:51, 26 Dec 2005 Gwax deleted "Ragnvald" (NRV:Dec19th)
9. 16:51, 26 Dec 2005 Gwax deleted "Rachmaninov" (NRV:Dec19th)
10. 16:51, 26 Dec 2005 Gwax deleted "Poohman" (NRV:Dec19th)

--Sir gwax (talk) 16:21, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

My delete sprees are even crueler!

1. 09:45, 29 Dec 2005 Dawg deleted "Ässpoo" (NRV Expired)
2. 09:45, 29 Dec 2005 Dawg deleted "William H. Gates" (NRV Expired)
3. 09:45, 29 Dec 2005 Dawg deleted "Vapourware releases" (NRV Expired)
4. 09:45, 29 Dec 2005 Dawg deleted "Vagoo" (NRV Expired)
5. 09:45, 29 Dec 2005 Dawg deleted "Super bowl" (NRV Expired)
6. 09:45, 29 Dec 2005 Dawg deleted "Tuba" (NRV Expired)
7. 09:45, 29 Dec 2005 Dawg deleted "Toxic avenger" (NRV Expired)
8. 09:45, 29 Dec 2005 Dawg deleted "Snus" (NRV Expired)
9. 09:45, 29 Dec 2005 Dawg deleted "Sian n rizzo" (NRV Expired)
10. 09:45, 29 Dec 2005 Dawg deleted "Short Circuit" (NRV Expired)
11. 09:45, 29 Dec 2005 Dawg deleted "Shithead" (NRV Expired)
12. 09:45, 29 Dec 2005 Dawg deleted "Shield" (NRV Expired)
13. 09:45, 29 Dec 2005 Dawg deleted "Ring of Fire" (NRV Expired)
14. 09:45, 29 Dec 2005 Dawg deleted "Robert Kennedy" (NRV Expired)
15. 09:45, 29 Dec 2005 Dawg deleted "RMDB" (NRV Expired)
16. 09:45, 29 Dec 2005 Dawg deleted "RTC" (NRV Expired)
17. 09:45, 29 Dec 2005 Dawg deleted "Pepino di Caprio" (NRV Expired)
18. 09:45, 29 Dec 2005 Dawg deleted "Poser goths" (NRV Expired)

» Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 16:52, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

If it is just about size, observe:

1. 02:09, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "Poptarts" (content was: '#REDIRECT Pop-tarts')
2. 02:09, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "Santa Clara" (content was: '#REDIRECT Saint Claire')
3. 02:09, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "Cotton Gin" (content was: '#REDIRECT Cotton gin')
4. 02:09, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted ""Accidentally" exposing your breast at the Super Bowl as a publicity stunt" (content was: '#REDIRECT wardrobe malfunction')
5. 02:09, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "Luke skywalkers heterosexuality" (content was: '#REDIRECT Luke Skywalker's heterosexuality')
6. 02:09, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "Numismatist" (content was: '#REDIRECT Numismatists')
7. 02:09, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "Dammann" (content was: '#Redirect:Da Man')
8. 02:09, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "100 Years War" (content was: '#REDIRECT 100 Years war')
9. 02:09, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "Priest Cthulhu" (content was: '#REDIRECT Priest of Cthulhu')
10. 02:09, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "Quotes" (content was: '#redirect Quote')
11. 02:09, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "John durrant" (content was: '#REDIRECT John Durrant')
12. 02:09, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "Clipart" (content was: '#redirectClip Art')
13. 02:09, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "Complex Number" (content was: '#REDIRECT Complex number')
14. 02:09, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "Peter Mckinlay" (content was: '#REDIRECT Peter McKinlay')
15. 02:09, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "Billy Connoly" (content was: '#REDIRECT Billy Connelly')
16. 02:09, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "Margaret tatcher" (content was: '#REDIRECT Margaret Tatcher')
17. 02:09, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "Dame edna" (content was: '#REDIRECT Dame Edna')
18. 02:09, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "Varun choda" (content was: '#REDIRECT Varun Choda')
19. 02:09, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "Spy vs spy" (content was: '#REDIRECT Spy vs Spy')
20. 02:09, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "Talius Del'Agriel" (content was: '#REDIRECT Priest of Cthulhu')
21. 02:09, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "Rivers cuomo" (content was: '#REDIRECT Rivers Cuomo')
22. 02:08, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "Carlos santana" (content was: '#REDIRECT Carlos Santana')
23. 02:08, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "Judd nelson" (content was: '#REDIRECT Judd Nelson')
24. 02:08, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "Grandizer" (content was: '#redirect Goldorak')
25. 02:08, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "Northfield mount hermon" (content was: '#REDIRECT Northfield Mount Hermon')
26. 02:08, 13 Dec 2005 Splaka deleted "User:Chomu Sclavus/clipboard" (some unused redirects -- first up: content was: '#REDIRECT Heartlessness')

