Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Lingerie Football a big hit in America but draws the ire of PETA and NOW

UnNews:Lingerie Football a big hit in America but draws the ire of PETA and NOW (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: UnNews:Lingerie Football a big hit in America but draws the ire of PETA and NOW	Score: 2.5 double entendres
Nominated by:	21:26, November 14, 2011 (UTC)
For: 4.5	SelfNomandFor-- 21:26, November 14, 2011 (UTC) for I remember reading that during the PLS and it's great! Mattsnow 21:30, November 14, 2011 (UTC) For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:26, 15 November 2011 For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:25, November 15, 2011 (UTC) For. 71.84.105.21 03:51, November 21, 2011 (UTC)
Against: 2	Unfortunately, a lot of Monika's PLS criticisms still hold true for this one. Truly, this is the Whitney of articles. TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 06:47, November 15, 2011 (UTC) I almost abstained, and then I wrote out a long explanation, but it boils down to this: Why should an article that the author admits was quickly half-assed and not worth polishing up be featured? (To keep any potential drama off this page, I'll gladly continue that conversation on the page where it already exists.) --monika 13:31, November 15, 2011 (UTC) (discussion here)
Comments	Forward: PLS entry (with suggested italics/punctuation/minor prose changes). I did not make up any of these team names or spokespersons and the league is real. Pretty much a sausage fest loaded with double entendre. Comment: I do encourage people who love drama to follow the link provided by Monika. You can clearly see that my words have been intentionally misrepresented and that she has, in fact, proofread the article herself - and I made the changes she prescribed.-- 15:33, November 15, 2011 (UTC) DrStrange's articles have this mysterious property that makes them attract controversy. Maybe I should nom Gay Jesus again. ; ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:40, 15 November 2011 VFH is not a discussion page. You put this article up for voting, now please accept the votes. If you wish to discuss with the folks, do so on the users' talkpages. 1 2 3 4 ~ 16:06, 15 November 2011 Um As well written as it is, I could totally see the jokes coming. The game is just out and out porn, we can see that, there isn't anything really gained by hiding it behind double entendre. Sorry. --Nikau 08:48, November 20, 2011 (UTC)