And I didn't even artificially have to make that just for the purpose of this discussion, *cough*dawg*cough* ^_^ ... see all (huge link) --Splaka 22:10, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Centering the table on User:Nonymous/eurotest

Know of any way to center the table and use Image:Therest.gif as the background? - Nonymous 23:17, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Looks like the auto-margins were your problem on the centering. You can't do background images in wiki tables, the code is ignored. --Splaka 23:22, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Polish Delete

It looks like you were around during at least part of the history of Category:Pl:Delete. Can it go away now? I got rid of Template:delete, which referenced it. Not being well-versed in Polish customs (but old enough to remember Pollack jokes), I'd like a second opinion. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 21:33, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Better ask Codeine about it, he was the polish huffinator. --Splaka 21:35, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

He said go ahead and delete the cat. Poor kitty. But if anyone compains, I'll probably stick to my usual strategy and Blame Splaka. Thanks for being there. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 00:09, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)

adslgr.com

I've seen a notice made by you on my article adslgr.com that it will be deleted in 5 days and i decide to contact you in order to find out why this is so

I read about the typical characteristics of articles that are deleted from uncyclopedia and apart from the obvius non candidates i excluded i found only some possible reasons and would like to list em

Advertising: [www.adslgr.com] is a greek site writen in greek and frequent by Greeks, uncyclopedia on the other hand is an english site frequent mostly by non-Greeks (aka Barbarians) therefore advertising adslgr, which is not even my site and by the way has in deed over 15000 members, would be futile. In the contrary i found out about Uncyclopedia in adslgr.com

Unrelevance: the article first of all deals with a site that is Greece's bigest forum about broadband connections in Greece and the internet in general , besides that it is a subtle critisism of the way the major ISP's in Greece deal with broadband connections, Greece at the moment is the home of over 12 million citizen (i know this is small but we re working on it, round the clock, u can come do your bit next summer). Also on this point i would like to say that i have seen many articles whose subject i failed to recognise , still i found em funny.

Unfunnyness: This is the only reason i would accept if u said so to me to be true, since Humour is a matter of relevance.

Please consider this and give me a reply

ps: If u go ahead and delete my article i will kill that cat [[3]]

ps 2: heres my only other article The great 1927 riot of Poughkeepsy

There are other reasons to delete articles, other than 'not being allowed' or 'not funny'. Sometimes they are just bad. Note that the NRV tag is actually 'giving the article a chance'. First and foremost, do not sign your articles. You sign talk pages and vote pages, but not articles. Second, it has no formatting and no links. It just looks like a bad copy/paste (eg, it is plain text, not an article). Thirdly, it has the potention to incite vanity (which happens anytime you write about a forum site, we get that a lot actually). Fourthly, 15,000 is just barely notable. Note for example that the english Wikipedia has no article with this title. Given all these reasons, I feel justified in NRV tagging it (you have more like 11 days by my calculations).

Things that can be done: For the first two, it just needs to be expanded/cleaned up. For the third, just make sure that if it does start mentioning individual members and in-jokes, that the page gets tagged with {{vanity}} (showing that it is allowable vanity). For the fourth, I don't think anything can be done to make it more notable in just 7 days. The best route to go might be {{vanity}}. See ZFGC for an example of allowable community forum vanity. --Splaka 23:10, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

wikipedia actually has a link to adslgr.com under the DSL around the world article the link is titled "all you need to know about adsl in greece"

But, we don't care about what wikipedia has. The article itself is still bad, and unless someone makes it better, I'm deleting it at the end of today.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 17:43, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

well you mentioned wikipedia,

User 66.117.168.123 eats Hay

Just wanted to thank you for dealing with the defilements on Hay. As much as I'm honored that my page is worthy of being defaced, I like what I had better that his "Justin and Trina" rubbish. Thanks again!! --Simulacrum Caputosis

That's my job sir. Enjoy! --Splaka 23:29, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)